14:59:46 RRSAgent has joined #gld 14:59:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/12/12-gld-irc 14:59:47 PhilA has joined #gld 14:59:48 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:59:48 Zakim has joined #gld 14:59:50 Zakim, this will be GLD 14:59:50 ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started 14:59:51 Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference 14:59:51 - +3539149aaaa 14:59:51 Date: 12 December 2013 15:00:07 olyerickson has left #gld 15:00:11 olyerickson has joined #gld 15:00:13 +??P9 15:00:15 cygri has joined #gld 15:00:21 dialing 15:00:28 zakim, code? 15:00:28 the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), cygri 15:00:29 gatemezi has joined #gld 15:01:01 +bhyland 15:01:04 +[IPcaller] 15:01:04 +??P13 15:01:08 +[IPcaller.a] 15:01:08 I'm trying to join, but sip:zakim@voip.w3.org does not answer... 15:01:10 +[IPcaller.aa] 15:01:11 zakim, ??P13 is me 15:01:11 +cygri; got it 15:01:20 zakim, ipcaller is me 15:01:21 deirdrelee has joined #gld 15:01:21 +PhilA; got it 15:01:31 zakim I am [ipcaller.aa] 15:01:35 +Sandro 15:01:36 +[IPcaller] 15:01:46 zakim [ipcaller.aa] is me. 15:01:55 Zakim, [IPcaller] is me 15:01:55 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:02:06 now I managed to get ni 15:02:12 hello 15:02:16 zakim, [ipcaller.aa] is me. 15:02:17 +olyerickson; got it 15:02:26 zakim, thank you. 15:02:27 you are very welcome, olyerickson 15:02:32 zakim, who is here? 15:02:32 On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, csarven, bhyland, PhilA, cygri, [IPcaller.a], olyerickson, Sandro, JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:02:34 On IRC I see deirdrelee, gatemezi, cygri, olyerickson, Zakim, PhilA, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, fadmaa, JoaoPauloAlmeida, csarven, TallTed, bhyland, sandro, trackbot 15:02:39 zakim, mute me 15:02:40 PhilA should now be muted 15:02:50 HadleyBeeman has changed the topic to: agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20131212 15:02:51 zakim, mute me 15:02:51 cygri should now be muted 15:02:55 +fadmaa 15:02:56 Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me 15:02:56 +deirdrelee; got it 15:03:11 -deirdrelee 15:03:52 +[IPcaller] 15:03:58 zakim, unmute me 15:03:58 cygri should no longer be muted 15:04:01 zakim, ipcaller is me 15:04:01 +PhilA; got it 15:04:07 DaveReynolds1 has joined #gld 15:04:14 zakim, mute me 15:04:14 PhilA was already muted, PhilA 15:04:24 zakim, unmute me 15:04:24 PhilA should no longer be muted 15:04:35 -HadleyBeeman 15:04:38 HadleyBeeman has joined #gld 15:04:52 +[LC] 15:04:57 is anyone speaking? 15:05:06 +[IPcaller] 15:05:15 +HadleyBeeman 15:05:16 zakim, select a victim? 15:05:16 I don't understand your question, HadleyBeeman. 15:05:22 I don't hear 15:05:23 tinagheen has joined #gld 15:05:23 zakim, pick a victim? 15:05:24 I don't understand your question, HadleyBeeman. 15:05:25 yes 15:05:27 yes 15:05:34 now I can hear 15:05:47 scribe: PhilA 15:05:53 scribeNick:ph 15:05:59 scribeNick: PhilA 15:06:06 topic: Last week's minutes 15:06:08 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-12-05 15:06:12 +1 15:06:13 +1 15:06:14 +1 15:06:17 +1 15:06:19 +1 15:06:20 HadleyBeeman: Propose to accept 15:06:23 +1 15:06:33 HadleyBeeman: So accepted 15:06:48 Zakim, mute me 15:06:48 fadmaa should now be muted 15:06:50 s/calll/call 15:06:56 Topic: Best Practices 15:07:21 bhyland: I'm working through comments. Prefer to go at end of the agenda as I need to fix an error. I;ve been making micro changes this morning 15:07:51 bhyland: Takes 5 minutes to fix whatever is broken 15:07:55 agenda? 15:08:20 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20131212 15:08:29 chair: HadleyBeeman 15:09:12 bhyland: Maybe we should close some actions? 