14:58:13 RRSAgent has joined #gld 14:58:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/12/05-gld-irc 14:58:15 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:58:16 Zakim has joined #gld 14:58:17 Zakim, this will be GLD 14:58:17 ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 14:58:18 Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference 14:58:18 Date: 05 December 2013 14:59:00 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started 14:59:07 +HadleyBeeman 14:59:17 fadmaa has joined #gld 14:59:36 JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld 15:00:09 bhyland has joined #gld 15:00:39 + +3539149aaaa 15:00:46 + +33.4.93.00.aabb 15:00:57 Zakim, aaaa is me 15:00:57 +fadmaa; got it 15:01:41 Biplav has joined #gld 15:01:42 +??P11 15:01:42 +bhyland 15:01:50 Zakim, ??P11 is me 15:01:50 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:01:52 Hi 15:02:23 +Sandro 15:02:58 zakim, who is on the call? 15:02:58 On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, fadmaa, +33.4.93.00.aabb, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Sandro 15:03:14 zakim, gatemezi is aabb 15:03:14 sorry, HadleyBeeman, I do not recognize a party named 'gatemezi' 15:03:18 zakim, aabb is gatemazi 15:03:18 +gatemazi; got it 15:03:24 +biplav 15:03:26 Zakim, mute me 15:03:26 fadmaa should now be muted 15:03:30 scribe: fadmaa 15:03:36 +[IPcaller] 15:03:38 chair: hadley 15:03:54 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-11-21 15:04:03 +1 15:04:06 +1 15:04:08 proposed: approve last week's minutes 15:04:10 +1 15:04:11 deirdrelee has joined #gld 15:04:13 +1 15:04:14 +1 15:04:17 +1 15:04:18 +1 15:04:28 resolved:  approve last week's minutes 15:04:56 the link was wrong 15:05:02 should have been http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-11-28 15:05:05 +1 15:05:13 thanks, joaopaulo! 15:05:31 tinagheen has joined #gld 15:05:41 +1 minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-11-28 15:05:44 +1 anyway 15:05:46 TOPIC: DCAT 15:05:50 (agreed we meant that one) 15:05:50 Zakim, unmute me 15:05:50 fadmaa should no longer be muted 15:06:02 scribe: sandro 15:06:05 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_PR_transition 15:06:16 HadleyBeeman: fadmaa where are we on PR transition 15:06:30 fadmaa: all good, except I didn't know how to generate diff 15:06:44 sandro: I'll do diff 15:06:46 +[LC] 15:06:56 Zakim, LC is me 15:06:56 +tinagheen; got it 15:07:02 zakim, who is on the call? 15:07:02 On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, fadmaa, gatemazi, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Sandro, biplav, [IPcaller], tinagheen 15:07:33 Zakim, IPcaller is deirdrelee 15:07:33 +deirdrelee; got it 15:08:09 fadmaa: Impl report, three sections to look at 15:08:28 dcat:byteSize has only one conforming usage, however its deprecated predecessors (dcat:bytes and dcat:size) are used. dcat:byteSize was introduced to replace dcat:bytes and dcat:size to simplify the data model less than a year ago. The DCAT Application profile for data portals in Europe (DCAT-AP), a specification based on DCAT for describing public sector datasets in Europe, includes dcat:byteSize in its recommended terms. A similar recommendation of dcat:byte[CUT] 15:08:35 fadmaa: only dcat:byteSize is at issue 15:08:44 +1 15:09:15 Some further comments were received. We kept track of them and tried to address all of them. Few requests asked to extend the vocabulary in some direction (e.g. specific terms for tabular data, versioning, etc...) These requests couldn't be addressed due to the scope of the work as described in the WG charter and to the resources available. 15:09:18 HadleyBeeman: under Wide Review, yes, looks good. 15:10:01 HadleyBeeman: I think that's okay. 15:10:44 fadmaa: I added the bit about domains. 15:10:58 … to the HTML document. PhilA did it for the ontology. 15:11:04 fadmaa: It's a "noteworthy" change, but not "minor" 15:11:11 Missing domain definitions for some terms The document was updated so that all properties defined under the DCAT namespace have their domain explicitly mentioned in the document (described above). 