14:59:14 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/02/09-ldp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/02/09-ldp-irc ←
14:59:16 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
14:59:18 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be LDP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be LDP ←
14:59:18 <Zakim> ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started ←
14:59:19 <trackbot> Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference
14:59:19 <trackbot> Date: 09 February 2015
14:59:25 <Zakim> +azaroth
Zakim IRC Bot: +azaroth ←
14:59:59 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
15:00:04 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:00:12 <Zakim> +Steve_Speicher
Zakim IRC Bot: +Steve_Speicher ←
15:00:21 <Ashok> zakim, [ is me
Ashok Malhotra: zakim, [ is me ←
15:00:21 <Zakim> +Ashok; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ashok; got it ←
15:00:21 <SteveS> zakim, Steve_Speicher is me
Steve Speicher: zakim, Steve_Speicher is me ←
15:00:24 <Zakim> +SteveS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveS; got it ←
15:00:27 <Zakim> +deiu
Zakim IRC Bot: +deiu ←
15:01:01 <deiu> scribenick: deiu
(Scribe set to Andrei Sambra)
<deiu> chair: Arnaud
<deiu> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2015.02.09
15:03:21 <azaroth> zakim, who is here?
Robert Sanderson: zakim, who is here? ←
15:03:21 <Zakim> On the phone I see azaroth, Arnaud, Ashok, SteveS, deiu
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see azaroth, Arnaud, Ashok, SteveS, deiu ←
15:03:23 <Zakim> On IRC I see cburleson, TallTed, Zakim, RRSAgent, azaroth, Ashok, bblfish__, MiguelAraCo, nmihindu, deiu, betehess, SteveS, jmvanel, Arnaud, tommorris_, sandro, Yves, ericP,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see cburleson, TallTed, Zakim, RRSAgent, azaroth, Ashok, bblfish__, MiguelAraCo, nmihindu, deiu, betehess, SteveS, jmvanel, Arnaud, tommorris_, sandro, Yves, ericP, ←
15:03:23 <Zakim> ... trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: ... trackbot ←
15:03:52 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:04:00 <cburleson> Zakim, IPcaller is me.
Cody Burleson: Zakim, IPcaller is me. ←
15:04:00 <Zakim> +cburleson; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cburleson; got it ←
15:04:10 <SteveS> Zakim, what is Arnaud?
Steve Speicher: Zakim, what is Arnaud? ←
15:04:10 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, SteveS.
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand your question, SteveS. ←
15:04:37 <cburleson> Zakim, MiguelAraCo is with me.
Cody Burleson: Zakim, MiguelAraCo is with me. ←
15:04:37 <Zakim> +MiguelAraCo; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MiguelAraCo; got it ←
15:05:09 <Zakim> + +1.617.838.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.617.838.aaaa ←
15:05:14 <TallTed> Zakim, aaaa is me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, aaaa is me ←
15:05:14 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
15:05:16 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:05:16 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:06:45 <bblfish__> hi
Henry Story: hi ←
15:07:07 <bblfish__> hi I am in train, internet is up and down
Henry Story: hi I am in train, internet is up and down ←
15:07:16 <deiu> Topic: Admin
15:07:22 <Arnaud> Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 26 January teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-01-26
Arnaud Le Hors: Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 26 January teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-01-26 ←
15:07:47 <Arnaud> Resolvedl: Approve the minutes of the 26 January teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-01-26
RESOLVED: Approve the minutes of the 26 January teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-01-26 ←
15:07:56 <Arnaud> s/Resolvedl/Resolved/
15:08:08 <deiu> Arnaud: we’ll be meeting again next week
Arnaud Le Hors: we’ll be meeting again next week ←
15:08:24 <deiu> … or wait, we can’t meet next week (I’m flying out)
… or wait, we can’t meet next week (I’m flying out) ←
15:08:33 <bblfish__> what is the agenda?
Henry Story: what is the agenda? ←
15:08:39 <deiu> …how about we meet in 2 weeks
…how about we meet in 2 weeks ←
15:09:13 <deiu> …does anyone else want to hold (chair) the meeting?
