20:02:25 RRSAgent has joined #webperf 20:02:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/10/23-webperf-irc 20:02:27 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:02:27 Zakim has joined #webperf 20:02:29 Zakim, this will be WPWG 20:02:29 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 20:02:30 Meeting: Web Performance Working Group Teleconference 20:02:30 Date: 23 October 2013 20:03:04 zakim, this will be per 20:03:04 ok, plh; I see RWC_web-per()4:00PM scheduled to start 3 minutes ago 20:03:10 RWC_web-per()4:00PM has now started 20:03:12 +Plh 20:03:17 + +1.503.264.aaaa 20:03:38 zakim, aaaa is Ganesh 20:03:38 +Ganesh; got it 20:04:13 JatinderMann has joined #webperf 20:08:07 + +1.425.681.aabb 20:08:22 zakim, aabb is Jatinder 20:08:22 +Jatinder; got it 20:08:32 trackbot, start telecon 20:08:34 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:08:36 Zakim, this will be WPWG 20:08:36 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 20:08:37 Meeting: Web Performance Working Group Teleconference 20:08:37 Date: 23 October 2013 20:08:45 zakim, this is per 20:08:45 ok, plh; that matches RWC_web-per()4:00PM 20:09:59 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2013OctDec/0056.html 20:10:01 Topic: Existing specs 20:10:11 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2013OctDec/0072.html 20:10:28 so, RAF, User Timing, and Performance Timeline should be moving forward 20:11:44 plh: We should have a issues list for our specs prior to TPAC. 20:11:48 http://www.w3.org/2013/08/cr-issues-performance-timeline.html 20:12:03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Aug/0106.html 20:13:18 performance.getEntries() == performance.getEntries() returns false 20:15:55 performance.getEntries()[0] == performance.getEntries()[0] 20:16:13 performance.getEntries() == performance.getEntries() 20:16:20 Jatinder: IE11 gives me false on both tests 20:16:46 performance.getEntries()[0] == performance.getEntries()[0] 20:17:11 Jatinder: Returns true in Chrome 20:17:29 performance.getEntries() == performance.getEntries() is false for the entire list 20:18:13 Jatinder: Seems like we should test both cases. 20:18:58 Jatinder: I made updates to Performance Timeline based on feedback from Philippe, namely note to wiki page with latest known entryTypes and a new Vendor Extensions section, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Oct/0053.html 20:19:39 Plh: Let's plan to do the transition request sometime next week. 20:21:05 Jatinder: Navigation Timing L1 Errata: Update Performance object to implement EventTarget, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Oct/0046.html 20:26:43 plh: NTL1 change would have no compatibility hit, but will have a conformance hit. We would have to go to Last Call again and the whole process again. 20:27:08 plh: Alternatively, we can just define this change in NT L2 and deprecate NT L1. Resource Timing would be tied to NT L2 though. 20:33:27 Jatinder: Seeing that we have defined all the attributes in the NT L2 spec, I am okay with deprecating NT L1 in favor of NT L2. IE11 already supports NT L2. I'll email the list. 20:33:36 Jatinder: High Resolution Time L1 Errata: Move navigationStart reference to note, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Oct/0049.html 20:36:08 Plh: I'll make the update to the Errata. 20:36:54 Jatinder: Page Visibility L1 had a spelling mistake on visibilitychange, which was fixed in the latest draft. Do we need to update errata or can this change just be pushed out? 20:37:52 Plh: Let me follow and see what I can do about this. 20:38:19 ACTION Plh to fix visibilitychange typo in Page Visibility L1 spec. 20:38:19 Created ACTION-109 - Fix visibilitychange typo in page visibility l1 spec. [on Philippe Le Hégaret - due 2013-10-30]. 20:38:39 Topic: Progress on new specs 20:38:58 Jatinder: I have been making changes based on feedback on Resource Priorities. I don't believe we have any significant feedback changes remaining, but there may be some. Can we at least publish this spec as a FPWD? 20:39:11 Resolved: Publish resource priorities as FPWD 20:39:40 Jatinder: I haven't looked at the Beacon spec in a while, but I didn't think there was a lot of feedback on that spec. I may need to strengthen the processing model. Can we publish this spec as FPWD as well? 20:39:40 Resolved: Publish beacon API as FPWD 20:40:23 Jatinder: We had quite a bit discussion on Navigation Error Logging and Resource Error Logging, and I think there are changes that remain to be made. I'll ping Arvind and I'll try to help make changes. 20:40:44 Jatinder: I believe for Prerender we decided that we should try to get the link = prerender text added to the HTML5 spec. Is there a bug open on that? 20:44:55 Plh: We updated the wiki page pointed on the HTML5 spec. We will want to ask HTML WG to put this into the spec. 20:47:46 Plh: Why topics did you want to talk to with HTML WG? 20:48:22 Jatinder: Mainly the prerender spec and we can introduce the Resource Priorities spec. 20:48:47 Jatinder: I believe we still have plans to document HAR as a note. We should try to make progress on that 20:48:55 Jatinder: Based on the last discussions, I'm not sure if we are yet committed to JavaScript Injection. We should close on whether we want to pursue it or not. 20:49:46 Jatinder: Since TPAC is only two weeks away, why don't we talk about this spec at TPAC. 20:50:17 Plh: Mark will be at TPAC. 20:50:28 Jatinder: We'll be sure to talk about this with Mark and Alois in the room. 20:54:02 Topic: Moving repository to github 20:54:08 Jatinder: Philippe shared documentation here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Oct/0052.html 21:00:03 Topic: TPAC 2013 21:00:40 plh: I will add the agenda on a wiki page 21:00:47 -Ganesh 21:00:48 -Jatinder 21:00:50 -Plh 21:00:50 RWC_web-per()4:00PM has ended 21:00:50 Attendees were Plh, +1.503.264.aaaa, Ganesh, +1.425.681.aabb, Jatinder 21:06:38 rrsagent, generate minutes 21:06:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/23-webperf-minutes.html JatinderMann 22:15:01 Zakim has left #webperf