15:11:14 DaveReynolds has joined #gld 15:11:20 +1 15:11:24 +1 15:11:46 +1 15:11:50 sandro: suggest s/mentioned/declared/ 15:11:50 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_Implementations 15:11:50 s/mentioned/declared 15:12:24 fadmaa: Three new reports. ckan, ... 15:12:42 … Data Tank 15:12:52 fadmaa: new section, on "Recommending DCAT" 15:12:59 +1 looks great 15:13:04 -deirdrelee 15:13:35 HadleyBeeman: I like it, it supports the case well. 15:14:19 fadmaa: Yes, I'm happy with impl. reports. Links are all good. 15:14:22 Whoot! Great work Fadi! 15:14:24 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments 15:14:26 HadleyBeeman: Comments? 15:14:46 fadmaa: I just replied to Leigh Dodds asking for confirmation that he's okay with the text as it now stands 15:15:11 fadmaa: For the one about downloadURL and accessURL; last week I sent reply, but don't have confirmation from commenters. 15:15:27 fadmaa: Two issues were resolved by WG. We just don't have formal acknowledgement. 15:15:41 deirdrelee_ has joined #gld 15:15:49 HadleyBeeman: Table at top of comments page. 15:16:12 HadleyBeeman: Status.... 15:16:14 +[IPcaller] 15:16:37 +[IPcaller.a] 15:16:37 fadmaa: All we've replied to, but not received.... 15:16:53 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:17:07 +??P11 15:17:09 Zakim, ??P11 is me 15:17:09 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:17:19 sandro: LC vs CR comments....? 15:17:32 fadmaa: Some of the LC ones were CR. 15:17:55 fadmaa: I'll split the CR ones out into another table. 15:18:00 fadmaa: on same page 15:18:13 HadleyBeeman: It looks like we're ready to go! 15:18:21 HadleyBeeman: Anything else on your to-do list? 15:18:38 HadleyBeeman: As the WG had enough time to review it? 15:18:53 The organization of the http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments is really helpful. 15:18:56 bhyland: I'd like a chance to review, but I don't want to hold things up. 15:19:44 sandro: If folks needs to review, we could resolve to move forward sending transition request tomorrow? 15:20:05 bhyland: THanks so much Fadi. Excellent, excellent work. 15:21:02 PROPOSED: DCAT is ready to advance to Proposed Recommendations. We 15:21:09 PROPOSED: DCAT is ready to advance to Proposed Recommendations. 15:21:13 PROPOSED: DCAT is ready to advance to Proposed Recommendation. 15:21:16 +1 15:21:18 +1 15:21:20 +1 15:21:21 +1 15:21:22 +1 15:21:24 +1 15:21:25 +1 15:21:26 +1 15:21:44 +1 15:21:53 RESOLVED: DCAT is ready to advance to Proposed Recommendation. 15:21:59 Yay! 15:22:05 congradulations!!!! 15:22:08 Zakim, mute me 15:22:08 fadmaa should now be muted 15:22:17 congrats fadmaa and al. 15:22:21 TOPIC: Data Cube 15:22:21 topic: Data Cube 15:22:30 15:22:34 scribe:fadmaa 15:22:40 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_PR_transition 15:22:56 Congratulations to Fadi, John, and Phil for the considerable work in getting DCAT transitioned! 15:22:59 DaveReynolds: There's been no change to the transition page itself 15:23:09 s/transitioned/ready for transition 15:23:09 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Implementations 15:23:24 ... the implementations page http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Implementations had three new reports 15:23:39 ... there were some issued raised related to conformance report 15:23:46 s/issued/issues/ 15:24:25 DaveReynolds: there were three failures but all agreed that the failure was due to the data and not the conformance test 15:24:50 ... that's a good indicator that the conformance tests are doing good job 15:25:32 DaveReynolds: It is still possible that we get an extra one 15:25:46 +1 DaveReynolds this is awesome 15:25:53 HadleyBeeman: that's great work! phenomenal 15:26:11 great work DaveReynolds ! 15:26:38 DaveReynolds: no changes were made to the Data Cube TR 15:26:46 @Dave, your implementations write up should serve as the bar for all others, excellent work. Thank you! 15:26:49 +1 15:26:53 RESOLVED: Data Cube is ready to advance to Proposed Recommendation. 