14:58:49 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-irc ←
14:58:51 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
14:58:53 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394 ←
14:58:53 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes ←
14:58:54 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
14:58:54 <trackbot> Date: 26 June 2013
14:59:12 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
Guus Schreiber: zakim, who is here? ←
14:59:12 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus ←
14:59:13 <Zakim> On IRC I see RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, sandro ←
15:00:09 <pfps> zakim, who is on the phone?
Peter Patel-Schneider: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
15:00:09 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, pfps
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, pfps ←
15:00:10 <Zakim> On IRC I see pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, sandro ←
15:00:28 <pfps> zakim, this will be rdf-wg
Peter Patel-Schneider: zakim, this will be rdf-wg ←
15:00:28 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, pfps
Zakim IRC Bot: I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, pfps ←
15:00:35 <AndyS> zakim problems? code not recognized
Andy Seaborne: zakim problems? code not recognized ←
15:00:42 <pfps> zakim, this will be 73394
Peter Patel-Schneider: zakim, this will be 73394 ←
15:00:43 <Zakim> ok, pfps; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start now
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, pfps; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start now ←
15:00:44 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
Guus Schreiber: zakim, who is here? ←
15:00:45 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus ←
15:00:45 <Zakim> On IRC I see pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, sandro ←
15:01:22 <TallTed> TallTed has changed the topic to: RDF-WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- agenda http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.06.26
Ted Thibodeau: TallTed has changed the topic to: RDF-WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- agenda http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.06.26 ←
15:01:25 <AndyS> zakim, code?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, code? ←
15:01:26 <Zakim> the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), AndyS ←
15:01:31 <ericP> Zakim, please dial ericP-office
Eric Prud'hommeaux: Zakim, please dial ericP-office ←
15:01:31 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ericP; the call is being made ←
15:01:35 <Guus> chair: Guus
15:01:47 <TallTed> Zakim, who's here
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here ←
15:01:47 <Zakim> TallTed, you need to end that query with '?'
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed, you need to end that query with '?' ←
15:01:50 <TallTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
15:01:50 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, TallTed ←
15:01:51 <Zakim> On IRC I see ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, ←
15:01:51 <Zakim> ... sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: ... sandro ←
15:01:54 <TallTed> Zakim, this is rdfwg
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, this is rdfwg ←
15:01:54 <Zakim> ok, TallTed; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, TallTed; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM ←
15:01:58 <TallTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
15:01:58 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, +1.415.686.aabb, [OpenLink], EricP
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, +1.415.686.aabb, [OpenLink], EricP ←
15:02:01 <Zakim> On IRC I see ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, ←
15:02:01 <Zakim> ... sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: ... sandro ←
15:02:13 <TallTed> Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me ←
15:02:13 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
15:02:14 <Zakim> + +1.707.318.aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.707.318.aacc ←
15:02:16 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:02:16 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:02:20 <Zakim> +??P15
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P15 ←
15:02:21 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:02:23 <cgreer> zakim, aacc is me
Charles Greer: zakim, aacc is me ←
15:02:24 <Zakim> +cgreer; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cgreer; got it ←
15:02:25 <Zakim> +??P28
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P28 ←
15:02:26 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me ←
15:02:26 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
15:02:28 <pchampin> zakim, ??P15 is me
Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, ??P15 is me ←
15:02:28 <Zakim> +pchampin; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +pchampin; got it ←
15:02:34 <Zakim> - +1.415.686.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.415.686.aabb ←
15:02:35 <yvesr> Zakim, ??P28 is me
Yves Raimond: Zakim, ??P28 is me ←
15:02:36 <Zakim> +yvesr; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +yvesr; got it ←
15:02:46 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
Guus Schreiber: zakim, who is here? ←
15:02:46 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, TallTed (muted), EricP, cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, yvesr
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, TallTed (muted), EricP, cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, yvesr ←
15:02:47 <TallTed> trackbot, start meeting
Ted Thibodeau: trackbot, start meeting ←
15:02:48 <Zakim> On IRC I see ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ericP, ←
15:02:48 <Zakim> ... sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: ... sandro ←
15:02:49 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
15:02:51 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394 ←
15:02:51 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago ←
15:02:52 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
15:02:52 <trackbot> Date: 26 June 2013
15:04:12 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:04:12 <Zakim> sorry, TallTed, I don't know what conference this is
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, TallTed, I don't know what conference this is ←
15:04:34 <TallTed> Zakim, this is rdfwg
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, this is rdfwg ←
15:04:34 <Zakim> ok, TallTed; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, TallTed; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM ←
15:04:38 <TallTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
15:04:38 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, TallTed (muted), EricP, cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, yvesr, Sandro, +1.415.686.aadd, GavinC
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, TallTed (muted), EricP, cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, yvesr, Sandro, +1.415.686.aadd, GavinC ←
15:04:40 <Zakim> On IRC I see PatH, markus, ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see PatH, markus, ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, yvesr, trackbot, manu, mischat, ←
15:04:40 <Zakim> ... ericP, sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: ... ericP, sandro ←
15:04:44 <Zakim> +PatH
Zakim IRC Bot: +PatH ←
15:04:48 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
15:04:52 <Zakim> +??P42
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P42 ←
15:04:57 <markus> zakim, ??P42 is me
Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ??P42 is me ←
15:04:57 <Zakim> +markus; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +markus; got it ←
15:06:40 <markus> scribe: markus
(Scribe set to Markus Lanthaler)
15:06:56 <markus> guus: comments on minutes of last meeting?
