edit

RDF Web Applications Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 05 May 2011

Agenda
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011May/0028.html
Present
Ivan Herman, Ted Thibodeau, Nathan Rixham, Benjamin Adrian, Manu Sporny, Shane McCarron, Knud Möller
Chair
Manu Sporny
Scribe
Knud Möller
IRC Log
Original
Resolutions
  1. Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011. link
Topics
13:58:44 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-rdfa-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-rdfa-irc

13:58:46 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

13:58:48 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7332

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 7332

13:58:48 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes

13:58:49 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Web Applications Working Group Teleconference
13:58:49 <trackbot> Date: 05 May 2011
13:58:56 <manu> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011May/0028.html
13:58:59 <manu> Chair: Manu
13:59:10 <manu> Present: Ivan, Ted, Nathan, Benjamin, Manu, ShaneM, Knud
13:59:57 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started

14:00:04 <Zakim> + +1.612.217.aaaa

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.612.217.aaaa

14:00:10 <ShaneM> zakim, I am aaaa

Shane McCarron: zakim, I am aaaa

14:00:10 <Zakim> +ShaneM; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +ShaneM; got it

14:00:23 <Zakim> +??P16

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P16

14:00:26 <manu> zakim, I am ??P16

Manu Sporny: zakim, I am ??P16

14:00:26 <Zakim> +manu; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +manu; got it

14:01:06 <Zakim> + +3539149aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: + +3539149aabb

14:01:20 <Knud> zakim, I am +aabb

Knud Möller: zakim, I am +aabb

14:01:20 <Zakim> sorry, Knud, I do not see a party named '+aabb'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, Knud, I do not see a party named '+aabb'

14:01:24 <MacTed> Zakim, code?

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, code?

14:01:24 <Zakim> the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), MacTed

Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), MacTed

14:01:30 <Zakim> +??P25

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P25

14:01:41 <Knud> zakim, I am aabb

Knud Möller: zakim, I am aabb

14:01:41 <Zakim> +Knud; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Knud; got it

14:01:42 <Zakim> +Kingsley_Idehen

Zakim IRC Bot: +Kingsley_Idehen

14:01:49 <MacTed> Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software

14:01:50 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software; got it

14:01:56 <MacTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

14:01:56 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +MacTed; got it

14:01:56 <Benjamin> zakim, i am +??P25

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, i am +??P25

14:01:56 <Zakim> sorry, Benjamin, I do not see a party named '+??P25'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, Benjamin, I do not see a party named '+??P25'

14:02:16 <MacTed> Zakim, who's here?

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here?

14:02:16 <Zakim> On the phone I see ShaneM, manu, Knud, ??P25, MacTed

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see ShaneM, manu, Knud, ??P25, MacTed

14:02:17 <Zakim> On IRC I see Benjamin, Zakim, RRSAgent, Knud, ShaneM, MacTed, danbri, manu, ivan, webr3, manu1, trackbot

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see Benjamin, Zakim, RRSAgent, Knud, ShaneM, MacTed, danbri, manu, ivan, webr3, manu1, trackbot

14:02:20 <Knud> zakim, mute me

Knud Möller: zakim, mute me

14:02:20 <Zakim> Knud should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Knud should now be muted

14:02:22 <MacTed> Zakim, who's noisy?

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's noisy?

14:02:23 <manu> zakim, who is making noise?

Manu Sporny: zakim, who is making noise?

14:02:33 <Zakim> MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ShaneM (14%), manu (22%), ??P25 (75%)

Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ShaneM (14%), manu (22%), ??P25 (75%)

14:02:43 <Zakim> manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (15%), MacTed (19%), ??P25 (48%)

Zakim IRC Bot: manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (15%), MacTed (19%), ??P25 (48%)

14:02:47 <MacTed> Zakim, ??p25 is Benjamin

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, ??p25 is Benjamin

14:02:47 <Zakim> +Benjamin; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Benjamin; got it

14:03:00 <Benjamin> zakim, mute me

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, mute me

14:03:00 <Zakim> Benjamin should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should now be muted

14:03:16 <MacTed> Zakim, mute me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me

14:03:18 <Zakim> MacTed should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should now be muted

14:04:07 <manu> Scribe: Knud

(Scribe set to Knud Möller)