15:09:20 zakim, who is here? 15:09:20 On the phone I see csarven, bhyland, PhilA, cygri, olyerickson, Sandro, JoaoPauloAlmeida, fadmaa (muted), PhilA.a, [LC], DaveReynolds1, HadleyBeeman 15:09:23 On IRC I see tinagheen, HadleyBeeman, DaveReynolds1, deirdrelee, gatemezi, cygri, olyerickson, Zakim, PhilA, RRSAgent, fadmaa, JoaoPauloAlmeida, csarven, TallTed, bhyland, sandro, 15:09:23 ... trackbot 15:09:33 Zakim, [LC] is me 15:09:33 +tinagheen; got it 15:10:09 bhyland: The status is - lots of editors and Phil have been touching the doc 15:10:19 ... lots of feedback and trying to get that all sorted 15:10:36 ... trying to make it consistent throughout 15:11:09 ... I'll go either way. I'd like to finish my edits, but I'd like to add more of the feedback which is mostly references, not substantive 15:11:25 bhyland: I'm not going to get it finished today 15:11:45 bhyland: I think I'm the last one to touch it 15:12:07 HadleyBeeman: We do have everyone together and this is the last time so we need to make our decisions today 15:12:08 q? 15:12:11 s/I'm not going to get it finished today/I do aim to finish it today 15:12:14 q+ 15:12:18 HadleyBeeman: Those who have contributed comments... 15:12:34 HadleyBeeman: Are you happy to push this through as it is or do you have additional concerns 15:12:46 bhyland: I do want to get it done today 15:12:49 ack sandro 15:12:49 I don't see why we can not finish the doc today 15:13:01 +1 Ghislain 15:13:02 sandro: Is there a reason why we can't have 1 more meeting this time next week? 15:13:06 it would be best 15:13:19 HadleyBeeman: Not procedurally - we told everyone we wouldn't, that's all 15:13:34 sandro: Normally one week's notice is OK 15:13:39 I'm amenable to a call next week 15:13:54 sandro: we wouldn't get the publication done by the end of the year but we could have a call 15:14:10 sandro: The reason for pushing this is that it's clear that the doc is still in flux 15:14:24 Propose: BP editors complete & notify the WG to review. Have the group review & meet one more time 12/19. 15:14:31 sandro: There are lots of little things. If the pace keeps up, then we're good to go for next week 15:14:43 bhyland: People seem to agree that it's important and needs doing 15:14:51 I agree with bhyland's point to leverage current leverage of attention 15:14:56 FWIW I would probably not make next Thursday, competing meeting 15:15:10 HadleyBeeman: In my mind it depends on whether we need a discussion. 15:15:18 HadleyBeeman: Happy to call for vote by e-mail 15:15:42 HadleyBeeman: we tend to get most out of our meetings when the editors have specific things that need asking 15:15:55 +1 to HadleyBeeman suggestion 15:16:02 HadleyBeeman: If it's just incorporating comments and then a once over then a discussion may not be needed 15:16:13 -cygri 15:16:15 However, I support the editors' decisions and I doubt we actually require a voice discussion 15:16:18 bhyland: I have no problem with a decision by e-mail 15:16:35 bhyland: And there hasn't been a lot of discussion on the calls 15:16:53 q+ 15:16:54 HadleyBeeman: Can I ask the people who have commented how they feel? Do you want more discussion? 15:17:05 I would be OK with an e-mail discussion 15:17:06 HadleyBeeman: I understand what you need as an editor 15:17:15 ... but what do the commenters feel? 15:17:28 +??P13 15:17:33 zakim, ??P13 is me 15:17:33 +cygri; got it 15:17:50 sandro: I feel like a telecon is important. A call is better for saying "we're done" 15:18:27 note: I also sent in feedback 1-2 weeks ago (wrt RPI's revised/updated URI design principles), I haven't seen them but have assumed they are on the editors' "list" 15:19:10 PhilA: another round of discussion in a telco next week seems better to me 15:20:03 Did PhilA say "locked this time TOMORROW?" 15:20:08 yes 15:20:10 (please confirm) 15:20:15 (thanks) 15:20:30 I can say from the editors perspective, we *must* complete within this 24 hours 15:20:47 olyerickson: I suggested we might lock it tomorrow 15:20:53 Sandro: Remember we still have the pubrules processing that has to happen 15:21:19 olyerickson: I sent in a note about RPI's refined URI design principles 15:21:47 @olyerickson -On my list to add now because they were taken out by another editor ... 