14:57:48 RRSAgent has joined #dpub 14:57:48 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/10/21-dpub-irc 14:57:50 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:57:50 Zakim has joined #dpub 14:57:52 Zakim, this will be dpub 14:57:52 ok, trackbot; I see SW_DPUB-IG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 14:57:53 Meeting: Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference 14:57:53 Date: 21 October 2013 14:58:13 SW_DPUB-IG()11:00AM has now started 14:58:14 brady_duga has joined #dpub 14:58:20 +dauwhe 14:58:32 Is the status message still valid? 14:58:39 +Ruben 14:58:40 brady, no 14:58:44 ok 14:58:52 +??P13 14:58:52 tzviya has joined #dpub 14:59:01 Zakim, P13 is me 14:59:01 sorry, mgylling, I do not recognize a party named 'P13' 14:59:11 Zakim, ??P13 is me 14:59:14 +mgylling; got it 14:59:28 +Tzviya 14:59:40 +duga 14:59:54 +[IPcaller] 15:00:20 regrets: Robert Sanderson, Frederick Hirsch 15:00:36 zakim, IPcaller is me 15:00:36 +Vlad; got it 15:00:38 zakim, code? 15:00:38 the conference code is 3782 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), karen 15:00:41 zakim, who is noisy? 15:00:43 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #dpub 15:00:52 mgylling, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 6 (62%), mgylling (34%) 15:01:06 +Karen_Myers 15:01:17 Is this a prisoner reference? 15:01:36 +JeanKaplansky 15:01:56 +1 muted person 15:01:58 +BillKasdorf 15:02:13 JeanKaplansky has joined #dpub 15:02:20 -Vlad 15:02:29 +Bert 15:02:37 Bert has joined #dpub 15:02:44 zakim, who is here? 15:02:44 On the phone I see dauwhe, Ruben, mgylling, Tzviya, duga, Karen_Myers, JeanKaplansky, BillKasdorf, Bert 15:02:46 On IRC I see Bert, JeanKaplansky, Bill_Kasdorf, tzviya, brady_duga, Zakim, RRSAgent, Vlad, Hajar, mgylling, karen, dauwhe, trackbot, plinss, sandro 15:02:51 +[IPcaller] 15:03:02 zakim, IPcaller is me 15:03:02 +Vlad; got it 15:03:13 st has joined #dpub 15:04:00 Markus: any scribe volunteers today? 15:04:03 +plinss 15:04:21 Chair: Markus 15:04:23 Scribe: Karen 15:04:27 +Suzanne_Taylor 15:04:32 Markus: We did not meet last week but back in business now 15:04:39 last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/dpub/DPUB-07-Oct-2013.htm 15:04:41 ...Minutes from previous week 15:04:49 ...Do we have any objections to approve them? 15:04:53 ...If so, speak up now 15:05:03 ...Good, as you may recall 15:05:08 ...there was not a track bot 15:05:14 ...because we changed channels 15:05:21 ...so last week's minutes are raw irc minutes 15:05:24 ...We are back to normal today 15:05:29 ...We have a mixed bag agenda today 15:05:33 Suzanne_Taylor has changed the topic to: Code this week is back to 3782 15:05:36 ...Some planning for TPAC Agenda 15:05:42 ...Some Administrative issues 15:05:52 ...before we get to the Task Force [work] 15:05:58 +Sharad_Garg 15:06:01 ...Do we have anyone who has not been with us before today? 15:06:04 ...No 15:06:10 ...Other small thing to relay for TPAC 15:06:15 Sharad has joined #dpub 15:06:22 ...Ivan told me there will be dial-in abilities 15:06:30 ...a conference line and irc channel 15:06:37 ...So you can partake in all or part 15:06:44 ...Details will be provided closer to TPAC 15:06:49 ...On to today's first discussion 15:07:06 ...As you know we have defined a set of task forces or sub-groups holding on a particular topic 15:07:13 ...What we want to start thinking about acting on 15:07:20 ...is to identify additional task forces 15:07:29 ...to speed up the process of use case and requirements production 15:07:38 ...Let's remind ourselves what we have currently for task forces 15:07:45 ...We have Pagination group with Dave Cramer 15:07:55 ...Social MEdia and Annotations with Robert Sanderson as lead 15:08:03 ...Accessibility with Suzanne Taylor from Pearson 15:08:09 ...And Jean Kaplansky for 15:08:11 ...MathML 15:08:18 ...is that correct, or is there a broader scope? 