14:16:41 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg 14:16:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc 14:16:43 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:16:43 Zakim has joined #rdf-wg 14:16:45 Zakim, this will be 73394 14:16:45 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 44 minutes 14:16:46 Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference 14:16:46 Date: 28 August 2013 14:34:40 gavinc has joined #rdf-wg 14:37:39 TallTed has changed the topic to: RDF WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.08.28 14:52:05 ScottB has joined #rdf-wg 14:53:12 AndyS has joined #rdf-wg 14:56:54 SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started 14:57:02 +Guus_Schreiber 14:57:36 Guus has joined #rdf-wg 14:57:38 +GavinC 14:58:12 zakim, this will be rdf 14:58:12 ok, Guus, I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM already started 15:00:04 +Arnaud 15:00:07 Arnaud has joined #rdf-wg 15:00:31 +OpenLink_Software 15:00:36 zakim, dial ivan-voip 15:00:36 ok, ivan; the call is being made 15:00:37 +Ivan 15:00:45 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:00:45 +TallTed; got it 15:00:46 Zakim, mute me 15:00:46 TallTed should now be muted 15:00:51 zakim, mute me 15:00:51 Ivan should now be muted 15:01:04 gkellogg has joined #rdf-wg 15:01:14 +Sandro 15:01:59 zakim, who is here? 15:01:59 On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, GavinC, Arnaud, TallTed (muted), Ivan (muted), Sandro 15:02:01 On IRC I see gkellogg, Arnaud, Guus, AndyS, ScottB, gavinc, Zakim, RRSAgent, TallTed, ivan, davidwood, manu, trackbot, yvesr, sandro, ericP 15:02:24 +[IPcaller] 15:02:34 zakim, IPcaller is me 15:02:34 +AndyS; got it 15:03:09 someone is breathing heavily into their headset 15:03:27 pfps has joined #rdf-wg 15:03:37 scribenick: gavinc 15:03:38 zakim, mute me 15:03:38 Arnaud should now be muted 15:04:04 Topic: Admin 15:04:16 +gkellogg 15:04:23 PROPOSED Accept minutes from 2013-08-21 15:04:33 +1 15:04:40 Accepted Minutes 15:04:44 AZ has joined #rdf-wg 15:04:44 +[GVoice] 15:04:48 subtopic: action items 15:04:52 zakim, gvoice is me 15:04:52 +pfps; got it 15:05:00 ACTION-283? 15:05:00 ACTION-283 -- David Wood to Apply the resolution to issue-140 in concepts -- due 2013-08-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:05:00 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/283 15:05:04 +Tony 15:05:16 Zakim, who is making noise? 15:05:19 zakim, mute tony 15:05:19 Tony should now be muted 15:05:28 gavinc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Guus_Schreiber (13%) 15:05:56 Does anyone claim to be Tony? Anyone know who that is? 15:06:12 Zakim, Tony is temporarily me 15:06:12 +ScottB; got it 15:06:26 No problem 15:06:36 Guus: Respec bug? 15:06:38 +AZ 15:06:46 cgreer has joined #rdf-wg 15:06:48 gavinc: Yeah, with scroll position after load 15:06:55 gavinc: We'd fixed it locally, but not in the version in github 15:07:56 + +1.707.874.aaaa 15:08:06 zakim, aaaa is me 15:08:08 +cgreer; got it 15:08:08 Guus: Next meeting is next week 15:08:10 +EricP 15:08:24 Topic: ITS 2.0 Review 15:08:28 -EricP 15:08:29 zakim, unmute me 15:08:29 Ivan should no longer be muted 15:08:51 +EricP 15:09:15 ivan: Main issue that I had with the text was that they use URIs with fragment IDs, and if we want to be pedantic that fragment IDs are incorrect 15:09:20 zwu2 has joined #rdf-wg 15:09:28 ... they use fragment IDs that aren't designed for XML or HTML 15:09:48 ... I've told them that I have this problem 15:10:26 ... do we as a working group want to deal with this at all? For us the URI is an opaque string... but we have a section of concepts that talks about fragment IDs 15:10:49 ... the section in ITS is non nominative 15:10:52 +zwu2 15:10:57 -> http://www.w3.org/mid/898EEEF1-9B7F-476B-821A-21E3A24B785F@w3.org my las 15:12:26 .. they can go and register these kinds of fragment