15:33:03 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 15:33:03 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-wai-wcag-irc 15:33:05 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:33:05 Zakim has joined #wai-wcag 15:33:07 Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG 15:33:08 Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 15:33:08 Date: 11 February 2014 15:33:09 agenda + New Techniques: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140211misc/ 15:33:09 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_WCAG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 27 minutes 15:33:15 CSUN update – meeting confirmed 15:33:22 agenda + CSUN update – meeting confirmed 15:33:32 agenda + Techniques planning and expectations for working group members 15:34:26 Chair: Joshue 15:46:40 BarryJohnson has joined #wai-wcag 15:48:56 wuwei has joined #wai-wcag 15:56:04 WAI_WCAG()11:00AM has now started 15:56:11 +[IPcaller] 15:56:20 zakim, [IPcaller] is Joshue 15:56:20 +Joshue; got it 15:56:29 zakim, agenda? 15:56:29 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 15:56:30 1. New Techniques: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140211misc/ [from Joshue108] 15:56:30 2. CSUN update – meeting confirmed [from Joshue108] 15:56:30 3. Techniques planning and expectations for working group members [from Joshue108] 15:57:01 zakim, mute me 15:57:01 sorry, Joshue108, muting is not permitted when only one person is present 15:58:03 +AWK 15:58:24 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:58:24 On the phone I see Joshue, AWK 15:59:49 +Barry_Johnson 16:00:04 Kathleen has joined #wai-wcag 16:00:39 +Kathleen 16:01:15 +Kathy_Wahlbin 16:02:56 marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag 16:03:23 +Katie_Haritos-Shea 16:04:09 Loretta has joined #wai-wcag 16:04:25 scribe: Kathy 16:04:29 wuwei has joined #wai-wcag 16:04:50 +[IPcaller] 16:05:02 Are there "Scribe" instructions? 16:05:03 zakim, IPCaller is Loretta 16:05:03 +Loretta; got it 16:05:17 +??P21 16:05:29 wuwei has joined #wai-wcag 16:05:36 Scribe list: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List 16:06:00 +Marc_Johlic 16:06:23 Ryladog has joined #wai-wcag 16:06:29 wuwei has joined #wai-wcag 16:07:24 As of this point the attendees have been Joshue, AWK, Barry_Johnson, Kathleen, Kathy_Wahlbin, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Loretta, Michael_Cooper, Marc_Johlic 16:07:50 zakim, take up item one 16:07:50 'one' does not match any agenda item, Joshue108 16:08:03 zakim, take up first item 16:08:03 I don't understand 'take up first item', Joshue108 16:08:13 TOPIC: New Techniques: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140211misc/ 16:08:19 zakim, next item 16:08:19 agendum 1. "New Techniques: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140211misc/" taken up [from Joshue108] 16:08:45 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140211misc/results#x2670 16:09:13 TOPIC: New Technique: Using the track element to provide captions 16:09:13 zakim, mute me 16:09:13 Michael_Cooper should now be muted 16:09:42 Joshue - three comments 16:10:50 AWK: Worry that the procedure is saying that you do that and you meet the success criteria. We need to make sure that they have captions 16:11:36 Loretta: tried to capture the general requirements and this would be combined with how to do this in the specific technology 16:12:06 AWK: people going through the techniques people may not realize they need to look at the general technique as well. 16:12:30 Loretta: this information would be in the understanding doc and it would be an issue for other techniques as well 16:13:07 Joshue: accessibility of player controls is something we need to consider too 16:13:23 Here's the How To Meet for 1.2.1: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/#qr-media-equiv-captions 16:13:31 +David_MacDonald 16:13:39 Loretta: the issue for the controls being accessible, we tried to separate the concerns because it gets complex 16:13:44 s/we need to consider too 16:13:44 16:13/we may need to consider too 16:13:44 16:13 16:14:02 s/16:13/ 16:14:31 David_ has joined #wai-wcag 16:14:52 Loretta: may not be apparent that there are issues with HTML media element 16:15:53 rrsagent, make minutes 16:15:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html David_ 16:16:13 AWK: may want to add an advisory note to remind people that they need to look at the captions and controls 16:16:31 Loretta: info is in the understanding document 16:17:04 G87: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G87 