15:08:35 Jean: I was doing MathML but we also have broader scope which is @ 15:08:41 Markus: Those are the four we have started 15:09:01 Markus: Question becomes how do we want to proceed 15:09:07 there is a broader-scoped group of STM 15:09:14 ...to start new ones and continue with existing ones 15:09:20 ...Let's do a quick evaluation of existing ones 15:09:25 ...Rob cannot be here today 15:09:38 ...What we know is that his group has been one of the most active getting stuff onto the wiki 15:09:49 ...which is the first stepping stone towards our final deliverables 15:09:57 ...Rob is in the Annotation CG 15:10:04 ...don't worry a lot about getting what we need in that area 15:10:10 ...If you go to the directory page on the wiki 15:10:22 ...we have gotten two thirds of the way on the use cases he has set out to enter 15:10:33 ...They have yet to be reviewed; but at a good early stage in the process 15:10:42 ...Do we have any more on Social and Media Annotations? 15:10:47 ...Shall we consider it running well? 15:10:54 ...Take that as a yes 15:10:58 ...In terms of other work groups 15:11:02 ...Dave, on Pagination 15:11:07 ...you are still in very early stages here 15:11:16 ...We have good news with an IE coming with expertise 15:11:18 Dave: yes 15:11:24 ...I will get in touch with his this week 15:11:27 ...he was approved 15:11:37 ...I have gotten a fair amount of work done on a pagination document 15:11:52 ...We need to work out how we get this into a publicly available location so people can comment 15:11:59 ...That is an official agenda item for today 15:12:01 Markus: yes 15:12:05 ...May be a bit early 15:12:16 ...If task forces have lack of resources, we should identify that 15:12:27 ...It's a tad too early in your case since you started so recently 15:12:31 Dave: yes, things are not at risk 15:12:34 q+ 15:12:39 ...but I want to get it set up and on a server 15:12:48 ...and start getting feedback and contributions 15:12:52 ...Doing this in isolation now 15:12:59 ...would be a good next step to get this going 15:13:15 ack tzviya 15:13:16 Markus: let's talk about this 15:13:20 Hajar_ has joined #dpub 15:13:27 ack Tzviya 15:13:38 Tzviya: a lot has to do with trade books 15:13:50 ...outside of this world, we may want to get input from the rest of publishing 15:13:55 Dave: that would be great 15:14:02 ...I have added some stuff that is not trade centric 15:14:07 ...writing in HTML not in Google doc 15:14:14 ...seems the discussion with Ivan 15:14:18 ...would be good 15:14:32 Markus: Point taken, Tzviya, we need to look at other domains 15:14:41 ...not just describing for the West 15:14:56 ...Ok, Suzanne, how do you describe your current state? 15:15:12 Suzanne: I am unsure about how to collect names who want to participate and how to set up the calls 15:15:21 ...first time running a W3C task force 15:15:32 Markus: it's up to us to define best way to do things 15:15:38 ...I would start by the mailing list 15:15:45 ...It has been a bit silent so far 15:15:55 ...Important to have requirements and use cases going there 15:15:57 q+ 15:16:01 ...it is automatically archived 15:16:10 ...so good to get discourse going on the mailing list 15:16:16 ...In terms of getting people to help you out 15:16:22 ...I have been reaching out to Benetech 15:16:28 ...they recently became a W3C member 15:16:35 ...and they are all about Accessibility 15:16:44 ...also will get a Daisy Consortium member to participate 15:16:55 ...And I think we have a w3C member from Protocols and Formats WG 15:17:02 ...to contribute in Accessibility area 15:17:06 Suzanne: great 15:17:14 Markus: Do you have others in mind? 15:17:24 Suzanne: Would be great to find someone from school systems and universities 15:17:32 ...a lot of what we want to look at has to do with education 15:17:34 ack Bill 15:17:38 Bill: I have two names 15:17:43 ack Bill_Kasdorf 15:17:44 ...one is Bob Mingo at Georgia State 15:17:48 ...another is @ 15:17:57 s/Mingo/Martinengo/ 15:18:00 ...Markus is AAP a member or considering? 