14:52:25 RRSAgent has joined #gld 14:52:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/11/21-gld-irc 14:52:27 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:52:29 Zakim, this will be GLD 14:52:29 ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 14:52:30 Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference 14:52:30 Date: 21 November 2013 14:58:20 Makx has joined #GLD 14:59:02 PhilA has joined #gld 14:59:38 fadmaa has joined #gld 15:00:38 james has joined #gld 15:00:47 DaveReynolds has joined #gld 15:01:04 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started 15:01:09 +bhyland 15:01:11 +[IPcaller] 15:01:29 olyerickson has joined #gld 15:02:32 + +3539149aaaa 15:02:42 +HadleyBeeman 15:02:43 +[IPcaller] 15:02:46 Zakim, aaa is me 15:02:46 sorry, fadmaa, I do not recognize a party named 'aaa' 15:02:47 +[IPcaller.a] 15:02:50 zakim, ipcaller is me 15:02:50 +PhilA; got it 15:02:55 JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld 15:02:57 +[IPcaller] 15:02:59 -[IPcaller.a] 15:03:03 Zakim, 3539149 is me 15:03:03 sorry, fadmaa, I do not recognize a party named '3539149' 15:03:07 zakim, [ipcaller] is me. 15:03:07 +olyerickson; got it 15:03:09 Zakim, +3539149 is me 15:03:09 +fadmaa; got it 15:03:18 +[IPcaller] 15:03:22 Biplav has joined #gld 15:03:43 Makx has joined #gld 15:03:54 + +33.4.93.00.aabb 15:04:05 gatemezi has joined #gld 15:04:26 no voice for me today 15:04:36 zakim, aabb is gatemezi 15:04:36 +gatemezi; got it 15:04:37 +??P26 15:04:42 ??P26 is me 15:04:48 Zakim, ??P26 is me 15:04:48 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:04:51 Zakim, mute me 15:04:51 fadmaa should now be muted 15:05:00 scribe:gatemezi 15:05:06 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-11-14 15:05:13 chair:HadleyBeeman 15:05:17 proposed: accept minutes of last weeks meeting? 15:05:24 s/weeks/week's 15:05:26 +1 15:05:31 +1 15:05:38 cygri has joined #gld 15:05:42 wasn't there either 15:06:10 +1 15:06:15 +Sandro 15:06:30 +1 15:06:41 resolved: accept minutes of last weeks meeting 15:06:51 Resolved: meeting accepted of last week 15:06:55 Biplav - I am on IRC and having trouble connecting over phone. Trying. 15:06:58 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Implementations 15:06:59 Topic: Data Cube 15:07:22 tinagheen has joined #gld 15:07:34 DaveReynolds: Haave received new implementations ... 15:07:36 zakim, code? 15:07:37 the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), cygri 15:07:54 +[IPcaller] 15:07:59 +[LC] 15:08:02 ...and provided link on that, some to be published by December 15:08:02 +??P32 15:08:07 Zakim, [LC] is me 15:08:07 +tinagheen; got it 15:08:08 DeirdreLee has joined #gld 15:08:09 s/haave/have 15:08:10 + +91.80.67.84.aacc 15:08:28 +91.80.67.84.aacc is me (Biplav) 15:08:31 That's fabulous news - all terms used! 15:08:39 ...Plan to go ahead for Transition 15:08:44 Serious kudos to Dave on that 15:09:22 zakim, ??P32 is me 15:09:22 +cygri; got it 15:09:41 ..Still have to track the optional terms, without any criteria there.. So fine for that. 15:10:09 q+ 15:10:39 zakim, aacc is Biplav 15:10:39 sorry, PhilA, I do not recognize a party named 'aacc' 15:10:57 zakim, ipcaller is DeirdreLee 15:10:57 +DeirdreLee; got it 15:10:57 ack cygri 15:11:41 cygri asks what is the timeline for documentation report? Have to check all the integrity constraints? 15:12:20 Dave: a promise to have implementations by the end of November 15:12:38 Topic: Org 15:12:48 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations 15:13:10 DaveReynolds: Just one more implementation added since last week 15:14:07 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_PR_transition 15:14:33 ..current state is that 5 terms are not really used , and updated with some evidence of usage terms 15:15:07 +1 to Sandro 15:16:08 Sandro: What could be done for the terms not used ? 