14:59:54 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-ldp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-ldp-irc ←
14:59:56 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
14:59:58 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be LDP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be LDP ←
14:59:58 <Zakim> ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started ←
14:59:59 <trackbot> Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference
14:59:59 <trackbot> Date: 03 November 2014
15:00:39 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
15:00:41 <Zakim> +[IBM]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IBM] ←
15:00:53 <SteveS> zakim, [IBM] is me
Steve Speicher: zakim, [IBM] is me ←
15:00:53 <Zakim> +SteveS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveS; got it ←
15:01:22 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:01:29 <codyburleson> zakim, IPcaller is me.
Cody Burleson: zakim, IPcaller is me. ←
15:01:29 <Zakim> +codyburleson; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +codyburleson; got it ←
15:01:57 <Arnaud> zakim, who's on the phone?
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
15:01:57 <Zakim> On the phone I see azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson ←
15:02:01 <Zakim> +sergio
Zakim IRC Bot: +sergio ←
15:02:18 <MiguelAraCo> Zakim, I'm with codyburleson
Miguel Aragón: Zakim, I'm with codyburleson ←
15:02:18 <Zakim> +MiguelAraCo; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MiguelAraCo; got it ←
15:02:20 <Zakim> +Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ashok_Malhotra ←
15:02:53 <Zakim> +JohnArwe
Zakim IRC Bot: +JohnArwe ←
15:05:04 <Zakim> +[OpenLink]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[OpenLink] ←
15:05:06 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
15:05:09 <codyburleson> scribe: codyburleson
(Scribe set to Cody Burleson)
<codyburleson> chair: Arnaud
<codyburleson> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.11.03
<codyburleson> topic: Admin
15:05:10 <TallTed> Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me ←
15:05:10 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
15:05:14 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:05:17 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:06:16 <codyburleson> Arnaud: Objections to minutes of the last meeting?
Arnaud Le Hors: Objections to minutes of the last meeting? ←
<codyburleson> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-10-20
http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-10-20 ←
15:06:27 <Zakim> +Roger
Zakim IRC Bot: +Roger ←
15:06:56 <codyburleson> resolved: Minutes of Oct 20th approved (hearing no objections).
RESOLVED: Minutes of Oct 20th approved (hearing no objections). ←
15:07:21 <codyburleson> Topic: Tracking of actions and issues
15:07:33 <codyburleson> Steves: It's been done
Steve Speicher: It's been done ←
15:07:42 <codyburleson> Arnaud: OK, we can close Action 148.
Arnaud Le Hors: OK, we can close ACTION-148. ←
15:07:57 <codyburleson> Topic: Status of the LDP Spec
15:09:21 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I have not managed to get the team to schedule call, so this is still pending. But at the same time, I want to be sure the spec is ready to publish. Are we ready?
Arnaud Le Hors: I have not managed to get the team to schedule call, so this is still pending. But at the same time, I want to be sure the spec is ready to publish. Are we ready? ←
15:10:09 <codyburleson> SteveS: Yes. Add a note in front of ours and reference the draft that's there and leave a copy of the definition of the header within our spec.
Steve Speicher: Yes. Add a note in front of ours and reference the draft that's there and leave a copy of the definition of the header within our spec. ←
15:10:20 <Zakim> +??P17
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←
15:10:41 <Zakim> +ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: +ericP ←
15:10:43 <nmihindu> Zakim, ??P17 is me
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, ??P17 is me ←
15:10:43 <Zakim> +nmihindu; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +nmihindu; got it ←
15:10:53 <nmihindu> Zakim, mute me
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, mute me ←
15:10:53 <Zakim> nmihindu should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: nmihindu should now be muted ←
15:11:12 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We've failed in pushing hard enough on getting this RFP through, so now we're waiting on this (IETF).
Arnaud Le Hors: We've failed in pushing hard enough on getting this RFP through, so now we're waiting on this (IETF). ←
15:11:37 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We're talking about Accept-Post
Arnaud Le Hors: We're talking about Accept-Post ←
15:12:16 <SteveS> Current state of spec: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#header-accept-post
Steve Speicher: Current state of spec: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#header-accept-post ←
15:12:17 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We have apparently not reported enough implementations (Eric was told); not enough evidence to grant the spec moving forward.
Arnaud Le Hors: We have apparently not reported enough implementations (Eric was told); not enough evidence to grant the spec moving forward. ←
15:12:28 <codyburleson> Sandro: We can put in our spec.