15:18:13 Hajar__ has joined #dpub 15:18:18 Karen: I'll follow up with you offline 15:18:26 Bill: university contacts may be good 15:18:29 Suzanne: thank you 15:18:33 Bill: I am on queue 15:18:42 ...mailing list is that it goes to IG members or more broadly? 15:18:49 Markus: We use the public-dpub-ig list 15:19:24 Karen: subscribers to public lists can post 15:19:55 Markus: Bill, we'll need to first look at W3C membership 15:20:04 ...since it takes time to become an IE or Member 15:20:08 ...So Daisy would be good 15:20:17 ...In terms of schools and unversities 15:21:15 Karen: I'm happy to work with offline Suzanne about current members and identification of other universities doing work in this area 15:21:19 Hajar has joined #dpub 15:21:37 Bill: Courfe and Vital Source 15:21:47 ...biggest distributors of higher ed books 15:21:56 s/Courfe/CourseSmart/ 15:22:00 ...and they have significant Accessibility requirements in their platforms 15:22:08 CourseSmart and VitalSource (an Ingram company) 15:22:30 Markus: Continue to expand outreach 15:22:36 Suzanne: thank you 15:22:39 Markus: Jean and STM 15:22:47 Jean: Right now we have a few actual use cases out there 15:22:58 ...and area we need to pick up again 15:23:04 ...I have been doing testing across devices 15:23:11 ...we're doing a webinar Nov 5th 15:23:14 ...it will start up again 15:23:19 ...after I finish a bit of consulting 15:23:26 ...and put together more information based on testing 15:23:28 Markus: great 15:23:37 ...Do you have any thoughts about other stakeholders we should try to engage? 15:23:42 Jean: In terms of W3C members 15:24:03 ...we might want to reach out to someone at Cengage Learning 15:24:07 +1 Karen in touch 15:24:11 ...and they do a lot of.. 15:24:32 Wiley will contribute to STM use cases 15:24:35 Jean: have not thought of anybody else 15:24:43 Bill: Springer, Elsevier? 15:24:50 Jean: Those are good choices as well 15:24:54 Bill: they are big enough 15:25:02 ...would be good candidates for W3C membership 15:25:08 Jean: Springer and Elsevier are good choices 15:25:14 ...I will have to get back to you on that 15:25:21 ...also thinking about at least one university person 15:25:35 Karen: I am happy to follow up with Jean offline as well 15:25:37 Markus: Good 15:25:46 ...Jean, it sounds like you have a plan to get going 15:25:48 Jean: yes 15:25:54 ...heads down on testing and development period 15:26:03 ...then go back to what I'm doing for W3C 15:26:09 Markus: The next major question is new task forces 15:26:18 ...What do we try to start beyond what we already have 15:26:22 ...Do we have any @ 15:26:34 Tzviya: One of areas 15:26:41 ...listed is InfoGraphics 15:26:50 ...I think large images become tricky 15:26:55 ...dealing with multiple screen sizes 15:27:01 ...may be an area we want to explore 15:27:06 -duga 15:27:06 ...Not something I am equipped to head up 15:27:12 ...but maybe somebody else is 15:27:22 Markus: What is the abstract description of the problem? 