15:16:44 DaveReynolds: We can still go ahead at the current state.. approved by Sandro 15:18:10 Phil: Do we have assurance that those terms would be implemented ? 15:19:42 HadleyBeeman: So we've agreed to take this to transition as-is and try to get it through. 15:19:58 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:20:10 +??P26 15:20:15 Zakim, ??P26 is me 15:20:15 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:20:15 DaveReynolds : use Turtle for the example, so change the section to be non normative, for dependence with the other group 15:21:47 Note on Normative Refs might be relevant http://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references 15:22:09 from TPAC 15:22:34 PhilA gives a reference on normative from TPAC, see http://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references 15:23:01 -cygri 15:23:16 Topic: Best Practices 15:23:44 Boris sent his regrets earlier 15:24:23 Bhyland: work ongoing on the doc 15:24:32 +??P3 15:24:37 zakim, ??P3 is me 15:24:37 +cygri; got it 15:24:47 procurement section removed! 15:24:53 Topic: Procurement in BP 15:24:55 current status of the doc here https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html 15:24:56 See charter http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/charter 15:25:04 This is consistent with our resolution at the f2f http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-04-11#resolution_2 15:27:21 Procurement section has been entirely removed per past GLD WG discussion circa April 2013.  Editors have reflected the WG's decision to remove it.  15:29:40 bhyland : the work here could be used as input for any other WG to make a more stable document 15:30:03 makx has joined #gld 15:30:06 zakim, mute cygri 15:30:06 cygri should now be muted 15:30:12 zakim, who is speaking? 15:30:22 gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: bhyland (35%) 15:31:01 HadleyBeeman : a new timeline for the document? 15:31:20 ...or deadline? 15:31:21 1.  Editors revise and draft until 28 November.2.  One week for working group comments and discussion (until 5 December)** 15:31:21 3.  One week for the editors to revise the document, respond to feedback, and return new draft to the working group for final review (5-12 December) 15:31:21 4.  The working group resolves to publish: 12 December 15:31:33 Does that look right, bhyland? 15:32:09 yes, thanks/ 15:32:22 issue-6? 15:32:22 issue-6 -- How should publishers figure out good URIs for properties with non-literal ranges? -- raised 15:32:22 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/6 15:33:04 it looks like it's a very specific issue to be in the same level as the other sections in BP... (1.8 How should publishers figure out good URIs for properties with non-literal ranges?) 15:34:43 Zakim, unmute me 15:34:43 fadmaa should no longer be muted 15:34:51 Topic: DCAT 15:34:57 https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/70 15:35:02 fadmaa: 2 updates here 15:35:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Nov/0026.html 15:35:26 """That's right, a downloadURL is a legal accessURL, but we don't want to enforce that as an entailment. Profiles of dcat may, for example, wish to impose a stronger separation where they only use accessURL for non-download locations, and we don't want to preclude such usage. We'll clarify the editorial text."" 15:35:30 ...discussion around issue-70, and see Dave email 15:35:37 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:35:39 s/Dave/DaveReynolds 15:35:50 +??P26 15:35:57 Zakim, ??P26 is me 15:35:57 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 15:36:45 Dave's second suggestion had the correct balance (we feel) 15:36:46 Fine by me :), feel free to rephase as appropriate, was just informal expression. 