…does anyone else want to hold (chair) the meeting? ←
15:09:23 <SteveS> Feb 16th is a US national holiday but I’ll be at work
Steve Speicher: Feb 16th is a US national holiday but I’ll be at work ←
15:09:44 <deiu> Arnaud: that would be Feb 23th (skipping next week)
Arnaud Le Hors: that would be Feb 23th (skipping next week) ←
15:09:55 <deiu> …any problems with that?
…any problems with that? ←
15:10:19 <deiu> Topic: Tracking of actions & issues
15:10:30 <deiu> Arnaud: there are several actions opened
Arnaud Le Hors: there are several actions opened ←
15:10:50 <deiu> q+ about Action-154
q+ about ACTION-154 ←
15:11:02 <deiu> errr
errr ←
15:11:07 <Arnaud> ack deiu
Arnaud Le Hors: ack deiu ←
15:11:15 <Arnaud> queue=
Arnaud Le Hors: queue= ←
15:11:57 <deiu> deiu: we have taken care of Action-154
Andrei Sambra: we have taken care of ACTION-154 ←
15:12:08 <deiu> Arnaud: the link betehess sent us confuses me
Arnaud Le Hors: the link betehess sent us confuses me ←
15:12:29 <Arnaud> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html#conformance
Arnaud Le Hors: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html#conformance ←
15:12:37 <deiu> Arnaud: Ok, I got it
Arnaud Le Hors: Ok, I got it ←
15:12:41 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
15:12:44 <deiu> …we can close the action
…we can close the action ←
<deiu> Resolved: Close Action-154
RESOLVED: Close ACTION-154 ←
<deiu> topic: LDP Spec
15:13:20 <deiu> Arnaud: what is the status of the LDP spec, sandro?
Arnaud Le Hors: what is the status of the LDP spec, sandro? ←
15:13:36 <deiu> sandro: I don’t know anything, I just know that Ralph has been out a lot
Sandro Hawke: I don’t know anything, I just know that Ralph has been out a lot ←
15:14:01 <deiu> Arnaud: it would be nice to see the spec become a REC
Arnaud Le Hors: it would be nice to see the spec become a REC ←
15:14:14 <deiu> sandro: so we finished PR and nobody did the final bit?
Sandro Hawke: so we finished PR and nobody did the final bit? ←
15:14:19 <deiu> Arnaud: that’s right
Arnaud Le Hors: that’s right ←
15:14:39 <deiu> sandro: the meeting where we were supposed to discuss it has been canceled due to weather
Sandro Hawke: the meeting where we were supposed to discuss it has been canceled due to weather ←
15:15:00 <deiu> Arnaud: I’ll nudge ericP a bit
Arnaud Le Hors: I’ll nudge ericP a bit ←
15:15:05 <deiu> Topic: Paging
15:15:11 <deiu> Arnaud: any progress to report?
Arnaud Le Hors: any progress to report? ←
15:15:58 <deiu> SteveS: I have reached out to some folkes to see how they feel about using paging and whether they have done some testing
Steve Speicher: I have reached out to some folkes to see how they feel about using paging and whether they have done some testing ←
15:16:21 <deiu> Arnaud: is there a way we can identify which areas need to be tested?
Arnaud Le Hors: is there a way we can identify which areas need to be tested? ←
15:16:58 <Arnaud> http://w3c.github.io/ldp-testsuite/manifest/paging/
Arnaud Le Hors: http://w3c.github.io/ldp-testsuite/manifest/paging/ ←
15:17:07 <deiu> SteveS: the methods are there, we just need to assign people to implement them
Steve Speicher: the methods are there, we just need to assign people to implement them ←
15:17:21 <deiu> Arnaud: is anybody interested in working on this (other than SteveS)?
Arnaud Le Hors: is anybody interested in working on this (other than SteveS)? ←
15:17:55 <deiu> …Henry, you said you were interested?
