14:57:36 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 14:57:36 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/09/12-html-a11y-irc 14:57:38 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:57:38 Zakim has joined #html-a11y 14:57:40 Zakim, this will be 2119 14:57:40 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 57 minutes ago 14:57:41 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 14:57:41 Date: 12 September 2013 14:57:47 zakim, clear agenda 14:57:48 agenda cleared 14:57:52 Meeting: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference 14:57:52 Chair: Janina_Sajka 14:57:52 agenda+ Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 14:57:55 agenda+ HTML Mappings Document Update 14:57:58 agenda+ Alt Edits Review [See Below] 14:58:00 agenda+ Longdesc Testing Update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0062.html 14:58:03 agenda+ Longdesc LC Comments: Process and Responses 14:58:06 agenda+ Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; AAPI Mapping; Media; 14:58:08 agenda+ Administrative Update: TF Publications; Our 5.1 Issues 14:58:11 agenda+ Potential TF Participation at TPAC 2013? 14:58:13 agenda+ HTML 5.1 Objectives -- Open Discussion 14:58:16 agenda+ Other Business 14:58:17 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has now started 14:58:18 agenda+ Identify Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 14:58:24 +??P2 14:58:40 agenda+ be donezakim, who's on the phone? 14:59:03 zakim, drop item 12 14:59:03 agendum 12, be donezakim, who's on the phone?, dropped 14:59:14 agenda+ Be Done 14:59:29 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:59:29 On the phone I see ??P2 14:59:37 zakim, ??P2 is me 14:59:37 +janina; got it 14:59:44 zakim, clear agenda 14:59:44 agenda cleared 14:59:50 Meeting: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference 14:59:50 Chair: Janina_Sajka 14:59:50 agenda+ Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 14:59:53 agenda+ HTML Mappings Document Update 14:59:56 agenda+ Alt Edits Review [See Below] 14:59:58 agenda+ Longdesc Testing Update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0062.html 15:00:01 agenda+ Longdesc LC Comments: Process and Responses 15:00:04 agenda+ Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; AAPI Mapping; Media; 15:00:06 agenda+ Administrative Update: TF Publications; Our 5.1 Issues 15:00:09 agenda+ Potential TF Participation at TPAC 2013? 15:00:11 agenda+ HTML 5.1 Objectives -- Open Discussion 15:00:14 agenda+ Other Business 15:00:16 agenda+ Identify Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 15:00:19 agenda+ be done 15:00:29 Thanks, Ted! 15:00:54 zakim, take up item 1 15:00:54 agendum 1. "Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List" taken up [from janina] 15:01:02 +MarkS 15:01:07 +Judy 15:01:28 Judy has joined #html-a11y 15:01:58 regrets: Leonie, Hober 15:02:00 chaals has joined #html-a11y 15:04:20 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Scribe_List 15:05:42 + +1.201.390.aaaa 15:05:58 Suzanne_Taylor has joined #html-a11y 15:07:13 scribe: SuzanneT 15:07:46 http://idpf.org/edupub-2013 15:08:15 +Cynthia_Shelly 15:08:38 +John_Foliot 15:09:03 zakim, next item 15:09:03 agendum 2. "HTML Mappings Document Update" taken up [from janina] 15:09:50 janina: not ready to published, but was published 15:10:42 ironing out status of document, wondering whether or not to finish consensus process 15:11:34 status should say aimed at HTML 5.1 15:11:39 need a second editor 15:12:20 judy: should complete process, with a note that the document is intended to be joinly produced document 15:12:51 status should be updated per bug that steve f entered 15:13:59 JF has joined #html-a11y 15:14:01 should we get Mark listed on any of these joint documents, to help prevent this type of issue 15:14:20 Sorry folks, I just sent regrets and some comments... 15:14:26 regrets+ chaals 15:16:11 Group: need to archive some of the editors; okay to drop Cynthia? yes 15:17:33 zakim, next item 15:17:33 agendum 3. "Alt Edits Review" taken up [from See Below] 15:18:48 (if possible, try to say your name when speaking, since i'm still learning voices) 15:19:47 janina: discussion on Aug 1st: conclusion was yes, useful to id class of object, such as "logo" 15:20:02 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23207 -> filed by janina 15:20:07 propose to include a number of these like, pie chart, bar graph, etc 15:20:10 Q+ 15:20:41 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22854 -> david macdonald 15:20:46 Mark: foound related bug by Dave McDonald 15:20:56 mark as duplicate 15:21:10 +[IPcaller] 15:21:21 Mark will add additional classes of images 15:21:29 SteveF has joined #html-a11y 15:22:31 zakim, [ipcaller] is stevef 15:22:31 +stevef; got it 15:23:26 janina: perhaps show a few design patterns for how you add the classes 15:23:35 steve: might be in WCAG techniques 15:23:49 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/embedded-content-0.html#graphical-representations:-charts,-diagrams,-graphs,-maps,-illustrations 15:24:15 s/steve: might be in WCAG techniques/JF: might be in WCAG techniques 15:24:20 group: keep these parallel, there's a task force that is responsible for WCAG techniques for HTML 5 15:24:53 oh, sorry JF 15:26:31 steve: problem with active images, 'logo' might cause folks to think this is a link to a logo 15:27:33 steve: the alt-text for active images is the link text which needs to be a brief description of the target 15:28:03 group: logo: links to homepage? but then print icon: prints page? 15:28:15 janina: okay to ask techniques taskforce to take this up 15:28:20 group: yes, useful 15:29:10 Mark S: can take this up as an action item 15:29:51 ACTION: MarkS to follow up with WCAG on providing feedback on ALT advise document, specifically on the use of class/category info on images, especially when contained within hyperlinks. 