13:43:50 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dap
13:43:50 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-irc
13:43:52 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
13:43:52 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #dap
13:43:54 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be DAP
13:43:54 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see UW_DAP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 17 minutes
13:43:55 <trackbot> Meeting: Device APIs Working Group Teleconference
13:43:55 <trackbot> Date: 03 July 2013
13:44:48 <fjh> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jul/0003.html
13:45:06 <fjh> fjh has changed the topic to: DAP 3279  ; agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jul/0003.html
13:45:26 <fjh> Chair: Frederick_Hirsch
13:45:42 <fjh> Present+ Frederick_Hirsch
13:47:18 <richt> richt has joined #dap
13:47:53 <richt> richt has joined #dap
13:49:22 <richt> richt has joined #dap
13:58:10 <Zakim> UW_DAP()10:00AM has now started
13:58:28 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
13:58:32 <fjh> zakim, [IPCaller] is me
13:58:32 <Zakim> +fjh; got it
13:58:57 <fjh> Topic: Welcome, agenda review, scribe selection, announcements
13:59:02 <dcheng3> dcheng3 has joined #dap
13:59:24 <fjh> scribeNick: fjh
14:00:51 <Zakim> +??P0
14:00:53 <dom> Zakim, ??P0 is me
14:00:53 <Zakim> +dom; got it
14:01:44 <Zakim> +dcheng3
14:02:00 <dcheng3> Present+ Diana_Cheng
14:02:06 <Zakim> + +1.214.919.aaaa
14:02:19 <Milan_Patel> Milan_Patel has joined #dap
14:02:36 <Zakim> + +1.858.651.aabb
14:02:38 <Milan_Patel> Present+ Milan_Patel
14:03:09 <fjh> zakim, where is 214?
14:03:09 <Zakim> North American dialing code 1.214 is Texas
14:03:38 <fjh> zakim, where is 858?
14:03:38 <Zakim> North American dialing code 1.858 is California
14:03:55 <fjh> zakim, aabb is giri
14:03:55 <Zakim> +giri; got it
14:04:01 <fjh> zakim, who is here?
14:04:01 <Zakim> On the phone I see fjh, dom, dcheng3, +1.214.919.aaaa, giri
14:04:02 <Zakim> On IRC I see Milan_Patel, dcheng3, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, dom, trackbot, Josh_Soref, slightlyoff, mounir, anssik
14:04:13 <dom> Zakim, aaaa is Milan_Patel
14:04:15 <Zakim> +Milan_Patel; got it
14:04:23 <fjh> zakim, who is here?
14:04:23 <Zakim> On the phone I see fjh, dom, dcheng3, Milan_Patel, giri
14:04:24 <Zakim> On IRC I see Milan_Patel, dcheng3, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, dom, trackbot, Josh_Soref, slightlyoff, mounir, anssik
14:05:17 <Zakim> +??P8
14:05:22 <anssik> zakim, ??P8 is me
14:05:22 <Zakim> +anssik; got it
14:05:27 <gmandyam> gmandyam has joined #dap
14:05:27 <fjh> fjh: "MediaStream Image Capture" CfC concluded with no objection to FPWD publication, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0018.html
14:05:56 <fjh> planned for 9 july publication
14:06:07 <fjh> s/planned/dom: planned/
14:06:19 <fjh> fjh: 31 July teleconference cancelled (chair not available)
14:06:29 <fjh> Topic: Minutes approval
14:06:35 <fjh> Approve minutes from 5 June 2013
14:06:41 <fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/att-0016/minutes-2013-06-05.html
14:06:42 <dom> (Regrets from me on July 17, 24)
14:06:48 <fjh> RESOLUTION: Minutes from 5 June 2013 are approved
14:06:55 <fjh> Topic:  Vibration LC
14:07:03 <fjh> LC (23 May - 13 June), http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-vibration-20130523/
14:07:12 <fjh> Disposition of comments, https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-vibration-20130523/doc/
14:07:27 <fjh> Clarification of Introduction (6 Jun)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0010.html
14:07:37 <fjh> Revision of processing steps (12 Jun) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0014.html
14:07:48 <dom> (definitely)
14:08:05 <Zakim> +Josh_Soref
14:08:20 <Josh_Soref> scribe: Josh_Soref
14:08:30 <fjh> fjh: next step should be CR transition, awaiting confirmation to close LC comment
14:08:41 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i'd like to go to CR ASAP
14:08:59 <Josh_Soref> ... if i hear nothing within two weeks, i'll close this out
14:09:04 <Josh_Soref> ... i don't think there's a rush here
14:09:11 <Josh_Soref> ... testcases can go on
14:09:15 <Josh_Soref> ... comments anssik ?
