ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists

Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Data Usage Vocabulary

Raised by:

Opened on:

2014-10-30

Description:

currently the ucr doesn't include code lists....does the use cases include code lists? This is an issue -per F2F
-JeniT's comment about separating the "vocabulary data model" requirement from the "vocabulary code list" requirement

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. RE: Code lists in the UCR (from Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu on 2015-03-27)
2. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from ig.ibert@gmail.com on 2015-03-26)
3. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br on 2015-03-26)
4. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl on 2015-03-26)
5. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-03-26)
6. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from laufer@globo.com on 2015-03-26)
7. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-03-26)
8. Re: Code lists in the UCR (from yaso@nic.br on 2015-03-26)
9. Code lists in the UCR (from phila@w3.org on 2015-03-26)
10. Re: Minor updates to UCR (from phila@w3.org on 2015-01-22)
11. Code lists Issue-48 (from phila@w3.org on 2015-01-22)
12. ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-10-30)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log