16:17:41 s/Meet for 1.2.1/Meet for 1.2.2 16:18:10 Loretta: caption track is covered under G87 16:18:46 q+ 16:18:50 Joshue: is there anything that we can give that would provide guidance for specific information 16:19:05 Loretta: we can add to this technique 16:19:16 Joshue: test procedure is clear 16:20:08 David: In the new technique, we may want to add to the test procedure about timing and captions 16:20:19 Loretta: that would go into the general technique 16:20:30 Loretta: this is an "and" 16:21:03 +1 16:21:27 +q 16:21:30 AWK: should people go to how to meet to find this information 16:21:38 ack awk 16:21:41 ack jo 16:22:07 ack me 16:22:07 q+ 16:22:10 Loretta: the group could reconsider 16:22:32 Joshue: we don't want people coming to the techniques to have to do alot of digging 16:22:50 -Barry_Johnson 16:23:16 AWK: for the tool support, there is user agent notes in the technique 16:23:38 Loretta: we could add information for polyfills 16:23:45 +Barry_Johnson 16:24:01 Joshue: have used this a bit, anyone else have experience in this 16:24:10 AWK: this is an area that is in rapid flux 16:24:51 Joshue: do you still need polyfills 16:24:58 ack dav 16:25:07 zakim, queue? 16:25:07 I see no one on the speaker queue 16:25:35 David: there may be a simple way; for example, we could add information to the test procedure with link to the technique 16:26:29 Joshue: This is something that we will come back to 16:26:56 Loretta: we need to revisit the understanding document where there are multiple techniques and see if we want to cross reference etc 16:27:33 ISSUE: we need to revisit the understanding document where there are multiple techniques and see if we want to cross reference etc 16:27:33 Created ISSUE-16 - We need to revisit the understanding document where there are multiple techniques and see if we want to cross reference etc. Please complete additional details at . 16:27:49 Joshue: this could help make the documents more accessible. This will make it more usable 16:28:13 AWK: the other item is a minor editorial 16:28:24 Loretta: that is a good edit 16:29:58 Joshue: the other comments we will come back when we talk about cross referencing 16:31:46 Loretta: we should keep audio description and captions separate 16:31:59 I see it now: captions text tracks provide the dialogue and also include other sounds important to understanding the video. subtitles contain only the dialogue 16:32:14 Joshue: we should clarify the sentence "captions text tracks provide the dialogue and also include other sounds important to understanding the video" 16:32:23 Loretta: we can add that to the work list 16:32:29 Change to: captions text tracks provide a text version of the dialogue and other sounds important to understanding the video. subtitles contain only the dialogue 16:32:53 include written record other sounds important to understanding 16:32:54 Joshue: make the change 16:33:25 Joshue: abou the line If other audio information is important to understanding the video, a subtitle track will not be sufficient to meet the success criteria." Does this relate to use of subtitles for audio description? If so, this may be better as " does this refer to audio information 16:33:53 Loretta: this technique refers to captions, but says that subtitles will not be sufficient 16:34:28 AWK: sound effects are not needed in subtitles 16:34:48 David: does North America have the same definition for subitles 16:35:00 wuwei has joined #wai-wcag 16:35:01 David: we should include definition 16:35:09 AWK: there is a note for that 16:35:19 AWK: could refer to the WCAG glossary 16:36:30 Joshue can you describe AD as you understand it? 16:36:56 Joshue: any other comments? 16:37:00 zakim, queue? 16:37:00 I see no one on the speaker queue 16:37:28 RESOLUTION: accept as amended 16:37:37 TOPIC: New Technique: Using the track element to provide audio descriptions 16:37:37 zakim, next item 16:37:37 agendum 2. "CSUN update – meeting confirmed" taken up [from Joshue108] 16:37:50 zakim, take up item 1 16:37:50 agendum 1. "New Techniques: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140211misc/" taken up [from Joshue108] 16:38:24 Loretta: this is an advisory technique 16:38:52 Andrew: same conversation about impacting how to meet 16:39:00 zakim, mute me 16:39:00 Joshue should now be muted 16:39:19 zakim, unmute me 16:39:19 Joshue should no longer be muted 16:40:42 AWK: how does this meet 1.2.1 16:41:12 AWK: this is not providing the text alternative 16:41:24 Loretta: this is providing and audio description