12:50:08 RRSAgent has joined #webtv 12:50:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-irc 12:50:10 RRSAgent, make logs world 12:50:10 Zakim has joined #webtv 12:50:12 Zakim, this will be 12:50:12 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 12:50:13 Meeting: Web and TV Interest Group Teleconference 12:50:13 Date: 14 August 2013 12:51:15 zakim, call kazuyuki-617 12:51:15 sorry, kaz, I don't know what conference this is 12:51:37 zakim, this will be webtv 12:51:37 ok, kaz; I see UW_WebTVIG()9:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 12:51:40 zakim, call kazuyuki-617 12:51:40 ok, kaz; the call is being made 12:51:41 UW_WebTVIG()9:00AM has now started 12:51:42 +Kazuyuki 12:56:35 ddavis has joined #webtv 12:56:59 Hello there 12:58:21 PaulHiggs has joined #webtv 12:58:44 +??P4 12:58:46 -??P4 12:58:46 +??P4 12:59:10 Zakim, ??P4 is ddavis 12:59:10 +ddavis; got it 12:59:37 + +1.720.934.aaaa 13:00:04 zakim, aaaa is Clarke 13:00:04 +Clarke; got it 13:00:30 -ddavis 13:00:33 zakim, who is here? 13:00:33 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke 13:00:34 On IRC I see PaulHiggs, ddavis, Zakim, RRSAgent, kaz, trackbot, glenn, timeless 13:00:43 +PaulHiggs 13:00:45 +??P9 13:01:05 +??P14 13:01:06 zakim, ??P9 is giueppep 13:01:06 +giueppep; got it 13:01:14 Zakim, ??P14 is ddavis 13:01:14 +ddavis; got it 13:01:23 zakim, who is here? 13:01:23 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke, PaulHiggs, giueppep, ddavis 13:01:24 On IRC I see PaulHiggs, ddavis, Zakim, RRSAgent, kaz, trackbot, glenn, timeless 13:01:42 Clarke has joined #webtv 13:01:43 Sheau has joined #webtv 13:01:48 giuseppe has joined #webtv 13:01:49 Bin_Hu has joined #webtv 13:02:04 zakim, who is here? 13:02:04 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke, PaulHiggs, giueppep, ddavis 13:02:05 On IRC I see Bin_Hu, giuseppe, Sheau, Clarke, PaulHiggs, ddavis, Zakim, RRSAgent, kaz, trackbot, glenn, timeless 13:02:09 + +1.917.693.aabb 13:02:29 zakim, aabb is Sheau 13:02:29 +Sheau; got it 13:02:33 zakim, who is here? 13:02:33 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke, PaulHiggs, giueppep, ddavis, Sheau 13:02:35 On IRC I see Bin_Hu, giuseppe, Sheau, Clarke, PaulHiggs, ddavis, Zakim, RRSAgent, kaz, trackbot, glenn, timeless 13:03:06 scribenick: ddavis 13:03:19 Meeting: Web&TV IG - Testing TF 13:03:24 Chair: Clarke 13:03:27 zakim, mute me 13:03:27 Kazuyuki should now be muted 13:03:30 +Bin_Hu 13:03:35 zakim, who is here? 13:03:35 On the phone I see Kazuyuki (muted), Clarke, PaulHiggs, giueppep, ddavis, Sheau, Bin_Hu 13:03:37 On IRC I see Bin_Hu, giuseppe, Sheau, Clarke, PaulHiggs, ddavis, Zakim, RRSAgent, kaz, trackbot, glenn, timeless 13:04:01 Present: Kaz, Clarke, Paul, Giuseppe, Daniel, Sheau, Bin 13:04:02 Clarke: Anything to add to the existing agenda? 13:05:01 Zakim, take up item 1 13:05:01 I see nothing on the agenda 13:05:04 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-web-and-tv/2013Aug/0001.html 13:05:07 Zakim, take up item 1 13:05:07 I see nothing on the agenda 13:05:24 Clarke: Looking at the "issues" page, sent to the list earlier. 13:05:28 issues: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/products/4 13:05:51 Giuseppe: There's a link to the tracker at the top of the wiki page in the quick links. 13:06:00 Clarke: Let's go over raised issues first. 13:06:04 issue-4? 13:06:04 issue-4 -- Use Case: Service User Interface -- closed 13:06:04 http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/4 13:06:20 Clarke: Starting with issue 62 "Media source extension" 13:06:33 ... They have all been included in the use cases. 13:06:51 ... Bin, have they adequately been addressed? 13:07:13 i|Let's go over|-> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page Web&TV wiki| 13:07:29 Bin_Hu: Yes, I think it's already included in the use case document so that's good. 13:09:55 close issue-62 13:09:55 Closed issue-62. 13:10:02 close issue-63 13:10:02 Closed issue-63. 13:10:04 close issue-64 13:10:04 Closed issue-64. 13:11:11 zakim, unmute me 13:11:11 Kazuyuki should no longer be muted 13:11:26 close issue-58 13:11:27 Closed issue-58. 