Sandro Hawke: We can put in our spec. ←
15:12:48 <codyburleson> Arnaud: That's what SteveS is saying; that we'll put the definition in our spec with a note.
Arnaud Le Hors: That's what SteveS is saying; that we'll put the definition in our spec with a note. ←
15:14:00 <codyburleson> Arnaud: The draft is close to ready. Eric, I sent an email a couple of weeks ago asking for the call to be scheduled; can you please put that atop your list? We need to get approval to move LDP and LDP Paging to CR.
Arnaud Le Hors: The draft is close to ready. Eric, I sent an email a couple of weeks ago asking for the call to be scheduled; can you please put that atop your list? We need to get approval to move LDP and LDP Paging to CR. ←
15:14:16 <codyburleson> SteveS: I put the target date to this Thursday, the 6th.
Steve Speicher: I put the target date to this Thursday, the 6th. ←
15:14:43 <codyburleson> Zakim, who is speaking?
Zakim, who is speaking? ←
15:14:55 <Zakim> codyburleson, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (39%), Sandro (65%)
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (39%), Sandro (65%) ←
15:14:59 <codyburleson> Zakim, who is talking?
Zakim, who is talking? ←
15:15:09 <Zakim> codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (15%), Sandro (10%), ericP (60%)
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (15%), Sandro (10%), ericP (60%) ←
15:15:52 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I'll do the transition requests, you schedule the call, Eric.
Arnaud Le Hors: I'll do the transition requests, you schedule the call, Eric. ←
15:16:02 <codyburleson> topic: Paging
15:16:35 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We've decided to move paging to CR, but we do not even have a shadow of a test report yet.
Arnaud Le Hors: We've decided to move paging to CR, but we do not even have a shadow of a test report yet. ←
15:17:24 <codyburleson> SteveS: Yes, we have a skeleton of a test suite; just not a lot of meat in it. And I haven't looked at it in much detail to be sure that it's right.
Steve Speicher: Yes, we have a skeleton of a test suite; just not a lot of meat in it. And I haven't looked at it in much detail to be sure that it's right. ←
15:18:10 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I see the draft still has the features at risk stuff in it.
Arnaud Le Hors: I see the draft still has the features at risk stuff in it. ←
15:18:27 <codyburleson> SteveS: Yes, there is a bit more work to be done on the draft of the Paging spec.
Steve Speicher: Yes, there is a bit more work to be done on the draft of the Paging spec. ←
15:18:36 <codyburleson> Arnaud: Do you know when that might get done?
Arnaud Le Hors: Do you know when that might get done? ←
15:18:46 <codyburleson> SteveS: I should be able to get to it this week, I hope.
Steve Speicher: I should be able to get to it this week, I hope. ←
15:19:16 <codyburleson> Arnaud: OK. I can still send the transition request just so that we do not get further delays on that.
Arnaud Le Hors: OK. I can still send the transition request just so that we do not get further delays on that. ←
15:21:17 <codyburleson> Arnaud: When I looked at the disposition of comments document, it looks a bit thin. It doesn't give a great idea of the comments that took place on the public mailing list. This is the second last call though, so it should be expected that there are fewer comments. But, we didn't get full acknowledgement from some of the commenters.
Arnaud Le Hors: When I looked at the disposition of comments document, it looks a bit thin. It doesn't give a great idea of the comments that took place on the public mailing list. This is the second last call though, so it should be expected that there are fewer comments. But, we didn't get full acknowledgement from some of the commenters. ←
15:21:21 <codyburleson> Topic: Patch Format
15:21:38 <codyburleson> Arnaud: Have we lost momentum here, or what?
Arnaud Le Hors: Have we lost momentum here, or what? ←
15:22:11 <codyburleson> Sandro: There's nobody to ask.(I think, as in - they haven't been on the calls)
Sandro Hawke: There's nobody to ask.(I think, as in - they haven't been on the calls) ←
15:22:39 <Arnaud> zakim, who's on the phone?
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
15:22:39 <Zakim> On the phone I see azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson, sergio, Ashok_Malhotra, JohnArwe, TallTed (muted), Roger, nmihindu (muted), ericP, Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson, sergio, Ashok_Malhotra, JohnArwe, TallTed (muted), Roger, nmihindu (muted), ericP, Sandro ←
15:22:41 <Zakim> codyburleson has MiguelAraCo
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson has MiguelAraCo ←
15:22:49 <codyburleson> Arnaud: OK, we'll skip that for now and maybe I'll ping them.
