17:57:41 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 17:57:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-tagmem-irc 17:57:43 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:57:43 Zakim has joined #tagmem 17:57:45 Zakim, this will be TAG 17:57:45 ok, trackbot; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 17:57:46 Meeting: Technical Architecture Group Teleconference 17:57:46 Date: 06 February 2014 17:58:17 JeniT has joined #tagmem 17:58:25 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started 17:58:32 +plinss 17:58:40 zakim, number? 17:58:40 I don't understand your question, Domenic__. 17:58:46 zakim, code? 17:58:46 the conference code is 0824 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), plinss 17:58:58 +dka 17:59:34 +Domenic__ 18:00:35 +??P11 18:01:10 +[IPcaller] 18:03:44 +wycats 18:04:08 +[Mozilla] 18:04:30 +Yves 18:05:07 marcosc has joined #tagmem 18:07:33 dherman has joined #tagmem 18:07:38 hello 18:07:48 zakim, code? 18:07:48 the conference code is 0824 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), Domenic__ 18:08:24 +TimBL 18:08:35 .me waves 18:08:41 s/.me waves// 18:08:54 dherman: still learning the process 18:08:55 Scribe: Dave 18:08:56 dka: sorry I didn't share the TAG info, it's not fully up to date 18:09:00 ScribeNick: dherman 18:09:27 plinss: first on agenda: upcoming f2f 18:09:54 dherman: we should be able to host it but I need to get that finalized 18:10:11 on my way 18:10:16 dherman: should be moz SF but I'll still have to get that confirmed 18:10:22 + +1.415.736.aaaa 18:10:24 plinss: have alternate space in PA in case 18:10:27 that's me 18:10:44 dka: prefer to do it in SF since the extensible web summit will be in the city 18:10:48 JeniT: glad you know how these newfangled things work = ) 18:11:22 dka: we have space for summit meeting, but need to invite the people we said we would 18:11:43 dka: I put a link to etherpad where we'd been collaborating on invitees to invite selected people before opening up to general registration 18:11:55 dka: haven't sent invites yet, partially b/c I need email addresses 18:12:00 dka: would prefer more of the group look at that list 18:12:06 dka: wrote some proposed invitation text in etherpad 18:13:29 dka: I'm happy to send all the invites 18:13:50 dka: we need to keep total # of attendees to 100 18:14:01 wycats_: would like to keep attendees to people personally invested in it 18:14:55 wycats_: these types of conversations can meander; I want this event to help us make progress on bigger mission 18:15:03 wycats_: if we have to waste time on education it will be less productive 18:15:19 slightlyoff: would be good to have a couple education sessions 18:15:23 wycats_: not saying we shouldn't 18:15:31 wycats_: most invested people could use some alignment 18:16:01 -twirl 18:16:25 +??P11 18:16:26 "Account not found: slightlyoff@google.com, request a new account for ewe" 18:16:42 plinss: next up -- dates for next f2f after that 18:17:25 dka: dherman has a constraint, I contacted amy to ask about tim's schedule 18:17:34 dka: timbl has subsequent week free 18:17:50 wycats_: I'd have to know now 18:17:54 dka: that's the goal now 18:18:06 wycats_: there's a tc39 meeting on 29th 18:18:35 dherman: so that's not conflicting, just back to back 18:19:01 dka: it is conflicting with IETF but we don't have any real overlap 18:19:15 wycats_: I don't think we should worry about IETF 18:19:38 wycats_: I can't actually say yes to this now but I could in an hour or so 18:20:12 dka: any other conflicts? 18:20:27 slightlyoff: so we're saying 22nd? 18:20:29 s/dka:/plinss:/ 18:20:36 dka: I'm asking JeniT if 21 - 23 would be better 18:21:22 dherman: what's the location for july? 18:21:55 plinss: MIT 18:22:17 s/plinss:/dka:/ 18:23:56 dka: let's tenatively say 21st - 23rd 18:24:05 dherman: I'll find a way to make it work 18:24:14 -TimBL 18:24:36 +TimBL 18:24:42 resolved: we're changing the dates for the july f2f to the 21-23, pending feedback from Yehuda. 18:24:44 slightlyoff: did we go around room with status? 18:25:49 Looks ok 18:27:16 slightlyoff: happy to see JeniT's work progressing, still have some concerns 18:27:21 slightlyoff: but happy to see it progressing 18:27:26 Domenic__: continuing work on promises 18:27:36 Domenic__: updating based on feedback 18:27:56 Domenic__: looked at quota management api 18:28:02 Domenic__: uses promises 18:28:06 Domenic__: would like to provide a formal review 18:28:11 Domenic__: maybe some bugs on spec? 18:28:19 slightlyoff: I'd like to talk to the maintainer 18:28:28 slightlyoff: I have real concerns about overall structure about how quotas are being perceived 18:28:33 slightlyoff: would like to help evolve to a more coherent model 18:28:41 Domenic__: sounds good; my feedback was minor, low-level 18:29:03 Domenic__: I think there's some urgency given recent furor on shadow dom for us to do a review 18:29:07 Domenic__: I might try to tackle 18:29:11 Domenic__: don't have much familiarity