14:04:21 <manu> scribenick: Knud
14:05:18 <Knud> Manu: PaySwarm developer sandbox going live today - depends heavily on RDFa and JSON-LD: http://payswarm.com/

Manu Sporny: PaySwarm developer sandbox going live today - depends heavily on RDFa and JSON-LD: http://payswarm.com/

14:05:22 <manu> Sandbox demo details available here: http://payswarm.com/wiki/WordPress_Recipes_Demo

Manu Sporny: Sandbox demo details available here: http://payswarm.com/wiki/WordPress_Recipes_Demo

14:05:39 <Zakim> +??P36

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P36

14:05:58 <webr3> zakim, i am ??p36

Nathan Rixham: zakim, i am ??p36

14:05:58 <Zakim> +webr3; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +webr3; got it

14:06:51 <manu> Topic: Publish the RDF Interfaces spec as a FPWD

1. Publish the RDF Interfaces spec as a FPWD

14:07:06 <webr3> -> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/Overview-src.html

Nathan Rixham: -> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/Overview-src.html

14:07:16 <Knud> Nathan giving update of latest changes, reflecting feedback from RDF Web Apps community and WG members

Nathan giving update of latest changes, reflecting feedback from RDF Web Apps community and WG members

14:07:26 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip

14:07:26 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made

14:07:27 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan

14:07:41 <Zakim> -Benjamin

Zakim IRC Bot: -Benjamin

14:07:44 <Knud> Nathan: small changes based on feedback

Nathan Rixham: small changes based on feedback

14:07:53 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip

14:07:53 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made

14:08:13 <Zakim> +??P43

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P43

14:08:23 <Benjamin> zakim, i am ??P43

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, i am ??P43

14:08:23 <Zakim> +Benjamin; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Benjamin; got it

14:08:30 <Zakim> -Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan

14:08:35 <Benjamin> zakim, who is making noise?

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, who is making noise?

14:08:46 <Zakim> Benjamin, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (28%), webr3 (20%), Benjamin (89%)

Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (28%), webr3 (20%), Benjamin (89%)

14:08:48 <Benjamin> zakim, mute me

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, mute me

14:08:49 <Zakim> Benjamin should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should now be muted

14:09:20 <Knud> Nathan: is "property" a keyword in python?

Nathan Rixham: is "property" a keyword in python?

14:09:29 <Knud> Ivan: no, it's not, no problem to use it

Ivan Herman: no, it's not, no problem to use it

14:09:56 <manu> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4621718/python-how-to-unshadow-the-keyword-property

Manu Sporny: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4621718/python-how-to-unshadow-the-keyword-property

14:09:57 <Knud> Nathan: "property" currently changed to "predicate"

Nathan Rixham: "property" currently changed to "predicate"

14:10:34 <Knud> ivan: can't see property keyword in official documentation of python

Ivan Herman: can't see property keyword in official documentation of python

14:10:57 <Knud> Ivan: maybe python 3...

Ivan Herman: maybe python 3...

14:11:38 <ivan> http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/reference/lexical_analysis.html

Ivan Herman: http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/reference/lexical_analysis.html

14:11:45 <Knud> manu: anyway, we can publish now and change it later, if we have to

Manu Sporny: anyway, we can publish now and change it later, if we have to

14:11:47 <webr3> -> 2.7 http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#keywords

Nathan Rixham: -> 2.7 http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#keywords

14:12:27 <webr3> what would we prefer? .property or .predicate

Nathan Rixham: what would we prefer? .property or .predicate

14:12:47 <Knud> ivan: if 2.7 doesn't have property keyword, then 2.4 doesn't either

Ivan Herman: if 2.7 doesn't have property keyword, then 2.4 doesn't either

14:13:08 <manu> http://kbyanc.blogspot.com/2007/06/python-property-attribute-tricks.html

Manu Sporny: http://kbyanc.blogspot.com/2007/06/python-property-attribute-tricks.html

14:13:17 <Knud> manu: "property" is a built-in function

Manu Sporny: "property" is a built-in function

14:13:51 <Knud> manu: do we want to change the spec for this?

Manu Sporny: do we want to change the spec for this?

