edit

RDFa Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 28 February 2013

Agenda
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Feb/0025.html
Seen
Gregg Kellogg, Ivan Herman, Manu Sporny, Niklas Lindström, Shane McCarron, Steven Pemberton, Stéphane Corlosquet
Scribe
Manu Sporny
IRC Log
Original
Resolutions
  1. Restrict the link and meta elements in HTML5+RDFa 1.1 when used in the body to require the usage of @property to be valid. link
Topics
14:41:51 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/28-rdfa-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/28-rdfa-irc

14:41:53 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

14:41:55 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7332

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 7332

14:41:55 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 19 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 19 minutes

14:41:56 <trackbot> Meeting: RDFa Working Group Teleconference
14:41:56 <trackbot> Date: 28 February 2013
15:00:49 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started

(No events recorded for 18 minutes)

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started

15:00:56 <Zakim> +??P5

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P5

15:01:13 <Zakim> +scor

Zakim IRC Bot: +scor

15:01:23 <manu> zakim, I am ??P5

Manu Sporny: zakim, I am ??P5

15:01:23 <Zakim> +manu; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +manu; got it

15:02:32 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip

15:02:32 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made

15:02:33 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan

15:02:35 <Zakim> +??P12

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P12

15:02:39 <niklasl> zakim, I am ??P12

Niklas Lindström: zakim, I am ??P12

15:02:39 <Zakim> +niklasl; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +niklasl; got it

15:03:27 <Zakim> +??P14

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P14

15:03:31 <gkellogg> zakim, I am ??P14

Gregg Kellogg: zakim, I am ??P14

15:03:31 <Zakim> +gkellogg; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +gkellogg; got it

15:04:53 <Zakim> +??P20

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P20

15:05:00 <Steven> zakim, I am ?

Steven Pemberton: zakim, I am ?

15:05:00 <Zakim> +Steven; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Steven; got it

15:05:09 <Steven> zakim, who is here?

Steven Pemberton: zakim, who is here?

15:05:09 <Zakim> On the phone I see manu, scor, niklasl, Ivan, gkellogg, Steven

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see manu, scor, niklasl, Ivan, gkellogg, Steven

15:05:11 <Zakim> On IRC I see Steven, niklasl, gkellogg, Zakim, RRSAgent, ivan, TallTed, nonge_, manu1, manu, trackbot

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see Steven, niklasl, gkellogg, Zakim, RRSAgent, ivan, TallTed, nonge_, manu1, manu, trackbot

15:06:46 <manu> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Feb/0025.html
15:07:45 <ivan> q+

Ivan Herman: q+

15:07:49 <manu> scribenick: manu

(Scribe set to Manu Sporny)

15:07:57 <manu> manu: Any changes to the agenda?

Manu Sporny: Any changes to the agenda?

15:08:17 <manu> ivan: I think we should discuss admin things first, it's not impossible for us to go to a 2nd LC.

Ivan Herman: I think we should discuss admin things first, it's not impossible for us to go to a 2nd LC.

15:08:41 <manu> ivan: Let's look at HTML5 and rdf:HTML stability first.

Ivan Herman: Let's look at HTML5 and rdf:HTML stability first.

15:08:52 <Zakim> +ShaneM

Zakim IRC Bot: +ShaneM

15:08:52 <manu> Topic: HTML5 datetime stability

1. HTML5 datetime stability

15:09:23 <manu> manu: Ivan spoke with Phillipe and Mike Smith(tm) on this.

Manu Sporny: Ivan spoke with Phillipe and Mike Smith(tm) on this.

15:09:47 <manu> ivan: We have to have a clear list of what kind of references we have to the HTML5 document, for each of those, we have to prove that what we're using is stable.

Ivan Herman: We have to have a clear list of what kind of references we have to the HTML5 document, for each of those, we have to prove that what we're using is stable.

15:10:13 <manu> ivan: We have datetime and rdf:HTML - unfortunately, the rules are more stringent than I thought. We have to prove for each of them the stability.

Ivan Herman: We have datetime and rdf:HTML - unfortunately, the rules are more stringent than I thought. We have to prove for each of them the stability.

