14:57:34 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg
14:57:34 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-rdf-wg-irc
14:57:36 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
14:57:36 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #rdf-wg
14:57:38 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394
14:57:38 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
14:57:39 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
14:57:39 <trackbot> Date: 03 July 2013
14:57:42 <AndyS> AndyS has joined #rdf-wg
14:58:11 <Guus> chair: Guus
14:59:35 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
14:59:35 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus
14:59:36 <Zakim> On IRC I see AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, manu, trackbot, Guus, gavinc, TallTed, SteveH, davidwood, manu1, yvesr, mischat, ericP, sandro
14:59:50 <davidwood> Zakim, this is RDF
14:59:50 <Zakim> ok, davidwood; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM
14:59:56 <davidwood> Zakim, who is here?
14:59:56 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, +1.540.898.aaaa, GavinC
14:59:58 <Zakim> On IRC I see AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, manu, trackbot, Guus, gavinc, TallTed, SteveH, davidwood, manu1, yvesr, mischat, ericP, sandro
15:00:03 <davidwood> Zakim, aaaa is me
15:00:03 <Zakim> +davidwood; got it
15:00:08 <Zakim> +??P4
15:00:17 <pfps> pfps has joined #rdf-wg
15:00:23 <yvesr> Zakim, ??P4 is me
15:00:23 <Zakim> +yvesr; got it
15:00:48 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:00:53 <Zakim> +[GVoice]
15:00:55 <AndyS> zakim, IPcaller is me
15:00:55 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
15:01:05 <pfps> zakim, who is on the phone?
15:01:05 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, davidwood, GavinC, yvesr, AndyS, [GVoice]
15:01:10 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
15:01:10 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, davidwood, GavinC, yvesr, AndyS, [GVoice]
15:01:12 <Zakim> On IRC I see pfps, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, manu, trackbot, Guus, gavinc, TallTed, SteveH, davidwood, manu1, yvesr, mischat, ericP, sandro
15:01:23 <pfps> zakim, gvoice is me
15:01:23 <Zakim> +pfps; got it
15:02:07 <pchampin> pchampin has joined #rdf-wg
15:02:16 <Arnaud> Arnaud has joined #rdf-wg
15:03:01 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
15:03:02 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, davidwood, GavinC, yvesr, AndyS, pfps
15:03:03 <Zakim> On IRC I see Arnaud, pchampin, pfps, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, manu, trackbot, Guus, gavinc, TallTed, SteveH, davidwood, manu1, yvesr, mischat, ericP, sandro
15:03:03 <Zakim> +Arnaud
15:03:21 <markus> markus has joined #rdf-wg
15:03:40 <gavinc> scribe: gavinc
15:03:52 <Arnaud> Arnaud has changed the topic to: RDF-WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- agenda http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.07.03
15:04:16 <gavinc> Topic: Admin
15:04:20 <Zakim> +Sandro
15:04:25 <gavinc> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 26 June telecon
15:04:28 <markus> zakim, code?
15:04:28 <Zakim> the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), markus
15:04:29 <pfps> minutes are fine
15:04:33 <Zakim> +EricP
15:04:38 <gavinc> Guss: No objections.
15:04:46 <Zakim> +??P14
15:04:46 <gavinc> Guus: No objections.
15:04:51 <markus> zakim, ??P14 is me
15:04:51 <Zakim> +markus; got it
15:04:55 <gavinc> RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 26 June telecon
15:05:02 <gavinc> subtopic: Actions
15:05:11 <pfps> q+
15:05:14 <gavinc> Guus: 9 pending review actions
15:05:36 <pfps> I marked some old actions as pending review
15:06:05 <gavinc> Guus: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview claiming victory on all 9 unless there are objections?
15:06:19 <PatH> PatH has joined #rdf-wg
15:06:25 <pfps> q+?
15:06:32 <gavinc> Guus: Skipping other actions
15:06:49 <gavinc> subtopic: Summer telecon schedule
15:07:15 <gavinc> davidwood: Was hoping that we'd get documents to LC before starting bi-weekly
15:07:18 <manu-work> manu-work has joined #rdf-wg
15:07:21 <Zakim> +PatH
15:07:24 <AndyS> +1 to DavidWood
15:07:25 <gavinc> Guus: Yes, assuming everything goes to plan
15:07:30 <gavinc> +1 to davidwood
15:07:31 <ericP> davidwood proposes that if we don't go to LC today, that we meet bi-hourly
15:08:05 <gavinc> Topic: LC Drafts of Concepts and Semantics
15:08:08 <pfps> q-
15:08:12 <pfps> q-?