types... chars for example might make sense for HTML and XML 15:12:42 ... for XPath it's already defined for XML, but doesn't apply to HTML 15:12:56 ... and HTML is unlikely to support XPath fragment ids 15:13:14 http://www.w3.org/community/cssselfrags/ might help them! 15:13:27 q? 15:14:27 PROPOSE Ivan to send official response from WG 15:15:18 RESP:VED: http://www.w3.org/mid/898EEEF1-9B7F-476B-821A-21E3A24B785F@w3.org to be WG response to ITS 2.0 review request 15:15:58 RESOLVED: http://www.w3.org/mid/898EEEF1-9B7F-476B-821A-21E3A24B785F@w3.org to be WG response to ITS 2.0 review request 15:16:08 action: ivan to send response re ITS (just testing tracker) 15:16:09 'ivan' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., ivan, imikhail). 15:16:31 zakim, mute me 15:16:31 Ivan should now be muted 15:16:51 Topic: N-Triples 15:17:08 Guus: I remember that there was a LC draft of N-Triples 15:17:55 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/677250c8f303/drafts/n-triples/Overview.html 15:19:20 also https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/drafts/n-quads/Overview.html 15:21:03 There is a LANG in [6] but it's LANGTAG at [144s] 15:21:41 q+ 15:21:58 ACTION Gavin to add Changes from Last Publication, and Acknowledgement sections 15:21:58 Created ACTION-284 - Add changes from last publication, and acknowledgement sections [on Gavin Carothers - due 2013-09-04]. 15:22:08 Minor editorial - uses "whitespace" and "white space". 15:22:18 Yeah, I noticed that last night 15:22:22 So does Turtle 15:23:22 scribenick: ericP 15:23:31 gavinc: so we want: 15:23:36 ... .. list of changes 15:23:45 ... .. grammar chagnes 15:24:01 ... .. just noticed a broken link 15:24:15 ... .. acknowledgements section 15:24:17 ... . 15:24:33 topic: Trig Doc 15:24:38 Also change LANG to LANGTAG, or visa-versa 15:24:57 Guus: last week we agreed that AndyS would co-edit the Trig doc 15:25:04 ... this is critical for our timeline 15:25:14 ... when will be ready for LC? 15:25:25 ... recall that we voted on two features at risk 15:25:40 ... two weeks ago, gavinc said there's nothing technically blocking this doc 15:25:52 ... so just awaiting editor attention 15:25:57 gavinc: confirm 15:26:10 AndyS: confirm. what were the features at risk? 15:26:21 feature-at-risk 1 -- bare default graph 15:26:25 gavinc: [those] features at risk were: 15:26:31 feature-at-risk 2 -- GRAPH keyword 15:26:43 ... .. triples outside of {}s 15:26:52 ... .. GRPAH keyword 15:27:37 ACTION: AndyS to prepare a LC edition of Trig by 11 Aug 15:27:37 Created ACTION-285 - Prepare a lc edition of trig by 11 aug [on Andy Seaborne - due 2013-09-04]. 15:27:43 ACTION: gavinc to prepare a LC edition of Trig by 11 Aug 15:27:43 Error finding 'gavinc'. You can review and register nicknames at . 15:27:52 gavinc: looking for examples of Trig docs 15:28:39 Guus: ask on the list. yves can probably provide some prov examples from the primer 15:29:05 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/drafts/n-quads/Overview.html 15:29:24 gavinc: NQuads is in the same state as Trig. 15:29:39 ... needs the same sections as Trig 15:29:43 ACTION: gavin to prepare a LC edition of Trig by 11 Aug 15:29:43 Created ACTION-286 - Prepare a lc edition of trig by 11 aug [on Gavin Carothers - due 2013-09-04]. 15:29:45 topic: n-quads 15:30:22 Guus: let's aim for 11 Sept 15:30:33 topic: test suites 15:30:56 Guus: three weeks ago we recorded some actions 15:31:17 from last week's minutes -- "David Wood: try for LC of N-Quads next week" 15:31:19 zakim, unmute me 15:31:19 Arnaud should no longer be muted 15:31:22 topic: RDF JSON Note 15:31:28 topic: RDF/JSON WG Note 15:31:55 Arnaud: from my point of view, i've addressed comments address to the list and editorial issues 15:32:03 ... i think the doc is ready to go to pub 15:32:21 ... there's a question about whether we meet level of quality of a REC 15:33:01 ... there were some unaddressed pertinent issues, e.g. that it's specified as an algorithm rather than a grammer. 