…Henry, you said you were interested? ←
15:18:16 <deiu> …it seems we have clearly lost momentum re. paging
…it seems we have clearly lost momentum re. paging ←
15:18:41 <deiu> SteveS: I’m not going to be at the meeting in 2 weeks but I can send an email once I hear back from this product team
Steve Speicher: I’m not going to be at the meeting in 2 weeks but I can send an email once I hear back from this product team ←
15:19:05 <deiu> …I can also see where we stand with the person available to me
…I can also see where we stand with the person available to me ←
15:19:39 <deiu> Arnaud: Ok, that’s about it for paging. If we feel that we’ll never make it through CR, then we just need to accept that fact and turn the spec into a WG note
Arnaud Le Hors: Ok, that’s about it for paging. If we feel that we’ll never make it through CR, then we just need to accept that fact and turn the spec into a WG note ←
15:20:23 <deiu> …we don’t have to make the decision quickly, but we’ll have to make that decision by the time of our expiration date
…we don’t have to make the decision quickly, but we’ll have to make that decision by the time of our expiration date ←
15:20:54 <deiu> sandro: can we go back a bit to the LDP spec? Did we handle those two comments we received?
Sandro Hawke: can we go back a bit to the LDP spec? Did we handle those two comments we received? ←
15:21:07 <deiu> Arnaud: we haven’t checked with the people who made the comments
Arnaud Le Hors: we haven’t checked with the people who made the comments ←
15:21:27 <deiu> Topic: LD Patch
15:21:50 <deiu> Arnaud: I put the responses in the agenda, for the questions we received when I submitted the TR
Arnaud Le Hors: I put the responses in the agenda, for the questions we received when I submitted the TR ←
15:22:18 <deiu> …as I explained last week, there was a bit of confusion re. the new process (removal of LC, etc)
…as I explained last week, there was a bit of confusion re. the new process (removal of LC, etc) ←
15:22:44 <deiu> …we basically need to integrate all the steps from LC
…we basically need to integrate all the steps from LC ←
15:23:10 <deiu> …the one part that remained open was the Conformance section
…the one part that remained open was the Conformance section ←
15:23:27 <deiu> …betehess put together that section so I would like people to take a look at it
…betehess put together that section so I would like people to take a look at it ←
15:23:44 <Arnaud> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html#conformance
Arnaud Le Hors: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html#conformance ←
15:24:11 <deiu> Arnaud: please take a moment to read it
Arnaud Le Hors: please take a moment to read it ←
15:24:29 <deiu> q+
q+ ←
15:25:00 <Arnaud> ack deu
Arnaud Le Hors: ack deu ←
15:25:07 <Arnaud> ack deiu
Arnaud Le Hors: ack deiu ←
15:25:40 <sandro> q+ to ask about "LD Patch Server" instead of "LD Patch engine"
Sandro Hawke: q+ to ask about "LD Patch Server" instead of "LD Patch engine" ←
15:25:46 <Arnaud> ack sandro
Arnaud Le Hors: ack sandro ←
15:25:46 <Zakim> sandro, you wanted to ask about "LD Patch Server" instead of "LD Patch engine"
Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, you wanted to ask about "LD Patch Server" instead of "LD Patch engine" ←
15:26:59 <azaroth> +1 to server
Robert Sanderson: +1 to server ←
15:27:16 <TallTed> +1 sandro's comment. "engine" seems more like "processor"
Ted Thibodeau: +1 sandro's comment. "engine" seems more like "processor" ←
15:27:21 <sandro> "LD Patch-Handling Server"
Sandro Hawke: "LD Patch-Handling Server" ←
15:28:21 <deiu> Arnaud: anyone objects to changing “LD Patch engine” to “LD Patch server”
Arnaud Le Hors: anyone objects to changing “LD Patch engine” to “LD Patch server” ←
15:28:27 <azaroth> q+ re "reading"
Robert Sanderson: q+ re "reading" ←
15:28:29 <TallTed> "A conforming LD Patch Server is an LDP Server which is capable of handling an LD Patch document..."
Ted Thibodeau: "A conforming LD Patch Server is an LDP Server which is capable of handling an LD Patch document..." ←
15:28:35 <Arnaud> ack azaroth
Arnaud Le Hors: ack azaroth ←
15:28:35 <Zakim> azaroth, you wanted to discuss "reading"
Zakim IRC Bot: azaroth, you wanted to discuss "reading" ←
15:29:13 <deiu> azaroth: the system can also be used locally to open a file handler
Robert Sanderson: the system can also be used locally to open a file handler ←
15:29:27 <deiu> …reading the document and doing something with the data
…reading the document and doing something with the data ←
15:30:56 <azaroth> +1 to parsing
Robert Sanderson: +1 to parsing ←
15:30:58 <deiu> Arnaud: everyone seems to be happy with the proposal
Arnaud Le Hors: everyone seems to be happy with the proposal ←
15:31:38 <deiu> Arnaud: “As well as sections…” I don’t really like that
Arnaud Le Hors: “As well as sections…” I don’t really like that ←
15:31:55 <deiu> sandro: it’s ugly but it’s standard boilerplate
Sandro Hawke: it’s ugly but it’s standard boilerplate ←
15:32:12 <deiu> Arnaud: maybe start with “Sections…”?