Arnaud Le Hors: OK, we'll skip that for now and maybe I'll ping them. ←
15:22:56 <codyburleson> Topic: Rechartering
15:23:02 <SteveS> pchampin, any update on patch?
Steve Speicher: pchampin, any update on patch? ←
15:23:26 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I put a draft together and received some comments; thank you. I already updated the draft with the comments I got.
Arnaud Le Hors: I put a draft together and received some comments; thank you. I already updated the draft with the comments I got. ←
15:24:00 <SteveS> betehess, update on patch?
Steve Speicher: betehess, update on patch? ←
15:24:16 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I did a very quick job of pulling from the wish-list when I put the draft together. I can't claim that this was the result of a very well-thought-out effort. So, I was a bit surprised that I didn't get much more feedback.
Arnaud Le Hors: I did a very quick job of pulling from the wish-list when I put the draft together. I can't claim that this was the result of a very well-thought-out effort. So, I was a bit surprised that I didn't get much more feedback. ←
15:24:51 <pchampin> oops, sorry; can't manage to join Zakim
Pierre-Antoine Champin: oops, sorry; can't manage to join Zakim ←
15:25:04 <codyburleson> Arnaud: There was one about Paging. I tried to change that: "How can a client specify the size of a page". I reworded that.
Arnaud Le Hors: There was one about Paging. I tried to change that: "How can a client specify the size of a page". I reworded that. ←
15:25:42 <Arnaud> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDPNext2015_Charter#scope
Arnaud Le Hors: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDPNext2015_Charter#scope ←
15:25:42 <pchampin> LD-patch: a little stuck right now, but we are working on enriching the language
Pierre-Antoine Champin: LD-patch: a little stuck right now, but we are working on enriching the language ←
15:25:48 <sergio> q+
Sergio Fernández: q+ ←
15:25:49 <codyburleson> Ashok: I'm actually happy with your wording there. I think it is very open-ended.
Ashok Malhotra: I'm actually happy with your wording there. I think it is very open-ended. ←
15:25:56 <pchampin> in order to allow multiple triples in a single Add/Remove statement
Pierre-Antoine Champin: in order to allow multiple triples in a single Add/Remove statement ←
15:26:21 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I did add the question that Steve brought up.
Arnaud Le Hors: I did add the question that Steve brought up. ←
15:27:39 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:27:39 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should no longer be muted ←
15:28:10 <codyburleson> SteveS: The scenario is - a mechanism by which to keep (not necessarily a replica) but an index (…?) We have a specification called Track Resource where the client can request info from a certain set and receive a baseline and then update a change log to keep that index current. So, that is something I thought may be interesting to look at.
Steve Speicher: The scenario is - a mechanism by which to keep (not necessarily a replica) but an index (…?) We have a specification called Track Resource where the client can request info from a certain set and receive a baseline and then update a change log to keep that index current. So, that is something I thought may be interesting to look at. ←
15:28:23 <sergio> q?
Sergio Fernández: q? ←
15:28:31 <codyburleson> (scribe had trouble interpreting - take that with a grain of salt)
(scribe had trouble interpreting - take that with a grain of salt) ←
15:28:39 <codyburleson> zakim, who is speaking?
zakim, who is speaking? ←
15:28:50 <Zakim> codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: SteveS (9%), TallTed (90%), ericP (4%)
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: SteveS (9%), TallTed (90%), ericP (4%) ←
15:29:54 <codyburleson> TallTed: If its really just an index of "all my resources and whether any of them have changed." This is either really, really simple or really, really complex.
Ted Thibodeau: If its really just an index of "all my resources and whether any of them have changed." This is either really, really simple or really, really complex. ←
15:30:11 <Ashok> q+
Ashok Malhotra: q+ ←
15:30:14 <codyburleson> SteveS: Are you saying it's solved with Pub Sub hubub or …?
Steve Speicher: Are you saying it's solved with Pub Sub hubub or …? ←
15:30:57 <Zakim> +bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: +bblfish ←
15:32:04 <codyburleson> Sandro: The technique I am using in vanilla servers is that you subscribe to a preset. Not a perfect solution, but it seems to work.