for the video 16:41:31 AWK: i agree 16:42:02 Joshue: Sailesh comment - this is advisory 16:42:23 Joshue: my comments, is audio description generally sythesized 16:42:38 Loretta: this is the first instance 16:43:10 Joshue: had a few editorial edits 16:43:29 regrets+ Kerstin Probiesch, James Nurthen, Michel Fitos 16:43:31 yes that is becoming more popular... synthesized AD 16:43:38 Joshue: confused about 1.2.7 16:44:17 Loretta: can create the descriptions, but you may have a longer description that what fits in the gap. 16:44:27 Joshue: so you can extend the gap to make it fit 16:44:35 Loretta: yes 16:45:11 Loretta: could use ARIA live regions but not timed and there is no way pause 16:45:16 -Loretta 16:45:30 Joshue: clarify the language would help 16:46:09 Note that it will be sufficient for 1.2.7 only if the user agent has the ability to stop the video to allow the extended audio description to fit 16:46:14 Joshue: what about this suggested text? 16:46:52 +[IPcaller] 16:47:06 AWK: would this go into the status 16:47:34 Loretta_ has joined #wai-wcag 16:47:42 Joshue: adding the word "fit" makes it clearer 16:48:19 -[IPcaller] 16:48:24 AWK: it is in that status which means it is not in the technique. Does this need to be a note under applicability 16:49:24 Joshue: take a look at the WIKI under status 16:49:45 Loretta has joined #wai-wcag 16:49:49 AWK: if we are approving the text, then we should put it in applicability 16:50:09 Joshue: if we approve then we will move to the applicability 16:50:27 I wonder if some IP has decided that I'm using too much bandwidth and decided to throttle me. 16:50:41 Welcome to the world of non-network-neutrality? 16:51:13 +[IPcaller] 16:51:24 Joshue: do you agree with the changes? 16:52:12 Note that it will be sufficient for 1.2.7 only if the user agent has the ability to pause the video to allow the extended audio description to play completely without overlapping other important audio in the primary program. 16:52:35 AWK: another option 16:52:48 +1 16:53:03 -[IPcaller] 16:53:15 David: likes the simplicity of AWK version 16:53:30 Joshue: like the indicator of the problem 16:53:53 am I still here? Lost skype again. :-( 16:54:23 +[IPcaller] 16:55:22 Joshue: the second comment was more word smithing 16:55:50 Loretta: yes 16:55:55 Joshue: any objections 16:56:07 Joshue: hearing none, will make the edits 16:57:05 -[IPcaller] 16:58:10 Joshue: last comment is on audio description cues 16:59:12 Loretta_ has joined #WAI-WCAG 16:59:38 +[IPcaller] 17:00:21 Joshue: should we add a bit about user experience 17:01:08 AWK: My change is in there now 17:01:46 Joshue: I suggest ignoring the last comment 17:02:21 Joshue: any objectives 17:02:28 No sounds good 17:02:33 zakim, queue? 17:02:33 I see no one on the speaker queue 17:02:44 s/objectives/objections 17:02:48 RESOLUTION: accepted as amended 17:03:01 TOPIC: 3. New Failure: Failure of SC 1.4.2 17:03:27 AWK: two bullets are almost the same 17:04:26 refresh ... I have a comment 17:04:29 Loretta: should this just be an example of F23 or should it be a separate failure 17:04:30 F23: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/F23 17:05:13 David: i agree with that 17:05:19 Joshue: yes sounds ok 17:05:32 Joshue: would be one less failure 17:06:16 AWK: if it is separate, it would capture a specific issue. Comes from the procedure which would be different from F23 17:06:33 Loretta: yes but it would get away from the wording issue 17:07:07 AWK: question about Why is the "muted" attribute a problem for 1.4.2? 17:07:25 AWK: so this did not seem necessary in the procedure 17:08:45 Joshue: could be both, stand on its own or combine 17:09:46 David: if it stands on its own, advantage that people are thinking about playing sound so they may miss some details 17:09:52 Joshue: agree 17:10:06 Joshue: preference or objectives to keeping them separate 17:10:22 Loretta: no opinion 17:10:39 AWK: like them separate; enough details for it to be separate 17:10:58 AWK: can we flip 4 & 5 17:11:06 David: suggested some language 17:11:09 +1 17:11:13 +1 17:11:24 Joshue: we will keep them separate 17:11:41 David: here is my comment 17:11:41 Perhaps make all the conditions of the test true... by making 4 and 5 like this 17:11:41 Check if the element is missing a muted attribute. 17:11:41 Check if a command or control to stop or pause the media element is missing. 