15:26:58 +1 15:26:59 Proposed: Transition Data Cube to recommendation 15:27:00 +1 15:27:01 +1 15:27:03 +1 15:27:04 +1 15:27:04 +1 15:27:05 +1 15:27:07 +1 15:27:20 Proposed: Transition Data Cube to Proposed recommendation 15:27:20 +1 15:27:41 Resolved: Transition Data Cube to Proposed recommendation 15:27:49 Congrats! 15:27:57 Congratulations!! 15:28:03 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_PR_transition 15:28:07 TOPIC: ORG vocabulary 15:28:21 DaveReynolds: ORG TR hasn't changed since two weeks 15:28:31 ... there has been no new implementation reports 15:28:36 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations 15:29:08 DaveReynolds: all terms are used apart from 5 terms each of which having 1 usage 15:29:16 ... and interest in using it later 15:29:54 ... I'd recommend to proceed with all the terms 15:30:04 ... this was agreed by the WG 15:30:46 DaveReynolds: we got contacted by a user who is willing to help the WG with the Org ontology 15:30:52 ... a bit late for our time 15:31:03 ... but that's evidence of interest 15:31:12 ... they promise to contact the list 15:31:33 q+ 15:32:11 sandro: I don't see a link from TR to the comments page on ORG 15:32:22 DaveReynolds: there were no issues raised durng the CR period 15:32:33 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:32:41 sandro: any relevant emails other than implementation reports? 15:32:46 +??P11 15:32:48 Zakim, ??P11 is me 15:32:48 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:32:50 DaveReynolds: I'll double check 15:33:06 ... may be clarifications requests 15:33:19 sandro: it is helpful to have these in a page 15:33:24 Dave , I have a small implementation that might be useful..see a small sample here http://goo.gl/fvEF21 ...with an application here http://semantics.eurecom.fr/datalift/Equipment/ 15:33:25 ... linked from the TR 15:33:36 I will send you an email 15:33:47 DaveReynolds: I'll do the same for the Data Cube 15:34:06 sandro: it's good to have such a page even if there were no issues 15:34:20 sandro: The Director will want to see a Disposition of Comments page, even if it is "There were no comments" 15:34:40 Proposed: transition ORG to proposed recommendation 15:34:43 +1 15:34:44 -DaveReynolds 15:34:53 +1 15:34:55 +1 15:34:56 +1 15:34:58 +1 15:34:59 +1 15:35:00 +1 15:35:08 +1 15:35:27 +1 15:35:44 resolved: transition ORG to proposed recommendation 15:35:49 Double whoot! really well done guys. Grazie mille 15:35:58 congratulations again! 15:35:58 great! 15:37:07 Well done, davreynolds and cygri!! 15:37:24 s/davreynolds/davereynolds 15:37:56 HadleyBeeman: These seem to be specialist vocabs, where lots of people don't care very much, but some people need them a lot. 15:38:38 HadleyBeeman: Editors please comments page & transition requestions in 24 hrs, then chairs will send these out. 15:39:25 q+ 15:40:01 hadleybeeman: We'll Send out transition requests to W3M and W3C chairs tomorrow 15:40:01 We'll arrange transition meetings (to include editors) 15:40:01 15:41:38 Last day for publications is Dec 17th. 15:41:55 If request comes in tomorrow, we can meet 13 or 16-Dec '13 15:42:16 +1 15:42:39 sandro: can the editors do the required changes in teh next 24 hours? 15:42:45 DaveReynolds: yes 15:42:52 yes 15:43:02 topic: Best practices 15:43:11 Report on status of Best Practices doc: 15:43:11 The editors believe we've resolved all reported issues in Tracker, including Issue-6 15:43:11 15:43:11 We've folded in the master normative & informative references but there is one more to add [Wood2011] 15:43:11 15:43:11 The work to link to the Linked Data Glossary is still outstanding, but isn't a material change. 15:43:11 15:43:12 Editors still must address the most recent feedback (Nov/Dec 2013) from Dave Reynolds, João Paulo Almeida, John Erickson & Richard Cyganiak which are very important. 15:43:12 15:43:12 I feel the URI Construction section is not complete. It is insufficient & I personally want to improve it. URI Construction section needs at a minimum references to RPI's design principals, Dutch Gov't reference, as well as informative guidance. 