Guus Schreiber: comments on minutes of last meeting? ←
15:07:12 <Guus> zakim, this is rdf-wg
Guus Schreiber: zakim, this is rdf-wg ←
15:07:12 <Zakim> sorry, Guus, I do not see a conference named 'rdf-wg' in progress or scheduled at this time
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, Guus, I do not see a conference named 'rdf-wg' in progress or scheduled at this time ←
15:07:14 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:07:14 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should no longer be muted ←
15:07:24 <sandro> trackbot, start meeting
Sandro Hawke: trackbot, start meeting ←
15:07:26 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
15:07:28 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394 ←
15:07:28 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 7 minutes ago
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 7 minutes ago ←
15:07:29 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
15:07:29 <trackbot> Date: 26 June 2013
15:08:16 <markus> RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 19 June telecon
RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 19 June telecon ←
15:08:20 <TallTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
15:08:20 <Zakim> I notice SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has restarted
Zakim IRC Bot: I notice SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has restarted ←
15:08:21 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, TallTed, EricP, cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, yvesr, Sandro, +1.415.686.aadd, GavinC, PatH, Arnaud, markus, Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, TallTed, EricP, cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, yvesr, Sandro, +1.415.686.aadd, GavinC, PatH, Arnaud, markus, Souri ←
15:08:21 <Zakim> On IRC I see Souri, PatH, markus, ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, yvesr, trackbot, manu,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see Souri, PatH, markus, ScottB, pfps, Zakim, RRSAgent, Arnaud, Guus, pchampin, cgreer, AndyS, gkellogg, TallTed, manu1, SteveH, gavinc, yvesr, trackbot, manu, ←
15:08:21 <Zakim> ... mischat, ericP, sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: ... mischat, ericP, sandro ←
15:08:31 <pfps> q+
15:08:35 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:08:35 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:09:00 <markus> pfps: there's no note on skolemization etc. it's not done
Peter Patel-Schneider: there's no note on skolemization etc. it's not done ←
15:09:12 <markus> guus: ok, I'll change the state to "open"
Guus Schreiber: ok, I'll change the state to "open" ←
15:09:13 <pfps> Concepts doesn't have anything on compatability or skolemization as per the action item.
Peter Patel-Schneider: Concepts doesn't have anything on compatability or skolemization as per the action item. ←
15:09:20 <Zakim> +Tony
Zakim IRC Bot: +Tony ←
15:09:51 <ScottB> Zakim, Tony is temporarily me
Scott Bauer: Zakim, Tony is temporarily me ←
15:09:51 <Zakim> +ScottB; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +ScottB; got it ←
15:09:59 <markus> TOPIC: publication of test suites
15:10:32 <markus> guus: the official title is Turtle test suite but that will have to change
Guus Schreiber: the official title is Turtle test suite but that will have to change ←
15:10:34 <ericP> http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/
Eric Prud'hommeaux: http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/ ←
15:10:40 <ericP> Tests for Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language
Eric Prud'hommeaux: Tests for Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language ←
15:11:10 <markus> ericP: I believe the directory is also specific so we'll use other directories for other test suites
Eric Prud'hommeaux: I believe the directory is also specific so we'll use other directories for other test suites ←
15:11:16 <markus> guus: I was talking about the wiki page
Guus Schreiber: I was talking about the wiki page ←
15:11:20 <ericP> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Test_Suite#Turtle_Tests
Eric Prud'hommeaux: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Test_Suite#Turtle_Tests ←
15:11:46 <markus> ericp: we can certainly change that. I'll fix it
Eric Prud'hommeaux: we can certainly change that. I'll fix it ←
15:12:14 <markus> ... there were 3-4 actions on me on this: license, zip, respond to some commenters
... there were 3-4 actions on me on this: license, zip, respond to some commenters ←
15:12:36 <markus> ... we declined one request *sorry missed it, something with ASCII chars*
... we declined one request *sorry missed it, something with ASCII chars* ←
15:12:48 <markus> ... have replies for other commenters ready
... have replies for other commenters ready ←
15:12:58 <markus> ... everything is reflected in wiki page
... everything is reflected in wiki page ←
15:13:35 <markus> guus: there's also a link from comments from andy
Guus Schreiber: there's also a link from comments from andy ←
15:13:59 <gavinc> and someone needs to write back on PrEfIx/BaSe
Gavin Carothers: and someone needs to write back on PrEfIx/BaSe ←
15:14:01 <markus> ericp: there's zip file (maybe not up to date).. I'll update it
Eric Prud'hommeaux: there's zip file (maybe not up to date).. I'll update it ←
15:14:02 <AndyS> EricP: rolleg NT results to be classic NT i.e. ASCII only, not UTF-8
Eric Prud'hommeaux: rolleg NT results to be classic NT i.e. ASCII only, not UTF-8 [ Scribe Assist by Andy Seaborne ] ←
15:14:08 <markus> guus: license?