15:33:15 ... doesn't use RFC2112 MUST/MAY/MIGHT 15:33:29 ... so not as good as a REC but probably good enough 15:33:48 Guus: worth having a seperate section on how this relates to the JSON LD spec? 15:34:20 Arnaud: i included text in the abstract to say that this is not the REC'd way, that unless there's a good reason, one should use JSON LD 15:35:34 Guus: propose to copy that sentence from the abstract into the intro 15:36:03 Arnaud: conformance is orthogonal to REC-track status 15:37:12 zakim, mute me 15:37:12 Arnaud should now be muted 15:37:13 ACTION: Arnaud to prepare a pubrules-ready copy and notify list about where it is 15:37:13 Created ACTION-287 - Prepare a pubrules-ready copy and notify list about where it is [on Arnaud Le Hors - due 2013-09-04]. 15:37:39 rdf/json 15:37:51 ACTION: Guus to publish RDF/JSON spec provided by Arnaud 15:37:51 Created ACTION-288 - Publish rdf/json spec provided by arnaud [on Guus Schreiber - due 2013-09-04]. 15:38:14 https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-08-07#tests_for_Concept_and_for_Semantics 15:38:14 topic: tests 15:39:25 topic: Turtle tests 15:39:41 http://librdf.org/2013/08-turtle/raptor-2-0-10-turtle-2013-earl.ttl 15:40:49 ericP: i think we're done. i notified some lists and we got enough implementations to go to PR 15:41:43 Guus: i just need a link to the final impl report. 15:41:49 We also need a draft of the document with the finalized features at risk, yes? 15:41:56 gkellogg: i should have this by EOD today 15:43:47 ericP: i recall some editing requires for Turtle to go to PR 15:46:11 ericP: gavinc, do you have a list of editorial changes? 15:46:19 gavinc: yes, i can put that together 15:47:09 ... greg willians is not satisfied with the resolution re: optionality of '.'s 15:47:11 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments 15:47:58 Guus: i need a final doc for disp of comments 15:49:39 ... not critical. prioritize Trig above Turtle 15:49:46 -gkellogg 15:50:05 [ we are not expecting further changes to Turtle ] 15:50:45 Guus: yes, we've resolved this. without new evidence, we'll not discuss it 15:51:38 -pfps 15:52:15 ... we should be clear if people object, but we won't let that stop process 15:53:07 -cgreer 15:54:03 +cgreer 15:56:03 -ScottB 15:56:11 -cgreer 15:56:13 -Ivan 15:56:20 -Guus_Schreiber 15:56:22 -AndyS 15:56:24 -TallTed 15:56:31 -Arnaud 15:56:32 trackbot, end meeting 15:56:32 Zakim, list attendees 15:56:33 As of this point the attendees have been Guus_Schreiber, GavinC, Arnaud, Ivan, TallTed, Sandro, AndyS, gkellogg, pfps, ScottB, AZ, +1.707.874.aaaa, cgreer, EricP, zwu2 15:56:33 +[GVoice] 15:56:34 -zwu2 15:56:40 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:56:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot 15:56:41 RRSAgent, bye 15:56:41 I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-actions.rdf : 15:56:41 ACTION: ivan to send response re ITS (just testing tracker) [1] 15:56:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc#T15-16-08 15:56:41 ACTION: AndyS to prepare a LC edition of Trig by 11 Aug [2] 15:56:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc#T15-27-37 15:56:41 ACTION: gavinc to prepare a LC edition of Trig by 11 Aug [3] 15:56:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc#T15-27-43 15:56:41 ACTION: gavin to prepare a LC edition of Trig by 11 Aug [4] 15:56:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc#T15-29-43 15:56:41 ACTION: Arnaud to prepare a pubrules-ready copy and notify list about where it is [5] 15:56:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc#T15-37-13 15:56:41 ACTION: Guus to publish RDF/JSON spec provided by Arnaud [6] 15:56:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-rdf-wg-irc#T15-37-51 15:56:43 -GavinC 15:57:01 -AZ