14:59:28 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 14:59:28 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/07/16-wai-wcag-irc 14:59:30 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:59:30 Zakim has joined #wai-wcag 14:59:32 Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG 14:59:32 ok, trackbot, I see WAI_WCAG()11:00AM already started 14:59:33 Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 14:59:33 Date: 16 July 2013 14:59:55 zakim, [IPcaller] is Joshue 14:59:56 +Joshue; got it 15:00:02 chair: Joshue O Connor 15:00:05 +??P4 15:00:18 Zakim, Adobe is AWK 15:00:18 +AWK; got it 15:00:43 regrets: Bruce_Bailey, Kathy_Wahlbin 15:00:54 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2013JulSep/0018.html 15:01:50 zakim, mute me 15:01:50 Joshue should now be muted 15:02:34 Loretta has joined #WAI-WCAG 15:02:35 korn has joined #wai-wcag 15:02:47 zakim, unmute me 15:02:47 Joshue should no longer be muted 15:03:16 +[IPcaller] 15:03:30 zakim, Ipcaller is Loretta_Guarino_Reid 15:03:30 +Loretta_Guarino_Reid; got it 15:03:45 + +1.650.506.aaaa 15:03:55 Zakim, aaaa is Peter_Korn 15:03:55 +Peter_Korn; got it 15:03:55 zakim, aaaa is Peter_Korn 15:03:57 sorry, MichaelC, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 15:05:13 +David_MacDonald 15:06:43 David has joined #wai-wcag 15:07:36 Scribe Peter_Korn 15:07:42 ScribeNick: Peter Korn 15:07:54 scribeNick: korn 15:08:43 Topic WCAG review of 'Using aria-describedby' technique 15:09:08 s/Topic WCAG review of 'Using aria-describedby' technique/Topic: WCAG review of 'Using aria-describedby' technique/ 15:10:00 q+ 15:11:01 ack korn 15:11:15 Programmatically associated http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/content-structure-separation-programmatic.html 15:13:21 q+ 15:14:10 The aria-describedby attribute provides a way to programmatically associate text that is on the page with an object such as an image. 15:15:33 ack awk 15:17:11 q+ 15:17:36 ack awk 15:17:58 q+ 15:18:19 q+ 15:18:26 ack Loretta 15:19:12 ack david 15:21:10 Agreement to drop the sentence: "This is called a "programmatic association" in WCAG 2." 15:21:59 RESOLUTION: Drop the sentence "This is called a "programmatic association" in WCAG 2." from "Using aria-describedby" technique 15:24:01 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Techniques/ARIA 15:24:49 zakim, queue? 15:24:49 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:25:39 +James_Nurthen 15:27:49 Suggest: Using ARIA Describedby to provide descriptions of objects that can be read by assistive technology 15:33:03 RESOLUTION: Change the title of this technique to "Using ARIA Describedby to provide descriptions of objects" 15:36:21 q+ 15:36:24 q+ 15:36:49 q+ to say that it seems like we might want a user agent note about this 15:37:13 ack David 15:37:51 q+ 15:37:56 ack awk 15:37:56 AWK, you wanted to say that it seems like we might want a user agent note about this 15:39:07 ack Loretta 15:40:24 q+ 15:42:35 q- 15:44:47 q+ 15:44:55 ack Lor 15:47:32 s/regrets: Bruce_Bailey, Kathy_Wahlbin/regrets: Bruce_Bailey, Kathy_Wahlbin, Cherie 15:51:33 http://wet-boew.github.io/wet-boew/demos/datepicker/datepicker-eng.html no role= application 15:52:01 q+ to suggest that Example 5 seems sufficiently complex and require extra explanation that perhaps we should remove it and then structure a different technique around using describedby in web apps and widgets 15:52:08 ack awk 15:52:08 AWK, you wanted to suggest that Example 5 seems sufficiently complex and require extra explanation that perhaps we should remove it and then structure a different technique around 15:52:11 ... using describedby in web apps and widgets 15:56:36 Proposal: Remove Example 5 and suggest the ARIA TF create a separate technique for describedby with role=application 15:57:37 We need a technique "providing keyboard access to widgets implemented with role=application. 15:59:01 David_ has joined #wai-wcag 15:59:54 -David_MacDonald 16:00:10 +David_MacDonald 16:01:20 zakim, queue? 