Guus Schreiber: license? ←
15:14:19 <markus> ericp: it's fixed
Eric Prud'hommeaux: it's fixed ←
15:14:28 <gkellogg> q+
Gregg Kellogg: q+ ←
15:14:38 <markus> guus: so ready to be published?
Guus Schreiber: so ready to be published? ←
15:14:48 <markus> ericp: once we agree to accept those changes
Eric Prud'hommeaux: once we agree to accept those changes ←
15:15:06 <markus> andys: where did you make the changes?
Andy Seaborne: where did you make the changes? ←
15:15:14 <markus> ericp: perhaps I didn't pushed yet
Eric Prud'hommeaux: perhaps I didn't push it yet ←
15:15:30 <markus> s/pushed/push it/
15:15:49 <markus> ericp: everything under cvs now, not under mercurial anymore
Eric Prud'hommeaux: everything under cvs now, not under mercurial anymore ←
15:16:28 <markus> gavinc: (?) do I have to get the zip and diff to get the changes?
Gavin Carothers: (?) do I have to get the zip and diff to get the changes? ←
15:16:51 <markus> ericp: I can also give you the changes
Eric Prud'hommeaux: I can also give you the changes ←
15:16:56 <markus> gavinc: log from cvs is fine too
Gavin Carothers: log from cvs is fine too ←
15:17:07 <ericP> http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/manifest.ttl
Eric Prud'hommeaux: http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/manifest.ttl ←
15:17:30 <markus> ericp: manifest has the changes.. look for "jeremy"
Eric Prud'hommeaux: manifest has the changes.. look for "jeremy" ←
15:17:52 <markus> ... I'll give you the log for the ascii in n-triples changes
... I'll give you the log for the ascii in n-triples changes ←
15:18:18 <AndyS> AndyS: 291 tests, all passed, latest zip file.
Andy Seaborne: 291 tests, all passed, latest zip file. [ Scribe Assist by Andy Seaborne ] ←
15:18:23 <gkellogg> q?
Gregg Kellogg: q? ←
15:18:48 <pfps> q-
15:19:01 <Guus> ack gkellogg
Guus Schreiber: ack gkellogg ←
15:19:05 <gavinc> yeah, but http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/comment_following_localName.ttl
Gavin Carothers: yeah, but http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/comment_following_localName.ttl ←
15:19:18 <gavinc> So no, I can't see changes ;)
Gavin Carothers: So no, I can't see changes ;) ←
15:19:22 <markus> gkellogg: will this wiki page be updated with info for nquads and trig?
Gregg Kellogg: will this wiki page be updated with info for nquads and trig? ←
15:19:29 <markus> ... I think there's no test suite for trig yet
... I think there's no test suite for n-quads yet ←
15:20:06 <markus> s/trig yet/n-quads yet/
15:20:22 <markus> ... I'm happy to create a first version of the n-quads test suite
... I'm happy to create a first version of the n-quads test suite ←
15:21:06 <markus> guus: I would just call it RDF Test Suites
Guus Schreiber: I would just call it RDF Test Suites ←
15:21:32 <markus> sandro: maybe just RDF Tests?
Sandro Hawke: maybe just RDF Tests? ←
15:21:38 <ericP> RDF Test Sweets?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: RDF Test Sweets? ←
15:21:43 <gavinc> Clearly
Gavin Carothers: Clearly ←
15:23:21 <markus> ACTION gkellogg: create first version of n-quads test suite
ACTION gkellogg: create first version of n-quads test suite ←
15:23:21 <trackbot> Created ACTION-275 - Create first version of n-quads test suite [on Gregg Kellogg - due 2013-07-03].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-275 - Create first version of n-quads test suite [on Gregg Kellogg - due 2013-07-03]. ←
15:23:47 <AndyS> gavinc: TriG ready LC draft next week
Gavin Carothers: TriG ready LC draft next week [ Scribe Assist by Andy Seaborne ] ←
15:24:03 <markus> gavinc: n-triples and n-quads originally planned to publish as one doc
Gavin Carothers: n-triples and n-quads originally planned to publish as one doc ←
15:24:15 <AndyS> ... NQ, NT: easier as two docs , ready for review next week
Andy Seaborne: ... NQ, NT: easier as two docs , ready for review next week ←
15:24:18 <markus> ... we currently have two docs. think it's easier to keep it that way
... we currently have two docs. think it's easier to keep it that way ←
15:25:57 <pfps> so we are delaying action on Concepts even further??