15:08:12 <gavinc> Guus: Thanks to davidwood and pfps
15:08:38 <AZ> AZ has joined #rdf-wg
15:09:07 <Guus> zakim, who is here?
15:09:07 <Zakim> On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, davidwood, GavinC, yvesr, AndyS, pfps, Arnaud, Sandro, EricP, markus, PatH
15:09:09 <Zakim> On IRC I see AZ, PatH, markus, Arnaud, pchampin, pfps, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, manu, trackbot, Guus, gavinc, TallTed, SteveH, davidwood, manu1, yvesr, mischat, ericP, sandro
15:09:20 <gavinc> davidwood: Markus did a review. I think I've addressed all of his concerns, except for one. Wanted to move a group of mathy sections into semantics, didn't do that.
15:09:28 <pfps> there are also independent reasons to keep several of these sections in Concepts
15:09:49 <gavinc> ... propose to go into last call as the documents stand, and peter and I can talk about moving some of the sections between the documents as I contend that editorial
15:10:00 <gavinc> markus: Yeah, we can sort it out later.
15:10:08 <zwu2> zwu2 has joined #rdf-wg
15:10:25 <gavinc> davidwood: Did move isomorphic out of headers per AndyS. I think your right markus to try and work that out.
15:10:39 <gavinc> subtopic: Semantics
15:10:56 <gavinc> PatH: Semantics is ready to go. There will be some tweaks to it.
15:11:01 <Zakim> +??P19
15:11:04 <Zakim> + +1.619.663.aabb
15:11:11 <gavinc> ... links to some of the terms in concepts will need to be added
15:11:19 <AZ> Zakim, aabb is me
15:11:20 <Zakim> +AZ; got it
15:11:22 <zwu2> zakim, +1.619.663.aabb is me
15:11:22 <Zakim> sorry, zwu2, I do not recognize a party named '+1.619.663.aabb'
15:11:25 <gavinc> pfps: Haven't had any significant changes in a few weeks
15:11:42 <davidwood> ISSUE-113?
15:11:42 <trackbot> ISSUE-113 -- RDF Keys -- open
15:11:42 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/113
15:11:45 <davidwood> ISSUE-118?
15:11:45 <trackbot> ISSUE-118 -- Simplifying datatype semantics -- open
15:11:45 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/118
15:11:51 <gavinc> davidwood: pfps, issue 118 and 113 need to be closed before Semantics/Concepts before LC?
15:11:55 <gavinc> pfps: Yes.
15:11:56 <zwu2> zakim, +1.619.663.aabb is me
15:11:56 <Zakim> sorry, zwu2, I do not recognize a party named '+1.619.663.aabb'
15:12:11 <davidwood> Peter's message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Jul/0037.html
15:12:12 <gavinc> davidwood: The mailing list seems to show consensus
15:12:18 <zwu2> zakim, aabb is me
15:12:18 <Zakim> sorry, zwu2, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb'
15:12:33 <gavinc> Guus: Happy to resolve these two issues.
15:12:34 <zwu2> zakim, mute me
15:12:34 <Zakim> sorry, zwu2, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
15:12:47 <gavinc> -1 to opening an issue around the lists stuff from JSON-LD
15:13:17 <gavinc> Guus: No discusion on LC Concepts and Semantics
15:13:27 <gavinc> ISSUE-113?
15:13:27 <trackbot> ISSUE-113 -- RDF Keys -- open
15:13:27 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/113
15:13:39 <gavinc> pfps: We need to close the two issues
15:13:59 <gavinc> davidwood: We haven't done anything releated to keys, but we have done things related to this issue.
15:14:24 <pfps> s/two issues/at least issue-118
15:15:16 <pfps> yes, OWL-2 has keys
15:15:24 <gavinc> sandro: OWL-2 has keys.
15:15:56 <davidwood> The RDF Keys message complains about the need for context (datasets) and quads (datasets).
15:16:18 <pfps> yes
15:16:20 <gavinc> ISSUE-118?
15:16:20 <trackbot> ISSUE-118 -- Simplifying datatype semantics -- open
15:16:20 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/118
15:16:36 <davidwood> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-113 saying that this WG's work on datasets and OWL-2's introduction of keys addresses the reported concern.
15:17:23 <davidwood> +1
15:17:24 <AZ> +1
15:17:25 <Guus> +1
15:17:26 <Arnaud> +1
15:17:26 <gavinc> +1
15:17:27 <AndyS> +1
15:17:29 <markus> +1
15:17:32 <pfps> +1
15:17:34 <zwu2> 0
15:17:36 <gavinc> sandro: +1
15:17:45 <yvesr> +0.8
15:17:48 <davidwood> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-113 saying that this WG's work on datasets and OWL-2's introduction of keys addresses the reported concern.
