15:02:01 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y
15:02:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/07/18-html-a11y-irc
15:02:03 RRSAgent, make logs world
15:02:03 Zakim has joined #html-a11y
15:02:05 Zakim, this will be 2119
15:02:05 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 62 minutes ago
15:02:06 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
15:02:06 Date: 18 July 2013
15:02:48 zakim, who is on the phone?
15:02:48 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has not yet started, MarkS
15:02:50 On IRC I see RRSAgent, richardschwerdtfeger, paulc, janina, David, SuzanneT, SteveF, davidb, MarkS, chaals, Joshue, hober, MichaelC, trackbot
15:02:58 zakim, who's here?
15:02:59 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has not yet started, janina
15:03:00 On IRC I see RRSAgent, richardschwerdtfeger, paulc, janina, David, SuzanneT, SteveF, davidb, MarkS, chaals, Joshue, hober, MichaelC, trackbot
15:03:11 zakim, this is 2119
15:03:11 ok, MarkS; that matches WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM
15:03:17 zakim, who is on the phone
15:03:17 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', MarkS
15:03:24 zakim, who is on the phone?
15:03:24 On the phone I see David_MacDonald, Mark_Sadecki, ??P5, +1.201.390.aaaa, [Microsoft], Rich_Schwerdtfeger
15:03:28 +John_Foliot
15:03:43 zakim, ??P5 is me
15:03:43 +janina; got it
15:05:02 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force
15:05:02 Chair: Chaals
15:05:02 agenda+ procedures CfC
15:05:02 agenda+ longdesc in Last Call
15:05:02 agenda+ HTML5 testing and interoperability
15:05:04 agenda+ Canvas testing and interoperability
15:05:07 agenda+ using alternative text in HTML
15:05:09 agenda+ Sub-teams
15:05:12 agenda+ Any Other Business
15:05:31 zakim, who's on the phone?
15:05:31 On the phone I see David_MacDonald, Mark_Sadecki, janina, +1.201.390.aaaa, [Microsoft], Rich_Schwerdtfeger, John_Foliot
15:05:33 +[IPcaller]
15:06:00 zakim, [ip is me
15:06:00 +chaals; got it
15:06:21 zakim, aaaa is SuzanneT
15:06:21 +SuzanneT; got it
15:06:27 zakim, +1.201.390.aaaa is Suzanne
15:06:27 sorry, janina, I do not recognize a party named '+1.201.390.aaaa'
15:06:29 + +1.619.846.aabb
15:06:37 JF has joined #html-a11y
15:06:40 zakim, who is here
15:06:40 chaals, you need to end that query with '?'
15:06:49 zakim, who is here?
15:06:49 On the phone I see David_MacDonald, Mark_Sadecki, janina, SuzanneT, [Microsoft], Rich_Schwerdtfeger, John_Foliot, chaals, +1.619.846.aabb
15:06:51 On IRC I see JF, Zakim, RRSAgent, richardschwerdtfeger, paulc, janina, David, SuzanneT, SteveF, davidb, MarkS, chaals, Joshue, hober, MichaelC, trackbot
15:06:57 scribe: JF
15:07:12 zakim, agenda?
15:07:12 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda:
15:07:15 1. procedures CfC [from janina]
15:07:15 2. longdesc in Last Call [from janina]
15:07:15 3. HTML5 testing and interoperability [from janina]
15:07:15 4. Canvas testing and interoperability [from janina]
15:07:15 5. using alternative text in HTML [from janina]
15:07:16 6. Sub-teams [from janina]
15:07:16 7. Any Other Business [from janina]
15:07:23 zakim take up next item
15:07:44 Chaals: sent out a CfC on new statement of work and new decision procedures
15:07:57 basic changes is to make things simpler
15:08:14 deadline for comments is Monday of next week
15:08:46 JS: small nit, usual term is calnedar day, and you say natural day
15:08:53 Chaals: same thing
15:09:24 Chaals: can change that. Please send an email
15:09:29 zakim, close this item
15:09:29 I do not know what agendum had been taken up, chaals
15:09:35 zakim, close item 1
15:09:35 agendum 1, procedures CfC, closed
15:09:36 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:09:36 2. longdesc in Last Call [from janina]
15:09:39 zakim, take up item 2
15:09:40 agendum 2. "longdesc in Last Call" taken up [from janina]
15:10:02 Chaals: spec is now in last call, there are only 60-something days left
15:10:07 +Cynthia_Shelly
15:10:24 Chaals: I anticipate a comment from Yandex, but will likely take another week or so - based on use-cases
15:10:46 DM: Seems the response has been mixed to date
15:11:19 JS: How do we want to proceed on the comments that have come in to date?
