17:00:06 RRSAgent has joined #webperf 17:00:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/08/21-webperf-irc 17:00:08 RRSAgent, make logs world 17:00:08 Zakim has joined #webperf 17:00:10 Zakim, this will be WPWG 17:00:10 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 17:00:11 Meeting: Web Performance Working Group Teleconference 17:00:11 Date: 21 August 2013 17:01:19 zakim, this is per 17:01:20 ok, plh; that matches RWC_web-per()1:00PM 17:01:24 +Plh 17:01:33 present+ JatinderMann 17:01:39 present+ plh 17:01:43 present+ Daniel 17:02:23 +[Microsoft.a] 17:02:54 + +1.949.754.aaaa 17:03:05 present+ AaronHeady 17:03:49 robfromdell has joined #webperf 17:04:03 + +1.408.203.aabb 17:04:07 zakim, aaaa is Rob 17:04:07 +Rob; got it 17:04:15 zakim, aabb is Arvind 17:04:15 +Arvind; got it 17:04:17 present+ ArvindJain 17:04:23 present+ RobDickenson 17:06:10 Topic: Element Visibility 17:07:20 simonjam has joined #webperf 17:07:24 Arvind: I've seen a few different types of requests: one is to see visibility on an element level. Today visibility is for top level browsing context. One ask is to see if it can be made at an element level. E.g., if an iframe is scrolled below the fold, it wants to know if its visible or not. 17:08:39 AaronHeady has joined #webperf 17:09:01 ...In one case the JavaScript on the main page can query the visibility of elements. The other case is third party advertisers want to be able to query when their ad is viewed or not. 17:09:31 ganesh has joined #webperf 17:09:50 + +1.650.214.aacc 17:10:21 - +1.650.214.aacc 17:10:39 ...Mozilla has a interface to give the iframe the screen coordinates to determine screen coordinates. See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22931. 17:10:44 + +1.650.214.aadd 17:12:15 + +1.503.712.aaee 17:19:10 Jatinder: If we are giving screen coordinates, we can just do the math and avoid the developer doing the math. 17:22:56 - +1.650.214.aadd 17:23:39 + +1.650.214.aaff 17:28:13 Jatinder: Let's put together an Element Visibility to answer the first part of the question. I'll share a draft with you Arvind. Arvind, also send me any thoughts or proposals. 17:34:08 Jatinder: We need to determine whether Chrome or IE for cross origin iframes share the top level parent or not. 17:34:16 Arvind: I'll follow up with Chrome behavior. 17:34:23 Jatinder: I can follow up with IE behavior. 17:36:36 -Arvind 17:39:44 Topic: Resource Priorities 17:55:16 http://www.w3.org/2013/08/results-user-timing-tests.html 17:55:35 Jatinder: Please review the Resource Priorities spec updates and raise issues. Thanks! 17:55:38 Topic: Test Cases 17:56:56 Plh: IE and Chrome both pass the tests. 17:57:00 http://www.w3.org/2013/08/results-google-resource-timing-tests.html 17:57:01 Plh: Do we need any additional tests? 17:57:20 James: I don't believe there are new tests we need to write. 18:02:24 - +1.503.712.aaee 18:02:25 -Rob 18:02:26 -[Microsoft] 18:02:26 - +1.650.214.aaff 18:02:27 -Daniel 18:02:27 -[Microsoft.a] 18:02:30 -Plh 18:02:32 RWC_web-per()1:00PM has ended 18:02:32 Attendees were Daniel, [Microsoft], Plh, +1.949.754.aaaa, +1.408.203.aabb, Rob, Arvind, +1.650.214.aacc, +1.650.214.aadd, +1.503.712.aaee, +1.650.214.aaff 18:02:35 Plh: Jatinder, can you check for the IE test failures? 18:03:01 Jatinder: I'll review all the test cases. I think this is a good opportunity to find test case issues, browser issues, or potentially spec issues. 18:03:37 Plh: I think we can move User Timing and Performance Timeline to PR and rAF to CR, based on this information. Resource Timing will just have to come in after. 18:03:46 Topic: Next meeting 18:03:54 James: I'm out next week. 18:03:57 Plh: Me too. 18:04:05 Jatinder: Let's schedule our next meeting for two weeks out. 18:04:11 rrsagent, generate minutes 18:04:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/21-webperf-minutes.html JatinderMann 19:34:24 Zakim has left #webperf