15:17:49 <pchampin> +1
15:17:49 <PatH> +1
15:17:51 <pfps> Proposed:  Close ISSUE-118 (datatypes) as specified in Semantics (datatype maps have been removed)
15:18:10 <AZ> +1
15:18:12 <PatH> +1
15:18:13 <gavinc> +1
15:18:14 <pfps> +1
15:18:16 <davidwood> +1
15:18:19 <Guus> +1
15:18:25 <gavinc> sandro: +1
15:18:28 <markus> +1
15:18:37 <yvesr> +1
15:18:39 <davidwood> RESOLVED:  Close ISSUE-118 (datatypes) as specified in Semantics (datatype maps have been removed)
15:19:33 <Guus> PROPOSED: Publish rdf11-concepts as a Last Call Working Draft  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html
15:19:41 <pfps> +1
15:19:42 <gavinc> +1
15:19:45 <davidwood> +1
15:19:46 <PatH> +1
15:19:48 <Guus> _1
15:19:48 <yvesr> +1
15:19:50 <markus> +1
15:19:51 <AZ> +1
15:19:51 <zwu2> +1
15:19:52 <Arnaud> +1
15:19:57 <pchampin> +1
15:19:57 <Guus> +1
15:20:05 <markus> (the JSON-LD ref. should be fixed before publication)
15:20:37 <gavinc> RESOLVED: Publish rdf11-concepts as a Last Call Working Draft  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html
15:21:11 <PatH> +1
15:21:15 <pfps> +1
15:21:15 <Guus> PROPOSED: Publish rdf11-mt as a Last Call Working Draft  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html
15:21:18 <pfps> +1
15:21:19 <davidwood> +1
15:21:21 <gavinc> +1
15:21:23 <AZ> +1
15:21:23 <pchampin> +1
15:21:27 <Guus> +1
15:21:32 <markus> +1
15:21:40 <PatH> +1
15:21:44 <Arnaud> +1
15:21:44 <yvesr> +1
15:21:46 <zwu2> +1
15:21:49 <gavinc> RESOLVED: Publish rdf11-mt as a Last Call Working Draft  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html
15:21:53 <AndyS> +1
15:22:05 <gavinc> subtopic: Publication Process
15:22:20 <gavinc> Guus: Requires a number of steps, these are recorded on the wiki
15:22:36 <gavinc> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_documents
15:23:02 <gavinc> sandro: Need to check what version of respec your using.
15:23:14 <gavinc> ... there is now a command line version of all those steps
15:23:20 <gavinc> ... little tricky to get to work
15:23:32 <gavinc> davidwood: Is there any documentation on this?
15:23:42 <gavinc> Guus: Link is now to global respec, not our local one.
15:23:47 <gavinc> +q
15:23:54 <gavinc> sandro: I'm still on vaction.
15:24:10 <markus> Concepts still uses an outdated version of ReSpec
15:24:14 <gavinc> Guus: It's simple enough
15:24:15 <PatH> Peter, do you want to do this or should I?
15:24:15 <gavinc> -q
15:24:17 <markus> Just sent a mail to the list
15:24:30 <gavinc> sandro: there is a command line if you don't want to do the steps on the website
15:24:39 <gavinc> Guus: I've done it for 4 documents and done it in detail
15:24:52 <gavinc> davidwood: when I screw it up, I'll yell for help
15:24:58 <gavinc> +q
15:25:08 <gavinc> -1
15:25:10 <gavinc> -q
15:25:30 <gavinc> Guus: Need the editors to tell me when it's ready.
15:25:40 <pfps> I'll take a look at Semantics and see what needs to be done.
15:25:43 <gavinc> ... and put the documents in  drafts/<short-name>/Overview.html
15:26:16 <gavinc> ... will ask web master to publish these at the same time.
15:26:36 <gavinc> ... david and pfps will notify guus when they are ready to publish.
15:26:43 <gavinc> ... last call period?
15:27:00 <gavinc> Guus: What kind of period do we propose?
15:27:04 <davidwood> 8 weeks?
15:27:26 <gavinc> PatH: Really need to be that long?
15:27:41 <markus> zakim, who is making noise?
15:27:49 <PatH> Kill that damn fly
15:27:52 <Zakim> markus, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Guus_Schreiber (19%), pfps (99%), Arnaud (4%)
15:27:53 <Guus> zakim, who is talking?