15:11:36 Chaals: wait another week or so, and then do review of comments on the list
15:12:14 zakim, close item 2
15:12:14 agendum 2, longdesc in Last Call, closed
15:12:15 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:12:15 3. HTML5 testing and interoperability [from janina]
15:12:24 zakim, take up agendum 3
15:12:24 agendum 3. "HTML5 testing and interoperability" taken up [from janina]
15:12:39 zakim, who is here
15:12:39 chaals, you need to end that query with '?'
15:12:46 zakim, who is here?
15:12:46 On the phone I see David_MacDonald, Mark_Sadecki, janina, SuzanneT, [Microsoft], Rich_Schwerdtfeger, John_Foliot, chaals, +1.619.846.aabb, Cynthia_Shelly
15:12:50 On IRC I see JF, Zakim, RRSAgent, richardschwerdtfeger, paulc, janina, David, SuzanneT, SteveF, davidb, MarkS, chaals, Joshue, hober, MichaelC, trackbot
15:13:16 plh has joined #html-a11y
15:13:22 MS: thanks to Paul for the reply. disappointed to have the response rejected in whole
15:13:48 MS: Not sure that more time is all that will be needed to meet the criteria
15:13:54 JS: Lets not give up that easy
15:14:12 may be true, or not, but having a problem in my mind on how to prove lack of interoperability
15:14:21 q+
15:14:33 q+
15:14:40 q- later
15:14:42 JS: would it be more acceptable if we can state we cannot find a user-agent that supports
15:15:05 q-
15:15:08 PC: Some kind of evidence, in particular to show, that X-scenario in a browser did not work
15:15:27 PC: Not suggesting that the TF, as author, produce test-cases that fail
15:15:55 PC: so simply testing 1 or more browsers, under x testing scenario, is better
15:15:59 http://html5accessibility.com/
15:16:05 q+
15:16:06 simply stating that "you beleive it" does not meet the bar
15:16:43 q?
15:16:46 q+
15:16:47 ack pa
15:16:50 PC: take a simple document, use a user-agent, one or more, perhaps with an AT, then explain what you did and the results
15:17:22 ack me
15:17:24 ack ri
15:17:27 Chaals: doesn't seem to be a high bar. Sounds like you are asking for a list of things that doesn't work, but has been tested
15:17:28 http://html5accessibility.com/
15:17:58 RS: the editor (Steve) has already done some testing and showing his results at the URL provided
15:18:13 suspect this is based on a non-nomative passage
15:18:20 testing has already been done for interop
15:18:37 RS: If steve were to present his test cases, would that be adequate?
15:19:14 PC: Yes, in fact what we are hoping is that if somebody came forward with a test case that shows a fail across all browsers, then we could look to add that to the larger test suite
15:20:05 Chaals: How much time would it take to get steve's work ready for this?
