ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit?

Should we remove the Reuse benefit?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Best practices document(s)
Raised by:
Phil Archer
Opened on:
2015-12-08
Description:
Should we remove the Reuse benefit? As one of the goals of the BP is to promote the data reuse, then all BP have this benefit. Is it still relevant having Reuse as part of the benefits?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2016-03-13)
  2. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] (from deirdre@derilinx.com on 2016-03-13)
  3. dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-12-08)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 226.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:26:31 ted Exp $