15:00:06 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/02-ldp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/02-ldp-irc ←
15:00:08 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
15:00:10 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be LDP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be LDP ←
15:00:10 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start now
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start now ←
15:00:11 <trackbot> Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference
15:00:11 <trackbot> Date: 02 March 2015
15:00:23 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started ←
15:00:31 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:00:36 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
15:00:45 <CodyBurleson> Zakim, IPcaller is me.
Cody Burleson: Zakim, IPcaller is me. ←
15:00:46 <Zakim> +CodyBurleson; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +CodyBurleson; got it ←
15:01:04 <CodyBurleson> Zakim, MiguelAraCo is with me.
Cody Burleson: Zakim, MiguelAraCo is with me. ←
15:01:04 <Zakim> +MiguelAraCo; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MiguelAraCo; got it ←
15:01:05 <Zakim> +azaroth
Zakim IRC Bot: +azaroth ←
15:01:11 <Zakim> +deiu
Zakim IRC Bot: +deiu ←
15:01:17 <Zakim> +??P3
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P3 ←
15:01:27 <pchampin> zakim, ??P3 is me
Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, ??P3 is me ←
15:01:27 <Zakim> +pchampin; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +pchampin; got it ←
15:02:15 <Zakim> +Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ashok_Malhotra ←
15:04:50 <Zakim> +ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: +ericP ←
15:04:52 <Zakim> +[IBM]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IBM] ←
15:05:01 <SteveS> zakim, [IBM] is me
Steve Speicher: zakim, [IBM] is me ←
15:05:01 <Zakim> +SteveS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveS; got it ←
15:05:44 <CodyBurleson> scribe: CodyBurleson
(Scribe set to Cody Burleson)
<CodyBurleson> chair: Arnaud
<CodyBurleson> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2015.03.02
<CodyBurleson> topic: Admin
15:06:04 <Arnaud> Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 23 February teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-02-23
PROPOSED: Approve the minutes of the 23 February teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-02-23 ←
15:06:17 <Arnaud> Resolved: Approve the minutes of the 23 February teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-02-23
RESOLVED: Approve the minutes of the 23 February teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-02-23 ←
15:06:22 <CodyBurleson> Minutes from last week approved (there were no resolutions).
Minutes from last week approved (there were no resolutions). ←
15:07:02 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Not sure if we should meet next week or give it 2 weeks. I wouldn't be against meeting every other week now. Or we can keep meeting per week and have a short call. Thoughts?
Arnaud Le Hors: Not sure if we should meet next week or give it 2 weeks. I wouldn't be against meeting every other week now. Or we can keep meeting per week and have a short call. Thoughts? ←
15:07:04 <azaroth> prefer every other week
Robert Sanderson: prefer every other week ←
15:07:23 <deiu> two weeks sounds good
Andrei Sambra: two weeks sounds good ←
15:07:33 <Arnaud> Next meeting: 2015.03.16
Arnaud Le Hors: Next meeting: 2015.03.16 ←
15:07:39 <pchampin> sounds good to me as well
Pierre-Antoine Champin: sounds good to me as well ←
15:07:42 <CodyBurleson> Team: Every 2 weeks (three individuals)
Team: Every 2 weeks (three individuals) ←
15:07:55 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: OK, we meet every 2 weeks for now.
Arnaud Le Hors: OK, we meet every 2 weeks for now. ←
15:07:57 <Zakim> +Roger
Zakim IRC Bot: +Roger ←
15:08:01 <CodyBurleson> Topic: Tracking of Actions and Issues
15:08:22 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
15:08:22 <CodyBurleson> Closing 152.
Closing 152. ←
15:08:29 <CodyBurleson> 153 is still pending.
153 is still pending. ←
15:08:54 <CodyBurleson> Topic: LDP Spec
15:09:27 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←
15:09:28 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Congratulations! LDP spec is now a recommendation. But, now that it is rec, what do we do about errata; correcting errors?
