edit

Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 10 February 2014

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.02.10
Present
Sandro Hawke, Arnaud Le Hors, Cody Burleson, Ashok Malhotra, John Arwe, Andrei Sambra, Ted Thibodeau, Steve Speicher, Roger Menday, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Pierre-Antoine Champin
Regrets
Steve Battle, Eric Prud'hommeaux
Chair
Arnaud Le Hors
Scribe
Roger Menday
IRC Log
Original
Resolutions
  1. Approved the minutes of the February 3 teleconf link
Topics
14:58:15 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-ldp-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-ldp-irc

14:58:17 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs public

14:58:19 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be LDP

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be LDP

14:58:19 <Zakim> ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started

14:58:20 <trackbot> Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference
14:58:20 <trackbot> Date: 10 February 2014
14:59:06 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro

14:59:08 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller.a]

14:59:19 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: -[IPcaller]

14:59:38 <Zakim> +Arnaud

Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud

14:59:39 <Ashok> zakin IPcaller.a is me

Ashok Malhotra: zakin IPcaller.a is me

14:59:56 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

15:00:05 <codyburleson> Zakim, IPcaller is me

Cody Burleson: Zakim, IPcaller is me

15:00:05 <Zakim> +codyburleson; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +codyburleson; got it

15:00:12 <Ashok> zakim IPcaller.a is me

Ashok Malhotra: zakim IPcaller.a is me

15:00:27 <Ashok> zakim, IPcaller.a is me

Ashok Malhotra: zakim, IPcaller.a is me

15:00:27 <Zakim> +Ashok; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ashok; got it

15:00:52 <Zakim> +JohnArwe

Zakim IRC Bot: +JohnArwe

15:01:09 <Zakim> +w3c

Zakim IRC Bot: +w3c

15:01:14 <deiu> Zakim, w3c is me

Andrei Sambra: Zakim, w3c is me

15:01:14 <Zakim> +deiu; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +deiu; got it

15:02:15 <Arnaud> regrets: stevebattle
15:02:37 <Arnaud> regrets: stevebattle, eric
15:02:56 <Zakim> +[IBM]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IBM]

15:02:58 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software

Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software

15:03:03 <TallTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

15:03:03 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it

15:03:06 <Arnaud> zakim, who's on the phone?

Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's on the phone?

15:03:06 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, Ashok, Arnaud, codyburleson, JohnArwe, deiu, [IBM], TallTed

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Sandro, Ashok, Arnaud, codyburleson, JohnArwe, deiu, [IBM], TallTed

15:03:13 <SteveS> zakim, [IBM] is me

Steve Speicher: zakim, [IBM] is me

15:03:13 <Zakim> +SteveS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveS; got it

15:07:06 <Zakim> +Roger

Zakim IRC Bot: +Roger

15:08:03 <roger> scribe: Roger

(Scribe set to Roger Menday)

<roger> chair: Arnaud
<roger> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.02.10
<roger> present: Sandro, Arnaud, codyburleson, Ashok, JohnArwe, deiu, TallTed, SteveS, Roger, nmihindu, pchampin
<roger> topic: Admin

1. Admin

15:08:15 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me

15:08:15 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted

15:08:44 <Arnaud> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-02-03

Arnaud Le Hors: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-02-03

15:09:00 <Arnaud> Resolved: Approved the minutes of the February 3 teleconf

RESOLVED: Approved the minutes of the February 3 teleconf

<roger> Arnaud: next meeting is February 17

Arnaud Le Hors: next meeting is February 17

15:09:54 <roger> Topic: Tracking of actions

2. Tracking of actions

15:10:50 <codyburleson> John, which is the action open against BPs?

Cody Burleson: John, which is the action open against BPs?

