None.
09:06:43 <AndyS> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jena-dev/message/38925 (do not read from Hawaii)
Andy Seaborne: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jena-dev/message/38925 (do not read from Hawaii) ←
09:54:34 <ericP> but what *did* they mean by OWL instead of RDF?
(No events recorded for 47 minutes)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: but what *did* they mean by OWL instead of RDF? ←
10:21:23 <AndyS> It's a recurring Q on jena-dev - "how do I convert OWL <-> RDF". The message "OWL is RDF" has not been heard.
(No events recorded for 26 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: It's a recurring Q on jena-dev - "how do I convert OWL <-> RDF". The message "OWL is RDF" has not been heard. ←
10:21:58 <AndyS> Good morning Steve - see the Guardian today? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology
Andy Seaborne: Good morning Steve - see the Guardian today? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology ←
10:25:57 <ericP> OWL folks routinely talk about OWL not being RDF
Eric Prud'hommeaux: OWL folks routinely talk about OWL not being RDF ←
10:26:08 <ericP> i'm not surprised that folks are mislead
Eric Prud'hommeaux: i'm not surprised that folks are mislead ←
10:46:08 <ericP> what does GRAPH <noSuchGraph> { FILTER (?i > 0) } do?
(No events recorded for 20 minutes)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: what does GRAPH <noSuchGraph> { FILTER (?i > 0) } do? ←
10:49:13 <AndyS> Evaluate to the empty result set. Sec 12.5 / GRAPH / part 2 : http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#defn_evalGraph
Andy Seaborne: Evaluate to the empty result set. Sec 12.5 / GRAPH / part 2 : http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#defn_evalGraph ←
10:52:03 <AndyS> Was that the question?
Andy Seaborne: Was that the question? ←
10:52:48 <ericP> pretty much
Eric Prud'hommeaux: pretty much ←
10:53:30 <ericP> i was thinking about whether these two are different:
Eric Prud'hommeaux: i was thinking about whether these two are different: ←
10:54:17 <ericP> { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } FILTER (1 = 1) }
Eric Prud'hommeaux: { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } FILTER (1 = 1) } ←
10:54:35 <ericP> { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } GRAPH <noSuchGraph> { FILTER (1 = 1) } }
Eric Prud'hommeaux: { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } GRAPH <noSuchGraph> { FILTER (1 = 1) } } ←
11:03:33 <AndyS> Yes. And feel free to use FILTER(true) - this isn't SQL-92
(No events recorded for 8 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: Yes. And feel free to use FILTER(true) - this isn't SQL-92 ←
11:16:26 <SteveH> AndyS: no, looking
(No events recorded for 12 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: no, looking [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
11:16:41 <SteveH> haha, good. liked the El Reg Apple patent one better
Steve Harris: haha, good. liked the El Reg Apple patent one better ←
11:17:24 <AndyS> The Guardian one is prominently on page 5 of the paper version. Go for it!
Andy Seaborne: The Guardian one is prominently on page 5 of the paper version. Go for it! ←
11:24:15 <ivan> AndyS, not a bad one indeed
(No events recorded for 6 minutes)
Ivan Herman: AndyS, not a bad one indeed ←
11:24:43 <ivan> there is also an opera news: http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/04/01/ and a google chrome one: http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/chrome/cadie/
Ivan Herman: there is also an opera news: http://labs.opera.com/news/2009/04/01/ and a google chrome one: http://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/chrome/cadie/ ←
11:26:35 <ivan> I wonder whether we will have something like the flying pinguins http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrxmpihCjqw
Ivan Herman: I wonder whether we will have something like the flying pinguins http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrxmpihCjqw ←
11:27:57 <SteveH> el reg are running something on a apple patent: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/01/apple_secrecy_patent/
Steve Harris: el reg are running something on a apple patent: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/01/apple_secrecy_patent/ ←
12:23:50 <ericP> given an empty default graph, FROM NAMED <foo> { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } FILTER (true) } gives no results?
(No events recorded for 55 minutes)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: given an empty default graph, FROM NAMED <foo> { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } FILTER (true) } gives no results? ←
13:41:56 <AndyS> EricP : re: "given an empty default graph" - not no results. As many as GRAPH...
(No events recorded for 78 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: EricP : re: "given an empty default graph" - not no results. As many as GRAPH... ←
13:42:45 <AndyS> I misread the {} in an earlier query : { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } FILTER (1 = 1) } mathes as many times as /**/
Andy Seaborne: I misread the {} in an earlier query : { GRAPH <foo> { /* matches at least one row */ } FILTER (1 = 1) } mathes as many times as /**/ ←
13:57:52 <ericP> thanks, AndyS
(No events recorded for 15 minutes)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: thanks, AndyS ←
Formatted by CommonScribe