15:21:55 olyerickson: that we've been working on with the Canadian gov on that. An older version of the doc referred to that but I see that's gone 15:21:58 q+ 15:22:20 olyerickson: I think that work would be worth referring to alongside Phil's (Actually the EC's) and the Ducth one 15:22:29 HadleyBeeman: Thanks John 15:22:29 ack me 15:22:33 ack DaveReynolds1 15:22:38 btw here' 15:22:57 btw here's a link to the unbroken document of an hour ago: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/cb6dde2928e7/bp/index.html 15:23:03 DaveReynolds1: from the POV - if the doc is roughly the right shape and it's just pub rules. it seems reasonable to continue this round and do a vote by e-mail next week 15:23:08 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:23:25 DaveReynolds1: My concern is that there might be a new section etc. that bhyland mentioned - that's more than editorial 15:23:28 +[IPcaller] 15:23:31 @olyerickson: you mean this link "URI Design Principles: Creating Persistent URIs for Government Linked Data" ? 15:23:31 PhilA: +1 to DaveReynolds1 15:23:32 q+ 15:23:34 Zakim, IPcaller is me 15:23:34 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:23:48 Ack bhyland 15:24:08 bhyland: I haven't lost your e-mail. There was a substantial rework of the references and the way it was done 15:24:25 ... I think it was inadvertent that it was dropped 15:24:38 bhyland: Thanks! ;) 15:24:44 bhyland: I haven't reviewed the URI design section since it was written a while ago 15:25:01 gatemezi: Yes, those... 15:25:27 bhyland: The 'whole new section' isn't as big as it sounds. It's just a little section that was there and needs to be put back. There's nothing huge... but we are doing more than pubrules 15:25:48 bhyland: But it doesn't quite hang together correctly and I'd like to get it right 15:25:56 q+ 15:26:12 bhyland: Any changes that people have sent, I'm working through them today. 15:26:20 ack sandro 15:26:25 q+ 15:26:26 bhyland: We all understand! 15:26:39 sandro: I was wondering what is the state of the PII best practice? 15:26:47 bhyland: I'm not planning to add any more to it... 15:27:04 sandro: I'm trying to understand why it's in the summary and not the main doc 15:27:36 bhyland: I think it should be a best practice but we shouldn't expand on it. I don't want to add a new section as DaveReynolds1 says but I do think it should be in the doc 15:27:43 Hadleybeeman: quick reminder that PII has different meanings and legal restrictions in different countries. 15:27:51 bhyland: If people don't want it as a BP then OK 15:28:06 s/PII/Perosnal Indentifiable Information (PII)/ 15:28:28 sandro: But there are times when you do want to publish PII (like public officials where it's a matter of public record 15:28:37 MakxDekkers has joined #gld 15:29:07 sandro: it's more like "don't ACCIDENTALLY publish PII" 15:29:07 sandro: It's more like don't accidentally publish PII 15:29:09 In Brazil, salaries are published with a full name 15:29:15 my salary by the way 15:29:19 bhyland: Makes some suggestions... 15:29:54 sandro: There are lots of cases where salaries have to be published (although not necessary as LD) 15:30:13 sorry for not being on the call -- still in another. 15:30:18 HadleyBeeman: makes point about PII having different meanings in different countries 15:30:28 ack me 15:30:52 that's also in my e-mail about normativity 15:30:56 PhilA: this is a note; nothing needs to be normative. 15:31:04 … It's nothing but informative. 15:31:22 ack HadleyBeeman 15:31:34 q+ HadleyBeeman 15:31:51 sandro: There was a note about splitting up URI best practices into publisher and consumer... 15:31:56 sandro: ... looks 15:32:06 +Makx_Dekkers 15:32:13 sandro: It was from JoaoPauloAlmeida.. 