15:10:43 <niklasl> q+ to ask about other HTML5-dependent specs going to REC before HTML5

Niklas Lindström: q+ to ask about other HTML5-dependent specs going to REC before HTML5

15:11:03 <manu> ivan: Let's separate the HTML5 dependencies and the rdf:HTML ones. The HTML5 dependencies are explicitly called out at W3C.

Ivan Herman: Let's separate the HTML5 dependencies and the rdf:HTML ones. The HTML5 dependencies are explicitly called out at W3C.

15:11:07 <manu> ack ivan

ack ivan

15:11:55 <manu> ivan: We have to have a clear list of all dependencies and whether they are stable for HTML5. From the top of my head, this is the <time> element and the datetime attribute.

Ivan Herman: We have to have a clear list of all dependencies and whether they are stable for HTML5. From the top of my head, this is the <time> element and the datetime attribute.

15:12:11 <manu> gkellogg: The use of meta and link in the body are also of concern, right?

Gregg Kellogg: The use of meta and link in the body are also of concern, right?

15:12:17 <manu> ivan: No, those have been around for a long time.

Ivan Herman: No, those have been around for a long time.

15:12:29 <ShaneM> q+ to discuss meta and llink

Shane McCarron: q+ to discuss meta and llink

15:13:24 <Steven> q+

Steven Pemberton: q+

15:14:32 <manu> ivan: What about the HTML5 parsing algorithm?

Ivan Herman: What about the HTML5 parsing algorithm?

15:14:41 <manu> manu: It's as stable as it's going to be, afaik.

Manu Sporny: It's as stable as it's going to be, afaik.

15:15:09 <manu> ivan: I asked Mike if time and datetime was sufficiently stable, he said more-or-less, yes it is.

Ivan Herman: I asked Mike if time and datetime was sufficiently stable, he said more-or-less, yes it is.

15:15:15 <ivan> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2013Feb/0393.html

Ivan Herman: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2013Feb/0393.html

15:16:03 <manu> ivan: They've changed the capitalization of the datetime attribute, so we'll have to update the spec.

Ivan Herman: They've changed the capitalization of the datetime attribute, so we'll have to update the spec.

15:19:07 <manu> Discussion about the stability of the HTML5 spec.

Discussion about the stability of the HTML5 spec.

15:19:16 <gkellogg> q?

Gregg Kellogg: q?

15:19:17 <Steven> q-

Steven Pemberton: q-

15:19:51 <manu> niklasl: Quick first question, do we have a reference to any other specs that are dependent on HTML5 that will go to REC before it.

Niklas Lindström: Quick first question, do we have a reference to any other specs that are dependent on HTML5 that will go to REC before it.

15:20:11 <manu> ivan: One of the API specs, maybe? Ping Philippe again to send you a reference of the document what has to be done for HTML5.

Ivan Herman: One of the API specs, maybe? Ping Philippe again to send you a reference of the document what has to be done for HTML5.

15:20:35 <manu> ACTION: Manu to contact Philippe to ask about things that need to be done for dependencies on HTML5.

ACTION: Manu to contact Philippe to ask about things that need to be done for dependencies on HTML5.

15:20:35 <trackbot> Created ACTION-119 - Contact Philippe to ask about things that need to be done for dependencies on HTML5. [on Manu Sporny - due 2013-03-07].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-119 - Contact Philippe to ask about things that need to be done for dependencies on HTML5. [on Manu Sporny - due 2013-03-07].

15:20:59 <niklasl> I don't get the renaming to dateTime; according to this, it is all-lowercase in HTML4: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#adef-datetime

Niklas Lindström: I don't get the renaming to dateTime; according to this, it is all-lowercase in HTML4: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#adef-datetime

15:21:02 <manu> ivan: I think we're fine from a TIME element and datetime attribute perspective.

Ivan Herman: I think we're fine from a TIME element and datetime attribute perspective.

15:21:30 <manu> ivan: We should ask Thomas and Ralph if they think we're okay on this before going to Transition Request.

Ivan Herman: We should ask Thomas and Ralph if they think we're okay on this before going to Transition Request.

15:21:36 <manu> ivan: That's for HTML5.

