See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 05 August 2013
<mielvds> Great, phones are dead here; won't be able to tune in
<scribe> scribenick: rgarcia
Arnaud: Minutes approved
Arnaud: Please, indicate your expected attendance
Arnaud: We can close action 91, it has been done
mielvds: I completed ACTION-82 (the comparison with GSP)
Arnaud: the document looks great
SteveS: What do we do with the text in the wiki?
Arnaud: We need to move the document from google docs to W3C land
mielvds: I can cut and paste into the wiki
<TallTed> action-82?
<trackbot> ACTION-82 -- Miel Vander Sande to take another look at how LDP and GSP compare and report back -- due 2013-06-27 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/82
Arnaud: it could also be an appendix in the spec. From now, we link to it from the WG web page
Ashok: Is a wiki entry formal enough?
Arnaud: the document is informational and probably no specification will reference it
… we can discuss later whether to promote it
Arnaud: ACTION-53 should be
closed
... What do we do with Richard's actions?
SteveS: ACTION-49 is now owned by Cody
… and maybe ACTION-46 is not valid anymore
Arnaud: Let's put that on Roger
Arnaud: we already received a first comment
… the editors will manage the comments received and make sure they are tracked and solved in an orderly fashion
… when issues are raised, the editors will bring them to the attention of the WG
… and the WG answers them (in different ways)
Arnaud: we should publish a new version as soon as possible
<svillata> rgarcia: I will update the document
<svillata> ... I cover the absolute requirements in the spec
<svillata> ... maybe I will need more help to cover further cases
<svillata> ... the primer provides input and output, we could refer to it
Ashok: I haven't updated it, don't think that an update is required but I can work on it
Arnaud: Miguel and Ted have to review the document, so don't do anything before getting the reviews
TallTed: I have made a partial pass over the document
… a lot of emptiness must be filled in (e.g., tables)
Arnaud: Ashok and TallTed can work offline on it
<nmihindu> Yes, most of the stuff in the wiki are now edited, regarding the best practices guide
Arnaud: the work is in progress
<nmihindu> one thing we need to discuss is that do we need any contributions for that
<nmihindu> like we did for UCR document
SteveS: The publication of the IETF draft is under review
Arnaud: support the spec in IETF so it progresses
… but we cannot do anything else
… if anyone has made any implementation, you can support the draft at IETF
… Eric Wilde could provide advice on how to support
… I will gather this information
Ashok: Someone asked about the LDP schema
… not clear what is it about
SteveS: I will take the action to respond pointing to the ontology documents
ericP: maybe the question is related to the RDF validation workshop
Arnaud: and ask him to clarify his question
Arnaud: we have the F2F to discuss any issues that appear, maybe we don't need to have calls unless something urgent appears
… we skip August 12th and the next call is on August 19th
<Ashok> Hi Eric, were you trying to attract my attention?
<Arnaud> trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/tpoic/topic/ Found ScribeNick: rgarcia Inferring Scribes: rgarcia Default Present: Arnaud, Ashok_Malhotra, rgarcia, SteveS, nmihindu, svillata, mielvds, TallTed, EricP Present: Arnaud Ashok_Malhotra rgarcia SteveS nmihindu svillata mielvds TallTed EricP WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 05 Aug 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/08/05-ldp-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]