with spec 18:29:24 Domenic__: it's gonna be ambitious but I'll see if I can make time 18:29:37 dherman: I suspect a number of us are gonna wanna get involved with shadow dom 18:29:38 wycats_: agree 18:29:44 wycats_: we've had an open item to get more involved 18:29:46 +1 18:29:51 wycats_: we need to move soon or forever hold our peace 18:30:03 Domenic__: looks like chrome's getting ready to ship soon 18:30:14 wycats_: chrome is saying -- hope I can trust -- that they're shipping a thing they can iterate on 18:30:18 wycats_: hopefully still space to make changes 18:30:21 quota management initial feedback https://gist.github.com/domenic/3146c10fd5ca5acae40a 18:30:25 slightlyoff: this is a team that I led for a couple years 18:30:34 slightlyoff: I'm not tech lead but I can vouch that they're engaged for long haul 18:31:04 dherman: it's good that intentions are good, but clock is still ticking before sites depend on things 18:31:52 -twirl 18:31:54 dka: anyone else committing time? 18:31:57 Domenic__: I will be 18:32:06 wycats_: I'm a quasi-implementor and have been diving in for a while 18:32:07 I'll try 18:32:09 wycats_: I'll work with them 18:32:16 +??P0 18:32:25 wycats_: I don't want to throwing stop energy 18:32:36 wycats_: but I also have some concerns 18:32:36 my apologies, I do need to go = \ 18:32:48 will read the minutes 18:32:58 wycats_: alex, Domenic__, dherman and I had a call last week 18:33:02 wycats_: talked about packaging 18:33:09 wycats_: some productive conversation on list about JeniT's proposal 18:33:17 wycats_: I have a strong hypothesis that won't be resolved till we have a f2f 18:33:20 wycats_: but conversation has been productive 18:33:20 -slightlyoff 18:33:35 wycats_: I've been involved in continuing module discussion 18:33:43 wycats_: very soon needs to be a thing we spend some time thinking about integrating 18:33:55 wycats_: ES6 nearing finish line 18:34:03 wycats_: we should start thinking how future features integrate with ES6 18:34:15 Domenic__: that's exciting if we can start not using global 18:34:19 wycats_: it affects web components and other stuff 18:34:29 Domenic__: excited about Object.observe too (not ES6 but still) 18:34:31 wycats_: yep 18:35:11 Domenic__: on TAG list marcos has been trying to get feedback on whether we should be duplicating HTML features 18:35:19 Domenic__: in the manifest spec 18:35:29 Domenic__: their direction has been putting them in JSON file 18:35:35 Domenic__: but potentially duplicating info that's in the HTML 18:35:46 wycats_: good question 18:35:55 wycats_: my gut feeling is that those similarities might be superficial 18:36:23 Domenic__: we should fulfill our responsibilities and reply to marcos's request for info 18:36:31 wycats_: there are serious issues with using in-HTML features for manifests 18:36:37 wycats_: there are some bootstrapping problems 18:36:54 wycats_: I'm open to a solution, but doing it in HTML is a can of worms 18:37:02 wycats_: my gut feeling is, let's just not worry about it 18:37:24 +??P1 18:37:33 twirl_ has joined #tagmem 18:37:59 sergey: spent some time on DRM issue 18:38:06 sergey: found some issues that I think are important 18:38:15 sergey: I sent that to mailing list 18:38:39 JeniT: capability URLs good practice document, sent around today 18:38:46 JeniT: ready to go to working draft if everyone's happy with that 18:38:51 JeniT: good to get it out and ask for comments 18:38:53 +1 18:38:57 let's do it! 18:39:02 +1 18:39:08 +1 18:39:09 -TimBL 18:39:32 resolution: publish the working draft 18:39:43 oops 18:39:44 JeniT: discussion on packaging proposal on list 18:40:10 JeniT: sent a request for some evidence on packaging issues 18:40:18 JeniT: next intend to concentrate on DRM 18:40:25 +[IPcaller] 18:40:34 Zakim, IPCaller is me 18:40:34 +timbl; got it 18:41:45 -JeniT 18:41:47 -dka 18:41:49 -??P1 18:41:51 -wycats 18:41:55 plinss: 18:41:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-tagmem-minutes.html Yves 18:42:11 -timbl 18:42:18 thanks, Dave, for scribing! 18:42:21 np 18:42:36 -Domenic__ 18:42:38 -[Mozilla] 18:42:40 -Yves 18:42:41 -plinss 18:47:35 -twirl 18:47:36 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:47:36 Attendees were plinss, dka, Domenic__, twirl, JeniT, wycats, [Mozilla], Yves, TimBL, +1.415.736.aaaa, slightlyoff 19:07:31 wycats_: it's actually quite a big deal, as it's the mechanism browser vendors are going to use to enable installable web apps. 19:07:53 so if it's a big f'up, then either no one will implement it or people won't use it. 19:08:06 it's pretty urgent to get a resolution 19:08:25 other wise, we will continue to have a huge gap in the web platform. 19:09:09 so would really appreciate some TAG help :) 19:20:39 dka has joined #tagmem 19:45:01 JeniT has joined #tagmem 19:47:36 rsagent, draft minutes 19:48:53 timbl_ has joined #tagmem 21:25:55 Zakim has left #tagmem 21:41:31 annevk has joined #tagmem 21:52:42 dherman has joined #tagmem 22:05:45 dka has joined #tagmem