15:20:21 PC: Please remember we have started the CfC for Canvas testing
15:20:44 if the TF comes back with a request for more time, that would likely be granted
15:21:04 Chaals: would that be reasonable to do quickly
15:21:26 MS: Steve has noted that html5accessibility requires some additional work to be updated
15:21:35 www.html5accessibility.com/tests/ARIA-tests/
15:21:52 MS: In an ideal world, likely 30 days, but with holidays, etc. would likely need a bit more time
15:23:11 PC: Suggest that request for an extension to Sept. 1st, and prior to that, present a status report. Expect the chairs to support. Set an agressive date, and then give rope as needed
15:23:21 Chaals: sounds like a reasonable time-line
15:24:04 PC: One additional request: if you make progress, do not batch it all at the end, rather provide rolling updates
15:25:34 JS: Need to add a footnote. Agree with the process, but it really is different from the original marking of the process outlined in San Jose
15:25:38 zakim, close item 3
15:25:38 agendum 3, HTML5 testing and interoperability, closed
15:25:39 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:25:39 4. Canvas testing and interoperability [from janina]
15:25:47 zakim, take up agendum 4
15:25:47 agendum 4. "Canvas testing and interoperability" taken up [from janina]
15:26:06 q+
15:26:13 Chaals: Short answer is, the same thing applies. We need to provide evidence of what works and what doesn't
15:26:15 ack pa
15:27:06 PC: Believe it was at WG meeting last week - probably going to be more testing of canvas than other aspects of the spec
15:27:47 Chaals: there was a call 2 weeks ago, where Rich discussed what worked and what didn't. Some does, some doesn't, but we want to get to a point where we can have it in HTML5, but its not ready yet
15:28:24 Chaals: hope to have them ready and passed later, and still catch up to html5
15:28:46 PC: encourage the TF to follow the same process as above - provide evidence as early as possible
15:30:06 Rich: as I understand it, the path piece has been implemented in a browser
15:30:16 Chaals: issues is that we do not have enough to pass
15:30:39 Rich: what I really want to see is the caret selection / focus rings get done in this Recommendation
15:31:03 Chaals: short answer is we are in the same position. Early comments better than complete comments
15:31:44 JS: So we need implementers of this correct?
15:32:14 Rich: sent out a note to MS asking about implementation, but have not received an answer
15:32:39 CS: don;t believe it is in yet
15:32:51 CS: Is there a date for a dot release for canvas?
15:33:21 JS: this could exit for CR now minus the things that might get pulled
15:33:40 PC: There is already a next-gen document now
15:34:04 For 5.1 schedule, refer to http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html
15:34:46 Chaals: short answer is that we need to look at interop and see what we have
15:34:57 q+
15:34:57 knowing that there are a number of things following
15:35:16 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-2dcontext-20121217/
15:35:16 PC: wish to point out that focus rings are not on "at risk" list
15:35:37 when you are in CR, 2 things that can block, testing and implementation
15:36:02 Focus rings are marked as At Risk in the implementation report: http://dev.w3.org/html5/misc/canvas-implementation.html
15:36:04 reason for 5.0 schedule stretches out so far is that anticipate length of time for implementation
15:36:32 PC: if you remove something from the Candidate Spec, you need to return to square 1
15:36:45 [MarkS - but that just means "no interop yet", it isn't the same as "at risk" in the process sense]
15:36:50 so focus rings is not on the At Risk list
15:37:13 zakim, close agendum 4
15:37:13 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, chaals
15:37:18 ack paul
15:37:20 zakim, close agendum 4
15:37:20 agendum 4, Canvas testing and interoperability, closed
15:37:21 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:37:21 5. using alternative text in HTML [from janina]
15:37:23 Chaals: we are where we were 2 weeks ago, so lets move on
15:37:26 zakim, take up agendum 5
15:37:26 agendum 5. "using alternative text in HTML" taken up [from janina]
15:37:48 Chaals: this is the changes to the HTML spec, and the guidance that it gives
15:38:06 Steve F has been working on that, but we do not have a published version of that yet
15:38:16 hope to have that available for review in a few days
15:38:56 note that if longdesc gets completed, we will now be able to use that as well, which will likely impact Steve's changes
15:39:05 q+
15:39:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0019.html
15:39:10 s/Steve's changes/the section/
15:39:15 ack pau
15:39:34 PC: there is a thread (linked here) - is this the same issue?