15:36:49 proposal: use option 2 of DaveReynolds email as official answer on DCAT 15:37:50 option 2 +1 15:37:51 Biplav has joined #gld 15:39:44 -cygri 15:40:11 fadmaa still have to discuss on versioning 15:40:26 -bhyland 15:40:51 phila: didn't Antoine Issac reply? I thought he was happy 15:41:02 makx has joined #gld 15:41:13 +bhyland 15:41:16 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Nov/0002.html Antoine's mail 15:41:46 He's happy (at least according to that email) 15:41:51 q+ 15:42:01 fadmaa will update the page accordingly 15:42:22 s/page/page in wiki for comments 15:42:29 +??P36 15:42:36 zakim, ??P36 is me 15:42:36 +cygri; got it 15:42:37 ack me 15:43:13 PhilA raises the worry of someone asking for putting more domain, range on properties 15:43:37 q+ 15:43:45 +1 in support of PhilA's reluctance to specify domains and ranges 15:43:51 ack me 15:43:58 PhilA asks if we should have more specific domain, range 15:44:07 although restricting the usage, it facilitates interoperability 15:44:30 +1 to add more domain, range 15:44:32 but also being too liberal is a problem 15:44:36 you say nothing 15:44:48 q+ 15:45:22 Zakim, who is speaking? 15:45:23 ack cygri 15:45:23 ack cygri 15:45:29 Hard to hear cygri 15:45:33 gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (38%), cygri (37%) 15:45:44 mute me. 15:45:50 zakim, mute me. 15:45:50 olyerickson should now be muted 15:45:53 This needs to be decided for each property, not in generael 15:46:27 +1 that's what I meant 15:46:35 cygri: there is a couple of properties saying in the text the range, but without explicitly adding in the vocabulary 15:46:35 I have an example - 'keyword' which is defined as 'A keyword or tag describing the dataset.' 15:46:57 +1 to cygri, the formal declaration should match the textual definition, 15:47:03 +1 to cygri 15:47:35 +1 15:47:38 zakim, unmute me. 15:47:38 olyerickson should no longer be muted 15:48:22 What about the diagram showing the relationships? 15:48:27 q+ 15:48:32 q+ 15:48:35 +1 to sandro on the comment that quality in ontology is improved by considering the domain and ranges 15:48:36 ack oly 15:50:10 olyerickson: we have to help users adopting the vocab 15:50:14 ack me 15:50:14 q- 15:50:41 s/generael/general 15:51:16 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:51:24 the call drop 15:51:30 sorry about that 15:51:35 fadmaa: I prefer not to restrict things, but can add more specifications 15:51:56 I was saying that the question is whether the property is meaningful without a restriction of domain and range 15:52:21 say, e.g., dateOfBirth is clearly something that you should restrict to make it meaningul 15:52:31 for some reason I can't get back on the call 15:52:32 ... 15:52:56 PhilA: I'll taken an action to read through the turtle schema and the original comment, and see if there is a domain or range not specifed — that it may be useful to do so. If so, I'll tell the mailing list. 15:53:07 Zakim, who's present? 15:53:07 I don't understand your question, gatemezi. 15:53:15 … Adding a domain or range is editorial; removing them may be substantive changes. 15:53:34 Thanks JoaoPauloAlmeida - helpful comment 15:53:35 Zakim, who is present? 15:53:35 I don't understand your question, gatemezi. 15:53:42 zakm, who is here? 15:53:48 zakim, who is here? 15:53:48 On the phone I see james, fadmaa, HadleyBeeman, PhilA, olyerickson, DaveReynolds, gatemezi (muted), Sandro, DeirdreLee, tinagheen, biplav, bhyland, cygri 15:53:51 On IRC I see makx, Biplav, DeirdreLee, tinagheen, cygri, gatemezi, JoaoPauloAlmeida, olyerickson, DaveReynolds, james, fadmaa, PhilA, RRSAgent, Zakim, HadleyBeeman, bhyland, 15:53:51 ... TallTed, trackbot, sandro 15:54:10 zakim, who has sent regrets? 15:54:10 sorry, gatemezi, I do not recognize a party named 'who' 15:55:05 Cygri: Adding a domain type, by definition, is a change. Stating a domain just tags the use of the domain of being of a particular class. 