Peter Patel-Schneider: so we are delaying action on Concepts even further?? ←
15:26:19 <markus> sandro: I have some issues with Trig/SPARQL alignment
Sandro Hawke: I have some issues with Trig/SPARQL alignment ←
15:26:32 <markus> gavinc: we already have resolutions on that
Gavin Carothers: we already have resolutions on that ←
15:26:48 <ericP> +1 to could and should address now
Eric Prud'hommeaux: +1 to could and should address now ←
15:26:50 <markus> sandro: I understand that but I think we could resolve these problems now pretty easily
Sandro Hawke: I understand that but I think we could resolve these problems now pretty easily ←
15:27:09 <markus> gavinc: there are no open issues at the moment
Gavin Carothers: there are no open issues at the moment ←
15:27:14 <markus> TOPIC: JSON-LD
15:27:26 <yvesr> scribe: yvesr
(Scribe set to Yves Raimond)
15:27:36 <yvesr> gkellogg: We had a productive call with pfps yesterday
Gregg Kellogg: We had a productive call with pfps yesterday ←
15:28:00 <yvesr> ... We ended up after an hour of discussion on not refering to the 'JSON-LD data model'
... We ended up after an hour of discussion on not refering to the 'JSON-LD data model' ←
15:28:05 <yvesr> ... But just on 'data model'
... But just on 'data model' ←
15:28:11 <yvesr> ... Which is based on the RDF data model
... Which is based on the RDF data model ←
15:28:27 <yvesr> ... So that we don't perpetuate the idea that there is a distinct data model for JSON-LD
... So that we don't perpetuate the idea that there is a distinct data model for JSON-LD ←
15:28:40 <yvesr> ... There are still issues around native datatypes
... There are still issues around native datatypes ←
15:28:48 <yvesr> ... and about blank nodes as predicates
... and about blank nodes as predicates ←
15:29:01 <yvesr> ... Some important distinctions in the handling of lists and sets in JSON-LD
... Some important distinctions in the handling of lists and sets in JSON-LD ←
15:29:16 <yvesr> ... my personal opinion is that JSON-LD lists are exactly the same as RDF lists
... my personal opinion is that JSON-LD lists are exactly the same as RDF lists ←
15:29:20 <AndyS> where is the list of changes from last LC?
Andy Seaborne: where is the list of changes from last LC? ←
15:29:39 <yvesr> pfps: My first comment is the schism between the two different models
Peter Patel-Schneider: My first comment is the schism between the two different worlds ←
15:29:40 <markus> andys: there's a changelog at the beginning of the doc
Markus Lanthaler: andys, there's a changelog at the beginning of the doc ←
15:30:00 <markus> s/andys: there's/andys, there's/
15:30:15 <yvesr> s/models/worlds
15:30:31 <gavinc> well... hey the JSON-LD website changed a lot...
Gavin Carothers: well... hey the JSON-LD website changed a lot... ←
15:30:35 <yvesr> pfps: If the formal basis of JSON-LD ends up being RDF graphs or an extended version of that I would be happy
Peter Patel-Schneider: If the formal basis of JSON-LD ends up being RDF graphs or an extended version of that I would be happy ←
15:30:36 <AndyS> markus - which is the editors doc currently?
Andy Seaborne: markus - which is the editors doc currently? ←
15:30:41 <yvesr> Guus: Can you leave with the current changes?
Guus Schreiber: Can you leave with the current changes? ←
15:30:46 <yvesr> pfps: I haven't seen them yet, but yes
Peter Patel-Schneider: I haven't seen them yet, but yes ←
15:30:58 <markus> andys, it's always on json-ld.org.. we sync to w3.org manually from the time to time
Markus Lanthaler: andys, it's always on json-ld.org.. we sync to w3.org manually from the time to time ←
15:31:00 <yvesr> markus: This will require a little bit of back and forth
Markus Lanthaler: This will require a little bit of back and forth ←
15:31:10 <yvesr> gkellogg: We think these changes won't require another LC
Gregg Kellogg: We think these changes won't require another LC ←
15:31:23 <yvesr> Guus: Can we leave at that at the moment, pending edits?
Guus Schreiber: Can we leave at that at the moment, pending edits? ←
15:31:50 <yvesr> sandro: We need to make a decision on whether we need that extension to RDF graphs
Sandro Hawke: We need to make a decision on whether we need that extension to RDF graphs ←
15:31:58 <yvesr> ... and whether it should leave in RDF concepts
... and whether it should leave in RDF concepts ←
15:32:10 <yvesr> pfps: It's also possible for the JSON-LD document to define that extension of RDF graphs
Peter Patel-Schneider: It's also possible for the JSON-LD document to define that extension of RDF graphs ←
15:32:15 <yvesr> .... that said it would be better in RDF concepts
.... that said it would be better in RDF concepts ←
15:32:48 <yvesr> ... If it ends up being duplicated in the two documents, we can still rip that out later from one of those documents
... If it ends up being duplicated in the two documents, we can still rip that out later from one of those documents ←
15:32:53 <yvesr> ... It is purely editorial
... It is purely editorial ←
15:33:17 <PatH> please dont call it a linked data graph.