14:15:06 <Knud> manu: in past discussions, we noted that some people have a problem with the term "predicate"

Manu Sporny: in past discussions, we noted that some people have a problem with the term "predicate"

14:15:42 <webr3> i can't see anybody who's going to be using or implementing this API having a problem with 'predicate' (personally)

Nathan Rixham: i can't see anybody who's going to be using or implementing this API having a problem with 'predicate' (personally)

14:16:22 <Knud> ivan: predicate or property won't make a big difference for RDF community

Ivan Herman: predicate or property won't make a big difference for RDF community

14:16:37 <MacTed> Zakim, unmute me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me

14:16:37 <Zakim> MacTed should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should no longer be muted

14:16:52 <webr3> property = rdf predicates and html rels - joined

Nathan Rixham: property = rdf predicates and html rels - joined

14:17:43 <Knud> ivan: "property" for an RDFa person might have a restricted meaning, because of we have @property and @rel

Ivan Herman: "property" for an RDFa person might have a restricted meaning, because of we have @property and @rel

14:18:59 <Knud> ted: "attribute" might be universally understood

Ted Thibodeau: "attribute" might be universally understood

14:19:03 <webr3> +1 predicate

Nathan Rixham: +1 predicate

14:19:53 <Knud> Manu: any concerns for publishing the spec as FPWD?

Manu Sporny: any concerns for publishing the spec as FPWD?

14:20:23 <Knud> Ivan: no - whatever we handle today, we handle today. The rest can be in the next version of the spec

Ivan Herman: no - whatever we handle today, we handle today. The rest can be in the next version of the spec

14:21:03 <webr3> RDFNode.value is an issue

Nathan Rixham: RDFNode.value is an issue

14:21:47 <Knud> Ivan: RDFNode.value naming is still under debate

Ivan Herman: RDFNode.value naming is still under debate

14:22:37 <Knud> Ivan: name, lexicalValueare possibilities, but we didn't really like any of them

Ivan Herman: name, lexicalValueare possibilities, but we didn't really like any of them

14:23:22 <Knud> Manu: maybe use lexicalValue temporarily, see if community is happy with it?

Manu Sporny: maybe use lexicalValue temporarily, see if community is happy with it?

14:24:12 <Knud> Ted: still missing an explicit warning that this whole spec might still change a lot

Ted Thibodeau: still missing an explicit warning that this whole spec might still change a lot

14:24:25 <Knud> Ivan: even though it is already labelled "working draft"

Ivan Herman: even though it is already labelled "working draft"

14:25:43 <Knud> ivan: however, the overall structure is pretty stable

Ivan Herman: however, the overall structure is pretty stable

14:26:02 <Zakim> -ShaneM

Zakim IRC Bot: -ShaneM

14:26:02 <Knud> manu: were triplesets taken out entirely?

Manu Sporny: were triplesets taken out entirely?

14:26:07 <Knud> nathan: yes, they were

Nathan Rixham: yes, they were

14:27:38 <Zakim> +McCarron

Zakim IRC Bot: +McCarron

14:27:41 <Knud> ivan: there could be text saying that "RDF WG is working on graph naming - this might find its way into this spec also"

Ivan Herman: there could be text saying that "RDF WG is working on graph naming - this might find its way into this spec also"

14:27:45 <Knud> manu: I'd prefer that we tell people that we intend to put in graph naming / graph literals / g-boxes / whatever RDF WG ends up calling them.

Manu Sporny: I'd prefer that we tell people that we intend to put in graph naming / graph literals / g-boxes / whatever RDF WG ends up calling them.

14:28:51 <manu> PROPOSAL: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011.

PROPOSED: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011.

14:28:54 <ivan> +1

Ivan Herman: +1

14:28:57 <webr3> +1

Nathan Rixham: +1

14:28:58 <manu> +1

Manu Sporny: +1

14:28:58 <Benjamin> +1

Benjamin Adrian: +1

14:29:00 <Knud> Knud: +1

Knud Möller: +1

14:29:13 <Knud> Shane: +1

Shane McCarron: +1

14:29:28 <MacTed> +1

Ted Thibodeau: +1

14:29:41 <manu> RESOLVED: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011.

RESOLVED: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011.