15:32:22 JoaoPauloAlmeida: It wasn't about URIs but vocabularies, yes 15:32:32 bhyland: It's on my screen here 15:32:38 ... I have yet to digest it 15:32:43 ... but I will 15:32:52 -cygri 15:32:54 I can't hear properly 15:32:58 HadleyBeeman: Invites JoaoPauloAlmeida to say more 15:33:15 Note, Joao's email came in < 2 hrs ago... 15:33:16 +??P13 15:33:20 zakim, ??P13 is me 15:33:20 +cygri; got it 15:33:39 JoaoPauloAlmeida: It was about the criteria for the vocabs. I thought it was confusing that some criteria were repeated in two sections. I think it could be simplified to make the role of the criteria a little clearer 15:33:40 @Joao this are the types of clean up & consistency checks that are underway today 15:34:00 bhyland: Yes, thanks. This is where the doc was touched at diff times by diff people. I'll look at that 15:34:11 thanks 15:34:24 HadleyBeeman: Anything else on content? 15:34:27 ack HadleyBeeman 15:34:45 HadleyBeeman: It sounds as if the editors want another 24 hours to work through the comments. 15:34:57 HadleyBeeman: That suggests a new draft being sent round by this time tomorrow 15:35:24 HadleyBeeman: I suggest that we review it over the W/E and that we have a call on Mon or Tues that should clarify what has been done. 15:35:32 ... we can schedule a call for Thursday as well 15:35:42 ... by then the pub rules should have been dealt with. 15:36:02 ... if everything goes perfectly, then we can get to our call on Mon/Tue and skips the Thursday 15:36:03 @sandro, are you able to help me with PubRules processing? 15:36:18 don't we need a week's notice for call? 15:37:16 bhyland: Can you help me with pubrules, sandro? 15:37:19 sandro: Yes 15:37:24 I heard HadleyBeeman propose an out of cycle call on Mon Tue, was I wrong? 15:37:43 sandro: Dave is right that we shouldn't have a telecon without a week's notice. 15:38:16 HadleyBeeman: Can we satisfy that by having an informal call and deciding if we're going to do an e-mail vote and then go to a call on Thursday if we need it 15:39:03 what about changes to the new content the editors are adding? 15:39:43 Further discussion ensues... 15:39:51 sandro: We need to converge 15:40:08 sandro: We can have an informal discussion on Mon or Tues but ti can't make decisions. They have to be made on Thursday 15:40:23 HadleyBeeman: That's what I had in mind 15:40:35 bhyland: Who is the informal call with? 15:40:39 sandro: Anyone who wants to attend 15:40:47 HadleyBeeman: +1 15:40:58 bhyland: That would be Tuesday 17th 15:41:02 +1 15:41:07 sandro: How about this time Tuesday? 15:41:09 +1 15:41:13 +1 15:41:17 +0 15:41:23 +1 15:41:31 PhilA: Can make 15:00 GMT Tuesday 15:41:31 Propose: 1) Schedule telecon for final vote on BP doc only 12/12; 2) Schedule informal telecon w/ GLD WG for Tuesday 12/9) 10.00 US ET to make sure path is clear for final vote 15:41:39 +1 15:41:39 -1 15:42:34 HadleyBeeman: If you have a chance to have a look at the doc by Tuesday, MakxDekkers, that would be useful 15:42:37 MakxDekkers: I'll try 15:42:50 HadleyBeeman: Anything else you need Bernadette? 15:43:08 bhyland: If anyone has anything else to raise by e-mail, please do so. I'll respond in kind 15:43:16 HadleyBeeman: I think that winds up BP 15:43:40 bhyland: I'm sorry that we got to this stage before there was this much work on it. It's been adrift for best part of a year 15:43:51 HadleyBeeman: The past is the past. Important thing is what we can do inthe next week 15:44:04 s/inthe/in the 15:44:09 topic: Data Cube/ORG/DCAT 15:44:28 HadleyBeeman: How are you on ...,(Hadley starts talking through her onesie) 15:44:56 DaveReynolds1: There was one more implementation report from Sraven which was helpful but didn't affect status 15:45:24 DaveReynolds1: There was some feedback from Dom on lack of clarity on a term. Editorial only, I made the change on Friday and documented it in the PR section 15:45:27 s/sraven/csarven 15:45:45 HadleyBeeman: Sounds good 15:45:52 ... and ORG? 15:46:20 DaveReynolds1: That was ORG. For QB, one implementation report, ORG, one little ed change, responded and done 15:46:25 Zakim, unmute me 15:46:25 fadmaa should no longer be muted 15:46:30 HadleyBeeman: Sitting in a corridor ... 