Arnaud Le Hors: maybe start with “Sections…”? ←
15:32:39 <TallTed> "Sections marked as non-normative, as well as all authoring ..." *much* better
Ted Thibodeau: "Sections marked as non-normative, as well as all authoring ..." *much* better ←
15:33:06 <Arnaud> PROPOSED: accept conformance section with "server" instead of "engine" and "parsing" instead of "reading"
PROPOSED: accept conformance section with "server" instead of "engine" and "parsing" instead of "reading" ←
15:33:13 <deiu> Arnaud: hearing no objections, I propose we access the conformance sections
Arnaud Le Hors: hearing no objections, I propose we accept the conformance section ←
15:33:18 <sandro> +1
Sandro Hawke: +1 ←
15:33:19 <deiu> s/sections/section
15:33:21 <deiu> +!
+! ←
15:33:24 <deiu> +1
+1 ←
15:33:24 <TallTed> +1
Ted Thibodeau: +1 ←
15:33:27 <SteveS> +1
Steve Speicher: +1 ←
15:33:30 <cburleson> +1
Cody Burleson: +1 ←
15:33:35 <azaroth> +1
Robert Sanderson: +1 ←
15:33:50 <Arnaud> RESOLVED: Accept conformance section with "server" instead of "engine" and "parsing" instead of "reading"
RESOLVED: Accept conformance section with "server" instead of "engine" and "parsing" instead of "reading" ←
15:33:56 <deiu> s/access/accept
15:34:21 <deiu> Arnaud: I will send an email to plh as soon as the spec is edited
Arnaud Le Hors: I will send an email to plh as soon as the spec is edited ←
15:34:46 <deiu> …that should allow us to move forward with the publication process
…that should allow us to move forward with the publication process ←
15:34:58 <deiu> Topic: Workshop
15:35:20 <deiu> Arnaud: time is going by and there are some hard headlines in the W3C process (e.g. signal meetings 8 weeks ahead of time)
Arnaud Le Hors: time is going by and there are some hard deadlines in the W3C process (e.g. signal meetings 8 weeks ahead of time) ←
15:35:32 <azaroth> s/headlines/deadlines/
15:35:35 <deiu> …Rob has pointed out that the annotation WG has a meeting in April in SF
…Rob has pointed out that the annotation WG has a meeting in April in SF ←
15:35:53 <SteveS> Maybe we could code up the paging testsuite at a workshop
Steve Speicher: Maybe we could code up the paging testsuite at a workshop ←
15:35:58 <deiu> Arnaud: unless anyone has any news to report, I don’t think it’s going to happen
Arnaud Le Hors: unless anyone has any news to report, I don’t think it’s going to happen ←
15:36:20 <deiu> Ashok: I have emailed Arnaud that Oracle is interested and will at least have a couple of people there
Ashok Malhotra: I have emailed Arnaud that Oracle is interested and will at least have a couple of people there ←
15:36:33 <deiu> Arnaud: let’s have a straw poll
Arnaud Le Hors: let’s have a straw poll ←
15:37:00 <cburleson> +1
Cody Burleson: +1 ←
15:37:01 <Arnaud> STAWPOLL: would you expect to attend or have someone from your org attend a workshop in SF in April if we had one?