15:11:08 <JohnArwe> @cody: 134

John Arwe: @cody: 134

15:11:19 <JohnArwe> ...from the resolution last week on issue 93

John Arwe: ...from the resolution last week on ISSUE-93

15:11:52 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me

15:11:52 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should no longer be muted

<roger> Steves: all actions on the spec editors have been taken care of

Steve Speicher: all actions on the spec editors have been taken care of

<roger> Arnaud: ok, we'll close these, and have the editors highlight the changes next

Arnaud Le Hors: ok, we'll close these, and have the editors highlight the changes next

<roger> johnarwe: I think we can also close action-129

John Arwe: I think we can also close ACTION-129

<roger> tallted: yes

Ted Thibodeau: yes

15:13:09 <roger> Topic: Status of Spec

3. Status of Spec

15:14:06 <roger> Arnaud: Plan was that spec edits would be done by today, so we can move to review.

Arnaud Le Hors: Plan was that spec edits would be done by today, so we can move to review.

15:14:49 <Zakim> +??P15

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P15

15:14:56 <roger> Editors summarise the highlights of the recent edits ...

Editors summarise the highlights of the recent edits ...

15:15:06 <nmihindu> Zakim, ??P15 is me

Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, ??P15 is me

15:15:06 <Zakim> +nmihindu; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +nmihindu; got it

15:15:17 <nmihindu> Zakim, mute me

Nandana Mihindukulasooriya: Zakim, mute me

15:15:17 <Zakim> nmihindu should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: nmihindu should now be muted

15:15:31 <roger> re-structuring to add a new section 4  - which is about LDP clients

re-structuring to add a new section 4 - which is about LDP clients

15:16:42 <roger> also new content about the 3 types of container : Basic, Direct and Indirect (Basic used to be called Simple).

also new content about the 3 types of container : Basic, Direct and Indirect (Basic used to be called Simple).

15:18:03 <roger> new terminology: LDP-RR, LDP-BR, etc ..

new terminology: LDP-RR, LDP-BR, etc ..

15:18:24 <roger>  ldp:created is replaced by ldp:contains

ldp:created is replaced by ldp:contains

15:18:39 <roger> examples about Indirect container

examples about Indirect container

15:19:13 <roger> there is a table trying to summarise the differences between membership and containment.

there is a table trying to summarise the differences between membership and containment.

15:19:37 <sandro> q+ to suggest "Graph Resource" and "Opaque Resource", since Binary is wrong, and "RDF Resource" is utterly ambiguous with rdf:Resource.

Sandro Hawke: q+ to suggest "Graph Resource" and "Opaque Resource", since Binary is wrong, and "RDF Resource" is utterly ambiguous with rdf:Resource.

15:20:13 <Arnaud> ack sandro

Arnaud Le Hors: ack sandro

15:20:13 <Zakim> sandro, you wanted to suggest "Graph Resource" and "Opaque Resource", since Binary is wrong, and "RDF Resource" is utterly ambiguous with rdf:Resource.

Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, you wanted to suggest "Graph Resource" and "Opaque Resource", since Binary is wrong, and "RDF Resource" is utterly ambiguous with rdf:Resource.

15:21:23 <TallTed> "Managed Resource" vs "Unmanaged Resource"?

Ted Thibodeau: "Managed Resource" vs "Unmanaged Resource"?

15:22:04 <Ashok> I like "opaque resource"

Ashok Malhotra: I like "opaque resource"

15:23:55 <sandro> sandro: In RDF 1.1 Concepts, these these things are called "RDF Sources"

Sandro Hawke: In RDF 1.1 Concepts, these these things are called "RDF Sources" [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

15:24:57 <sandro> "Non-RDF Source"

Sandro Hawke: "Non-RDF Source"

15:24:59 <roger> people seem to like "RDF sources" ...

people seem to like "RDF sources" ...