15:46:44 HadleyBeeman: Anything on DCAT? 15:46:50 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/open 15:46:51 fadmaa: Nope. All well and no change 15:46:55 topic: Open Actions 15:47:01 action-34? 15:47:01 action-34 -- Bernadette Hyland to Convene a meeting on armchair usability for community directory -- due 2013-02-28 -- OPEN 15:47:01 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/34 15:47:11 zakim, who is speaking? 15:47:12 HadleyBeeman: bhyland? 15:47:16 I hear a lot of noise 15:47:21 bhyland, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: bhyland (30%), cygri (20%), Sandro (4%), fadmaa (10%) 15:47:31 zakim, who is making noise? 15:47:42 PhilA, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: bhyland (64%), HadleyBeeman (53%), Makx_Dekkers (10%) 15:47:53 action-34 close 15:48:01 close action-34 15:48:01 Closed action-34. 15:48:13 zakim, mute makx_dekkers 15:48:13 Makx_Dekkers should now be muted 15:48:20 gatemezi_ has joined #gld 15:48:29 action-35? 15:48:29 action-35 -- Bart van Leeuwen to Leeuwen to investigate how Good Relations etc could assist with automatically filling up the directory -- due 2012-02-01 -- OPEN 15:48:29 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/35 15:48:37 -cygri 15:48:53 HadleyBeeman: Did what you just said apply to the directory as well on this bhyland? 15:49:21 Suggest it is obsolete 15:49:22 bhyland: This was something Bart raised a year ago 15:49:29 +??P13 15:49:33 bhyland: It's no longer in scope 15:49:36 zakim, ??P13 is me 15:49:36 +cygri; got it 15:49:47 Action-35 has been overtaken by events 15:50:04 close action-34 15:50:04 Closed action-34. 15:50:09 close action-35 15:50:09 Closed action-35. 15:50:23 action-67? 15:50:23 action-67 -- Bernadette Hyland to Send presentation -- due 2012-04-26 -- OPEN 15:50:23 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/67 15:50:40 bhyland: I have no idea what they was about - overtaken by events... 15:50:44 close action-67 15:50:44 Closed action-67. 15:51:04 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/74 15:51:19 close action-45 15:51:19 Closed action-45. 15:51:29 -olyerickson 15:51:44 action-75? 15:51:44 action-75 -- Bernadette Hyland to Get a Computer Science Intern to spend ca. 4 hours a week on gathering data for the directory -- due 2012-09-13 -- OPEN 15:51:44 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/75 15:51:56 Overtaken by evetns - now in the CG 15:52:01 close action-75 15:52:01 Closed action-75. 15:52:11 action-77? 15:52:11 action-77 -- Fadi Maali to Include text in DCAT to point to the BP doc, with link to the issue in the interim -- due 2013-05-30 -- OPEN 15:52:11 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/77 15:52:17 action-77? 15:52:17 action-77 -- Fadi Maali to Include text in DCAT to point to the BP doc, with link to the issue in the interim -- due 2013-05-30 -- OPEN 15:52:17 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/77 15:52:29 fadmaa: I don't think is appropriate anymore 15:52:42 close action-77 15:52:42 Closed action-77. 15:52:50 close action-85 15:52:50 Closed action-85. 15:53:01 action-105? 15:53:01 action-105 -- Sandro Hawke to Determine who meets the current "active participants" bar, for including in publications -- due 2013-03-28 -- OPEN 15:53:01 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/105 15:53:12 sandro: I will try to do that - we should leave it open 15:53:27 close action-113 - we did it 15:53:36 close action-113 15:53:36 Closed action-113. 15:54:08 close action-74 15:54:08 Closed action-74. 15:54:12 action-118? 15:54:12 action-118 -- Richard Cyganiak to Raise issue on adms:includedAssed vs adms:includedItem -- due 2013-04-19 -- OPEN 15:54:12 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/118 15:54:23 close action-114 15:54:23 Closed action-114. 15:54:36 bhyland: Because the CG is done (i.e. open) 15:54:57 action 118 was resolved ages ago when ADMS was publsihed, no worries 15:54:57 Error finding '118'. You can review and register nicknames at . 