Arnaud Le Hors: Congratulations! LDP spec is now a recommendation. But, now that it is rec, what do we do about errata; correcting errors? ←
15:09:35 <TallTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←
15:09:35 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
15:09:37 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:09:37 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:09:39 <Arnaud> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2015Feb/0015.html
Arnaud Le Hors: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2015Feb/0015.html ←
15:09:51 <Zakim> +??P18
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P18 ←
15:10:03 <ericP> -> http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/errata LDP errata
Eric Prud'hommeaux: -> http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/errata LDP errata ←
15:10:07 <nmihindu> Zakim, ??P18 is me
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, ??P18 is me ←
15:10:07 <Zakim> +nmihindu; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +nmihindu; got it ←
15:10:14 <nmihindu> Zakim, mute me
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, mute me ←
15:10:14 <Zakim> nmihindu should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: nmihindu should now be muted ←
15:10:59 <CodyBurleson> ericP: At the top of the document, we can have a link to errata that says "Please check errata for any omissions and errors"; a separate document - and we can put them in there.
Eric Prud'hommeaux: At the top of the document, we can have a link to errata that says "Please check errata for any omissions and errors"; a separate document - and we can put them in there. ←
15:11:34 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: Some of the workgroups just use wiki (being lazy)
Sandro Hawke: Some of the workgroups just use wiki (being lazy) ←
15:11:57 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: We have a document that points to LDP errata already
Arnaud Le Hors: We have a document that points to LDP errata already ←
15:12:02 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: We can redirect that
Sandro Hawke: We can redirect that ←
15:12:32 <CodyBurleson> ... Actually updating the rec document is very difficult (not worth it)
... Actually updating the rec document is very difficult (not worth it) ←
15:14:10 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: That answers my question from a process point of view. Once the Rec is published, the burden is very high to make changes. Does everyone agree? We did not remove the reference to the ATF draft. I don't think it would confuse anyone, but I think we should add a note to errata to forget that reference.
Arnaud Le Hors: That answers my question from a process point of view. Once the Rec is published, the burden is very high to make changes. Does everyone agree? We did not remove the reference to the ATF draft. I don't think it would confuse anyone, but I think we should add a note to errata to forget that reference. ←
15:14:32 <CodyBurleson> ... Everyone agree with use of a wiki?
... Everyone agree with use of a wiki? ←
15:14:51 <CodyBurleson> SteveS: I hate wiki syntax. Easier to use ResPec and HTMl and commit/push
Steve Speicher: I hate wiki syntax. Easier to use ResPec and HTMl and commit/push ←
15:15:27 <TallTed> for errata, and given these may not always involve existing editors, I think wiki will be better
Ted Thibodeau: for errata, and given these may not always involve existing editors, I think wiki will be better ←
15:15:35 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: The team is interested in the wiki so that when working group isn't active, there is a domain that W3C staff can edit
Arnaud Le Hors: The team is interested in the wiki so that when working group isn't active, there is a domain that W3C staff can edit ←
15:15:44 <CodyBurleson> ericP: More people can edit in the wiki
Eric Prud'hommeaux: More people can edit in the wiki ←
15:16:14 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: We're talking about errata only. That could still be in GitHub or something, but it's just a plain text.
Sandro Hawke: We're talking about errata only. That could still be in GitHub or something, but it's just a plain text. ←
15:17:28 <Arnaud> PROPOSED: Reference "[Accept-Post]J. Arwe; S. Speicher; E. Wilde. The Accept-Post HTTP Header. Internet Draft. URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-accept-post" shouldn't be there - remove
PROPOSED: Reference "[Accept-Post]J. Arwe; S. Speicher; E. Wilde. The Accept-Post HTTP Header. Internet Draft. URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-accept-post" shouldn't be there - remove ←
15:17:35 <ericP> +1
Eric Prud'hommeaux: +1 ←
15:17:37 <SteveS> +1
Steve Speicher: +1 ←
15:17:42 <roger> +1
Roger Menday: +1 ←
15:17:42 <TallTed> +1
Ted Thibodeau: +1 ←
15:17:42 <nmihindu> +1
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: +1 ←
15:17:47 <CodyBurleson> +1
+1 ←
15:17:54 <Arnaud> RESOLVED: Reference "[Accept-Post]J. Arwe; S. Speicher; E. Wilde. The Accept-Post HTTP Header. Internet Draft. URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-accept-post" shouldn't be there - remove
RESOLVED: Reference "[Accept-Post]J. Arwe; S. Speicher; E. Wilde. The Accept-Post HTTP Header. Internet Draft. URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-accept-post" shouldn't be there - remove ←
15:18:18 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Eric, can you get the wiki redirect thingy done?