16:01:20 I see no one on the speaker queue 16:04:03 -Peter_Korn 16:04:09 korn has left #wai-wcag 16:05:16 scribe: MichaelC 16:06:12 RESOLUTION: Remove Example 5 and suggest the ARIA TF create a separate technique for describedby with role=application 16:06:14 rrsagent, make minutes 16:06:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/16-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC 16:09:42 s|ScribeNick: Peter Korn|Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ARIATechs_June21_2013/results| 16:09:54 s/Scribe Peter_Korn// 16:10:08 s/scribeNick: korn/scribe: korn/ 16:10:14 rrsagent, make minutes 16:10:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/16-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC 16:10:26 q+ 16:10:49 separately 16:13:31 RESOLUTION: accept as amended 16:14:13 Scribe: Joshue 16:14:18 topic: Instituational Memory https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20120716_im/results 16:14:19 zakim, mute me 16:14:19 Joshue should now be muted 16:14:46 On this call we covered the first item on this survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ARIATechs_June21_2013/results). Will address other items next week. 16:14:59 MC: The idea of this exercise, its that it is apparent that there was a lot of discussion on getting WCAG to the way it is. 16:15:27 MC: Due to turnover of people etc we have a lot of info that has been lost, many things need to be preserved. 16:15:42 MC: We therefore try to collect some of this knowledge before it disappears. 16:16:02 MC: Much of the detailed discussion isn't available partially due to WG scribing style. 16:16:43 MC: Theres a lot of info in peoples heads so we want to collect that as best we can. This is experimental, we don't know what will be effective. 16:17:00 MC: If we can collect the groups memories then this will be useful. 16:17:34 MC: This is an attemp to walk through the guidelines in an organised manner, this survey just asks 'What do you remember about x?' 16:17:47 MC: We are open to other ideas about how to do this, and if it's useful. 16:18:18 MC: We propose to limit discussion to a max of 30 mins per week. It may take a few months to get through but will help with future requirements gathering. 16:18:41 MC: Not many have filled in the survey - what do people think about this? 16:18:46 zakim, unmute me 16:18:46 Joshue should no longer be muted 16:19:04 AWK: I like the idea of doing this incrementally... 16:20:10 MC: Does anyone think this isn't a good use of time? 16:20:17 zakim, mute me 16:20:17 Joshue should now be muted 16:20:26 DMacD: Time is limited.. 16:20:39 MC: Does anyone else share this thought? 16:21:08 LGR: I think it's a good idea, but if we spend a lot of time on it - I'd be concerned spending too much time on it. 16:21:17 LGR: Where would it live? 16:21:23 MC: We could create a wiwi? 16:21:30 MC: zakim, mute me 16:21:41 zakim, mute me 16:21:41 Joshue was already muted, Joshue 16:22:13 MC: People at least passively think it could be valuable.. 16:22:25 MC: Does anyone thing this is a top priority? 16:22:39 MC: Should it be last priority behing all the other stuff we are doing? 16:23:05 zakim, unmute me 16:23:05 Joshue should no longer be muted 16:23:29 MC: Sounds like a soft support of a limited investigation of Inst Memory. 16:23:42 MC: Are there better ways to do this? Any other ideas? 16:24:08 LGR: One question would be if we can target people who were around? 16:24:29 MC: What questions should we ask? 16:25:02 LGR: Should we contact people like Andi, Alex Li, John from MicroS etc 16:25:33 MC: Should we just ping them, and ask them what they think? We could structure survey permissions etc.. 16:26:46 MC: We could schedule calls and interview people.. 16:27:01 LGR: Sounds more resource intensive.. 16:27:27 MC: We should spend some time on this, reach out, ask them how they would like to participate etc.. 16:28:20 zakim, unmute me 16:28:20 Joshue was not muted, Joshue 16:29:00 ok 16:29:14 scribe: MichaelC 16:29:40 -Joshue 16:30:08 JN: maybe ask the current WG members what questions they have to pose to people who were around 16:30:15 James: What if we asked the working group to generate questions as prompts for WG to gather reponses? 16:36:39 Chairs and staff contact will try a wiki version of this collection process and run by group next week 16:37:08 -AWK 16:37:09 -Michael_Cooper 16:37:11 -James_Nurthen 16:37:11 -Loretta_Guarino_Reid 16:37:12 WAI_WCAG()11:00AM has ended 16:37:12 Attendees were Joshue, Michael_Cooper, AWK, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, +1.650.506.aaaa, Peter_Korn, David_MacDonald, James_Nurthen 16:37:20 rrsagent, make minutes 16:37:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/16-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC 17:00:19 Joshue108 has joined #wai-wcag 18:58:25 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 19:01:42 Joshue has joined #wai-wcag