Sandro Hawke: The technique I am using in vanilla servers is that you subscribe to a preset. Not a perfect solution, but it seems to work. ←
15:32:12 <azaroth> q+
Robert Sanderson: q+ ←
15:32:23 <azaroth> q-
Robert Sanderson: q- ←
15:32:33 <azaroth> q+ to note ActivityStreams
Robert Sanderson: q+ to note ActivityStreams ←
15:32:44 <codyburleson> Arnaud: So the question is whether or not this is a topic of interest for the charter: if there is a way to keep track of resource changes without having to download the whole resource. Kind of the reverse of patch, I guess.
Arnaud Le Hors: So the question is whether or not this is a topic of interest for the charter: if there is a way to keep track of resource changes without having to download the whole resource. Kind of the reverse of patch, I guess. ←
15:33:12 <codyburleson> Sandro: I don't know if it is within scope of LDP, but I don't know how you could build a web app without such a thing.
Sandro Hawke: I don't know if it is within scope of LDP, but I don't know how you could build a web app without such a thing. ←
15:33:28 <Arnaud> ack Ashok
Arnaud Le Hors: ack Ashok ←
15:34:36 <codyburleson> Ashok: Use cases: 1) Tell me if the value of (…?) 2) I'm on the oRacle server and I'd like to go to the IBM server. So which are we speaking of? Or both?
Ashok Malhotra: Use cases: 1) Tell me if the value of (…?) 2) I'm on the oRacle server and I'd like to go to the IBM server. So which are we speaking of? Or both? ←
15:35:27 <codyburleson> Arnaud: I suspect maybe there is a better way to phrase this so that people will know what we are talking about exactly.
Arnaud Le Hors: I suspect maybe there is a better way to phrase this so that people will know what we are talking about exactly. ←
15:35:32 <codyburleson> zakim, who is speaking?
zakim, who is speaking? ←
15:35:44 <Zakim> codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: TallTed (69%)
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: TallTed (69%) ←
15:35:52 <codyburleson> zakim, who is speaking?
zakim, who is speaking? ←
15:36:03 <Zakim> codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: TallTed (55%)
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: TallTed (55%) ←
15:36:20 <Arnaud> ack azaroth
Arnaud Le Hors: ack azaroth ←
15:36:20 <Zakim> azaroth, you wanted to note ActivityStreams
Zakim IRC Bot: azaroth, you wanted to note ActivityStreams ←
15:36:25 <bblfish> +1 for working out the connection
Henry Story: +1 for working out the connection ←
15:36:53 <codyburleson> Sandro: Can you explain where you see the overlap? As far as I can tell, ActivityStreams is just a vocabulary, but doesn't soplve the protocol issue.
Sandro Hawke: Can you explain where you see the overlap? As far as I can tell, ActivityStreams is just a vocabulary, but doesn't soplve the protocol issue. ←
15:37:17 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
15:37:29 <codyburleson> zakim, who is talking?
zakim, who is talking? ←
15:37:40 <Zakim> codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (5%), TallTed (72%), ericP (8%)
Zakim IRC Bot: codyburleson, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (5%), TallTed (72%), ericP (8%) ←
15:38:51 <codyburleson> (Scribe did not get any of that, please somebody note this? I'm lost.)
(Scribe did not get any of that, please somebody note this? I'm lost.) ←
15:39:23 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We don't have to resolve this pprolem yet, but I'm glad Rob you brought that up.
Arnaud Le Hors: We don't have to resolve this pprolem yet, but I'm glad Rob you brought that up. ←
15:40:17 <azaroth> Rob: Noting that the social web working group is working on notifications, called activity streams. The Annotation WG is looking to use LDP for the HTTP API and AS for notifications, would not like to be out of sync if LDP's notification framework is not compatible with what comes out of Social Web
Robert Sanderson: Noting that the social web working group is working on notifications, called activity streams. The Annotation WG is looking to use LDP for the HTTP API and AS for notifications, would not like to be out of sync if LDP's notification framework is not compatible with what comes out of Social Web [ Scribe Assist by Robert Sanderson ] ←
15:40:31 <Arnaud> ack bblfish
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bblfish ←
15:40:51 <Arnaud> ack sergio
Arnaud Le Hors: ack sergio ←
15:40:58 <codyburleson> Sergio: My point was broader - out of Activity Streams.
