12:04:10 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 12:04:10 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/07/10-mlw-lt-irc 12:04:11 present+ Pedro 12:04:27 present+ Milan 12:04:45 meeting: MLW-LT WG 12:04:47 I hope felix has not forgotten, I got an auto-reply to one of my messages to him saying he is on vacation 12:05:01 I'll give it another two minutes and then drop from the GTM and start another session. 12:05:25 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jul/0005.html 12:06:12 OK. I'm going to start another GTM. I'll paste details here as soon as I have them. 12:06:14 present: Arle, glazou, kfritsche, SebastianS, Ankit, pnietoca, Pedro, Milan 12:06:23 present+ tadej 12:07:00 Yves_ has joined #mlw-lt 12:07:18 Present+ Yves 12:07:25 New URL: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/609536477 12:07:29 No password 12:07:47 Meeting ID: 609-536-477 12:08:19 I have only a French phone number to dial in. Does anyone need a phone dial in? 12:08:33 leroy has joined #mlw-lt 12:09:19 present+ chriLi 12:09:23 present+ leroy 12:09:42 present+ Des 12:11:01 chair: Arle 12:11:06 daveL has joined #mlw-lt 12:11:25 just monitoring on IRC for now... 12:14:20 Scribe: Arle 12:14:40 joerg has joined #mlw-lt 12:14:52 present+ joerg 12:14:53 Daniel: described the burden of dealing with the script solution for ITS rules in HTML/XHTML/etc. Needs switches in the code depending on the HTML flavor. 12:15:17 .. All HTML tools will need to deal with this. Not XML server apps. But for HTML it is a big deal. 12:15:46 .. Outside from ITS, I find it weird to have different DOMs depending on whether you use the XML or HTML serializations for HTML5. 12:16:32 .. Solution was to wrap the rules in a CDATA section to ensure that we have the same character data nodes and one DOM, no matter what the serialization. 12:16:51 .. We have provisions like this for JavaScript, you have to encapsulate the code if you use a < sign. 12:16:59 .. It's not uncommon. 12:17:21 Arle: Anyone want to respond. 12:18:19 Yves: I don't have a strong opinion. I understand Daniel’s point and I would like to have one representation. But I am worried about the change at this point makes so much change. LQI and Provenance use the same method for standoff. So we would have to do the same. 12:18:54 .. My implementation wouldn't have to change much. But others would. It's late in the process, but we should do the right technical thing. 12:19:34 Daniel: I think if implementations have implemented something from a preliminary spec, that is their problem. The goal is to make the best possible spec. The DOM difference is a BIG design issue, not something minor. 12:19:55 Yves: Timing is secondary for me. But I'm fine with the change. 12:20:11 Daniel: Has anyone pinged the HTML WG on this matter to know what they know about the DOM issue? 12:20:50 Yves: I think that Jirka is our main contact there. As he says, it is a case of preference to go one way or another, but I think Daniel has the technical argument here. 12:21:04 Action: Daniel to ping HTML5 WG to ask them about this issue. 12:21:04 Created ACTION-553 - Ping HTML5 WG to ask them about this issue. [on Daniel Grasmick - due 2013-07-17]. 12:22:00 NOTE: CHANGE TO DANIEL GLAZMAN, NOT GRASMICK. 12:22:19 Daniel: If the HTML5 WG doesn't think this is a big deal, I will withdraw my comment. 12:23:04 I think the same as Yves 12:23:09 Pedro: I think we need to consider this seriously. I would like to stress one unusual factor. Our WG has been funded with the mandate to finish before December of this year. The funding enabled us to move quickly. In this case, we have show cases, final clients, etc. 12:23:23 fsasaki has joined #mlw-lt 12:24:09 .. My only question is, if we can deal with this without putting the commitments of the project at risk, how will this affect things. If we can fix this in 2.1 perhaps? 12:24:29 present+ felix(ircOnly) 12:25:06 Daniel: Basically, you would not change the technical contents of the spec, but to fix one minor issue. It would mean fixing five to ten tests that could be easily done. I imagine you have XHTML and HTML tests separately. So you could remove some tests and consolidate. 12:25:33 .. Who is the activity leader? I'll ask Richard what he thinks of it. 12:25:51 .. It might add a few weeks in the loop, but it shouldn't blow your schedule. 12:26:19 Pedro: For us it is important to make sure the requirements match the EU requirements. 12:26:30 Daniel: I'm hitting the issue now because of the EU funding to work on this. 12:27:00 .. It is a question of complexity, code maintainability, saving an HTML doc into XHML (and back), changing flavors, etc. 12:27:23 hi all, for the record, please don't decide about the change today. But have a straw poll. It would be good to see in the minutes votes (just one per particpant) like: 1) want CDATA 2) do not want CDATA 3) would be fine with both or have no opinion 12:28:17 Yves: Could we hear from Karl or Pablo as implementers? Do they see it as a big issue? 12:28:35 Pablo: For me it is not a big issue, but I think it would be better to save trouble with CDATA, but it's not big. 12:28:55 Karl: I didn't try it yet, so I don't know for certain, but I don't imagine it is big. 12:29:18 Daniel: There is a fourth possibility beyond Felix’s 3: I ping the HTML5 WG and ask them for input. 12:30:11 I agree with Daniel on this last one 12:30:13 Pinging the HTML5 WG should definitely be the first action 12:30:17 for TCD we would vote 3) would be fine with both or have no opinion 12:30:26 Des: I'm trying to catch up with this. Just to be clear, wrapping the rules in CDATA, there is no localizable content wrapped in CDATA? Correct? 12:30:38 Daniel: Correct. 12:30:55 for DCU: 3) 12:31:06 .. That way, you just need the first child of the