Arnaud Le Hors: Eric, can you get the wiki redirect thingy done? ←
15:18:33 <CodyBurleson> ericP: Steve, somebody needs to create the wiki page.
Eric Prud'hommeaux: Steve, somebody needs to create the wiki page. ←
15:18:57 <ericP> -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF1.1_Errata Turtle errata
Eric Prud'hommeaux: -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF1.1_Errata Turtle errata ←
15:19:22 <CodyBurleson> ericP: I'll actually just go ahead and do this.
Eric Prud'hommeaux: I'll actually just go ahead and do this. ←
15:20:27 <CodyBurleson> ... 2015 feb 0015 - I'll take an action on that.
... 2015 feb 0015 - I'll take an action on that. ←
15:20:38 <CodyBurleson> Topic: Paging
15:21:29 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Any progress? Anyone? The time is going by and I am less and less convinced that we will ever meet the exit criteria. This spec may end up becoming a working group note. We still have time; we don't have to pull the plug quite yet.
Arnaud Le Hors: Any progress? Anyone? The time is going by and I am less and less convinced that we will ever meet the exit criteria. This spec may end up becoming a working group note. We still have time; we don't have to pull the plug quite yet. ←
15:22:35 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: If we were to alter the spec and add in more client-side controls, would that help adoption?
Ashok Malhotra: If we were to alter the spec and add in more client-side controls, would that help adoption? ←
15:23:00 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Good question. I would even broden it and ask, "Are there any changes to the spec that would make it more appealing?"
Arnaud Le Hors: Good question. I would even broden it and ask, "Are there any changes to the spec that would make it more appealing?" ←
15:23:25 <CodyBurleson> ... What you are saying is that adding more client control would make it more attractive to you (Oracle).
... What you are saying is that adding more client control would make it more attractive to you (Oracle). ←
15:23:38 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: Indeed.
Ashok Malhotra: Indeed. ←
15:24:42 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:24:42 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should no longer be muted ←
15:25:22 <CodyBurleson> Topic: LD Patch
15:25:39 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Andrew, I understand you sent it out for publications?
Arnaud Le Hors: Andrei, I understand you sent it out for publications? ←
15:26:02 <CodyBurleson> ericP: We have a transition request to CR already?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: We have a transition request to CR already? ←
15:26:10 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:26:10 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:26:29 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: From Phillipe on behalf of the director.
Arnaud Le Hors: From Phillipe on behalf of the director. ←
15:26:45 <TallTed> TallTed: the trouble with Paging is that the simple solution (what we have) doesn't really give you much, and the complex solution *is* complex, so takes much more than we've got
Ted Thibodeau: the trouble with Paging is that the simple solution (what we have) doesn't really give you much, and the complex solution *is* complex, so takes much more than we've got [ Scribe Assist by Ted Thibodeau ] ←
15:27:14 <CodyBurleson> Andrew: I guess that frees you from Action 153; I think it's done.
Andrei Sambra: I guess that frees you from ACTION-153; I think it's done. ←
15:27:24 <CodyBurleson> ... Close Action 153.
... Close ACTION-153. ←
15:27:31 <deiu> s/Andrew/Andrei/g
15:27:39 <CodyBurleson> ... Now we can assume we are in CR. We need to get the implementations cranking.
... Now we can assume we are in CR. We need to get the implementations cranking. ←
15:27:54 <CodyBurleson> ... How many do we expect?
... How many do we expect? ←
15:28:04 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Heard 3. Anyone else?