STRAWPOLL: would you expect to attend or have someone from your org attend a workshop in SF in April if we had one? ←
15:37:08 <sandro> +1
Sandro Hawke: +1 ←
15:37:10 <cburleson> +1
Cody Burleson: +1 ←
15:37:14 <azaroth> +1
Robert Sanderson: +1 ←
15:37:15 <Ashok> +1
Ashok Malhotra: +1 ←
15:37:21 <MiguelAraCo> +1
Miguel Aragón: +1 ←
15:37:24 <deiu> +1 (if my boss allows me ;) )
+1 (if my boss allows me ;) ) ←
15:37:26 <azaroth> Or +3 if we're counting people
Robert Sanderson: Or +3 if we're counting people ←
15:37:34 <Arnaud> s/STAWPOLL/STRAWPOLL/
15:37:36 <SteveS> +0.5 depends on approval and topics
Steve Speicher: +0.5 depends on approval and topics ←
15:38:02 <TallTed> +1 likely by remote
Ted Thibodeau: +1 likely by remote ←
15:38:13 <SteveS> would be good if we had a hackday/afternoon
Steve Speicher: would be good if we had a hackday/afternoon ←
15:38:43 <deiu> Arnaud: so it seems there *is* interest in doing it
Arnaud Le Hors: so it seems there *is* interest in doing it ←
15:39:02 <deiu> …I need to check the timing and what it would take to make it happen
…I need to check the timing and what it would take to make it happen ←
15:39:05 <Zakim> +??P5
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P5 ←
15:39:14 <nmihindu> Zakim, ??P5 is me
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, ??P5 is me ←
15:39:14 <Zakim> +nmihindu; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +nmihindu; got it ←
15:39:19 <nmihindu> Zakim, mute me
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, mute me ←
15:39:19 <Zakim> nmihindu should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: nmihindu should now be muted ←
15:39:44 <deiu> Arnaud: I’ll talk to ericP about it
Arnaud Le Hors: I’ll talk to ericP about it ←
15:40:13 <deiu> …I cannot take a leadership role in this either, maybe someone else in the group would be interested in chairing this event?
…I cannot take a leadership role in this either, maybe someone else in the group would be interested in chairing this event? ←
15:40:21 <deiu> sandro: I’m afraid I can’t do it either
Sandro Hawke: I’m afraid I can’t do it either ←
15:40:32 <deiu> Ashok: maybe I could do it
Ashok Malhotra: maybe I could do it ←
15:41:08 <deiu> Ashok: it would be better if I had a co-chair
Ashok Malhotra: it would be better if I had a co-chair ←
15:41:46 <deiu> Arnaud: I’ll have a call with ericP to see how we can make it happen
Arnaud Le Hors: I’ll have a call with ericP to see how we can make it happen ←
15:41:54 <deiu> Topic: Social web WG
15:42:14 <deiu> Arnaud: several people in this group are involved in the social web WG
Arnaud Le Hors: several people in this group are involved in the social web WG ←
15:42:40 <deiu> …some people have looked at how LDP can help them
…some people have looked at how LDP can help them ←
15:43:16 <deiu> …I agree with Henry about leveraging LDP
…I agree with Henry about leveraging LDP ←
15:43:29 <deiu> …that would help LDP a lot
…that would help LDP a lot ←
15:44:03 <deiu> …if anybody is interested, please help by joining the group or participating in some form
…if anybody is interested, please help by joining the group or participating in some form ←
15:44:06 <azaroth> q+ to note anno ED
Robert Sanderson: q+ to note anno ED ←
15:44:18 <deiu> sandro: I started the wiki page that Henry mentioned in his email
Sandro Hawke: I started the wiki page that Henry mentioned in his email ←
15:44:37 <deiu> …I don’t know how to move foward with this, because there’s a gap between LDP and the social Web group
…I don’t know how to move foward with this, because there’s a gap between LDP and the social Web group ←
15:44:51 <Zakim> +ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: +ericP ←
15:45:05 <deiu> …CIMBA could help close the gap but there are still a lot of bits missing
…CIMBA could help close the gap but there are still a lot of bits missing ←
15:45:44 <deiu> …if you think using LDP to exchange social data, then please help
…if you think using LDP to exchange social data, then please help ←
15:45:48 <Arnaud> ack azaroth
Arnaud Le Hors: ack azaroth ←
15:45:48 <Zakim> azaroth, you wanted to note anno ED
Zakim IRC Bot: azaroth, you wanted to note anno ED ←
15:45:49 <azaroth> http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/
Robert Sanderson: http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/ ←
15:46:18 <deiu> azaroth: just wanted to note that in the annotation WG we have a possible way of using LDP for annotations
Robert Sanderson: just wanted to note that in the annotation WG we have a possible way of using LDP for annotations ←
15:46:27 <deiu> …we’re looking at how to make it work
…we’re looking at how to make it work ←
15:47:04 <deiu> Arnaud: you said there’s a proposal being put together, but what’s your sentiment about, is it going to happen?