13:11:27 -ddavis 13:12:03 +??P14 13:12:07 Zakim, ??P14 is ddavis 13:12:07 +ddavis; got it 13:12:12 zakim, mute ddavis 13:12:12 ddavis should now be muted 13:12:16 close issue-67 13:12:16 Closed issue-67. 13:12:35 close issue-61 13:12:35 Closed issue-61. 13:12:45 -ddavis 13:13:05 close action-108 13:13:05 Closed action-108. 13:13:34 close action-109 13:13:34 Closed action-109. 13:13:37 i|close issue-62|(check the status of issues and actions)| 13:13:40 +??P14 13:13:46 rrsagent, make log public 13:13:49 Zakim, ??P14 is ddavis 13:13:49 +ddavis; got it 13:13:55 close action-110 13:13:55 Closed action-110. 13:14:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:14:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:14:26 close action-111 13:14:26 Closed action-111. 13:15:04 i|Anything to add|topic: issues and actions| 13:15:04 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:15:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:15:23 Giuseppe: Should we use Google Docs instead? 13:15:40 Clarke: The tools we have already do it in the correct format. 13:16:09 Clarke: But I'd be open to do it in Google Docs 13:16:20 Bin: Google Docs works well in my experience. 13:16:39 Giuseppe: With Google Docs you can just share the link and make edits 13:16:48 Clarke: I'm happy to do that. Anybody opposed? 13:16:59 Action: Clarke to move the requirements document to Google Docs 13:17:00 Created ACTION-131 - Move the requirements document to google docs [on Clarke Stevens - due 2013-08-21]. 13:17:24 s/Bin: /Sheau: / 13:17:37 Clarke: We've now completed and closed the survey. 13:17:41 close action-112 13:17:42 Closed action-112. 13:17:55 close action-117 13:17:55 Closed action-117. 13:18:56 Clarke: That completes the action items. Next, let's talk about the table. 13:20:05 https://www.w3.org/Member/wiki/Webtv/testing 13:20:37 Giuseppe: Did you discuss how to aggregate the results in the last call? 13:20:44 Clarke: No, we wanted to have you here. 13:21:05 Giuseppe: OK, so it should be clear what I've done and how I've put the sum of the votes from the members. 13:21:33 ... I haven't done any normalization or calculating averages. 13:22:06 ... So we have two options - either we create two "mandatory" and "optional" choices 13:22:15 ... or we create a ranking, ordering by priority 13:22:28 Clarke: I like the ranking idea. 13:22:48 ... If it makes sense, we could do ranking and whether it got one or more votes for "mandatory". 13:22:53 ... I think ranking would be most useful for me. 13:23:04 Giuseppe: By the way, the table can already be ordered. 13:23:17 i|/wiki/Webtv/testing|topic: Requirements| 13:23:24 Sheau: Would it be useful if we normalized the internal/external vote because at the moment they're very different. 13:23:31 Clarke: I think that would be useful. 13:23:48 Giuseppe: Also, are the votes/ranking the same thing for internal and external? 13:24:04 zakim, mute me 13:24:04 Kazuyuki should now be muted 13:24:07 Clarke: Would you suggest doing two separate tables or both ranking numbers in a single table? 13:24:28 Giuseppe: You can have two columns in the same table for external and Web & TV members. 13:24:53 ... You could then have the final ranking based on the sum. 13:25:15 Clarke: That makes sense for the ranking and aggregate results. 13:25:26 ... The columns after the "Category" - do we want to include those? 13:25:39 ... CoreMob is not confidential. Is it useful to have that there? 13:26:00 Giuseppe: We can leave it in because it's something that they (Tobie's group) is already using. 13:26:32 Clarke: So "group", "category", "CoreMob", maybe something that says "mandatory" for anything that got at least one "mandatory" vote 13:26:41 ... then something for external votes, then a composite ranking. 13:26:59 Giuseppe: I'd skip "mandatory" because it's difficult to measure 13:27:23 Clarke: So "group", "category", "CoreMob", internal vote, external vote, final vote. 13:27:48 ... Ranking should be 1 for the highest vote-getter? Or display a percentage? 13:28:06 ... You'd get a little more information if you use percentage. 