14:42:11 RRSAgent has joined #papag 14:42:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/10/29-papag-irc 14:42:13 RRSAgent, make logs 121 14:42:15 Zakim, this will be 72724 14:42:16 ok, trackbot; I see SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM scheduled to start in 18 minutes 14:42:16 Meeting: Push API Patent Advisory Group Teleconference 14:42:17 Date: 29 October 2013 14:53:01 agenda+ Review and call for objections on the Draft PAG Report 14:53:26 wseltzer has changed the topic to: Call today, 29 October http://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/PAG_Report 14:59:19 dka has joined #papag 14:59:36 efullea has joined #papag 15:00:34 SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM has now started 15:00:41 +efullea 15:00:47 +dka 15:02:18 zakim, call wendy-office 15:02:18 ok, wseltzer; the call is being made 15:02:19 +Wendy 15:03:35 +??P25 15:03:43 -> http://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/PAG_Report Draft PAG Report 15:05:05 zakim, who is here? 15:05:05 On the phone I see efullea, dka, Wendy, Yves 15:05:06 On IRC I see efullea, dka, RRSAgent, Zakim, trackbot, Yves, wseltzer 15:06:37 plh has joined #papag 15:06:46 +Plh 15:09:11 chair: wseltzer 15:09:21 Topic: PAG Report 15:09:25 -> http://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/PAG_Report Draft PAG Report 15:10:15 wseltzer: sent the report last week with call for objections 15:12:04 ... The Push API PAG believes that the technology described in the Nokia Patents does not apply to the Push API Specification. 15:12:05 wendy: following the summary of disclosures, we could move forward without modifying the spec 15:12:35 ... any other recommendation to make? 15:12:46 ... or concerns or considerations? 15:12:52 No questions from us. 15:12:59 [wseltzer reviews the draft report, section-by-section] 15:13:00 We are happy with the report as it is. 15:13:08 plh: +1 15:13:33 ?: in the conclusion, should we be explicit on the version of the spec? 15:13:52 wendy: the working draft is linked at the top 15:14:19 plh: clarify in the conclusion, too 15:14:27 wendy: ok 15:14:38 ... I'll make the modification 15:14:43 Makes sense as a clarification. 15:15:07 I don't think a new call is necessary - for what it's worth. 15:15:27 +1 to say that it is just an editorial clarification 15:15:31 It's editorial. 15:15:51 ACTION: Wendy to forward the conclusion on the Director 15:15:52 Created ACTION-8 - Forward the conclusion on the director [on Wendy Seltzer - due 2013-11-05]. 15:15:58 PROPOSED: Forward the conclusion to the director as PAG Report 15:16:07 plh: should we recommend to close the PAG as well? 15:16:11 wendy: I think so 15:16:30 ... do we anticipate a change in the spec to make it necessary to revisit the question? 15:16:41 Eduardo: not for now 15:16:55 ... I don't hyave in mind any change at the moment 15:18:30 Resolved: the report is approved by the PAG 15:18:46 Wendy: I'll forward to the Director and look for recommendation on the PAG itself 15:18:51 ... the WG can continue on the REC track 15:19:00 Dan: thank you Wendy 15:19:09 ... went as well as it could have 15:19:22 Wendy: thank you Dan and Eduardo 15:19:39 [adjourned] 15:19:44 -dka 15:19:47 -Plh 15:19:49 -Yves 15:19:51 -Wendy 15:19:54 -efullea 15:19:55 SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM has ended 15:19:55 Attendees were efullea, dka, Wendy, Yves, Plh 15:20:14 trackbot, end teleconf 15:20:14 Zakim, list attendees 15:20:14 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 15:20:22 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:20:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/29-papag-minutes.html trackbot 15:20:23 RRSAgent, bye 15:21:38 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:21:50 rrsagent, make minutes 15:21:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/29-papag-minutes.html wseltzer