Patrick Hayes: please dont call it a linked data graph. ←
15:33:20 <yvesr> sandro: If we extended RDF graphs as a, said, 'Linked Data graph', how would it be different from the current definition of RDF graphs
Sandro Hawke: If we extended RDF graphs as a, said, 'Linked Data graph', how would it be different from the current definition of RDF graphs ←
15:33:31 <gavinc> No.
Gavin Carothers: No. ←
15:33:38 <yvesr> pfps: There are no commonalities between the two atm - everything is being redefined from the ground up
Peter Patel-Schneider: There are no commonalities between the two atm - everything is being redefined from the ground up ←
15:33:48 <yvesr> ... the only common ground is IRIs
... the only common ground is IRIs ←
15:34:11 <yvesr> pfps: It is reasonable to say that Linked Data is what you think of when you're programming against it
Peter Patel-Schneider: It is reasonable to say that Linked Data is what you think of when you're programming against it ←
15:34:12 <gkellogg> Its hard to see how adding bnode predicates would be described in a Linked Data graph.
Gregg Kellogg: Its hard to see how adding bnode predicates would be described in a Linked Data graph. ←
15:34:17 <PatH> q+
Patrick Hayes: q+ ←
15:34:26 <gavinc> Yeah, gkellogg, that.
Gavin Carothers: Yeah, gkellogg, that. ←
15:34:31 <yvesr> ... RDF provides the details
... RDF provides the details ←
15:34:40 <markus> markus: I'm afraid that if we call it Linked Data graph we end up having another Linked Data discussion
Markus Lanthaler: I'm afraid that if we call it Linked Data graph we end up having another Linked Data discussion [ Scribe Assist by Markus Lanthaler ] ←
15:34:43 <yvesr> sandro: Or 'Generalized RDF graph'?
Sandro Hawke: Or 'Generalized RDF graph'? ←
15:34:50 <markus> markus: I would prefer JSON-LD graph
Markus Lanthaler: I would prefer JSON-LD graph [ Scribe Assist by Markus Lanthaler ] ←
15:35:16 <yvesr> PatH: We shouldn't call anything 'Linked Data graph'
Patrick Hayes: We shouldn't call anything 'Linked Data graph' ←
15:35:39 <yvesr> Guus: Thanks for having this discussion which helped resolve this
Guus Schreiber: Thanks for having this discussion which helped resolve this ←
15:35:40 <PatH> JSON-RDF-graph?
Patrick Hayes: JSON-RDF-graph? ←
15:35:53 <markus> scribe: markus
(Scribe set to Markus Lanthaler)
15:35:56 <yvesr> topic: Concepts and Semantics
15:36:32 <pfps> consensus has been reached!
Peter Patel-Schneider: consensus has been reached! ←
15:36:44 <pfps> there is one editorial issue remaining
Peter Patel-Schneider: there is one editorial issue remaining ←
15:36:49 <markus> guus: antoine can you confirm we reached consensus?
Guus Schreiber: antoine can you confirm we reached consensus? ←
15:37:10 <markus> ... ok, not on the call. is my observation correct?
... ok, not on the call. is my observation correct? ←
15:37:11 <PatH> Antoine said he woul dbe late on the call but would be here.
Patrick Hayes: Antoine said he woul dbe late on the call but would be here. ←
15:37:49 <markus> path: his latest email suggested a niggle about one phrase
Patrick Hayes: his latest email suggested a niggle about one phrase ←
15:37:59 <markus> ... maybe an editorial tweak will address that
... maybe an editorial tweak will address that ←
15:38:10 <markus> ... rest should be ok
... rest should be ok ←
15:38:40 <markus> guus: what about datasets and default graphs?