Ivan Herman: That's for HTML5.

15:21:48 <manu> ack niklasl

ack niklasl

15:21:48 <Zakim> niklasl, you wanted to ask about other HTML5-dependent specs going to REC before HTML5

Zakim IRC Bot: niklasl, you wanted to ask about other HTML5-dependent specs going to REC before HTML5

15:22:10 <manu> niklasl: Is there any chance to go to REC with HTML4+RDFa?

Niklas Lindström: Is there any chance to go to REC with HTML4+RDFa?

15:22:38 <niklasl> .. or just HTML

Niklas Lindström: .. or just HTML

15:22:41 <manu> ivan: There is always the possibility that we take out the time/datetime element - but we do HTML5+RDFa, that would be fine. so if this is an issue, we can remove the feature.

Ivan Herman: There is always the possibility that we take out the time/datetime element - but we do HTML5+RDFa, that would be fine. so if this is an issue, we can remove the feature.

15:23:23 <manu> niklasl: What is the chance for us to do a specific HTML5 spec after that to add datetime?

Niklas Lindström: What is the chance for us to do a specific HTML5 spec after that to add datetime?

15:23:32 <manu> ivan: No, we shouldnt' do HTML4+RDFa - that would be bad...

Ivan Herman: No, we shouldnt' do HTML4+RDFa - that would be bad...

15:23:58 <manu> niklasl: If we want to have datetime support, and if somebody doesn't think it's possible, then could we put a REC out after that?

Niklas Lindström: If we want to have datetime support, and if somebody doesn't think it's possible, then could we put a REC out after that?

15:24:05 <manu> ivan: That would be a new charter, new group, etc.

Ivan Herman: That would be a new charter, new group, etc.

15:24:09 <manu> ack ShaneM

ack ShaneM

15:24:09 <Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to discuss meta and llink

Zakim IRC Bot: ShaneM, you wanted to discuss meta and llink

15:24:39 <manu> ShaneM: You mentioned meta and link earlier, those have been around for a while, that's true, but prior to HTML5 and in all legacy user agents, elements that are in the body are moved into the head silently.

Shane McCarron: You mentioned meta and link earlier, those have been around for a while, that's true, but prior to HTML5 and in all legacy user agents, elements that are in the body are moved into the head silently.

15:25:27 <manu> ivan: There is a good point there, when we make the list, this should be listed there as well - maybe a similar statement from Mike on browsers not moving it would be good to have.

Ivan Herman: There is a good point there, when we make the list, this should be listed there as well - maybe a similar statement from Mike on browsers not moving it would be good to have.

15:25:46 <manu> ivan: That has to be explicitly mentioned.

Ivan Herman: That has to be explicitly mentioned.

15:26:06 <manu> niklasl: What about the dateTime naming?

Niklas Lindström: What about the dateTime naming?

15:27:04 <manu> manu: We do have to change the capitalization now.

Manu Sporny: We do have to change the capitalization now.

15:28:12 <manu> niklasl: I don't get the reasoning for the naming...

Niklas Lindström: I don't get the reasoning for the naming...

15:28:41 <manu> ivan: Well, it's outside of this groups control.

Ivan Herman: Well, it's outside of this groups control.

15:28:51 <Zakim> -scor

Zakim IRC Bot: -scor

15:28:58 <manu> Topic: rdf:HTML dependency

2. rdf:HTML dependency

15:30:14 <manu> ivan: So, for HTML5, there is a special rule... there isn't one for RDF Concepts. We can only refer to rdf:HTML informatively - it's an optional feature, ugly but do-able.

Ivan Herman: So, for HTML5, there is a special rule... there isn't one for RDF Concepts. We can only refer to rdf:HTML informatively - it's an optional feature, ugly but do-able.

15:31:54 <ivan> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/

Ivan Herman: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/

15:32:34 <manu> ivan: Thomas and I discussed this today, OWL2 wanted to use XSD 1.1 - but XSD 1.1 was CR (not REC)

Ivan Herman: Thomas and I discussed this today, OWL2 wanted to use XSD 1.1 - but XSD 1.1 was CR (not REC)

15:32:55 <manu> ivan: OWL2 refers to XSD 1.1 by saying that you should refer to the CR on it.