Arnaud Le Hors: Heard 3. Anyone else? ←
15:28:35 <azaroth> Stanford/Fedora are looking at it, it's on the roadmap, but not a priority
Robert Sanderson: Stanford/Fedora are looking at it, it's on the roadmap, but not a priority ←
15:28:45 <CodyBurleson> SteveS: IBM is implementing it
Steve Speicher: IBM is implementing it ←
15:29:14 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: What's the status of the test suite? Do we need to do more work there?
Arnaud Le Hors: What's the status of the test suite? Do we need to do more work there? ←
15:29:30 <CodyBurleson> zakim, who is talking?
zakim, who is talking? ←
15:29:30 <Zakim> I am sorry, CodyBurleson; I don't have the necessary resources to track talkers right now
Zakim IRC Bot: I am sorry, CodyBurleson; I don't have the necessary resources to track talkers right now ←
15:29:53 <CodyBurleson> pchampin: I am actually working on that.
Pierre-Antoine Champin: I am actually working on that. ←
15:30:15 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Sounds like things are in good shape on this.
Arnaud Le Hors: Sounds like things are in good shape on this. ←
15:30:20 <CodyBurleson> Topic: LDP Primer
15:30:55 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: I realized that the Primer is currently published as a draft. Should we just republish as a Working Group Note?
Arnaud Le Hors: I realized that the Primer is currently published as a draft. Should we just republish as a Working Group Note? ←
15:31:15 <nmihindu> +1 for republishing it as a final note.
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: +1 for republishing it as a final note. ←
15:31:24 <SteveS> do it
Steve Speicher: do it ←
15:31:33 <pchampin> +1
15:31:35 <Arnaud> PROPOSED: publish LDP Primer as a WG Note
PROPOSED: publish LDP Primer as a WG Note ←
15:31:38 <CodyBurleson> ... We published it as a first Public Working Draft. Does everyone agree that we publish it as a Note?
... We published it as a first Public Working Draft. Does everyone agree that we publish it as a Note? ←
15:31:43 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/02-ldp-minutes.html ericP
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/02-ldp-minutes.html ericP ←
15:32:01 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: We should scan it again with fresh eyes. Don't know if anyone is interested.
Sandro Hawke: We should scan it again with fresh eyes. Don't know if anyone is interested. ←
15:32:24 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Valid point; unless someone is really willing to put the effort in.
Arnaud Le Hors: Valid point; unless someone is really willing to put the effort in. ←
15:32:47 <CodyBurleson> SteveS: I might be able to find someone, - so it will be REALLY fresh eyes. Someone new.
Steve Speicher: I might be able to find someone, - so it will be REALLY fresh eyes. Someone new. ←
15:33:01 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: I know some people like that too; I will ask someone too.
Sandro Hawke: I know some people like that too; I will ask someone too. ←
15:33:23 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: OK, so we will not rush to republish as-is. Let's give a couple of weeks to review again.
Arnaud Le Hors: OK, so we will not rush to republish as-is. Let's give a couple of weeks to review again. ←
15:33:46 <CodyBurleson> Topic: Workshop / Meeting
15:34:16 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: There has been some email on the list with the Working Group Annotation people.
Arnaud Le Hors: There has been some email on the list with the Working Group Annotation people. ←
15:35:35 <CodyBurleson> ... some say we're too late. Some say, let's do it. Some say, let's just not call it a workshop. There are some costs associated; who will cover? So...
... some say we're too late. Some say, let's do it. Some say, let's just not call it a workshop. There are some costs associated; who will cover? So... ←
15:36:10 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: We require somebody to tell us what is the cost and after that, figure out if we can go with that. So that's what we are waiting on now.
Ashok Malhotra: We require somebody to tell us what is the cost and after that, figure out if we can go with that. So that's what we are waiting on now. ←
15:36:33 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: The longer it takes to get these questions answered, the worse it gets from an announcement point of view.
Arnaud Le Hors: The longer it takes to get these questions answered, the worse it gets from an announcement point of view. ←
15:36:43 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud, Can you help us with this issue, Rob?