15:28:01 <markus> zakim, mut pfps
15:28:01 <Zakim> I don't understand 'mut pfps', markus
15:28:03 <Zakim> Guus, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: davidwood (9%), pfps (100%)
15:28:03 <markus> zakim, mute pfps
15:28:03 <davidwood> Zakim, mute pfps
15:28:05 <Zakim> pfps should now be muted
15:28:05 <Zakim> pfps was already muted, davidwood
15:28:42 <pfps> google voice gets into this strange problem when it has communication delays
15:28:48 <gavinc> sandro: min is 4 week, but can't count weeks in August, first week of September seems best.
15:29:07 <davidwood> pfps, did you have something to say or was it just google voice?
15:29:10 <pfps> we have other stuff that is yet to be done, so there is really no reason to compress too much
15:29:11 <PatH> I miht be at risk for the second week in september.
15:29:15 <gavinc> Guus: I think we should do first week of September.... 6th September?
15:29:30 <gavinc> sandro: We still need to do outreach to make sure people hear about it before vactions
15:29:39 <PatH> OK
15:29:57 <gavinc> PROPOSED: LC period ends 2013-09-06
15:30:04 <AZ> +1
15:30:07 <markus> +1
15:30:09 <PatH> +1
15:30:10 <gavinc> +1
15:30:11 <davidwood> +1
15:30:17 <yvesr> +1
15:30:21 <Arnaud> +1
15:30:28 <gavinc> RESOLVED: LC period for Concepts and Semantics ends 2013-09-06
15:30:47 <gavinc> Guus: davidwood and I take an action to do out reach
15:31:16 <gavinc> ACTION on Guus to write blog post and do out reach on publication of Concepts and Semantics
15:31:16 <trackbot> Error finding 'on'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>.
15:31:21 <gavinc> ACTION Guus to write blog post and do out reach on publication of Concepts and Semantics
15:31:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-277 - Write blog post and do out reach on publication of Concepts and Semantics [on Guus Schreiber - due 2013-07-10].
15:31:51 <gavinc> Topic: TriG
15:32:41 <gavinc> Guus: Trailing-dot discussion, this has reached concensus.
15:32:53 <gavinc> subtopic: ISSUE-137
15:33:01 <gavinc> ISSUE-137?
15:33:01 <trackbot> ISSUE-137 -- Should TriG be a subset of SPARQL Quad Pattern? -- raised
15:33:01 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/137
15:34:26 <gavinc> sandro: So my perspective preparing for semtech, noticed how close TriG and SPARQL are. There are two bits that are not the same, and I couldn't really think of how to explain why they are diffrent
15:35:02 <gavinc> .. the two are GRAPH keywords, and requiring {} around the default graph
15:35:13 <gavinc> Guus: First one is the GRAPH keyword.
15:35:17 <gavinc> +q
15:36:41 <Guus> ack gavinc
15:36:46 <manu> manu has joined #rdf-wg
15:38:14 <PatH> FWIW, the advantages of Sandro's suggestions are obvious. Are there any technical arguments against them? Technical, not procedural.
15:38:30 <gavinc> +q
15:38:59 <AndyS> Obvious? Break existing practice?
15:39:12 <gavinc> -q
15:39:55 <AndyS> q+
15:40:12 <gavinc> Guus: Propose adding them as features at Risk
15:40:21 <gavinc> sandro: I hope we'll see comments on them
15:40:27 <Guus> ack AndyS
15:41:04 <Zakim> -Sandro
15:41:14 <gavinc> AndyS: I can we be so dismisive of parser writters. We don't have any examples of {} not around default graph, we don't understand the results of these.
15:41:26 <Zakim> +Sandro
15:41:40 <gavinc> ... I don't care about the GRAPH keyword. But I don't like the issue which includes opinion
15:43:20 <Arnaud> I would say that's a feature! :)
15:44:05 <PatH> One could say, its a good idea to raise issues like this before there are any serious implementations.
15:45:26 <PatH> I presume that making the { } optional would just make life harder for everyone (??)
15:46:59 <pchampin> making both GRAPH and {} (for default graph) optional may make things harder,
15:47:19 <pchampin> ... as a leading URI could be either a graph label or a subject in the default graph
15:47:32 <AndyS> What is the proposal for the grammar?  LL(2) ?
15:49:47 <gavinc> ACTION Eric to create new grammar for TriG that includes optional graph keywords and make {} optional around the default graph
15:49:47 <trackbot> Created ACTION-278 - Create new grammar for TriG that includes optional graph keywords and make {} optional around the default graph [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2013-07-10].