Sergio Fernández: My point was broader - out of Activity Streams. ←
15:40:59 <azaroth> ... Agrees that it's not important to solve immediately but would be valuable to engage with Social Web moving forwards
Robert Sanderson: ... Agrees that it's not important to solve immediately but would be valuable to engage with Social Web moving forwards ←
15:42:23 <codyburleson> Arnaud: On one hand, it feels like the working group is ready for a break and may benefit from such a break. On the other hand, I am afraid of losing momentum and focus. The current charter is at the end of this month, but I can tell you that we're not going to have a charter by then.
Arnaud Le Hors: On one hand, it feels like the working group is ready for a break and may benefit from such a break. On the other hand, I am afraid of losing momentum and focus. The current charter is at the end of this month, but I can tell you that we're not going to have a charter by then. ←
15:42:46 <codyburleson> Arnaud: The end of the year is coming up quick. But, I think there will be some kind of slow down if not a complete break.
Arnaud Le Hors: The end of the year is coming up quick. But, I think there will be some kind of slow down if not a complete break. ←
15:43:30 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We don't need to pause, per se. We just need to continue at a slow pace. I think it would be better if we still worked on the charter and we get the charter through the process so that we still have a working group.
Arnaud Le Hors: We don't need to pause, per se. We just need to continue at a slow pace. I think it would be better if we still worked on the charter and we get the charter through the process so that we still have a working group. ←
15:44:04 <Ashok> Why don't we pause from Nov 23 to January 4 ?
Ashok Malhotra: Why don't we pause from Nov 23 to January 4 ? ←
15:44:15 <bblfish> Mind you the Social Web Working group seems to be very keen to move all kinds of topics onto other CGs or Worgking Groups, such as Use Cases, or discussions on github, etc.. so perhaps the LDP group can take on whatever fits into the protocol side of things
Henry Story: Mind you the Social Web Working group seems to be very keen to move all kinds of topics onto other CGs or Worgking Groups, such as Use Cases, or discussions on github, etc.. so perhaps the LDP group can take on whatever fits into the protocol side of things ←
15:44:37 <codyburleson> sergio: It's clear that the schedule is too tight on paging.
Sergio Fernández: It's clear that the schedule is too tight on paging. ←
15:45:02 <codyburleson> Arnaud: there are two different deliverables and so the scheduling is a bit complicated. There is Paging 1.0 and Patch format.
Arnaud Le Hors: there are two different deliverables and so the scheduling is a bit complicated. There is Paging 1.0 and Patch format. ←
15:46:06 <sandro> q+
Sandro Hawke: q+ ←
15:46:14 <Arnaud> ack sandro
Arnaud Le Hors: ack sandro ←
15:46:19 <codyburleson> sergio: Then you have to be clear that Paging 1.0 is not going to be the final solution and there will be a 1.1. A small break would help because it would help everyone materialize things and come with more.
Sergio Fernández: Then you have to be clear that Paging 1.0 is not going to be the final solution and there will be a 1.1. A small break would help because it would help everyone materialize things and come with more. ←
15:47:10 <bblfish> Btw. I'll be speaking about LDP at SemWeb Pro in Paris on Wednesday
Henry Story: Btw. I'll be speaking about LDP at SemWeb Pro in Paris on Wednesday ←
15:47:41 <codyburleson> Sandro: A little perspective on the small break. Nandana, Sergio, and I were together some weeks ago. A couple of the researches there were interested. It was just sort of beginning to be on their radar. The world has not paid any attention to LDP yet. I think , if we're going to do a next version, it would make sense to have the world paying attention first.
Sandro Hawke: A little perspective on the small break. Nandana, Sergio, and I were together some weeks ago. A couple of the researches there were interested. It was just sort of beginning to be on their radar. The world has not paid any attention to LDP yet. I think , if we're going to do a next version, it would make sense to have the world paying attention first. ←
15:47:48 <bblfish> http://semweb.pro/semwebpro-2014.html
Henry Story: http://semweb.pro/semwebpro-2014.html ←
15:49:09 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:49:09 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
15:49:13 <ericP> SPARQL kind of took the (SemWeb) world by storm so momentum wasn't an issue.
Eric Prud'hommeaux: SPARQL kind of took the (SemWeb) world by storm so momentum wasn't an issue. ←
15:49:23 <codyburleson> Sergio: The thinking in the community seemed to be that somehow LDP is too complex. Once we started explaining they said, "Oh, well that's not too complex" But that was first impression.