15:55:03 close action-118 15:55:03 Closed action-118. 15:55:21 action-119? 15:55:21 action-119 -- Richard Cyganiak to Write up justification for no-change approach to ISSUE-64 (Dataset vs dataset vs hasDataset) -- due 2013-04-19 -- OPEN 15:55:21 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/119 15:55:33 cygri? 15:55:34 HadleyBeeman: Was that done cygri? 15:56:14 cygri: I can't remember what the story was. I don't recall doing it, neitehr do I remember what was involved 15:56:20 +1 15:56:20 ... no longer something we need to do 15:56:25 close action-119 15:56:25 Closed action-119. 15:56:28 action-125? 15:56:28 action-125 -- Tope Omitola to PhilA update ADMS timetable -- due 2013-05-09 -- OPEN 15:56:28 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/125 15:56:42 Did that ages ago. ADMS well out of the door 15:56:50 close action-125 15:56:50 Closed action-125. 15:56:52 action-126? 15:56:52 action-126 -- Tope Omitola to PhilA update RegORG timetable -- due 2013-05-09 -- OPEN 15:56:52 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/126 15:56:58 Likewise 15:57:01 close action-126 15:57:01 Closed action-126. 15:57:06 action-128? 15:57:06 action-128 -- Bernadette Hyland to Coordinate with sandro on CommonScribe replacement process. -- due 2013-05-16 -- OPEN 15:57:06 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/128 15:57:16 Overcome by events 15:57:25 close action-128 15:57:25 Closed action-128. 15:57:27 action-129? 15:57:27 action-129 -- Bernadette Hyland to Update GLD WG Scribe's End of Meeting Checklist -- due 2013-05-16 -- OPEN 15:57:27 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/129 15:57:30 Overcome by events 15:57:34 close action-129 15:57:34 Closed action-129. 15:57:44 action-131? 15:57:44 action-131 -- Hadley Beeman to Communicate work with W3C staff contacts to progress to CR -- due 2013-05-16 -- OPEN 15:57:44 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/131 15:57:55 That was done. Lots of CRs 15:57:58 close action-131 15:57:58 Closed action-131. 15:57:59 action-133? 15:57:59 action-133 -- Hadley Beeman to Going to request another week to review Marios' comments -- due 2013-05-16 -- OPEN 15:57:59 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/133 15:58:08 done a while back 15:58:14 close action-133 15:58:14 Closed action-133. 15:58:17 action-136 15:58:17 action-136 -- Marios Meimaris to Draft response to JSON-LD by early next week -- due 2013-05-23 -- OPEN 15:58:17 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/136 15:58:23 Similar - all done 15:58:26 close action-136 15:58:26 Closed action-136. 15:58:29 action-141? 15:58:29 action-141 -- Bernadette Hyland to Bhyland to fix the meeting page -- due 2013-06-06 -- OPEN 15:58:29 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/141 15:58:36 overcome by... 15:58:42 close action-141 15:58:42 Closed action-141. 15:58:44 action-148? 15:58:44 action-148 -- Bernadette Hyland to Fold in 10 steps to Linked Open Data from Denise W & Martin K, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Jun/0016.html -- due 2013-08-08 -- OPEN 15:58:44 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/148 15:58:56 bhyland: I did that, it's in the current draft 15:58:59 close action-148 15:58:59 Closed action-148. 15:59:07 action-149? 15:59:07 action-149 -- Phil Archer to Will communicate with schema.org facilitators & ask them to update terms from dcat & adms. -- due 2013-10-24 -- OPEN 15:59:07 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/149 15:59:14 PhilA: I did that 16:00:12 action-156? 16:00:12 action-156 -- Bernadette Hyland to Indicate in the bp abstract that the document is unfinished and is subject to change -- due 2013-12-12 -- OPEN 16:00:12 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/156 16:00:14 There's an e-mail about that in the archive 16:00:22 close action-149 16:00:22 Closed action-149. 16:00:28 bhyland: I did that 16:00:35 close action-156 16:00:35 Closed action-156. 