Arnaud Le Hors: you said there’s a proposal being put together, but what’s your sentiment about, is it going to happen? ←
15:47:50 <Zakim> +bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: +bblfish ←
15:47:54 <deiu> azaroth: we had some comments about containers storing a lot of annotations
Robert Sanderson: we had some comments about containers storing a lot of annotations ←
15:48:36 <deiu> azaroth: there was also some discussion around using Turtle and JSONLD and conformance
Robert Sanderson: there was also some discussion around using Turtle and JSONLD and conformance ←
15:49:29 <deiu> azaroth: there’s also the issue of RDF people vs non-RDF people
Robert Sanderson: there’s also the issue of RDF people vs non-RDF people ←
15:50:03 <SteveS> Actually JSON-LD is almost the same level as Turtle in LDP, it is a MUST when requested
Steve Speicher: Actually JSON-LD is almost the same level as Turtle in LDP, it is a MUST when requested ←
15:50:33 <SteveS> Should do turtle when header is absent
Steve Speicher: Should do turtle when header is absent ←
15:50:34 <deiu> Arnaud: yes, there’s usually an adverse reaction to RDF
Arnaud Le Hors: yes, there’s usually an adverse reaction to RDF ←
15:50:51 <deiu> …Henry, did you catch the discussion?
…Henry, did you catch the discussion? ←
15:50:59 <deiu> bblfish_: I followed a little bit
Henry Story: I followed a little bit ←
15:51:11 <deiu> …the LDP story is going for the API
…the LDP story is going for the API ←
15:51:34 <deiu> …they agree with non-reasoning RDF (e.g. JSON-LD)
…they agree with non-reasoning RDF (e.g. JSON-LD) ←
15:52:10 <azaroth> Ooops, true. I guess it's 4.3.2.2 that the Anno WG would want to change to recommend the JSON-LD serialization over turtle as the default
Robert Sanderson: Ooops, true. I guess it's 4.3.2.2 that the Anno WG would want to change to recommend the JSON-LD serialization over turtle as the default ←
15:52:23 <deiu> …I think there is going to be a lot of discussion, but the people working on LDP also need to get together and show some interop
…I think there is going to be a lot of discussion, but the people working on LDP also need to get together and show some interop ←
15:52:50 <deiu> …maybe we can get a group of LDP people with implementation to see how we can get simple things working together
…maybe we can get a group of LDP people with implementation to see how we can get simple things working together ←
15:53:22 <deiu> Arnaud: the SW WG is really keen on that
Arnaud Le Hors: the SW WG is really keen on that ←
15:53:26 <SteveS> azaroth, that is fine…think why we relaxed to should. I’m not sure how it works to say you create a profile of LDP to strikeout the turtle MUST
Steve Speicher: azaroth, that is fine…think why we relaxed to should. I’m not sure how it works to say you create a profile of LDP to strikeout the turtle MUST ←
15:53:40 <deiu> …they want the WG to be implementation-driven, so Henry is right
…they want the WG to be implementation-driven, so Henry is right ←
15:54:01 <deiu> Arnaud: they already made the leap to using JSON-LD
Arnaud Le Hors: they already made the leap to using JSON-LD ←
15:54:21 <deiu> …they might be closer to using LDP than the anno WG
…they might be closer to using LDP than the anno WG ←
15:54:33 <deiu> …if there are people interested, they should reach out to Henry
…if there are people interested, they should reach out to Henry ←
15:55:03 <deiu> …I think we’re running out of time, so maybe we can leave it like this for now
…I think we’re running out of time, so maybe we can leave it like this for now ←
15:55:19 <deiu> ericP: any chance you can report on some progress for the open Actions?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: any chance you can report on some progress for the open Actions? ←
15:55:35 <deiu> ericP: there was one abour LDP going to REC, right?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: there was one abour LDP going to REC, right? ←
15:56:03 <deiu> …my guess is that it will take a week before we have a meeting about it, so we might just go ahead and submit a TR
…my guess is that it will take a week before we have a meeting about it, so we might just go ahead and submit a TR ←
15:56:15 <deiu> sandro: we won’t need a meeting, there’s no controverse
Sandro Hawke: we won’t need a meeting, there’s no controverse ←
15:56:42 <deiu> ericP: ok, so then we should respond to the commented and seek consent (the director will want to know we did this)
Eric Prud'hommeaux: ok, so then we should respond to the commented and seek consent (the director will want to know we did this) ←
15:56:52 <deiu> Arnaud: who is going to do this?