Ivan Herman: OWL2 refers to XSD 1.1 by saying that you should refer to the CR on it.

15:33:22 <manu> OWL 2 is defined to use datatypes defined in the XML Schema Definition Language (XSD). As of this writing, the latest W3C Recommendation for XSD is version 1.0, with version 1.1 progressing toward Recommendation. OWL 2 has been designed to take advantage of the new datatypes and clearer explanations available in XSD 1.1, but for now those advantages are being partially put on hold. Specifically, until XSD 1.1 becomes a W3C Recommendation, the elements of OWL 2 which are based on it should be considered optional, as detailed in Conformance, section 2.3. Upon the publication of XSD 1.1 as a W3C Recommendation, those elements cease to be optional and are to be considered required as otherwise specified.

OWL 2 is defined to use datatypes defined in the XML Schema Definition Language (XSD). As of this writing, the latest W3C Recommendation for XSD is version 1.0, with version 1.1 progressing toward Recommendation. OWL 2 has been designed to take advantage of the new datatypes and clearer explanations available in XSD 1.1, but for now those advantages are being partially put on hold. Specifically, until XSD 1.1 becomes a W3C Recommendation, the elements of OWL 2 which are based on it should be considered optional, as detailed in Conformance, section 2.3. Upon the publication of XSD 1.1 as a W3C Recommendation, those elements cease to be optional and are to be considered required as otherwise specified.

15:33:30 <manu> We suggest that for now developers and users follow the XSD 1.1 Candidate Recommendation. Based on discussions between the Schema and OWL Working Groups, we do not expect any implementation changes will be necessary as XSD 1.1 advances to Recommendation.

We suggest that for now developers and users follow the XSD 1.1 Candidate Recommendation. Based on discussions between the Schema and OWL Working Groups, we do not expect any implementation changes will be necessary as XSD 1.1 advances to Recommendation.

15:40:17 <manu> Discussion about how to avoid a 2nd Last Call or a 3rd Last Call.

(No events recorded for 6 minutes)

Discussion about how to avoid a 2nd Last Call or a 3rd Last Call.

15:41:12 <ShaneM> q+ to propose rdfa:html

Shane McCarron: q+ to propose rdfa:html

15:41:23 <manu> gkellogg: Could we take over the definition of rdf:HTML?

Gregg Kellogg: Could we take over the definition of rdf:HTML?

15:41:38 <manu> shanem: Why not put it in the RDF namespace? let's just do rdfa:html.

Shane McCarron: Why not put it in the RDF namespace? let's just do rdfa:html.

15:42:26 <niklasl> .. or just :html

Niklas Lindström: .. or just :html

15:42:53 <niklasl> .. which may make danbri more happy (since he found rdf:HTML harder to sell IIRC)

Niklas Lindström: .. which may make danbri more happy (since he found rdf:HTML harder to sell IIRC)

15:43:19 <manu> manu: Can't we just make this optional and make rdf:HTML non-normative?

Manu Sporny: Can't we just make this optional and make rdf:HTML non-normative?

15:44:03 <manu> ivan: That might allow us to go forward, let's pass it by Ralph and Thomas to make sure.

Ivan Herman: That might allow us to go forward, let's pass it by Ralph and Thomas to make sure.

15:44:36 <manu> ivan: The OWL2 approach that was there, that worked with XSD CR - we could do exactly the same, but with that we have to wait for concepts to be in CR, and that's several weeks.

Ivan Herman: The OWL2 approach that was there, that worked with XSD CR - we could do exactly the same, but with that we have to wait for concepts to be in CR, and that's several weeks.

15:45:55 <Steven> q+

Steven Pemberton: q+

15:45:59 <manu> ack shanem

ack shanem

15:45:59 <Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to propose rdfa:html

Zakim IRC Bot: ShaneM, you wanted to propose rdfa:html

15:46:14 <ShaneM> ack shanem

Shane McCarron: ack shanem

15:46:20 <manu> Steven: The agreement to end the exclusion period early, does that block us?