15:39:59 I asked some questions on that thread, and did not receive a response
15:40:20 PC: Question is about status of Last Call on Alt Text techniques
15:40:38 q+
15:40:53 davidb has joined #html-a11y
15:40:58 JS: delay appears that we were going to finish some edits in the html5 spec first, and having those edites come into the spec document
15:41:29 Chaals: short answer is that we expect Steve's document to be moot.
15:42:08 PC: Notice Steve\s note of June 6 - states: I have added/updated the following sections in the 5.1 spec...
15:42:28 JS: working in the nightlies, with goal of backporting when completed
15:42:43 PC: Is there a tag to use that is tracking these issues?
15:43:03 Chaals: Will need to query steve, but he is aware of the need
15:43:53 PC: Want to make sure what all the steps are. Co-chairs looking for heart-beat docs to be done, and alt techniques is on the list
15:44:23 but no point doing that, as it is being merged into the html 5 and 5.1 docs
15:44:42 Chaals: I believe that if you asked the group, they would agree to that
15:44:59 zakim, close agendum 5
15:44:59 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, chaals
15:45:08 ack pa
15:45:12 ack ch
15:45:20 zakim, close item 5
15:45:20 agendum 5, using alternative text in HTML, closed
15:45:22 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:45:22 6. Sub-teams [from janina]
15:45:40 Chaals: I know there is nothing from text sub-team, nor bugs
15:45:51 are there any sub-teams that have anything to report?
15:46:18 Chaals: I have started to look at some media stuff.
15:46:26 zakim, close item 6
15:46:26 agendum 6, Sub-teams, closed
15:46:27 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
15:46:27 7. Any Other Business [from janina]
15:46:31 JS: need to look for a time to have a meeting
15:46:53 Chaals: have a question about meeting schedules over the next 2 weeks.
15:47:16 how many anticipate attendance next week?
15:47:26 Chaals: following week?
15:47:50 (JF notes that getting quorum over the next 2 weeks is do-able)
15:48:07 Chaals: end the meeting early?
15:48:24 PC: TF should expect to see a note from the admin re: extension requests
15:48:27 - +1.619.846.aabb
15:48:29 -Cynthia_Shelly
15:48:31 -chaals
15:48:31 -[Microsoft]
15:48:32 -Mark_Sadecki
15:48:32 -janina
15:48:33 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger
15:48:33 -David_MacDonald
15:48:35 -SuzanneT
15:48:37 -John_Foliot
15:48:38 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has ended
15:48:38 Attendees were David_MacDonald, Mark_Sadecki, +1.201.390.aaaa, [Microsoft], Rich_Schwerdtfeger, John_Foliot, janina, [IPcaller], chaals, SuzanneT, +1.619.846.aabb, Cynthia_Shelly
15:48:45 zakim, draft minutes
15:48:45 I don't understand 'draft minutes', chaals
15:48:50 rrsagent, draft minutes
15:48:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/18-html-a11y-minutes.html chaals
15:48:56 rrsagent, make minutes public
15:48:56 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', chaals. Try /msg RRSAgent help
15:49:04 rrsagent, make log public
15:51:56 i/JS: need/Topic: Other business (next meetings)/
15:52:00 rrsagent, draft minutes
15:52:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/18-html-a11y-minutes.html chaals
15:53:34 i/Chaals: I know there is nothing/Topic: Sub-teams?/
15:54:37 i/Chaals: sent out a CfC/Topic: CfC on our procedures/
15:55:40 rrsagent, draft minutes
15:55:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/18-html-a11y-minutes.html chaals
15:57:29 Present: Chaals, Janina, David_McDonald, JohnF, PaulC, RichS, TedO'C, SuzanneT, MarkS, CynthiaS
15:57:37 Regrets: Leonie, SteveF
15:57:49 rrsagent, draft minutes
15:57:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/18-html-a11y-minutes.html chaals
15:58:31 s/zakim take up next item//
15:58:40 rrsagent, draft minutes
15:58:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/18-html-a11y-minutes.html chaals
16:01:24 janina has changed the topic to: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference; Thursday 25 July at 15:00Z for 60 minutes
17:53:34