Ashok, Can you help us with this issue, Rob? ←
15:36:55 <CodyBurleson> s/Arnaud/Ashok
15:37:27 <ericP> SteveS, does https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Errata look good?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: SteveS, does https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Errata look good? ←
15:37:32 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: I think people can buy their own lunch.
Sandro Hawke: I think people can buy their own lunch. ←
15:37:51 <SteveS> ericP, it looks *good* for a wiki page
Steve Speicher: ericP, it looks *good* for a wiki page ←
15:38:00 <ericP> nice!
Eric Prud'hommeaux: nice! ←
15:38:03 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: Well maybe you can get me close for both with/without lunch?
Sandro Hawke: Well maybe you can get me close for both with/without lunch? ←
15:38:23 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Maybe we should have a wiki page asking whether people are planning to attend or not.
Arnaud Le Hors: Maybe we should have a wiki page asking whether people are planning to attend or not. ←
15:38:54 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: The bigger question is how many outsiders? That's the real goal. How do we advertise and generate the interest?
Sandro Hawke: The bigger question is how many outsiders? That's the real goal. How do we advertise and generate the interest? ←
15:39:45 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: Once we have agreement on that; I can create a wiki page with outline and such.
Ashok Malhotra: Once we have agreement on that; I can create a wiki page with outline and such. ←
15:40:03 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: I think you should start with that. Say, "This is what we're intendeing to do..."
Arnaud Le Hors: I think you should start with that. Say, "This is what we're intendeing to do..." ←
15:40:09 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: OK, I can do that.
Ashok Malhotra: OK, I can do that. ←
15:40:42 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: I could use some help for someone to add the location details, Where it's going to be and such.
Ashok Malhotra: I could use some help for someone to add the location details, Where it's going to be and such. ←
15:41:14 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Rob, I assume this is already noted by the Annotations working group. Can you find a pointer to that?
Arnaud Le Hors: Rob, I assume this is already noted by the Annotations working group. Can you find a pointer to that? ←
15:41:59 <CodyBurleson> Topic: HTTP Query verb
15:42:26 <azaroth> conference at the same place is: http://iannotate.org/2015/
Robert Sanderson: conference at the same place is: http://iannotate.org/2015/ ←
15:42:39 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: Idea. Some of us are working on a query verb proposal.
Ashok Malhotra: Idea. Some of us are working on a query verb proposal. ←
15:43:50 <CodyBurleson> ... It's worth thinking about that the original version I had written up included paging. It may be worth thinking about integrating Paging and HTTP Query verb and creating something new around that.
... It's worth thinking about that the original version I had written up included paging. It may be worth thinking about integrating Paging and HTTP Query verb and creating something new around that. ←
15:44:00 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Henry was also interested in that.
Arnaud Le Hors: Henry was also interested in that. ←
15:44:28 <azaroth> And we have a ... very incomplete ... F2F page: https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/Meetings/f2f/SF_Q1_2015 :(
Robert Sanderson: And we have a ... very incomplete ... F2F page: https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/Meetings/f2f/SF_Q1_2015 :( ←
15:44:53 <CodyBurleson> ... Jim Snell has been pulled in other projects; I would be cautious on what you can expect from him.
... Jim Snell has been pulled in other projects; I would be cautious on what you can expect from him. ←
15:45:05 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: He said last week that he could help.
Ashok Malhotra: He said last week that he could help. ←
15:45:32 <CodyBurleson> ... We should think about whether or not to include paging inquery.
... We should think about whether or not to include paging inquery. ←
15:45:43 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Would the Query verb make paging more interesting?
Arnaud Le Hors: Would the Query verb make paging more interesting? ←
15:45:56 <CodyBurleson> Ashok: Yes. And would Paging make Query verb more interesting.
Ashok Malhotra: Yes. And would Paging make Query verb more interesting. ←
15:46:38 <CodyBurleson> Sandro: The query verb is for efficiency and technical elegance. We can totally prototype without it and to me, that seems like the thing to do.
Sandro Hawke: The query verb is for efficiency and technical elegance. We can totally prototype without it and to me, that seems like the thing to do. ←
15:47:03 <deiu> Almost all JSON APIs use one form of query or another, these days. They all do it through POST/GET though.