14:30:56 <webr3> q+ to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue

Nathan Rixham: q+ to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue

14:31:02 <ivan> q+

Ivan Herman: q+

14:31:07 <Knud> manu: 2nd last call exited without any major criticism

Manu Sporny: 2nd last call exited without any major criticism

14:31:09 <manu> ack webr3

Manu Sporny: ack webr3

14:31:09 <Zakim> webr3, you wanted to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue

Zakim IRC Bot: webr3, you wanted to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue

14:32:02 <Knud> nathan: "lexicalValue" not good choice for b-nodes

Nathan Rixham: "lexicalValue" not good choice for b-nodes

14:33:01 <Knud> nathan: how about keeping "value" and "valueOf", as it is now?

Nathan Rixham: how about keeping "value" and "valueOf", as it is now?

14:33:08 <Knud> ivan: no, that's too misleading

Ivan Herman: no, that's too misleading

14:34:28 <Knud> (lots of ideas being thrown around)

(lots of ideas being thrown around)

14:34:34 <Knud> manu: nominalValue?

Manu Sporny: nominalValue?

14:34:42 <Knud> ivan: hm, not bad

Ivan Herman: hm, not bad

14:35:53 <Knud> ivan: maybe put an issue in the document to indicate that this term might change

Ivan Herman: maybe put an issue in the document to indicate that this term might change

14:36:23 <Zakim> -McCarron

Zakim IRC Bot: -McCarron

14:36:38 <manu> ISSUE: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode

ISSUE: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode

14:36:38 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-95 - Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/95/edit .

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-95 - Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/95/edit .

14:36:45 <Zakim> +McCarron

Zakim IRC Bot: +McCarron

14:37:13 <ivan> q+

Ivan Herman: q+

14:37:25 <manu> ack ivan

Manu Sporny: ack ivan

14:37:34 <Knud> Topic: Scheduling RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa Candidate Recommendation

2. Scheduling RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa Candidate Recommendation

14:37:54 <Knud> manu: any preference as to the order of publishing these and the RDF API

Manu Sporny: any preference as to the order of publishing these and the RDF API

14:38:56 <Benjamin> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/

Benjamin Adrian: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/

14:39:08 <Knud> ivan: we should be careful about this. We should publish all parts of the API (RDF API, RDFa API, RDF Interfaces) together.

Ivan Herman: we should be careful about this. We should publish all parts of the API (RDF API, RDFa API, RDF Interfaces) together.

14:39:34 <Benjamin> zakim, unmute me

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, unmute me

14:39:34 <Zakim> Benjamin should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should no longer be muted

14:39:58 <Knud> Benjamin: document has been cleaned and updated

Benjamin Adrian: document has been cleaned and updated

14:41:24 <Knud> manu: some things still need to be done

Manu Sporny: some things still need to be done

14:41:51 <webr3> I can do FPWD for interfaces any-time, I've just made all the changes bar adding a note about graph identifiers - can help benjamin w/ rdf-api from tomorrow if that helps

Nathan Rixham: I can do FPWD for interfaces any-time, I've just made all the changes bar adding a note about graph identifiers - can help benjamin w/ rdf-api from tomorrow if that helps

14:41:51 <Knud> Manu: I think we should really reserve two weeks for this

Manu Sporny: I think we should really reserve two weeks for this

14:43:16 <Benjamin> zakim, mute me

Benjamin Adrian: zakim, mute me

14:43:16 <Zakim> Benjamin should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should now be muted

14:44:17 <Knud> Ivan: why not publish as FPWD as soon as possible, with the caveat that some issues might still need to be resolved afterwards

Ivan Herman: why not publish as FPWD as soon as possible, with the caveat that some issues might still need to be resolved afterwards

14:44:33 <Knud> manu: let's see where we stand in a week

Manu Sporny: let's see where we stand in a week

14:45:34 <Knud> manu: some issues need to be handled still for RDFa Core Candidate Rec

Manu Sporny: some issues need to be handled still for RDFa Core Candidate Rec

14:45:43 <ShaneM> 'the w3c tax'

Shane McCarron: 'the w3c tax'

14:46:32 <Knud> Manu: IRI vs URI, CURIE/URI value space collision, fragment id comment from TAG

Manu Sporny: IRI vs URI, CURIE/URI value space collision, fragment id comment from TAG

14:46:56 <webr3> iirc - both of those have equiv issues open on the RDF WG too

Nathan Rixham: iirc - both of those have equiv issues open on the RDF WG too

14:48:01 <Knud> ivan: CURIE/URI value space collision problem seems to be the one that really needs work

Ivan Herman: CURIE/URI value space collision problem seems to be the one that really needs work

14:50:41 <Knud> manu: benjamin and nathan and ivan will work on RDF API FPWD for next week or the week after

Manu Sporny: benjamin and nathan and ivan will work on RDF API FPWD for next week or the week after

14:52:01 <Knud> shane: can we have optional test cases for @role?