Arnaud Le Hors: who is going to do this? ←
15:57:15 <deiu> SteveS: I responded to ericP’s comment on the list, so I assumed you were going to respond to them
Steve Speicher: I responded to ericP’s comment on the list, so I assumed you were going to respond to them ←
15:57:30 <deiu> ericP: why do I respond and CC you? do you have the answers?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: why do I respond and CC you? do you have the answers? ←
15:57:34 <deiu> Arnaud: it’s in the list
Arnaud Le Hors: it’s in the list ←
15:57:47 <deiu> …maybe I suggest that you don’t leave it open ended?
…maybe I suggest that you don’t leave it open ended? ←
15:58:06 <deiu> ericP: yes, respond in a week, otherwise we take it that you agree
Eric Prud'hommeaux: yes, respond in a week, otherwise we take it that you agree ←
15:58:16 <Zakim> -bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: -bblfish ←
15:58:17 <deiu> Arnaud: there was also an Action about LD Patch TR
Arnaud Le Hors: there was also an Action about LD Patch TR ←
15:58:23 <azaroth> SteveS: Agreed, striking out MUST isn't a reasonable thing for a profile to do
Steve Speicher: Agreed, striking out MUST isn't a reasonable thing for a profile to do [ Scribe Assist by Robert Sanderson ] ←
15:58:37 <deiu> …I have all the info to respond to plh, but please follow up on getting the call schedule
…I have all the info to respond to plh, but please follow up on getting the call schedule ←
15:58:43 <sandro> eric, how about the first email just say, "can you take a quick look now and let us know"... that way we might get immediate responses, rather than waiting for a week
Sandro Hawke: eric, how about the first email just say, "can you take a quick look now and let us know"... that way we might get immediate responses, rather than waiting for a week ←
15:58:56 <deiu> Arnaud: ok, that should take care of everything
Arnaud Le Hors: ok, that should take care of everything ←
15:59:03 <deiu> …I think we can close the call
…I think we can close the call ←
15:59:11 <azaroth> Thanks all :)
Robert Sanderson: Thanks all :) ←
15:59:25 <Zakim> -cburleson
Zakim IRC Bot: -cburleson ←
15:59:29 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
15:59:30 <Zakim> -azaroth
Zakim IRC Bot: -azaroth ←
15:59:31 <Zakim> -SteveS
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveS ←
15:59:33 <deiu> [meeting adjourned]
[meeting adjourned] ←
15:59:43 <Zakim> -Ashok
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ashok ←
15:59:44 <Zakim> -nmihindu
Zakim IRC Bot: -nmihindu ←
16:00:14 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
16:00:15 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
16:00:17 <Zakim> -deiu
Zakim IRC Bot: -deiu ←
16:00:21 <Zakim> -ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericP ←
16:00:22 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended ←
16:00:22 <Zakim> Attendees were azaroth, Arnaud, Ashok, SteveS, deiu, cburleson, MiguelAraCo, +1.617.838.aaaa, TallTed, Sandro, nmihindu, ericP, bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were azaroth, Arnaud, Ashok, SteveS, deiu, cburleson, MiguelAraCo, +1.617.838.aaaa, TallTed, Sandro, nmihindu, ericP, bblfish ←
<deiu> Present: azaroth, Arnaud, Ashok, SteveS, deiu, cburleson, MiguelAraCo, TallTed, Sandro, nmihindu, ericP, bblfish
18:20:19 <Arnaud> rrsagent, draft minutes
(No events recorded for 139 minutes)
Arnaud Le Hors: rrsagent, draft minutes ←
18:20:19 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/02/09-ldp-minutes.html Arnaud
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/02/09-ldp-minutes.html Arnaud ←
Formatted by CommonScribe