Sergio Fernández: The thinking in the community seemed to be that somehow LDP is too complex. Once we started explaining they said, "Oh, well that's not too complex" But that was first impression. ←
15:49:36 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
15:49:54 <codyburleson> Sergio: These things come out, then people have to use it, and then only can they come with good information of what they want/need from it going forward.
Sergio Fernández: These things come out, then people have to use it, and then only can they come with good information of what they want/need from it going forward. ←
15:50:46 <codyburleson> Arnaud: What I was trying to do is come up with charter that would allow us 1) continue finish what we have in the works: Paging and Patch. That would give us time to come up with better idea of what we want for LDP 1.1.
Arnaud Le Hors: What I was trying to do is come up with charter that would allow us 1) continue finish what we have in the works: Paging and Patch. That would give us time to come up with better idea of what we want for LDP 1.1. ←
15:51:23 <bblfish> yes, that's what I was going to say, there are things that are not done, such as PATCH, Paging and perhaps Web Access Control,
Henry Story: yes, that's what I was going to say, there are things that are not done, such as PATCH, Paging and perhaps Web Access Control, ←
15:51:33 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We could start in January and kind of see if that would give us enough time. If we do not have a group for some period of time, that means we're leaving Patch and Paging in limbo.
Arnaud Le Hors: We could start in January and kind of see if that would give us enough time. If we do not have a group for some period of time, that means we're leaving Patch and Paging in limbo. ←
15:51:56 <codyburleson> Sandro: Laying my cards on the table, I don't personally care so much about Patch and Paging. I'm not too motivated.
Sandro Hawke: Laying my cards on the table, I don't personally care so much about Patch and Paging. I'm not too motivated. ←
15:52:16 <codyburleson> Arnaud: We can decide to leave them as is - leave them sitting.
Arnaud Le Hors: We can decide to leave them as is - leave them sitting. ←
15:52:18 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
15:52:20 <codyburleson> q+
q+ ←
15:52:24 <SteveS> I/we are
Steve Speicher: I/we are ←
15:52:30 <SteveS> we have
Steve Speicher: we have ←
15:52:36 <Arnaud> ack bblfish
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bblfish ←
15:52:46 <SteveS> we plan to use ld-patch as well
Steve Speicher: we plan to use ld-patch as well ←
15:52:47 <nmihindu> may we will. not in our list at this moment.
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: may we will. not in our list at this moment. ←
15:53:35 <codyburleson> Henry: I'm starting to write JavaSCript user interfaces where I have to get RDF data and I can see where I need to get it in smaller chunks. I'm not sure the way we're doing it….I'm not sure what the best solution is. I can see paging being useful though. There are also other things like Web Access Control.
Henry Story: I'm starting to write JavaSCript user interfaces where I have to get RDF data and I can see where I need to get it in smaller chunks. I'm not sure the way we're doing it….I'm not sure what the best solution is. I can see paging being useful though. There are also other things like Web Access Control. ←
15:53:46 <codyburleson> Henry: Distributed access control.
Henry Story: Distributed access control. ←
15:54:14 <codyburleson> Henry: The Social Web Working group have some of this. But that group is very disparate. And a lot of them will be against very technical things like LDP.
Henry Story: The Social Web Working group have some of this. But that group is very disparate. And a lot of them will be against very technical things like LDP. ←
15:54:49 <sandro> q+
Sandro Hawke: q+ ←
15:55:05 <codyburleson> Henry: They constrain themselves in such a way that they can't do some things very interesting. This could be the opportunity for LDP to take the lead to build these distributed things.
Henry Story: They constrain themselves in such a way that they can't do some things very interesting. This could be the opportunity for LDP to take the lead to build these distributed things. ←
15:55:24 <codyburleson> Arnaud: That may be making a lot of assumptions. I think they ARE considering LDP as a possibility.
Arnaud Le Hors: That may be making a lot of assumptions. I think they ARE considering LDP as a possibility. ←
15:55:27 <Arnaud> ack codyburleson
Arnaud Le Hors: ack codyburleson ←
15:56:40 <Arnaud> ack sandro
Arnaud Le Hors: ack sandro ←
15:57:03 <codyburleson> Cody: Our problem with paging is only that we haven't got to it yet. We're just trying to finalize all from core spec still.