Guus Schreiber: what about datasets and default graphs? ←
15:38:58 <markus> path: I'm waiting to know what to put in the document
Patrick Hayes: I'm waiting to know what to put in the document ←
15:39:11 <markus> ... did we resolve that already
... did we resolve that already ←
15:39:15 <markus> sandro: we did
Sandro Hawke: we did ←
15:39:41 <markus> path: ok, if we are clear on that I'll update the document
Patrick Hayes: ok, if we are clear on that I'll update the document ←
15:40:24 <markus> guus: three messages from pfps
Guus Schreiber: three messages from pfps ←
15:40:35 <markus> pfps: the first one is out of scope (bnodes as predicates)
Peter Patel-Schneider: the first one is out of scope (bnodes as predicates) ←
15:40:58 <markus> ... the rest is explaining the current state, all editorial
... the rest is explaining the current state, all editorial ←
15:41:14 <markus> ... the third one is a proposal to define generalized graphs and datasets in Concepts
... the third one is a proposal to define generalized graphs and datasets in Concepts ←
15:41:29 <markus> ... this is the result of the JSON-LD discussion
... this is the result of the JSON-LD discussion ←
15:41:51 <markus> guus: I guess "extended" could be "generalized"
Guus Schreiber: I guess "extended" could be "generalized" ←
15:41:55 <markus> pfps: yes
Peter Patel-Schneider: yes ←
15:42:01 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
15:42:05 <pfps> that's 'extended' could be 'generalized', not extended could be generalized (further)
Peter Patel-Schneider: that's 'generalized' could be 'generalized', not generalized could be generalized (further) ←
15:42:40 <markus> sandro: would like to get an idea where people stand on this
Sandro Hawke: would like to get an idea where people stand on this ←
15:42:50 <pfps> the proposal is to define generalized RDF graphs in Concepts, for use in Semantics
Peter Patel-Schneider: the proposal is to define generalized RDF graphs in Concepts, for use in Semantics ←
15:43:03 <markus> path: it has come up over and over again in the last decade.. would like to solve it once for all
Patrick Hayes: it has come up over and over again in the last decade.. would like to solve it once for all ←
15:43:11 <pfps> The section could certainly be labelled non-normative
Peter Patel-Schneider: The section could certainly be labelled non-normative ←
15:43:32 <gavinc> No.
Gavin Carothers: No. ←
15:43:35 <gavinc> You can't use Turtle.
Gavin Carothers: You can't use Turtle. ←
15:43:43 <markus> sandro: we need to be careful how we phrase it (non-normative etc.) so that people who don't want it don't have to do anything
Sandro Hawke: we need to be careful how we phrase it (non-normative etc.) so that people who don't want it don't have to do anything ←
15:43:51 <gavinc> Correct pfps!
Gavin Carothers: Correct pfps! ←
15:44:23 <pfps> one could certainly build generalized turtle, generalized RDF/XML (well, probably not!), ...
Peter Patel-Schneider: one could certainly build generalized turtle, generalized RDF/XML (well, probably not!), ... ←
15:44:23 <AndyS> ack me
Andy Seaborne: ack me ←
15:44:33 <PatH> q-
Patrick Hayes: q- ←
15:45:01 <Guus> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Jun/0204.html
Guus Schreiber: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Jun/0204.html ←
15:45:20 <Guus> strawpoll: what's your opinion of adding this to Concepts?
STRAWPOLL: what's your opinion of adding this to Concepts? ←
15:45:31 <PatH> +1
Patrick Hayes: +1 ←
15:45:32 <markus> +1
+1 ←
15:45:34 <pfps> s/extended/generalized/ and make non-normative
15:45:34 <Arnaud> +1
Arnaud Le Hors: +1 ←
15:45:35 <markus> sandro: +1
Sandro Hawke: +1 ←
15:45:35 <pfps> +1
15:45:37 <pchampin> +1
15:45:37 <cgreer> +a
Charles Greer: +a ←
15:45:38 <AndyS> OK : but not "define" - discussion text, not definitional
Andy Seaborne: OK : but not "define" - discussion text, not definitional ←
15:45:39 <ericP> +1
Eric Prud'hommeaux: +1 ←
15:45:39 <yvesr> +1
Yves Raimond: +1 ←
15:45:40 <gkellogg> +1
Gregg Kellogg: +1 ←
15:45:41 <PatH> Sandro +1
Patrick Hayes: Sandro +1 ←
15:45:44 <cgreer> +1
Charles Greer: +1 ←
15:45:52 <TallTed> +1
Ted Thibodeau: +1 ←
15:46:01 <gavinc> 0
Gavin Carothers: 0 ←
15:46:05 <PatH> a <0.0005?
Patrick Hayes: a <0.0005? ←
15:46:19 <Souri> 0
Souripriya Das: 0 ←
15:46:29 <PatH> Yes I think so yvesr
Patrick Hayes: Yes I think so yvesr ←
15:46:49 <cgreer> a == 1
Charles Greer: a == 1 ←
15:47:10 <PatH> Does it allow literals in property position?
Patrick Hayes: Does it allow literals in property position? ←
15:47:21 <PatH> OK
Patrick Hayes: OK ←
15:47:24 <AndyS> and datatypes?
Andy Seaborne: and datatypes? ←
15:47:28 <gavinc> "An extended RDF triple is an RDF triple, but with subjects, predicates, and objects all allowed to be IRIs, blank nodes, or literals."
Gavin Carothers: "An extended RDF triple is an RDF triple, but with subjects, predicates, and objects all allowed to be IRIs, blank nodes, or literals." ←
15:47:31 <markus> guus: ok, I think that covered all the discussions we had
Guus Schreiber: ok, I think that covered all the discussions we had ←
15:47:40 <gavinc> Doesn't talk about datatyes
Gavin Carothers: Doesn't talk about datatyes ←
15:47:48 <markus> ... where do we stand with publishing Concepts and Semantics?