Shane McCarron: can we have optional test cases for @role?

14:52:06 <Knud> manu: yes, we can do that

Manu Sporny: yes, we can do that

14:52:41 <Zakim> -webr3

Zakim IRC Bot: -webr3

14:52:43 <Knud> manu: you can commit test cases via github - manu, ivan, and gregg are the contact points for access rights

Manu Sporny: you can commit test cases via github - manu, ivan, and gregg are the contact points for access rights

14:52:49 <Knud> manu: Ok, so the plan is for Nathan and Benjamin to work on the RDF API spec and get it in shape for FPWD by next week or the week after. Shane will update RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 for CR while the WG members work on resolving all of the remaining 2nd LC issues.

Manu Sporny: Ok, so the plan is for Nathan and Benjamin to work on the RDF API spec and get it in shape for FPWD by next week or the week after. Shane will update RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 for CR while the WG members work on resolving all of the remaining 2nd LC issues.

14:53:22 <manu> Topic: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions

3. CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions

14:53:27 <manu> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/90

Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/90

14:53:53 <manu> Niklas Lindström says "The Working Group should consider whether or not CURIEs should be further restricted in order to not conflict with future Internet protocol schemes."

Manu Sporny: Niklas Lindström says "The Working Group should consider whether or not CURIEs should be further restricted in order to not conflict with future Internet protocol schemes."

14:54:00 <manu> "For instance, not allowing CURIEs in that space to use anything after the prefix+':' other than say an isegment-nz-nc from RFC 3987, or something to that effect (like a "[A-Za-z0-9_-.]+" regexp)."

Manu Sporny: "For instance, not allowing CURIEs in that space to use anything after the prefix+':' other than say an isegment-nz-nc from RFC 3987, or something to that effect (like a "[A-Za-z0-9_-.]+" regexp)."

14:54:23 <Knud> ivan: sounds like a very rare problem

Ivan Herman: sounds like a very rare problem

14:55:24 <ivan> what about - db:resource/RRR

Ivan Herman: what about - db:resource/RRR

14:56:43 <manu> We could create a CURIE pattern that rejects anything that starts w/ *:// - that is a URL

Manu Sporny: We could create a CURIE pattern that rejects anything that starts w/ *:// - that is a URL

14:56:54 <manu> so this is a URL under the new pattern? foo://

Manu Sporny: so this is a URL under the new pattern? foo://

14:57:20 <manu> however, it fails to protect us against this: sip:msporny@digitalbazaar.com

Manu Sporny: however, it fails to protect us against this: sip:msporny@digitalbazaar.com

14:58:32 <manu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Apr/0046.html

Manu Sporny: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Apr/0046.html

15:03:30 <Zakim> -Knud

Zakim IRC Bot: -Knud

15:05:13 <MacTed> ACTION: manu to respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example.

ACTION: manu to respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example.

15:05:13 <trackbot> Created ACTION-75 - Respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example. [on Manu Sporny - due 2011-05-12].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-75 - Respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example. [on Manu Sporny - due 2011-05-12].

15:05:20 <MacTed> RRSAgent, forget action 1

Ted Thibodeau: RRSAgent, forget ACTION-1

15:05:20 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'forget action 1', MacTed.  Try /msg RRSAgent help

RRSAgent IRC Bot: I'm logging. I don't understand 'forget ACTION-1', MacTed. Try /msg RRSAgent help

15:05:23 <Benjamin> bye

Benjamin Adrian: bye

15:05:25 <Zakim> -manu

Zakim IRC Bot: -manu

15:05:25 <Zakim> -McCarron

Zakim IRC Bot: -McCarron

15:05:26 <MacTed> RRSAgent, drop action 1

Ted Thibodeau: RRSAgent, drop ACTION-1



Formatted by CommonScribe