Cody Burleson: Our problem with paging is only that we haven't got to it yet. We're just trying to finalize all from core spec still. ←
15:57:23 <azaroth> +1 to Sandro
Robert Sanderson: +1 to Sandro ←
15:57:40 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:57:40 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should no longer be muted ←
15:57:41 <bblfish> +1 to Sandro
Henry Story: +1 to Sandro ←
15:57:59 <codyburleson> Sandro: We may need to be working rapidly and effectively in the next number of months to be able to improve our specs so that Social group can rely on us to solve their protoicol problems.
Sandro Hawke: We may need to be working rapidly and effectively in the next number of months to be able to improve our specs so that Social group can rely on us to solve their protoicol problems. ←
15:58:26 <codyburleson> Sandro: They're not relying on us. They could do it themselves. But if we work together - we'll have a much better Web.
Sandro Hawke: They're not relying on us. They could do it themselves. But if we work together - we'll have a much better Web. ←
15:58:32 <bblfish> so am I on both groups
Henry Story: so am I on both groups ←
15:58:41 <codyburleson> Sandro: At least me and Arnaud are in both groups.
Sandro Hawke: At least me and Arnaud are in both groups. ←
15:59:09 <bblfish> very cool
Henry Story: very cool ←
15:59:13 <codyburleson> Arnaud: They don't actually have a well thought out plan on this protocol. So, if we could make a good case for LDP, then maybe we can win their favor to it.
Arnaud Le Hors: They don't actually have a well thought out plan on this protocol. So, if we could make a good case for LDP, then maybe we can win their favor to it. ←
15:59:41 <codyburleson> Sandro: What is the scop of Social? All software that derives its value from having opeople there. That is a way broader definition than what they have.
Sandro Hawke: What is the scop of Social? All software that derives its value from having opeople there. That is a way broader definition than what they have. ←
16:01:01 <codyburleson> Arnaud: Out of time. We don't have to settle now. We can stay together even without charter for now. I encourage all to think about those questions. I appreciate the need to not rush into the next thing. But maybe we can set up the charter so that we can get the working group rechartered. There is a use cases and requirments 1.1 deliverable for example.
Arnaud Le Hors: Out of time. We don't have to settle now. We can stay together even without charter for now. I encourage all to think about those questions. I appreciate the need to not rush into the next thing. But maybe we can set up the charter so that we can get the working group rechartered. There is a use cases and requirments 1.1 deliverable for example. ←
16:01:05 <bblfish> thanks
Henry Story: thanks ←
16:01:07 <Zakim> -Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ashok_Malhotra ←
16:01:08 <bblfish> bye
Henry Story: bye ←
16:01:08 <azaroth> Thanks! bye all
Robert Sanderson: Thanks! bye all ←
16:01:09 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
16:01:10 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
16:01:11 <Zakim> -SteveS
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveS ←
16:01:11 <Zakim> -Roger
Zakim IRC Bot: -Roger ←
16:01:12 <Zakim> -bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: -bblfish ←
16:01:13 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
16:01:14 <Zakim> -sergio
Zakim IRC Bot: -sergio ←
16:01:16 <codyburleson> Arnaud: Meeting adjourned.
Arnaud Le Hors: Meeting adjourned. ←
16:01:18 <Zakim> -azaroth
Zakim IRC Bot: -azaroth ←
16:02:40 <Zakim> -JohnArwe
Zakim IRC Bot: -JohnArwe ←
16:03:05 <Zakim> -codyburleson
Zakim IRC Bot: -codyburleson ←
16:03:27 <Zakim> -ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericP ←
16:35:00 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, nmihindu, in SW_LDP()10:00AM
(No events recorded for 31 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, nmihindu, in SW_LDP()10:00AM ←
16:35:02 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended ←
16:35:02 <Zakim> Attendees were azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson, sergio, MiguelAraCo, Ashok_Malhotra, JohnArwe, Sandro, TallTed, Roger, ericP, nmihindu, bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson, sergio, MiguelAraCo, Ashok_Malhotra, JohnArwe, Sandro, TallTed, Roger, ericP, nmihindu, bblfish ←
<codyburleson> Present: azaroth, Arnaud, SteveS, codyburleson, sergio, MiguelAraCo, Ashok_Malhotra, JohnArwe, Sandro, TallTed, Roger, ericP, nmihindu, bblfish
Formatted by CommonScribe