Steven Pemberton: The agreement to end the exclusion period early, does that block us?

15:46:55 <Steven> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44350/earlyexcl2013/results

Steven Pemberton: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44350/earlyexcl2013/results

15:47:06 <manu> ivan: We need to have 2-3 more members who have not signed the exclusion period. We need OpenLink and DFKI to sign off on it.

Ivan Herman: We need to have 2-3 more members who have not signed the exclusion period. We need OpenLink and DFKI to sign off on it.

15:47:42 <manu> ivan: We don't need IEs to sign off on it. I sent an e-mail to OpenLink and DFKI, maybe Manu will have to call Ted and I'll call the guy at DFKI.

Ivan Herman: We don't need IEs to sign off on it. I sent an e-mail to OpenLink and DFKI, maybe Manu will have to call Ted and I'll call the guy at DFKI.

15:47:55 <Steven> ack me

Steven Pemberton: ack me

15:48:12 <manu> Topic: Stefan Schumacher's LC Comment

3. Stefan Schumacher's LC Comment

15:48:16 <manu> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/148

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/148

15:49:07 <manu> Group agrees to let the editor deal with the issue since it's an editorial issue.

Group agrees to let the editor deal with the issue since it's an editorial issue.

15:49:16 <manu> Topic: Mike Smith(tm)'s Complaint

4. Mike Smith(tm)'s Complaint

15:49:22 <manu> http://bugzilla.validator.nu/show_bug.cgi?id=964

http://bugzilla.validator.nu/show_bug.cgi?id=964

15:49:49 <manu> manu: Someone had put this markup in the body <link rel="stylesheet" href="foo.css" />

Manu Sporny: Someone had put this markup in the body <link rel="stylesheet" href="foo.css" />

15:50:37 <manu> manu: Mike has complained that RDFa allows the above in the body of the document and that you can't make a mistake like that via Microdata because it required itemprop to be valid in the body.

Manu Sporny: Mike has complained that RDFa allows the above in the body of the document and that you can't make a mistake like that via Microdata because it required itemprop to be valid in the body.

15:51:03 <niklasl> q+

Niklas Lindström: q+

15:51:40 <manu> ack niklasl

ack niklasl

15:52:00 <ShaneM> q+ to ask why tool authors who work for us get to wag the dog here

Shane McCarron: q+ to ask why tool authors who work for us get to wag the dog here

15:52:47 <manu> niklasl: When I saw this, I cursed because I expected this subconsciously - the rule for @itemprop for using link and meta in body, it's a coherent design.

Niklas Lindström: When I saw this, I cursed because I expected this subconsciously - the rule for @itemprop for using link and meta in body, it's a coherent design.

15:52:52 <ivan> q+

Ivan Herman: q+

15:53:11 <manu> shanem: I think that the tool is broken.

Shane McCarron: I think that the tool is broken.

15:53:13 <manu> ack shanem

ack shanem

15:53:13 <Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to ask why tool authors who work for us get to wag the dog here

Zakim IRC Bot: ShaneM, you wanted to ask why tool authors who work for us get to wag the dog here

15:54:47 <manu> shanem: A warning could be generated.

Shane McCarron: A warning could be generated.

15:55:28 <manu> ivan: What terms do we allow in HTML5+RDFa 1.1?

Ivan Herman: What terms do we allow in HTML5+RDFa 1.1?

15:55:34 <manu> manu: I don't think we allow any?

Manu Sporny: I don't think we allow any?

15:58:47 <manu> manu: If the content of @rel in LINK in BODY contains anything other than 'describedby', 'license', and 'role' or a value with a colon in it, and @vocab isn't active, then you can kick out an error.

Manu Sporny: If the content of @rel in LINK in BODY contains anything other than 'describedby', 'license', and 'role' or a value with a colon in it, and @vocab isn't active, then you can kick out an error.

16:04:57 <manu> PROPOSAL: Restrict the link and meta elements in HTML5+RDFa 1.1 when used in the body to require the usage of @property to be valid.

(No events recorded for 6 minutes)

PROPOSED: Restrict the link and meta elements in HTML5+RDFa 1.1 when used in the body to require the usage of @property to be valid.

