http://www.w3.org/2013/HCLS-tutorials/RIM/

<Josh> Can you re-paste the link?

http://www.w3.org/2013/HCLS-tutorials/RIM/

<Josh> "We can also... ?"

http://www.w3.org/2013/C-CDA/IJ.xml

mike: is FHIR as RIM the most effective path?

ericP: can be used to get interop with e.g. CCDA

mike: is FHIR beholden to expressing CCDA?

Josh: i don't believe that CCDA coverage is in the critical path
... HL7 *is* trying to get at least a nominal mapping to RIM
... the intention is that FHIR is cover CCDA. but no one's working on the code

riksmithies: agreed. priorities elsewhere

mike: would that be valuable if we volunteered

<eafry> Eric- I just got a call I have to deal with and need to drop off. Sorry.

<riksmithies_> http://gforge.hl7.org/svn/hl7owl/trunk

<Josh> Shoot, I lied and said I was taking notes.

<Josh> Starting now.

<Josh> [backlog:... Josh: HL7 community agrees that C-CDA <--> FHIR mappings are desirable. Not sure if anyone is working on them. Eric: Yes, we could build something like that using FHIR -> ORIM, and then ORIM + Shape Expression Language -> C-CDA]

<Josh> http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hl7owl/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2F

<Josh> should work with no auth.

<Josh> Eric: How can we collaborate on breaking these tasks down into chunks. Could Mike use an OWL reasoner, write logic, and run SPARQL queries on the result?

<Josh> Mike: Think so.

<Josh> Eric: OK. To my knowledge, that's the most "test-driven development" way to proceed

<Josh> Mike: Schedules are pretty full through the end of the year, but I can at least "get my feet wet."

OWL-SPARQL-tool -d IJ.ttl -o ontology-that-im-working-on -q 'SELECT ?result WHERE { ?s rim:result ?result }'

OWL-SPARQL-tool -d IJ.ttl -o ontology-that-im-working-on -q 'SELECT ?result WHERE { ?s a fhir:problem ; fhir:result ?result }'

OWL-SPARQL-tool -d IJ.ttl -o fhir-O-RIM-ontology -q 'SELECT ?result WHERE { ?s a fhir:problem ; fhir:result ?result }'

http://www.w3.org/2013/HCLS-tutorials/RIM/