Andrei Sambra: Almost all JSON APIs use one form of query or another, these days. They all do it through POST/GET though. ←
15:47:39 <Ashok> The POST is often repurposed for Query
Ashok Malhotra: Yes POST is often repurposed for Query ←
15:47:53 <Ashok> s/The/Yes/
15:48:16 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: POST is the wildcard verb in HTTP land that everything else doesn't fit into. It is used both to update and to retrieve. The rationalization for QUERY verb is to make it very explicit that it is JUST for retrieval and not modification of data.
Arnaud Le Hors: POST is the wildcard verb in HTTP land that everything else doesn't fit into. It is used both to update and to retrieve. The rationalization for QUERY verb is to make it very explicit that it is JUST for retrieval and not modification of data. ←
15:48:37 <CodyBurleson> ... If I cared to push this further, I would tsart by talking to Mark Nottingham.
... If I cared to push this further, I would tsart by talking to Mark Nottingham. ←
15:49:00 <ericP> http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/errata and http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-ldp-20150226/errata redirect to https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Errata which has the erratum for "Superfluous normative reference"
Eric Prud'hommeaux: http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/errata and http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-ldp-20150226/errata redirect to https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Errata which has the erratum for "Superfluous normative reference" ←
15:49:27 <deiu> +1 to ignore :)
Andrei Sambra: +1 to ignore :) ←
15:49:57 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: I'm not very motivated to try to push this uphill.
Arnaud Le Hors: I'm not very motivated to try to push this uphill. ←
15:51:05 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: OK, thanks for the reminder that this is going on Ashok.
Arnaud Le Hors: OK, thanks for the reminder that this is going on Ashok. ←
15:51:38 <CodyBurleson> ericP: I've done the wiki page and setup the redirect already (on the errata). I made the wiki and setup redirects from the dated and non-0dated errata links.
Eric Prud'hommeaux: I've done the wiki page and setup the redirect already (on the errata). I made the wiki and setup redirects from the dated and non-0dated errata links. ←
15:51:52 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: You can be very efficient at times. Well done.
Arnaud Le Hors: You can be very efficient at times. Well done. ←
15:51:52 <deiu> ericP: link?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: link? [ Scribe Assist by Andrei Sambra ] ←
15:52:36 <Zakim> -SteveS
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveS ←
15:52:38 <Zakim> -Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ashok_Malhotra ←
15:52:41 <Zakim> -nmihindu
Zakim IRC Bot: -nmihindu ←
15:52:42 <Zakim> -azaroth
Zakim IRC Bot: -azaroth ←
15:52:42 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
15:52:43 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
15:52:44 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
15:52:46 <Zakim> -deiu
Zakim IRC Bot: -deiu ←
15:52:47 <Zakim> -Roger
Zakim IRC Bot: -Roger ←
15:52:48 <Zakim> -ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericP ←
15:52:50 <CodyBurleson> Arnaud: Thank you guys. Ashok, get on that meeting thing. Meeting adjourned.
Arnaud Le Hors: Thank you guys. Ashok, get on that meeting thing. Meeting adjourned. ←
15:52:56 <Zakim> -CodyBurleson
Zakim IRC Bot: -CodyBurleson ←
16:35:01 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, pchampin, in SW_LDP()10:00AM
(No events recorded for 42 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, pchampin, in SW_LDP()10:00AM ←
16:35:02 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended ←
16:35:02 <Zakim> Attendees were Arnaud, CodyBurleson, MiguelAraCo, azaroth, deiu, pchampin, Ashok_Malhotra, ericP, SteveS, Roger, Sandro, TallTed, nmihindu
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were Arnaud, CodyBurleson, MiguelAraCo, azaroth, deiu, pchampin, Ashok_Malhotra, ericP, SteveS, Roger, Sandro, TallTed, nmihindu ←
<Zakim> Present: Arnaud, CodyBurleson, MiguelAraCo, azaroth, deiu, pchampin, Ashok_Malhotra, ericP, SteveS, Roger, Sandro, TallTed, nmihindu
Formatted by CommonScribe