14:09:19 <Josh_Soref> anssik: no comments/concerns
14:09:23 <Josh_Soref> ... you covered the changes
14:09:39 <Josh_Soref> s/this/this DoC comment/
14:10:14 <Josh_Soref> fjh: dom, do we need to do any special stuff? we've been to CR before
14:10:19 <Josh_Soref> dom: we need a Transition Request
14:10:28 <Josh_Soref> ... but i don't think we need a Transition Call
14:10:30 <richt> richt has joined #dap
14:10:34 <fjh> action: fjh to send Vibration CR CfC and make transition request once LC disposition complete
14:10:34 <trackbot> Created ACTION-639 - Send Vibration CR CfC and make transition request once LC disposition complete [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2013-07-10].
14:10:41 <Josh_Soref> ... once there Request is drafted, i can work with you on making it clear that we don't need a call as such
14:10:48 <Josh_Soref> topic: DAP Charter
14:10:50 <fjh> http://www.w3.org/2011/07/DeviceAPICharter
14:10:58 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i don't think it's been extended yet
14:11:00 <Josh_Soref> dom: it's in process
14:11:11 <Josh_Soref> ... if all goes as planned, i think we'll get the extension next week
14:11:15 <Josh_Soref> topic: Network Discovery
14:11:25 <fjh> Simplification proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0015.html  (Jean-Claude)
14:11:26 <fjh> Open Source implementation: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0009.html (Jean-Claude)
14:11:27 <fjh> Earlier comments and issues, status: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0028.html
14:11:47 <gmandyam> +q
14:11:56 <Josh_Soref> s/+q/q+/
14:12:19 <Josh_Soref> ack gmandyam
14:12:31 <Josh_Soref> gmandyam: the two independent implementations is an unwritten rule
14:12:46 <Josh_Soref> ... we had Opera under its old engine do an implementation
14:12:52 <Josh_Soref> ... and we have jcd doing an implementation
14:12:58 <richt_> richt_ has joined #dap
14:13:01 <Josh_Soref> ... do we need a Firefox/similar implementation?
14:13:03 <Josh_Soref> q+ Josh_Soref
14:13:07 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i think we have two
14:13:21 <Josh_Soref> dom: my recollection was that we agreed that for recommendations targeted at browsers
14:13:34 <Josh_Soref> ... we wanted implementations in major shipping browsers
14:13:37 <Josh_Soref> Josh_Soref: +1
14:13:40 <Josh_Soref> q- Josh_Soref
14:13:47 <Josh_Soref> fjh: thank you dom for remembering that
14:13:56 <Josh_Soref> ... but i think we should be appreciative of jcd's work
14:14:02 <Josh_Soref> topic: Proximity, Light
14:14:13 <fjh> Single interface to expose both state and value: - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0008.html
14:14:26 <fjh> proposal - CfC to accept Anssi's proposed resolution?  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Apr/0043.html
14:14:26 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i'm wondering...
14:14:39 <Josh_Soref> ... should i send a CfC to accept anssik 's proposed resolution?
14:14:45 <Josh_Soref> ... what are we waiting for?
14:14:52 <Josh_Soref> ... anssik what do you suggest at this point?
14:15:02 <Josh_Soref> anssik: i haven't talked w/ dougt about this
14:15:16 <Josh_Soref> ... i noticed that Firefox 22 shipped an api for ambient light (in Lux)
14:15:19 <Josh_Soref> ... on OS X
14:15:33 <anssik> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/DeviceLightEvent
14:15:38 <Josh_Soref> ... it's something shipping in the desktop firefox which has significant marketshare
14:15:55 <Josh_Soref> ... so that means we keep the DeviceLight interface intact
14:16:05 <Josh_Soref> ... and probably merge the other interface with that one
14:16:09 <Josh_Soref> fjh: it's not necessary
14:16:11 <dom> (well, if it's only on MacOS X, I'm not sure it's such a big market share)
14:16:17 <Josh_Soref> ... we could keep our current design
14:16:29 <Josh_Soref> anssik: if we keep our current interface, it's what's shipping in Desktop in OS X
14:16:40 <Josh_Soref> ... the suggestion initially by anne was to merge Light-Level with that Interface
14:16:44 <Josh_Soref> ... i think we're still on track
14:17:00 <Josh_Soref> fjh: is this a matter of taste, or efficiency?
14:17:11 <Josh_Soref> ... is there a reason to make a change whatsoever?