15:55:20 PhilA: Does it help to declare a domain? What do you gain by doing that? 15:55:21 s/Cygri/cygri 15:55:43 Cygri: Then an inference engine can work with it. 15:56:12 … We may have to look on a case-by-case basis 15:56:27 +1 to looking into them case by case 15:56:38 PhilA: need to go through the schema to see if there is ambiguity to specify domain and range 15:57:21 +1 for looking on case by case. domain-range helps but we should not insist at the cost of being overly restrictive. 15:57:51 PhilA takes an action for that 15:57:54 -cygri 15:58:03 Also implementation report from WHOI 15:58:04 action: PhilA to review domains and ranges as implied/stated by the spec and encoded in the schema 15:58:04 Created ACTION-155 - Review domains and ranges as implied/stated by the spec and encoded in the schema [on Phil Archer - due 2013-11-28]. 15:58:04 fadmaa is working on 2 implementations of DCAT 15:58:37 -DeirdreLee 15:58:53 olyerickson looking for another example 15:59:14 -biplav 15:59:29 ...and have to state the specific properties used by that given implementation 15:59:51 zakim, who is here? 15:59:51 On the phone I see james, fadmaa, HadleyBeeman, PhilA, olyerickson, DaveReynolds, gatemezi (muted), Sandro, tinagheen, bhyland 15:59:53 On IRC I see makx, DeirdreLee, tinagheen, cygri, gatemezi, JoaoPauloAlmeida, olyerickson, DaveReynolds, james, fadmaa, PhilA, RRSAgent, Zakim, HadleyBeeman, bhyland, TallTed, 15:59:53 ... trackbot, sandro 16:00:39 +??P36 16:00:47 Zakim, ??P36 is me 16:00:48 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 16:02:12 HadleyBeeman, do we have enough information for exit criteria for WHOI implementation? 16:02:22 Our CR exit criteria for DCAT: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_CR_transition#Implementations 16:02:54 -bhyland 16:03:23 -tinagheen 16:03:50 JoaoPauloAlmeida has left #gld 16:04:18 JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld 16:04:27 -olyerickson 16:04:53 action: john erickson put a paragraph into the mailing list to explain how the WHOI report helps us meet the CR criteria 16:04:53 'john' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., olyerickson, jgoodwin, jsherida). 16:04:59 fadmaa feeling good enough to go through DCAT procedure 16:05:06 ..on exit criteria 16:05:16 thanks all! 16:05:18 -james 16:05:19 james has left #gld 16:05:20 -HadleyBeeman 16:05:21 -PhilA 16:05:21 -Sandro 16:05:23 -fadmaa 16:05:23 -DaveReynolds 16:05:23 bye 16:05:25 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 16:05:39 trackbot end meeeting 16:05:39 Sorry, PhilA, I don't understand 'trackbot end meeeting'. Please refer to for help. 16:05:40 RRSAgent, set logs world-visible 16:05:52 trackbot, end meeeting 16:05:52 Sorry, PhilA, I don't understand 'trackbot, end meeeting'. Please refer to for help. 16:06:08 RSSAgent, generate minutes 16:06:26 zakim, bye 16:06:26 leaving. As of this point the attendees were bhyland, james, +3539149aaaa, HadleyBeeman, PhilA, olyerickson, fadmaa, DaveReynolds, +33.4.93.00.aabb, gatemezi, JoaoPauloAlmeida, 16:06:26 Zakim has left #gld 16:06:29 ... Sandro, tinagheen, +91.80.67.84.aacc, cygri, biplav, DeirdreLee 16:06:39 PhilA has left #gld 16:09:17 RRSAgent, set logs world-visible 16:09:27 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:09:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/11/21-gld-minutes.html gatemezi 16:09:37 HadleyBeeman has left #gld 16:12:34 @Sandro, how to I get the final version of the minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/11/21-gld-minutes.html ? 16:13:01 ..when looking at http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-11-21, it seems empty.. any help? 16:42:33 olyerickson has left #gld 16:52:43 DaveReynolds has left #gld 17:16:11 bhyland has joined #gld