15:50:23 <AndyS> and aligns to Turtle.
15:50:40 <gavinc> ACTION sandro to propose text for TriG feature at risk for both GRAPH keywords and {} being optional around the default graph
15:50:40 <trackbot> Created ACTION-279 - Propose text for TriG feature at risk for both GRAPH keywords and {} being optional around the default graph [on Sandro Hawke - due 2013-07-10].
15:51:09 <gavinc> ericP, please use the trig.bnf file that exists in hg
15:52:37 <ericP> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#c13
15:52:58 <gavinc> ericP: I looked at all the comments on the test suite and CR comments, there are no test comments that haven't been tracked and only one that hasn't been responded too
15:53:28 <gavinc> ericP: Found some more non unicode characters and fixed those as well
15:53:37 <PatH> pfps: does shift-ctrl-alt-s not work?
15:53:43 <Guus> q?
15:54:48 <ericP> PROPOSED: accept all tests in http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/
15:54:51 <PatH> pfps: suggest emailing Robin Berjeron
15:55:05 <ericP> +1
15:55:10 <Guus> +1
15:55:22 <gavinc> +1
15:55:23 <davidwood> +1
15:55:27 <PatH> +1
15:55:31 <pfps> +1 (what the heck)
15:55:37 <gavinc> sandro: +1
15:55:42 <zwu2> +1
15:55:42 <AZ> +1
15:55:47 <ericP> RESOLVED: accept all tests in http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/
15:57:50 <AZ> Zakim, who is speaking?
15:57:53 <gavinc> Zakim, who is speaking?
15:57:56 <PatH> That sounds like something that should not be done in public.
15:58:00 <Zakim> AZ, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Guus_Schreiber (27%), davidwood (41%), Arnaud (5%), Sandro (70%)
15:58:12 <davidwood> Zakim, mute me
15:58:12 <Zakim> gavinc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Guus_Schreiber (22%), davidwood (4%), Sandro (64%), PatH (8%)
15:58:13 <Zakim> davidwood should now be muted
15:58:35 <gavinc> Zakim, mute sandro
15:58:35 <Zakim> Sandro should now be muted
15:58:43 <ericP> ACTION: gavinc to contact rdf-wg-comments, semantic-web and submitters of test results at the bottom of http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations
15:58:43 <trackbot> Error finding 'gavinc'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users>.
15:58:57 <ericP> ACTION: gavin to contact rdf-wg-comments, semantic-web and submitters of test results at the bottom of http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations
15:58:57 <trackbot> Created ACTION-280 - Contact rdf-wg-comments, semantic-web and submitters of test results at the bottom of http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations [on Gavin Carothers - due 2013-07-10].
16:00:55 <gavinc> markus: JSON-LD text was updated to say JSON-LD is based on RDF
16:01:27 <gavinc> Guus: waiting for agreement on consesus from pfps and JSON-LD subgroub
16:01:41 <pfps> consider that a flag has been raised
16:02:09 <gavinc> Guus: Thanks, and ajorned. Next Week N-Triples/N-Quads, and JSON-LD and RDF-JSON
16:02:18 <Zakim> -Arnaud
16:02:18 <Zakim> -Sandro
16:02:21 <Zakim> -EricP
16:02:22 <Zakim> -davidwood
16:02:24 <Zakim> -PatH
16:02:25 <Zakim> -markus
16:02:25 <Zakim> -yvesr
16:02:27 <Zakim> -AndyS
16:02:27 <Zakim> -??P19
16:02:32 <Zakim> -Guus_Schreiber
16:02:34 <pchampin> bye
16:02:40 <Guus> trackbot, end meeting
16:02:40 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
16:02:40 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been Guus_Schreiber, +1.540.898.aaaa, GavinC, davidwood, yvesr, AndyS, pfps, Arnaud, Sandro, EricP, markus, PatH, +1.619.663.aabb, AZ
16:02:40 <markus> bye
16:02:48 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
16:02:48 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot
16:02:49 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
16:02:49 <RRSAgent> I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-rdf-wg-actions.rdf :
16:02:49 <RRSAgent> ACTION: gavinc to contact rdf-wg-comments, semantic-web and submitters of test results at the bottom of http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations [1]
16:02:49 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-rdf-wg-irc#T15-58-43
16:02:49 <RRSAgent> ACTION: gavin to contact rdf-wg-comments, semantic-web and submitters of test results at the bottom of http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#Implementations [2]
16:02:49 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-rdf-wg-irc#T15-58-57
16:02:51 <Zakim> -GavinC