16:04:57 <ShaneM> +1

Shane McCarron: +1

16:04:59 <Steven> +1

Steven Pemberton: +1

16:05:07 <manu> manu: +1

Manu Sporny: +1

16:05:10 <ivan> +1

Ivan Herman: +1

16:05:10 <gkellogg> +1

Gregg Kellogg: +1

16:05:14 <niklasl> +1

Niklas Lindström: +1

16:05:17 <Zakim> -ShaneM

Zakim IRC Bot: -ShaneM

16:05:24 <manu> RESOLVED: Restrict the link and meta elements in HTML5+RDFa 1.1 when used in the body to require the usage of @property to be valid.

RESOLVED: Restrict the link and meta elements in HTML5+RDFa 1.1 when used in the body to require the usage of @property to be valid.

16:06:16 <Zakim> -Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan

16:06:32 <manu> Topic: Status of Implementations

5. Status of Implementations

16:06:48 <manu> gkellogg: Processor conformance was updated earlier this month. We have two inter-operable implementations.

Gregg Kellogg: Processor conformance was updated earlier this month. We have two inter-operable implementations.

16:06:59 <manu> gkellogg: As far as doing a transition, we're okay.

Gregg Kellogg: As far as doing a transition, we're okay.

16:07:12 <manu> niklasl: I'm close to being done with the pattern stuff.

Niklas Lindström: I'm close to being done with the pattern stuff.

16:07:28 <manu> gkellogg: Semargl probably passes more than they did before. Never got feedback from Alex Milowski on this.

Gregg Kellogg: Semargl probably passes more than they did before. Never got feedback from Alex Milowski on this.

16:07:48 <manu> Action: Manu to ping Alex Milowski about doing another EARL report.

ACTION: Manu to ping Alex Milowski about doing another EARL report.

16:07:48 <trackbot> Created ACTION-120 - Ping Alex Milowski about doing another EARL report. [on Manu Sporny - due 2013-03-07].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-120 - Ping Alex Milowski about doing another EARL report. [on Manu Sporny - due 2013-03-07].

16:07:59 <manu> niklasl: I might want to submit my CoffeeScript implementation.

Niklas Lindström: I might want to submit my CoffeeScript implementation.

16:08:10 <manu> niklasl: Clojure implementation now works in the browser.

Niklas Lindström: Clojure implementation now works in the browser.

16:08:26 <manu> gkellogg: You can update that in the DOAP profile, try updating that.

Gregg Kellogg: You can update that in the DOAP profile, try updating that.

16:08:32 <manu> niklasl: It works in JVM and browsers.

Niklas Lindström: It works in JVM and browsers.

16:09:04 <gkellogg> http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/earl.html#processors

Gregg Kellogg: http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/earl.html#processors

16:10:14 <manu> ACTION: Gregg to update EARL reports at the end of March 2013.

ACTION: Gregg to update EARL reports at the end of March 2013.

16:10:14 <trackbot> Created ACTION-121 - Update EARL reports at the end of March 2013. [on Gregg Kellogg - due 2013-03-07].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-121 - Update EARL reports at the end of March 2013. [on Gregg Kellogg - due 2013-03-07].

16:13:06 <Zakim> -Steven

Zakim IRC Bot: -Steven

16:13:08 <Zakim> -manu

Zakim IRC Bot: -manu

16:13:09 <Zakim> -gkellogg

Zakim IRC Bot: -gkellogg

16:13:11 <Zakim> -niklasl

Zakim IRC Bot: -niklasl

16:13:11 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended

16:13:11 <Zakim> Attendees were scor, manu, Ivan, niklasl, gkellogg, Steven, ShaneM

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were scor, manu, Ivan, niklasl, gkellogg, Steven, ShaneM

16:14:21 <manu> rrsagent, make logs public

rrsagent, make logs public

16:14:49 <niklasl> to be clear, our restriction on meta and link above  is actually just holding back a bit in our extension of HTML5 to allow it there at all.

Niklas Lindström: to be clear, our restriction on meta and link above is actually just holding back a bit in our extension of HTML5 to allow it there at all.



Formatted by CommonScribe