... where do we stand with publishing Concepts and Semantics? ←
15:48:16 <markus> ... we should try to vote on it next week
... we should try to vote on it next week ←
15:48:41 <markus> pfps: Semantics is more or less done
Peter Patel-Schneider: Semantics is more or less done ←
15:48:55 <markus> ... only thing left is to label some sections as non-normative
... only thing left is to label some sections as non-normative ←
15:49:08 <markus> ... Semantics already uses extended RDF graphs
... Semantics already uses extended RDF graphs ←
15:49:12 <markus> path: but it doesn't say so
Patrick Hayes: but it doesn't say so ←
15:49:16 <markus> pfps: yeah
Peter Patel-Schneider: yeah ←
15:49:30 <markus> ... and the semantics of the default graph are not mentioned yet
... and the semantics of the default graph are not mentioned yet ←
15:49:49 <markus> guus: have all reviews been addressed?
Guus Schreiber: have all reviews been addressed? ←
15:49:52 <markus> pfps: yes
Peter Patel-Schneider: yes ←
15:51:08 <markus> guus: markus, you have been asked by david to help as editor for Concepts
Guus Schreiber: markus, you have been asked by david to help as editor for Concepts ←
15:51:27 <markus> markus: right.. waiting for a reply to my questions before making a decision whether I accept
Markus Lanthaler: right.. waiting for a reply to my questions before making a decision whether I accept ←
15:51:42 <markus> pfps: I reviewed the comments
Peter Patel-Schneider: I reviewed the comments ←
15:52:33 <markus> guus: pfps, can you inform the WG when Semantics is ready?
Guus Schreiber: pfps, can you inform the WG when Semantics is ready? ←
15:52:37 <markus> pfps: yes
Peter Patel-Schneider: yes ←
15:52:46 <markus> guus: I will ask David to do the same for Concepts
Guus Schreiber: I will ask David to do the same for Concepts ←
15:52:56 <markus> ... we really need to get it out now
... we really need to get it out now ←
15:52:58 <AndyS> Move on to RDF/JSON?
Andy Seaborne: Move on to RDF/JSON? ←
15:52:59 <Zakim> -cgreer
Zakim IRC Bot: -cgreer ←
15:53:10 <PatH> OK peter, you work on it and email me when done, then I can take it from there.
Patrick Hayes: OK peter, you work on it and email me when done, then I can take it from there. ←
15:53:15 <ericP> gavinc, you should be see the diffs in your inbox
Eric Prud'hommeaux: gavinc, you should be see the diffs in your inbox ←
15:53:30 <pfps> action on Concepts editors to add bit on generalized RDF graphs?
Peter Patel-Schneider: action on Concepts editors to add bit on generalized RDF graphs? ←
15:53:30 <trackbot> Error finding 'on'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Error finding 'on'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>. ←
15:53:54 <markus> action guus to ask david on the LC draft of Concepts
action guus to ask david on the LC draft of Concepts ←
15:53:54 <trackbot> Created ACTION-276 - Ask david on the LC draft of Concepts [on Guus Schreiber - due 2013-07-03].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-276 - Ask david on the LC draft of Concepts [on Guus Schreiber - due 2013-07-03]. ←
15:54:09 <ericP> i didn't compile diffs for the changes moving all U+FFFF to U+FFFD ('cause U+00..FFFE and U+00..FFFF are non characters)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: i didn't compile diffs for the changes moving all U+FFFF to U+FFFD ('cause U+00..FFFE and U+00..FFFF are non characters) ←
15:54:19 <PatH> I could help with Concepts editing also. Whatever.
Patrick Hayes: I could help with Concepts editing also. Whatever. ←
15:54:20 <pfps> I can make changes to Concepts if needed
Peter Patel-Schneider: I can make changes to Concepts if needed ←
15:54:26 <markus> sandro: I may suggest peter to step in and just make the changes
Sandro Hawke: I may suggest peter to step in and just make the changes ←
15:54:33 <markus> guus: ok
Guus Schreiber: ok ←
15:54:58 <ericP> gavinc, i take it back. i tried to send it through gmail which is resisting
Eric Prud'hommeaux: gavinc, i take it back. i tried to send it through gmail which is resisting ←
15:55:06 <markus> TOPIC: RDF/JSON as Note
15:55:11 <gavinc> heh, okay, yeah didn't see it
Gavin Carothers: heh, okay, yeah didn't see it ←
15:55:18 <pfps> I have no problems with RDF/JSON as a note
Peter Patel-Schneider: I have no problems with RDF/JSON as a note ←
15:56:04 <markus> arnaud: I already updated the draft to make the status of the draft clearer
Arnaud Le Hors: I already updated the draft to make the status of the draft clearer ←
15:56:37 <markus> ... I'm aware that the WG is concerned about publishing two RDF serializations in JSON
... I'm aware that the WG is concerned about publishing two RDF serializations in JSON ←
15:56:44 <ericP> gavinc, gzip'ing worked. should be there now
Eric Prud'hommeaux: gavinc, gzip'ing worked. should be there now ←
15:56:51 <markus> ... all I'm asking to revisit this decision
... all I'm asking to revisit this decision ←
15:57:01 <markus> ... I'm happy to make all the necessary changes
... I'm happy to make all the necessary changes ←
15:57:02 <AndyS> update to datasets?