15:27:28 ...tables are same problem 15:27:37 Tzviya: may be in area of adaptive layout 15:27:42 ...especially when they include fine detail 15:27:45 Markus: yes 15:27:45 +duga 15:27:47 ...that is one area 15:28:03 ...We have short exchange about fonts 15:28:08 ...and maybe starting something about that 15:28:12 ...Is Vlad on the call? 15:28:19 Vlad: yes, on call, but bad connection 15:28:36 Markus: Do you think it's a good idea to start a task force around fonts in dpublishing 15:28:41 Vlad: I would like to give it more thought 15:28:56 ...not about fonts but more about typography as a resource; how people use fonts 15:29:04 ...see if it's worthwhile to create a sub-group 15:29:16 ...or if it's done another way; good to discuss at TPAC 15:29:19 ...I will be there 15:29:28 Markus: yes, we need to understand better what you have in mind 15:29:35 ...We have a placeholder slot for this 15:29:41 ...Good to devote some time to this at TPAC 15:29:45 Vlad: good, thank you 15:29:48 Markus: What else? 15:29:57 Tzviya: We have not approached the topic of metadata at all 15:30:01 ...there is a lot of it out there 15:30:04 ...and it's all messed up 15:30:06 Markus: yes 15:30:12 ...I have talked with Ivan as well 15:30:16 ...In terms of addressing 15:30:23 ...it's an enormously complicated field 15:30:26 q+ 15:30:45 ...It's...challenging to have just IDPF and W3C address when there are many solutions out there 15:31:00 ...Tzviya, maybe you have ideas about what to contribute 15:31:04 ack Sharad 15:31:14 Sharad: I would suggest looking at largest architecture issues 15:31:20 ...rather than what does metadata say 15:31:20 q+ 15:31:26 ...either other aspects of HTML5 spec 15:31:35 ...that could be approved and help increase the utility of metadata 15:31:45 ...it intersects with RDF and microdata 15:31:49 q? 15:31:50 ...that approach I would suggest 15:32:01 ...We don't want to get into discussions with ONYX and PRISM 15:32:02 ack Tzviya 15:32:07 ...should be a higher level than that 15:32:13 ack Tzviya 15:32:22 Tzviya: yes, Bill said what I was going to say 15:32:35 ...more like schema project to figure out how to incorporate with RDF 15:32:43 ...I know a lot of people who would have fun with this 15:33:00 Markus: our mandate so to speak is to identify problems in the Open Web Platform 15:33:09 ...and say what it does not yet address for publishing 15:33:15 ...is it really a problem here for the OWP 15:33:31 ...is it providing all the building blocks we need to make rich vocabularies 15:33:40 Bill: not prepared to answer; but that may be the anser 15:33:46 s/anser/answer 15:33:55 Markus: that is a good approach 15:34:00 ...to find out what the answer is 15:34:08 ...Bill, would you be willing to look at it 15:34:15 ...not nec commit to lead it right away? 15:34:17 Bill: sure 15:34:25 Markus: My first suggestion is for you to talk to Ivan 15:34:31 ...who also is SemWeb lead at W3C 15:34:38 ...contact him and we can set up an offline discussion 15:34:40 Bill: ok 15:34:43 Markus: Good 15:34:50 ...Another one I was thinking about 15:35:01 ...and looking at you, Tzviya, about structural semantics 15:35:03 ...Thinking that 15:35:10 ...at the moment ePub is extending HTML in various ways 15:35:20 ..structural semantics; also name spaces being used 15:35:28 ...you will know what I'm thinking about 15:35:35 ...and that is one of the areas in this activity as a whole 15:35:42 ...is to understand what these extensions do and why 15:35:55 ...and whether OWP should provide better solutions to enable these extensions 15:36:12 ...I am looking for a task force to look at the various extensions being used out there and documenting them 15:36:14 Correction: "Sharad" above should be "Bill" 15:36:22 ...So we have documented extension use cases 15:36:26 q? 15:36:34 Markus: Structural semantics is just one 15:36:46 Tzviya: Examples like data type 15:36:52 Markus; yes and custom name spaces 15:37:09 ...all the kinds of things that various vendors do in slightly different ways 15:37:20 ...I am wondering if there is anybody who would be willing to focus on HTML content 15:37:26 ...extensions or adaption 15:37:38 ...and basically map out use cases for extentions that we have today? 