13:28:28 Giuseppe: We could just leave the numbers how they are, putting them in order, and explain how we got there. 13:28:40 Sheau: I find percentages easier to grasp 13:28:56 ... Numbers feels like having my feet in two separate boats. 13:29:14 Clarke: I don't see any reason to not use the raw numbers (percentages) 13:29:54 ... If we have the total respondents in the header and then below a paragraph or two explaining our methodology. 13:30:34 ... Now on to the Word document. 13:31:12 Giuseppe: Who's going to do the table work? 13:31:26 Clarke: Why don't you go ahead and finish it off. 13:31:48 Action: Giuseppe to finish the table display/columns. 13:31:49 Created ACTION-132 - Finish the table display/columns. [on Giuseppe Pascale - due 2013-08-21]. 13:32:12 Clarke: On to the next item and there are some changes. 13:32:39 Giuseppe: Regarding the document in general, there seem to be inputs from different mixed groups so I'm wondering how we should organise it. 13:33:41 Clarke: I'll put the doc on Google Docs today and you can make any changes or organisation suggestions on there. 13:34:22 ... Look at section 5.25.11 13:34:41 ... It looks like a requirement was not captured here before. Any comments about that addition? 13:35:14 s/5.25.11/5.2.11/ 13:35:31 Giuseppe: What's the point of just listing one or two things for each spec? 13:36:13 ... Maybe there should be a dedicated bit with these specs and why. 13:36:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:36:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:36:32 Clarke: Our objective is to look at test tool requirements and communicate that in a logical way. 13:36:48 ... What you're suggesting is a list of requirements and beneath that, a justification? 13:37:01 s/topic: Requirements/topic: Feature table/ 13:37:05 i|On to the next|topic: Requirements document| 13:37:15 Giuseppe: We started listing general requirements but now we have requirements for specific specs. 13:37:32 ... I'm not saying we shouldn't do it but we should say why we're doing it. 13:37:45 i|On to the next|-> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-web-and-tv/2013Aug/att-0002/Web___TV_Testing_Requirements-2013-08-13.docx updated document (member-only)| 13:37:55 ... Also, some specs (EME, MSC) are not in the table 13:37:59 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:37:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:38:22 ... So there are some requirements here just for EME and MSC - why are we picking things only for these specs? 13:38:30 Clarke: One reason is that they were listed as use cases. 13:38:42 ... Generally we try to take use cases and extract requirements from those. 13:39:02 ... I listed all the use cases we went over in the group. Admittedly they may not be completely normalized. 13:39:12 ... I'm open to other ways of doing this. 13:39:30 ... We had some general overview kinds and then we had some more specific use cases. 13:40:04 ... I agree that it's not ideally presented so would be good if you had suggestions for improvement. 13:40:16 Giuseppe: OK, I'll write something - that would be easier to explain. 13:40:48 ... I'll put it in an email. I think we should have general requirements and for specific specs, a separate section. 13:40:53 ... with an explanation why. 13:41:30 Clarke: What I want to say is that these use cases exposed certain requirements for a test tool that may not have been covered in other use cases. 13:41:55 ... We picked out use cases that were relevant to web on TV in order to expose requirements for this are that may not be in other groups. 13:42:12 Sheau: Is it correct to say this reflects the group's gap analysis? 13:42:34 Giuseppe: Actually, we haven't done a gap analysis. 13:42:58 ... Although this was a bit special, we now have the use cases, we have generated a requirement. 13:43:38 ... Next is to discuss ongoing work to see if there are some requirements not covered, during which we can do gap analysis. 13:44:18 Clarke: In section 6.1.4 there are some comments specific to Media Source Extensions 13:45:12 ... The comments cover splicing. 