16:01:28 http://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPostal_code&ei=0t2pUpKwDdPQkQfc54HABA&usg=AFQjCNG-PxcV-JKGz7Yzd9nq9HxQwhF_Eg&sig2=8fpEt0a1WV8dLndAfAwDZA&bvm=bv.57967247,d.eW0 16:01:33 sorry about that 16:01:38 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_code 16:01:45 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_code 16:01:48 now it's right 16:01:50 Pending review actions http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/pendingreview 16:02:00 action-19? 16:02:00 action-19 -- Biplav Srivastava to Agreed to document some use cases for "roadmap" scenarios for localities contemplating putting content on the LoD. -- due 2011-11-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:02:00 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/19 16:02:13 that was due in Nov 2011! 16:02:19 Must run now :) Came to say: congrats to everyone for awesome work. Great output! Learned a lot. Thank you! :) [If I can make it next week, I'll repeat ;)] 16:02:20 close action-19 16:02:20 Closed action-19. 16:02:30 action-22? 16:02:30 action-22 -- Ronald Reck to Reck to make a contribution to section 2.5 on stability -- due 2011-11-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:02:30 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/22 16:02:32 -csarven 16:02:41 -Sandro 16:02:46 close action-22 16:02:46 Closed action-22. 16:02:52 action-24? 16:02:52 action-24 -- Phil Archer to DCAT Community draft -- due 2011-12-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:02:52 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/24 16:03:15 close action-24 16:03:15 Closed action-24. 16:03:18 action-54? 16:03:18 action-54 -- Bernadette Hyland to Produce a Linked Data Glossary from existing content in wiki & books. -- due 2013-02-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:03:18 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/54 16:03:22 Done 16:03:28 close action-54 16:03:28 Closed action-54. 16:03:28 action-96? 16:03:28 action-96 -- Richard Cyganiak to Ask Sandro how to proceed on getting an HTML representation for the namespace document (see ACTION-68) -- due 2013-02-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:03:29 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/96 16:03:41 cygri? 16:04:00 http://www.w3.org/2013/vocabspec/examples/dcat.html 16:04:27 cygri: I reminded sandroof this 2 weeks ago. Only 10 months late on the action 16:04:33 close action-96 16:04:33 Closed action-96. 16:04:55 -cygri 16:05:17 HadleyBeeman: I'll hold the last part of the agenda - the new groups - until next week. 16:05:28 HadleyBeeman: I'll send out a note about next week in due course 16:05:40 Yay, good looking list http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/ 16:05:45 bye 16:05:45 Thanks Hadley & all! 16:05:52 +??P8 16:05:52 Thanks Phil for scribing 16:05:55 -tinagheen 16:05:57 -PhilA 16:05:59 -DaveReynolds1 16:06:01 cheers 16:06:01 -fadmaa 16:06:01 -Makx_Dekkers 16:06:03 DaveReynolds1 has left #gld 16:06:04 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 16:06:07 -??P8 16:06:08 -bhyland 16:06:11 zakim, who is here? 16:06:11 On the phone I see PhilA.a, HadleyBeeman 16:06:12 On IRC I see gatemezi_, HadleyBeeman, deirdrelee, cygri, olyerickson, Zakim, PhilA, RRSAgent, TallTed, bhyland, sandro, trackbot 16:06:25 trackbot, end meeting 16:06:25 Zakim, list attendees 16:06:25 zakim, who is here? 16:06:26 As of this point the attendees have been HadleyBeeman, +3539149aaaa, bhyland, csarven, cygri, PhilA, Sandro, JoaoPauloAlmeida, olyerickson, fadmaa, deirdrelee, DaveReynolds1, 16:06:29 ... tinagheen, Makx_Dekkers 16:06:29 On the phone I see PhilA.a, HadleyBeeman 16:06:29 On IRC I see gatemezi_, HadleyBeeman, deirdrelee, olyerickson, Zakim, PhilA, RRSAgent, TallTed, bhyland, sandro, trackbot 16:06:33 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:06:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/12/12-gld-minutes.html trackbot 16:06:34 RRSAgent, bye 16:06:34 I see no action items