15:26:17 <sandro> the RDF 1.1 Concepts reference is http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#change-over-time

Sandro Hawke: the RDF 1.1 Concepts reference is http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#change-over-time

15:27:19 <roger> editors will go off and incorporate 'rdf source' language

editors will go off and incorporate 'rdf source' language

15:27:51 <roger> +q

+q

15:28:17 <sandro> +1 and LDPC is a kind of LDP RS

Sandro Hawke: +1 and LDPC is a kind of LDP RS

15:29:01 <Arnaud> ack roger

Arnaud Le Hors: ack roger

15:30:01 <SteveS> So hierarchy/structure looks like https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/images/ldpc1.png

Steve Speicher: So hierarchy/structure looks like https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/images/ldpc1.png

15:30:05 <Zakim> +??P30

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P30

15:30:11 <pchampin> zakim, ??P30 is me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, ??P30 is me

15:30:11 <Zakim> +pchampin; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +pchampin; got it

15:30:50 <sandro> SteveS, JohnArwe, I'm not totally thrilled with "RDF Source" for this -- I think when you're editing the text you might find it doesn't read well.     (That's why my first suggestion was "Graph Resource".   Sigh.)

Sandro Hawke: SteveS, JohnArwe, I'm not totally thrilled with "RDF Source" for this -- I think when you're editing the text you might find it doesn't read well. (That's why my first suggestion was "Graph Resource". Sigh.)

15:32:40 <Ashok> q+

Ashok Malhotra: q+

15:33:37 <Arnaud> ack ashok

Arnaud Le Hors: ack ashok

15:34:40 <roger> Ashok questions the colouring of the hierarchy picture ...

Ashok questions the colouring of the hierarchy picture ...

15:35:40 <roger> Ted, would prefer boxes-inside-other-boxes, venn diagram style.

Ted, would prefer boxes-inside-other-boxes, venn diagram style.

15:36:54 <codyburleson> :-( The UML made good sense to me, Steve.

Cody Burleson: :-( The UML made good sense to me, Steve.

15:38:15 <SteveS> codyburleson, it is good feedback though....perhaps it would help if I made it clear it was a "Class diagram" and not a "Flow diagram"

Steve Speicher: codyburleson, it is good feedback though....perhaps it would help if I made it clear it was a "Class diagram" and not a "Flow diagram"

15:39:44 <roger_> some changes related to Prefer header

some changes related to Prefer header

15:42:05 <roger_> in the 303 response, the server can inline the representation of the redirected resource, and the prefer-accepted header indicates this (i think)

in the 303 response, the server can inline the representation of the redirected resource, and the Preference-applied response header indicates this (i think)

15:42:42 <JohnArwe> s/prefer-accepted/Preference-applied response/
15:42:59 <roger_> ... and the client can use the prefer header to indicate this

... and the client can use the prefer header to indicate this

15:44:21 <roger_> hello John, which RFC got approved last week again please ?

hello John, which RFC got approved last week again please ?

15:44:43 <Arnaud> http bis

Arnaud Le Hors: http bis

15:46:26 <roger_> Arnaud would now like to talk about the timeline and where we are .. !

Arnaud would now like to talk about the timeline and where we are .. !

15:47:04 <SteveS> HTML diff from LC1 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-diff-20140210.html

Steve Speicher: HTML diff from LC1 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-diff-20140210.html

15:47:58 <roger_> Arnaud: suggestion: the group has 2 weeks to review the spec. Vote on Feb 24 to go to last call. ... ?

Arnaud Le Hors: suggestion: the group has 2 weeks to review the spec. Vote on Feb 24 to go to last call. ... ?

15:48:17 <roger_> in reading spec, please forward new names for things to the editors.

in reading spec, please forward new names for things to the editors.

15:48:29 <roger_> or suggestions for new names

or suggestions for new names

15:48:34 <Ashok> Where is the latest spec?

Ashok Malhotra: Where is the latest spec?

15:49:09 <roger_> i that it ? https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html

i that it ? https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html

15:49:26 <SteveS> yes, that is the link

Steve Speicher: yes, that is the link

15:49:48 <Ashok> OK.  Got it

Ashok Malhotra: OK. Got it

15:51:23 <roger_> Arnaud: bottom line is, be prepared to vote in 2 weeks time.

