ISSUE-146: Which section of a BP should be normative?

TheNorm

Which section of a BP should be normative?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Best practices document(s)
Raised by:
Annette Greiner
Opened on:
2015-01-30
Description:
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0307.html

This suggests that only the subtitle should be seen as normative and incldue RFC2119 keywords, and not the Intended Outcome.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: [dwbp] Propose to close Issue-146 (from deirdre@derilinx.com on 2015-09-03)
  2. [dwbp] Propose to close Issue-146 (from newton@nic.br on 2015-08-28)
  3. Re: What is normative? (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-05-21)
  4. Re: What is normative? (from deirdre@derilinx.com on 2015-05-21)
  5. Re: What is normative? (from newton@nic.br on 2015-05-20)
  6. What is normative? (from laufer@globo.com on 2015-05-19)
  7. Re: What is normative? (from yaso@nic.br on 2015-05-19)
  8. Re: What is normative? (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-05-18)
  9. Re: What is normative? (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-05-18)
  10. Re: What is normative? (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-05-18)
  11. Re: What is normative? (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-05-18)
  12. Re: What is normative? (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-05-18)
  13. Re: What is normative? (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-05-18)
  14. Re: What is normative? (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-05-18)
  15. Re: What is normative? (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-05-18)
  16. Re: What is normative? (from phila@w3.org on 2015-05-18)
  17. Re: What is normative? (from yaso@nic.br on 2015-05-18)
  18. What is normative? (from phila@w3.org on 2015-05-18)
  19. Re: Updated version of the BP document (from phila@w3.org on 2015-02-13)
  20. Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-02-04)
  21. Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (from adler1@us.ibm.com on 2015-02-04)
  22. Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (from cburle@nic.br on 2015-02-04)
  23. Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-02-04)
  24. Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-02-03)
  25. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-146 (TheNorm): Which section of a BP should be normative? [Best practices document(s)] (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-02-03)
  26. Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (from phila@w3.org on 2015-01-30)
  27. Status BP Friday 30 Jan (from phila@w3.org on 2015-01-30)
  28. dwbp-ISSUE-146 (TheNorm): Which section of a BP should be normative? [Best practices document(s)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-01-30)

Related notes:

Resolved at Sao Paulo f2f - we will not use RFC 2119

Phil Archer, 25 Sep 2015, 12:40:19

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 146.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:26:25 ted Exp $