Andy Seaborne: update to datasets? ←
15:57:10 <markus> ... just so that we have a stable reference
... just so that we have a stable reference ←
15:57:34 <markus> ... I updated the draft to clearly state that the WG did chose JSON-LD and that people should use that
... I updated the draft to clearly state that the WG did chose JSON-LD and that people should use that ←
15:58:03 <AndyS> I can review
Andy Seaborne: I can review ←
15:58:06 <markus> guus: I would like to have 1-2 WG members to have a look at the current doc
Guus Schreiber: I would like to have 1-2 WG members to have a look at the current doc ←
15:58:11 <markus> sandro: will do
Sandro Hawke: will do ←
15:58:19 <markus> cgreer: me too
Charles Greer: me too ←
15:58:47 <Zakim> - +1.408.992.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.408.992.aaaa ←
16:00:05 <markus> guus: so there won't be anything to vote on today
Guus Schreiber: so there won't be anything to vote on today ←
16:00:18 <ericP> gavinc, try now?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: gavinc, try now? ←
16:00:20 <markus> gavinc: no, I'll send a mail to the list
Gavin Carothers: no, I'll send a mail to the list ←
16:00:37 <ericP> (i could have sworn i did that already)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: (i could have sworn i did that already) ←
16:00:37 <Zakim> -ScottB
Zakim IRC Bot: -ScottB ←
16:00:37 <Zakim> -GavinC
Zakim IRC Bot: -GavinC ←
16:00:40 <Zakim> -PatH
Zakim IRC Bot: -PatH ←
16:00:40 <Zakim> -Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: -Souri ←
16:00:41 <markus> ADJOURNED
ADJOURNED ←
16:00:42 <Zakim> -AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←
16:00:43 <Zakim> -EricP
Zakim IRC Bot: -EricP ←
16:00:43 <Zakim> - +1.415.686.aadd
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.415.686.aadd ←
16:00:46 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
16:00:46 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
16:00:49 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, pchampin, yvesr, Arnaud (muted), markus
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, pchampin, yvesr, Arnaud (muted), markus ←
16:00:50 <Zakim> -markus
Zakim IRC Bot: -markus ←
16:00:55 <Zakim> -Guus_Schreiber
Zakim IRC Bot: -Guus_Schreiber ←
16:00:56 <markus> bye
bye ←
16:00:57 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
16:01:26 <Zakim> -pchampin
Zakim IRC Bot: -pchampin ←
16:01:27 <Zakim> yvesr is being disconnected
Zakim IRC Bot: yvesr is being disconnected ←
16:01:27 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has ended ←
16:01:27 <Zakim> Attendees were Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, +1.415.686.aabb, EricP, TallTed, +1.707.318.aacc, cgreer, AndyS, pchampin, yvesr, Sandro, +1.415.686.aadd, GavinC, PatH, Arnaud,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were Guus_Schreiber, +1.408.992.aaaa, +1.415.686.aabb, EricP, TallTed, +1.707.318.aacc, cgreer, AndyS, pchampin, yvesr, Sandro, +1.415.686.aadd, GavinC, PatH, Arnaud, ←
16:01:28 <Zakim> ... markus, Souri, ScottB
Zakim IRC Bot: ... markus, Souri, ScottB ←
16:01:45 <Guus> trackbot, end meeting
Guus Schreiber: trackbot, end meeting ←
16:01:45 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, list attendees ←
16:01:45 <Zakim> sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is ←
16:01:53 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, please draft minutes ←
16:01:53 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot ←
16:01:54 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, bye ←
16:01:54 <RRSAgent> I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-actions.rdf :
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-actions.rdf : ←
16:01:54 <RRSAgent> ACTION: gkellog to create first version of n-quads test suite [1]
ACTION: gkellog to create first version of n-quads test suite [1] ←
16:01:54 <RRSAgent> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-irc#T15-22-55
RRSAgent IRC Bot: recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-irc#T15-22-55 ←
16:01:54 <RRSAgent> ACTION: gkellogg to create first version of n-quads test suite [2]
ACTION: gkellogg to create first version of n-quads test suite [2] ←
16:01:54 <RRSAgent> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-irc#T15-23-21-1
RRSAgent IRC Bot: recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/06/26-rdf-wg-irc#T15-23-21-1 ←
Formatted by CommonScribe