15:37:48 Tzviya: I could take a stab at it 15:37:58 Markus: Thank you 15:38:03 ...Looking at the wiki page 15:38:08 ...you started structural semantics 15:38:13 ...could you genericize it 15:38:20 ...to include that and also include dictionaries 15:38:28 ...along with this 15:38:36 ...don't just limit to structural but also behavioral 15:38:37 I would like to contribute on HTML content 15:38:51 ...Suggestion for now that we have a new task force with Tzviya's lead 15:38:54 ...what should we call it? 15:39:10 q+ 15:39:30 Markus: use mailing list to comment, ask questions, make announcements so we get more traffic on the list 15:39:38 ...Any questions, Tzviya 15:39:49 Tzviya: I know there are people who interpret algorithms 15:39:54 ...does this fall into this category 15:40:09 Markus: Interpret as in what? 15:40:24 Tzviya: A new reference; rendering of book behaves in a certain way 15:40:29 Markus: Heuristics? 15:40:39 q? 15:40:42 ...no, I don't we think should describe these 15:40:47 ...great to see you take this on 15:40:57 ack JeanKaplansky 15:40:57 ack Jean 15:41:13 Jean: I was going to say...we should think of something to call it rather than Extensibility group 15:41:16 ...we have been there with XML 15:41:21 ...and we don't want any confusion 15:41:24 Markus: right 15:41:28 ...All of these things are done 15:41:34 ...because they are wanting in a declarative way 15:41:38 ...to indicate behaviors 15:41:49 ...the read about attribute to an audio element has a specific behavior 15:41:58 ...maybe call it something with behavioral adaption 15:42:02 ...is that what this is about? 15:42:05 Jean: That makes sense 15:42:09 ...we threw out heuristic 15:42:14 ...maybe call it behavioral 15:42:21 Markus: Behavioral Adaptional Content 15:42:24 ...maybe start there 15:42:27 ack Ruben 15:42:32 ack Ruben 15:42:35 q+ 15:42:38 q- 15:42:39 q? 15:42:47 q+ 15:42:59 Markus: of the task forces to kick off today 15:43:06 ...two new threads have started today 15:43:18 ...Bill is talking to Ivan about metadata and find an approach to find something there 15:43:26 ...And Tzviya is doing behavioral adpation of content 15:43:45 Markus: we have started agenda page for TPAC 15:43:48 ...Item 10 15:43:54 ...agenda email 15:44:03 ...we are talking and meeting with CSS group and parts of HTML Wg 15:44:08 ...If you go onto the agenda page 15:44:14 ...you will see preliminary meetings 15:44:25 ...Also hope to have sessions to work on use case and requirements production 15:44:29 ...We have currently listed five 15:44:34 ...Not go into deep discussion now 15:44:41 ...But request to all of you who are participating 15:44:52 ...and let us know if there is a particular topic you would like to see listed 15:44:58 ...We decided today we will talk about fonts 15:45:02 ...Vlad will be tehre 15:45:05 s/there 15:45:13 ...We are talking about Pagination with CSS WG 15:45:19 ...and work on producing requirements 15:45:28 ...your review of agenda topics and requirements is welcome 15:45:31 ...Any questions 15:45:42 ack Ruben 15:45:50 ack Sharad 15:46:01 Sharad: Should this group worry about anything to do with security or not? 15:46:06 Markus: yeah 15:46:10 ...it is not out of scope 15:46:17 Sharad: Should we create a group with that? 15:46:21 Markus: sure 15:46:24 ...that is certainly doable 15:46:27 q+ 15:46:33 ...would you be willing to lead that sub-group? 15:46:37 Sharad: yes 15:46:45 Markus: So we are listing a third new effort today 15:46:46 ack dauwhe 15:46:52 ...on security with lead from Sharad 15:47:00 Dave: is it content protection type ideas 15:47:06 ...be in contact with Ivan 15:47:13 ...about what @ is doing and W3C doing with EME 15:47:17 ...some talk of it that this group 15:47:25 ...might be a place to work out relationship between these things 15:47:30 ...what are needs of publishing industry 15:47:38 ...with tech that w3C is already or potentially working on 15:47:40 Markus: exactly 15:47:44 ...A good outcome 15:47:52 ...is to describe what DRM means in the case of digital publishing 15:47:59 Dave: yes, there is some confusion about 15:48:12 ...technologies that exist around books and as it relates to web platform 15:48:18 Markus: exactly 15:48:20 ...that is right 15:48:26 ...Ruben, are you here? 15:48:31 q+ 15:48:45 ack Brady 15:48:49 ack brady_duga 15:48:56 Brady: I have a question about security for users or for IPR? 15:49:03 Markus: for users or publishers? 