Arnaud Le Hors: bottom line is, be prepared to vote in 2 weeks time.

15:52:47 <JohnArwe> Expectation, for those reading only minutes, were that this coming week (ending Feb 17) is when all comments affecting normative content Should be made; second week (ending Feb 24) should be typos/editorial changes ONLY.

John Arwe: Expectation, for those reading only minutes, were that this coming week (ending Feb 17) is when all comments affecting normative content Should be made; second week (ending Feb 24) should be typos/editorial changes ONLY.

15:53:06 <roger_> Topic: Next F2F Meeting

4. Next F2F Meeting

15:53:18 <roger_> Arnaud: suggested dates 1-3 April .. ?

Arnaud Le Hors: suggested dates 1-3 April .. ?

15:53:24 <roger_> ... location ?

... location ?

15:53:25 <Ashok> q+

Ashok Malhotra: q+

15:53:36 <roger_> roger: I think we can offer to host

Roger Menday: I think we can offer to host

15:53:39 <Arnaud> ack Ashok

Arnaud Le Hors: ack Ashok

15:53:55 <SteveS> As these reviews usually go, feedback earlier than later is greatly appreciated

Steve Speicher: As these reviews usually go, feedback earlier than later is greatly appreciated

15:54:24 <pchampin> so did I :-D

Pierre-Antoine Champin: so did I :-D

15:54:42 <roger_> dates have changed :)

dates have changed :)

15:54:45 <roger_> 15-17 April

15-17 April

<roger> roger: sorry, I can't host on those dates

Roger Menday: sorry, I can't host on those dates

15:55:27 <sandro> I'm happy to host at MIT yet again.

Sandro Hawke: I'm happy to host at MIT yet again.

15:55:54 <Ashok> I'm happy with MIT

Ashok Malhotra: I'm happy with MIT

15:56:00 <deiu> +1 for MIT :)

Andrei Sambra: +1 for MIT :)

15:56:28 <codyburleson> +1 MIT

Cody Burleson: +1 MIT

<roger> Arnaud: ok, MIT is the default location, if others want to make an offer, let us know

Arnaud Le Hors: ok, MIT is the default location, if others want to make an offer, let us know

15:57:45 <roger_> Topic: Status of the other deliverables

5. Status of the other deliverables

15:57:59 <roger_> Arnaud: UC&R is in good shape

Arnaud Le Hors: UC&R is in good shape

16:00:30 <roger_> ... need to re-focus energy on to the other deliverables

... need to re-focus energy on to the other deliverables

<roger> ... we have editors for every deliverable, it is the responsibility of the editors to either make progress or let the WG what's stopping them from making progress

... we have editors for every deliverable, it is the responsibility of the editors to either make progress or let the WG what's stopping them from making progress

16:00:54 <Zakim> -SteveS

Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveS

16:00:56 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro

16:00:57 <Zakim> -Ashok

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ashok

16:00:57 <Zakim> -Roger

Zakim IRC Bot: -Roger

16:00:58 <Zakim> -deiu

Zakim IRC Bot: -deiu

16:00:58 <Zakim> -Arnaud

Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud

16:01:00 <Zakim> -TallTed

Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed

16:01:00 <Zakim> -codyburleson

Zakim IRC Bot: -codyburleson

16:01:04 <Zakim> -nmihindu

Zakim IRC Bot: -nmihindu

16:01:07 <Zakim> -JohnArwe

Zakim IRC Bot: -JohnArwe

16:35:01 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, pchampin, in SW_LDP()10:00AM

(No events recorded for 33 minutes)

Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, pchampin, in SW_LDP()10:00AM

16:35:02 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended

16:35:02 <Zakim> Attendees were Sandro, Arnaud, codyburleson, Ashok, JohnArwe, deiu, TallTed, SteveS, Roger, nmihindu, pchampin

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were Sandro, Arnaud, codyburleson, Ashok, JohnArwe, deiu, TallTed, SteveS, Roger, nmihindu, pchampin



Formatted by CommonScribe