13:46:07 ... I think our detail is a bit inconsistent - in this case we have a lot of detail. 13:46:31 Giuseppe: The content may be valid, we just need to justify why it's like this. 13:47:17 Clarke: No comments on this section? 13:47:48 ... OK, that's all the additions that have been made. 13:47:57 ... We were hoping to complete this by the end of the month which is still possible. 13:48:42 ... In order for it to be a successful document, we need comments and participation. 13:48:56 ... Let's move on to scheduling and anything general we want to cover. 13:49:04 topic: schedule 13:49:14 ... I'd like to have a list of requirements we can sent to the HTML testing group by the end of this month. 13:49:29 s/... I'd/Clarke: I'd/ 13:49:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:49:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:50:03 Giuseppe: We don't necessarily need to wait. We have the table so we could send that out before the requirements document. 13:50:04 s/schedule/Schedule/ 13:50:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:50:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:50:16 PaulHiggs has joined #webtv 13:50:33 Giuseppe: And regarding gap analysis, we can do that later 13:50:55 ... after we've seen how the HTML group is testing, e.g. TV/STB devices which may have special requirements. 13:51:04 +1 13:51:24 ... Maybe we should look at that aspect, such as do we need to have support for WebDriver? 13:51:51 Giuseppe: Maybe make a list of things to be aware of or what a device needs to support. 13:52:04 s/... Maybe/Giuseppe: Maybe/ 13:52:12 Clarke: That would be useful. Do you have any sample docs that could be used as a template? 13:52:20 Giuseppe: No, but we can make it ourselves. 13:52:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:52:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:52:48 Giuseppe: It could start as an index, to have a starting point for the TV aspect. 13:53:01 Clarke: Good idea. Any other comments? 13:53:10 q+ 13:53:21 zakim, who is here? 13:53:21 On the phone I see Kazuyuki (muted), Clarke, PaulHiggs, giueppep, Sheau, Bin_Hu, ddavis 13:53:23 On IRC I see PaulHiggs, Bin_Hu, giuseppe, Sheau, Clarke, ddavis, Zakim, RRSAgent, kaz, trackbot, glenn, timeless 13:53:26 zakim, unmute me 13:53:26 Kazuyuki should no longer be muted 13:53:33 Clarke: Let's get the table normalized and ready for publication before the next meeting in two weeks. 13:53:42 s/giueppep/giuseppe 13:53:44 ... Any other comments, I'll try to get them integrated by then. 13:54:01 Clarke: We can then publish the requirements after that. 13:54:16 Kaz: Do you want to make the requirements doc into an official note? 13:54:26 Clarke: I think it could be useful published as a separate note. 13:54:44 Kaz: Maybe we could publish it as a note including the whole requirements. 13:55:03 Clarke: There could be a tracking issue but I don't think we'll make changes because it's a survey. 13:55:13 Kaz: If needed we could merge the two notes later. 13:55:26 s/requirements doc/requirements doc and table/ 13:55:31 Clarke: Anything else? 13:55:44 Bin_Hu: So we'll talk about the schedule next time? 13:56:07 Clarke: Yes, there are a couple of small things which are achievable in the next two weeks so see where we are after that. 13:56:25 ... The requirements doc may need extra work after that. 13:56:32 -PaulHiggs 13:56:37 -Sheau 13:56:39 -Bin_Hu 13:56:41 -Clarke 13:56:48 Clarke: OK, meeting adjourned - see you in two weeks. 13:56:51 -giueppep 13:56:52 -ddavis 13:57:00 -Kazuyuki 13:57:01 UW_WebTVIG()9:00AM has ended 13:57:01 Attendees were Kazuyuki, ddavis, +1.720.934.aaaa, Clarke, PaulHiggs, giueppep, +1.917.693.aabb, Sheau, Bin_Hu 13:57:02 Thanks for scribing, Daniel 13:57:04 [ adjourned ] 13:57:08 You're welcome 13:57:17 zakim, giueppep is giuseppe 13:57:17 sorry, giuseppe, I do not recognize a party named 'giueppep' 13:57:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:57:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/14-webtv-minutes.html kaz 13:57:40 rrsagent, stop