15:49:12 Sharad: If we are to comprehend, we have to look at both 15:49:15 ...users and publishers 15:49:20 ...and sometimes devices as well 15:49:29 ...Maybe goal of sub-group is to see what has been done 15:49:35 ...and if there are limitations for publishers 15:49:42 ...or issues for users as well 15:49:44 ...Makes sense? 15:49:53 Brady: that is a good answer, thank you 15:49:59 Sharad: I am happy to talk to you 15:50:08 Markus: We need to move on 15:50:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013Oct/0014.html 15:50:16 ...Next agenda item is a request for review of CSS Text 15:50:19 ...Posted by Bert Bos 15:50:34 ...we are hopefully going to be able to produce some comments on this from a publishing perspective 15:50:42 ...we have until Nov 7th to produce commentary 15:50:53 ...Do we have anyone here today who would like to take on review of this specification? 15:51:01 ...Somebody reviews and brings up on one of these calls 15:51:08 ...So this group can respond as a whole 15:51:13 Dave: I can probably do that 15:51:19 Jean: I can contribute to it 15:51:22 Markus: anybody else 15:51:27 @: I will take a look 15:51:33 s/@/Brady 15:51:41 Markus: Dave, Jean and Brady 15:51:45 ...Not too much time left 15:51:50 ...So ask that you complete your review 15:51:54 ...by Monday, 4 November 15:52:00 ...and we'll bring this up the agenda then 15:52:14 ...for review and we will send to Bert and CSS WG on 5th or 6th 15:52:20 ...Any more questions about Bert and CSS WG? 15:52:22 ...Great 15:52:33 ...Dave Cramer and Pagination 15:52:36 ...You told us before 15:52:49 ...You continued work in a separate HTML doc not yet publicly available 15:53:03 Dave: right, based on conversations with you and Ivan about what authoring process to use 15:53:10 Markus: using GitHub is doable 15:53:18 ...one of reasons we are doing wiki is to keep content there 15:53:24 ...we will do a report format later on 15:53:33 ...and not have a struggle for contributors 15:53:49 ...If we believe use of @ will not be a hindrance, certainly fine 15:53:59 Dave: this is a fairly complex document structurally 15:54:08 ...has numerous code examples, illustrations 15:54:11 ...things like that 15:54:13 s/@/Git and ReSpec/ 15:54:21 ...does not seem a natural fit for a wiki environment 15:54:22 Markus: sure 15:54:37 Dave: I have never been ivolved with this kind of work at W3C so far 15:54:42 ...Ivan suggesting this 15:54:57 ...also not clear how much people are interested to author sections within this document on their own 15:55:05 ...or if I do the work to integrate contributions 15:55:07 ...things like that 15:55:18 Markus: Would this live on w3C Github account? 15:55:21 Dave: yes, I think so 15:55:26 Markus: sure 15:55:39 Dave: would need some help from Ivan getting this up and running 15:55:47 ...and set up an appropriate location 15:55:51 ...for repositories 15:56:01 Markus: do we have any objections to moving this document to GitHub? 15:56:12 ...I suggest you contact Ivan and you get going 15:56:20 ...This is same approach we will take for the wiki eventually 15:56:28 ...do that switch at the right point in time 15:56:30 ...which is not now 15:56:39 Dave: I'll be the guinea pig for this now 15:56:48 Markus: Anything else you want to discuss today? 15:56:54 Dave: not at the moment 15:57:06 Markus: Suzanne, on Accessibility, anything to bring up today? 