15:29:52 Created ACTION-194 - Follow up with wcag on providing feedback on alt advise document, specifically on the use of class/category info on images, especially when contained within hyperlinks. [on Mark Sadecki - due 2013-09-19]. 15:32:54 zakim, next item 15:32:54 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, janina 15:32:59 q? 15:33:05 ack jf 15:33:06 ack JF 15:33:10 q? 15:33:15 zakim, next item 15:33:15 agendum 4. "Longdesc Testing Update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0062.html" taken up [from janina] 15:33:25 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:33:25 On the phone I see janina, MarkS, Judy, +1.201.390.aaaa, Cynthia_Shelly, John_Foliot, stevef 15:33:50 2 items on the agenda today - 60 day last call closes on Monday - time for comments nearly passed 15:34:00 1) testing for CR exit 15:34:39 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Longdesc-tests -> longdesc test results wiki 15:34:42 zakim, aaaa is Suzanne_Taylor 15:34:42 +Suzanne_Taylor; got it 15:35:12 https://github.com/chaals/longdesc-tests -> longdesc tests on github 15:35:22 janina: clean up needed, can probably do in next couple weeks, not days 15:35:35 zakim, next item 15:35:35 agendum 5. "Longdesc LC Comments: Process and Responses" taken up [from janina] 15:36:24 2) need to provide a formal response to these, after establishing concensus on our response 15:36:39 there are five such comments 15:36:45 https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/44061/WD-html-longdesc-20130716/ -> longdesc comment tracker 15:37:02 send candidate resolutions to the list to see if there are any objections 15:38:20 janina: seeking to be exhaustive and thorough documenting both concensus and minor opinions 15:38:59 I propose to make no substantive changes in response to the comments, but in response to the comments from James Craig I will propose to add a statement to the effect that authors should not use longdesc as an excuse for not achieving better accessibility with techniques like the use of accessible SVG, or MathML instead of pictures of mathematical expressions - in such cases longdesc should be considered a fallback for old technology. 15:39:21 Q+ 15:39:24 q? 15:39:54 s/I propose/CN(via email): I propose 15:40:27 ???: is acceptable to use a description instead of mathML for a single bit of math 15:40:45 ???: is it acceptable to use a description instead of mathML for a single bit of math? 15:40:45 ack jf 15:41:21 jf: strong reservations on saying that long desc is inappropriate 15:41:27 q+ 15:42:06 jf: concerned how we convey this. for example, saying use SVG can be a problem, since support is poor 15:42:18 jf: should avoid negative comments 15:42:45 ST: often we use longdesc to include MathML 15:43:25 q? 15:43:30 jf: this could be an attempt at weakening longdesc, but the word 'inappropriate' is subjective 15:43:53 judy: helpful to focus on alternate response & wording 15:44:39 janina: better to talk about what we encourage and recognize that there are many ways to achieve appropriate markup 15:45:03 janina: spec is not the place for author guidance on choosing what to do 15:45:27 ack ja 15:45:40 janina: positive not negative, support many ways/options, point to other W3C guidance 15:45:53 jf: can live with that, believe it belongs in WCAG techniques document 15:46:30 q? 15:47:49 Cynthia: what about a see also link to other options, instead of making a judgement 15:48:51 q? 15:48:54 ack c 15:49:41 ???a: perhaps handle in techniques layers, but have to get the timing to work better 15:50:22 janina: Is there an appropriate use of longdesc instead of mathML or instead of SVG? 15:51:06 s/???/judy 15:51:18 q? 15:51:42 two considerations: developer learning curve & user learning curve (download mathplayer, etc) 15:52:41 q? 15:52:54 the tutorial folks have raised this question and need an answer 15:54:08 Q+ 15:55:01 q? 15:55:05 ack jf 15:55:40 jf: educational folks were concerned because Google Chrome was supposed to supply native support, but it was dropped 15:57:39 ACTION: JF to contact edu folks re: MathML support and failure status in 2 weeks 15:57:39 Created ACTION-195 - Contact edu folks re: mathml support and failure status in 2 weeks [on John Foliot - due 2013-09-19]. 15:58:13 -John_Foliot 15:59:55 -janina 15:59:57 -Judy 15:59:59 -Cynthia_Shelly 16:00:05 -stevef 16:00:15 janina: proposed response to very specific requirements for longdesc implementations: allow developers to be creative because 16:00:45 there is room for improvements 16:00:53 -Suzanne_Taylor 16:01:18 -MarkS 16:01:20 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has ended 16:01:20 Attendees were janina, MarkS, Judy, +1.201.390.aaaa, Cynthia_Shelly, John_Foliot, stevef, Suzanne_Taylor 16:02:23 rrsagent, make minutes 16:02:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/09/12-html-a11y-minutes.html MarkS 16:12:47 Judy has joined #html-a11y 16:52:29 janina has changed the topic to: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference; Thursday 19 September at 15:00Z for 60 minutes 18:40:01 davidb has joined #html-a11y 18:46:52 Joshue has joined #html-a11y 18:50:20 Joshue108 has joined #html-a11y 18:54:19 is has joined #html-a11y 19:02:22 chaals has joined #html-a11y 19:56:17 davidb has joined #html-a11y