ISSUE-74: Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc
Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Hadley Beeman
- Opened on:
- 2014-10-31
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-74: Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-10-31)
Related notes:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Proposal to close issue-74, and declare policy framework out-of-scope
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:55:00 +0000
Resent-From: member-dwbp-chairs@w3.org
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:53:39 +0100
From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
To: yaso@nic.br <yaso@nic.br>, member-dwbp-chairs@w3.org
+1
And we can cite
http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes#tech
as evidence
On 08/04/2015 13:33, yaso@nic.br wrote:
> Agree that this is out of scope
>
>
>
>
> On 04/07/2015 08:19 PM, Deirdre Lee wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/74
>>
>> Proposal to close issue-74, and declare policy framework
>> out-of-scope....unless there is a specific example in bp doc where you
>> think it should be included?
Display change log