15:43:13 15:43:13 Do we need a disposition of comments for this WG Note? I feel this may help with transition to the next Web Best Practices WG. 15:43:42 bhyland: thanks Dave for the comments 15:44:00 ... editors resolved all the issues recorded on the tracker 15:44:16 ... we got quite a bit of feedback 15:44:38 ... we still need to review the document 15:44:52 ... an important section taht I'd like to improve is the URI construction 15:45:04 Request to consider comments I sent earlier. Some still relevant/ unaddressed. At http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Nov/0029.html 15:45:15 s/taht/that 15:46:11 q+ 15:46:21 q- 15:46:49 HadleyBeeman: from teh next WG perspective, the more organised the work the easier for the next WG 15:47:06 ... I am more concerned about getting our work finished in this WG 15:47:19 Thanks Biplav..we will look at it closely. At the mean time, could you look at the current version of the doc at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#sumbp. TIA 15:47:39 ... the question is more to the editors whether the quality is good enough even if the scope is not as wide as we might like 15:48:02 q+ 15:48:11 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:48:23 bhyland: best practices document can be reviewed. I encourage people to do so 15:48:28 +??P11 15:48:35 Zakim, ??P11 is me 15:48:35 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:48:36 ... I want to change the section on the URI construction 15:49:22 q+ 15:49:50 HadleyBeeman: changes to the document is more important than organising the comments IMO 15:50:10 For example, choosing entity URIs is only "notes" quality, https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#howto 15:50:23 ... is it possible to do the changes to the URI construction section by next Monday? 15:51:09 HadleyBeeman: I mean having a stable version of the document to review by Monday? 15:51:11 bhyland: yes 15:51:13 q? 15:51:31 q- 15:51:38 gatemezi: I think we addressed most of the comments we received 15:51:51 ... I believe we can have a stable version by next week 15:52:06 Biplav: the BP document is extremely valuable 15:52:39 ... even if there are some pieces which are incomplete, I'd suggest having a section that indicate non-polished sections 15:52:48 ... the next WG can take it from there 15:53:07 ... let's have coloured sections indicating where further work is needed 15:53:14 bhyland: that's good idea 15:53:35 ack biplav 15:53:51 ack dave 15:54:33 DaveReynolds: in addition to talking about individual sections, I suggest we have an indication in the abstract that this document is unfinished 15:55:02 ... to set the reader's expectation and indicate that furhter changes might be introduced 15:55:40 ACTION: bhyland to indicate in the BP abstract that the document is unfinished and is subject to change 15:55:44 Created ACTION-156 - Indicate in the bp abstract that the document is unfinished and is subject to change [on Bernadette Hyland - due 2013-12-12]. 15:58:21 thanks all! a great meeting! 15:58:28 -HadleyBeeman 15:58:29 -Sandro 15:58:29 -gatemazi 15:58:31 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:58:31 -fadmaa 15:58:32 -tinagheen 15:58:32 -bhyland 15:58:33 -[IPcaller.a] 15:58:40 thank you, fadmaa and sandro for scribing!! 15:58:50 RRSAgent, generate minutes 15:58:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/12/05-gld-minutes.html fadmaa 15:58:55 -biplav 15:58:56 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended 15:58:56 Attendees were HadleyBeeman, +3539149aaaa, +33.4.93.00.aabb, fadmaa, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, Sandro, gatemazi, biplav, tinagheen, deirdrelee, DaveReynolds 15:58:58 RRSAgent, make minutes public 15:58:58 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', fadmaa. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:01:44 @Hadley, that was a rockin' GLD WG call, congrats & thanks for pushing things forward! Well done. 16:27:37 bhyland has joined #gld 16:28:36 HadleyBeeman has left #gld 18:02:21 Zakim has left #gld 18:02:29 DaveReynolds has left #gld 19:45:46 bhyland has joined #gld