15:57:10 Suzanne: not today 15:57:15 ...I am putting some categories up 15:57:18 ...and fill in use cases 15:57:30 ...and hoping it will recruit more people and spart interest 15:57:35 Markus: sounds like a great plan 15:57:40 ...we have a couple minutes left 15:57:46 ...Has there been any activity on the wiki 15:57:59 Tzviya: I added a use case 15:58:06 Markus: what does it say? 15:58:19 Tzviya: table data needs to be legible at different screen sizes 15:58:26 Markus: right, under pagination and styling 15:58:35 ...this is the spirit of the image problem you mentioned earlier 15:58:40 Tzviya: exactly 15:58:47 Markus: great 15:58:54 Bill: if nothing more...a question 15:59:05 ...Am I right that the use cases will not be used for proposed solutions 15:59:11 ...describes a problem, right? 15:59:20 Markus: correct; we are just describing problems 15:59:25 ...not finding solutions 15:59:38 Bill: collapsing rows and columns is in category of a proposed solution? 15:59:48 Markus: also case we are only putting time into describing things that are problems 15:59:57 ...If we have use cases already covered by OWP 15:59:59 ...they are out 16:00:07 ...We are not spending time to describe things that are solved 16:00:14 ...problem is in the ereader landscape 16:00:25 ...whether OWP needs to accommodate tables better 16:00:36 Tzviya: As screens get smaller, I think it's a problem on all platforms 16:00:43 ...seeing it more in books than on web pages 16:00:59 Markus: perhaps you can elaborate more on the specifics of the problem 16:01:09 ...so people will understand better than this is seriously annoying 16:01:16 Bill: and broadening the IG 16:01:22 ...beyond book publishing 16:01:30 ...journals are commonly online and it's a huge problem 16:01:32 ...for journals 16:01:47 ...people want to look at HTML journal content on various screen sizes so it's not just a book issue 16:01:50 Markus: we are over time 16:01:54 ...thank you for today 16:01:57 ...Any further comments? 16:02:10 @: I have a question 16:02:18 ...related to HTML5 and JS in epub 16:02:24 ...have we mentioned this kind of problem 16:02:29 ...or refer to this problem in the IG 16:02:37 Markus: if it's an epub problem, it's not for this IG 16:02:42 ...if it's HTML5.. 16:02:48 @: a widget in an ebook? 16:03:06 s/@/Hajar/ 16:03:06 Markus: if it's a problem with W3C technologies or a problem with ePub, not to be discussed here but at IDPF 16:03:22 Harjar: ebooks readers? 16:03:29 ...sometimes...visiblity 16:03:33 -Sharad_Garg 16:03:36 ...which can be related to W3C? 16:03:42 Markus: then yes, if related to W3C 16:03:49 Hajar: I contributed HTML content 16:03:51 Markus: great 16:04:05 ...Hajar will contribute to Tzviya's effort 16:04:08 ...any other questions 16:04:25 Suzanne: Is the MathML task force going to have a Pearson representative? 16:04:32 Jean: happy to have all contributors, that would be great 16:04:36 Markus: Any more questions 16:04:40 ...talk to you again next week 16:04:47 ...and increasingly on the list as well 16:04:50 ...thank you everyone 16:04:50 -duga 16:04:52 -mgylling 16:04:54 -BillKasdorf 16:04:54 -dauwhe 16:04:55 -Ruben 16:04:55 -Tzviya 16:04:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:04:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/21-dpub-minutes.html karen 16:04:56 -Vlad 16:04:56 -Suzanne_Taylor 16:04:57 -JeanKaplansky 16:04:58 -Bert 16:05:00 -Karen_Myers 16:05:02 -plinss 16:05:03 SW_DPUB-IG()11:00AM has ended 16:05:03 Attendees were dauwhe, Ruben, mgylling, Tzviya, duga, Vlad, Karen_Myers, JeanKaplansky, BillKasdorf, Bert, plinss, Suzanne_Taylor, Sharad_Garg 16:07:34 liam has joined #dpub 16:17:48 st2 has joined #dpub 17:01:56 mgylling has joined #dpub 17:14:05 liam has joined #dpub 17:23:44 Bert has left #dpub 18:13:52 Zakim has left #dpub 19:11:29 Suzanne_Taylor has joined #dpub