17:12:35 Joshue: like the change and makes the expected results easier to parse 17:12:41 +1 17:12:43 +1 17:12:48 +1 17:12:57 +1 17:13:24 AWK: instead of saying "is missing" ... say "does not have" 17:13:39 AWK: will edit the WIKI 17:14:05 Joshue: Kathleen had comment on failure example 1 17:14:43 -[IPcaller] 17:15:01 Joshue: any objection to Kathleen's comment 17:15:06 +1 17:15:17 Joshue: Andrew can you add the suggested text 17:15:23 Loretta has joined #WAI-WCAG 17:15:23 and because there does not appear to be any controls to allow the user to stop the video 17:15:52 +[IPcaller] 17:16:30 Loretta: no objection to the text change 17:17:59 Joshue: my comments refer to the custom controls text 17:18:29 Loretta: that makes sense 17:18:30 +1 17:18:47 Joshue: change is in the description 17:18:51 +1 17:19:18 Joshue: also update the test procedure so the language mirrors the description 17:19:52 AWK: may be implied in this document 17:19:54 LOL! 17:19:58 Joshue: just a suggestion 17:20:20 Joshue: David's suggestions have been added in the test procedure 17:20:32 Joshue: any objections? 17:20:54 RESOLUTION: accept as amended 17:21:11 zakim, queue? 17:21:12 I see no one on the speaker queue 17:21:17 zakim, next item 17:21:17 agendum 2. "CSUN update – meeting confirmed" taken up [from Joshue108] 17:21:20 TOPIC: CSUN 17:21:28 AWK: we will have a face to face on Tuesday 17:21:34 AWK: we have not picked the time 17:22:05 AWK: are people planning other activities like the keynote 17:22:20 The keynote is a 6pm 17:22:41 AWK: 9-5 17:23:31 AWK: we have logistics and agenda to figure out 17:23:44 AWK: proposed agenda will be next week 17:24:08 Katie: question, will we still have the call? 17:24:20 AWK: we will have remote access by phone 17:25:57 zakim, next item 17:25:57 agendum 3. "Techniques planning and expectations for working group members" taken up [from Joshue108] 17:26:11 TOPIC: Techniques planning 17:26:28 Joshue: major need for techniques and for the working group to create techniques 17:26:49 Joshue: we divert some of our time to creating techniques 17:27:12 Joshue: encourage people to create techniques and contribute 17:27:26 q+ 17:27:29 q+ 17:27:39 ack dav 17:28:10 David: government of Canada is on GitHub so they can create techniques 17:28:30 AWK: before you do that, we need to provide the struture and XML structure 17:28:49 AWK: we need to get that in place first 17:29:02 Joshue: get the group up to speed on that 17:30:23 AWK: to add to the this, we have the outside group on the techniques task force but we need other techniques from mobile and congitive. Everyone should be working on and contributing to 3 techniques for each 6 month cycle. 17:30:45 AWK: people will sign up for techniques 17:31:28 AWK: we can connect people for the technical parts if people are not comfortable 17:31:29 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Techniques/ToDo 17:31:43 ack kathy 17:32:09 Kathy: make sure to invite the TFs to any training on technique writing. 17:32:51 regrets+ Peter Thiessen 17:33:07 Scribe: AWK 17:33:16 -Kathy_Wahlbin 17:33:41 LGR: the "toDo" page is a listing of proposed technique, some are assigned to people already 17:34:15 LGR: there are many techniques claimed by a small number of people 17:34:21 q+ 17:34:29 ack AWK 17:35:16 q+ 17:35:25 -[IPcaller] 17:35:26 AWK: We need to structure this list a little better. We can mail people when its ready. Please just look at it, and make a note of what you are interested in. 17:35:28 q+ 17:35:39 ack dav 17:35:44 ack ryla 17:36:09 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List 17:37:01 Are there instructions on how to scribe and what steps are needed to capture all of the elements of the minutes? 17:37:12 -Joshue 17:37:13 -Michael_Cooper 17:37:14 -Katie_Haritos-Shea 17:37:16 -Kathleen 17:37:20 -Marc_Johlic 17:37:22 -David_MacDonald 17:38:01 -Barry_Johnson 17:38:20 AWK_ has joined #wai-wcag 17:38:27 Zakim, list attendees 17:38:27 As of this point the attendees have been Joshue, AWK, Barry_Johnson, Kathleen, Kathy_Wahlbin, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Loretta, Michael_Cooper, Marc_Johlic, David_MacDonald, [IPcaller] 17:38:41 RRSAgent, make minutes 17:38:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html AWK_ 17:39:14 Trackbot, end meeting 17:39:14 Zakim, list attendees 17:39:14 As of this point the attendees have been Joshue, AWK, Barry_Johnson, Kathleen, Kathy_Wahlbin, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Loretta, Michael_Cooper, Marc_Johlic, David_MacDonald, [IPcaller] 17:39:22 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:39:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html trackbot 17:39:23 RRSAgent, bye 17:39:23 I see no action items