14:17:16 <Josh_Soref> anssik: it's a matter of API design
14:17:22 <Josh_Soref> ... developer ergonomics
14:17:30 <Josh_Soref> ... and a bit of taste
14:17:33 <anssik> http://anssiko.github.io/light/
14:17:33 <Josh_Soref> ... i wanted to test this out
14:17:48 <Josh_Soref> ... if you have Firefox 22+ on OS X, you can try the demo
14:18:21 <Josh_Soref> ... i noticed that the light level doesn't expose dim-normal-bright
14:19:03 <anssik> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=842952
14:19:04 <Josh_Soref> anssik: the guy who was supposed to work on merging the interfaces in terms of implementation
14:19:12 <Josh_Soref> ... said he changed jobs and can't work on this
14:19:22 <Josh_Soref> ... so it would take a while for mozilla to get to this
14:19:40 <Josh_Soref> fjh: if we don't merge, aren't we closer to what we have now?
14:19:58 <Josh_Soref> anssik: what Firefox implements is just part of the spec
14:20:04 <Josh_Soref> ... there's still a migration path
14:20:08 <fjh> s/aren't we/isn't Firefox/
14:20:21 <Josh_Soref> ... we could still merge the interfaces and the implementation would be compliant
14:20:36 <Josh_Soref> fjh: so, i sense that making your proposed change would be premature
14:21:15 <Josh_Soref> anssik: it would be good to give Mozilla a bit more time
14:21:22 <Josh_Soref> ... and i'd be happy to hear developer feedback
14:21:33 <Josh_Soref> ... now that the device-light-event part is available to developers
14:21:48 <Josh_Soref> ... FirefoxOS might be on millions of devices
14:22:45 <fjh> fjh: Another reason to give this time is I anticipate additional feedback from the PING, privacy interest group, on these specs
14:23:04 <Josh_Soref> anssik: this is also shipping in Firefox OS
14:23:05 <fjh> http://www.w3.org/Privacy/
14:23:08 <Josh_Soref> ... and Firefox on Android
14:23:16 <Josh_Soref> ... and it was recently enabled on Firefox desktop on OS X
14:23:29 <Josh_Soref> ... because you need platform adaptation, on desktops this is currently only on OS X
14:23:42 <anssik> impl status: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/DeviceLightEvent#Gecko-specific_notes
14:24:28 <fjh> fjh: also have messages from Nick and Rigo
14:24:31 <fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0046.html
14:24:34 <Josh_Soref> s/FirefoxOS might/Firefox for OS X might/
14:24:41 <Josh_Soref> s/devices/computers/
14:24:44 <fjh>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0012.html
14:25:34 <Josh_Soref> anssik: it sounds reasonable to wait
14:25:42 <Josh_Soref> ... and collecting input from PING
14:26:02 <Josh_Soref> fjh: there was a request, but we haven't seen interest to follow through
14:26:29 <Josh_Soref> ... i think there's some confusion among the PING people
14:26:40 <Josh_Soref> ... that this sensor could be anywhere in the world
14:26:47 <Josh_Soref> ... but these sensors are usually closer to the UA
14:27:07 <fjh> action: fjh to respond to Nick and Rigo re privacy concerns in Proximity, Light
14:27:07 <trackbot> Created ACTION-640 - Respond to Nick and Rigo re privacy concerns in Proximity, Light [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2013-07-10].
14:27:22 <fjh> ACTION-640: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0046.html
14:27:22 <trackbot> Notes added to ACTION-640 Respond to Nick and Rigo re privacy concerns in Proximity, Light.
14:27:38 <fjh> ACTION-640: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jun/0012.html
14:27:38 <trackbot> Notes added to ACTION-640 Respond to Nick and Rigo re privacy concerns in Proximity, Light.
14:28:27 <Josh_Soref> dom: until we know what process needs to be followed to get this approved, it won't be approved
14:28:27 <fjh> Topic: Test suite migration to git
14:28:36 <Josh_Soref> s/Topic: Test suite migration to git//
14:28:38 <fjh> Waiting for pull requests to be accepted  - who is doing this?
14:28:38 <Josh_Soref> i/until/Topic: Test suite migration to git/
14:28:39 <fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0076.html
14:28:51 <fjh> Test case submission, approval process (and licensing requirements) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jul/0002.html
14:28:58 <Josh_Soref> dom: there was a discussion of having someone from each WG having commit privs
14:29:10 <Josh_Soref> ... and having someone else from the WG review each testcase before pulling
14:29:35 <Josh_Soref> dom: this has been a fluctuating conversation, so it's been difficult for me
14:30:15 <Josh_Soref> [ Discussion about Test Case evolution v. Recommendation evolution ]
14:31:41 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i think it's good to have testcases in the repository
14:32:51 <Josh_Soref> fjh: but we know where the testcases are coming from since anssik has been doing all the curating for a while
14:33:35 <Josh_Soref> fjh: are the testcases in a suitable state to pull into the GIT repo?
14:33:41 <Josh_Soref> anssik: i thought there was a review process
14:33:49 <Josh_Soref> ... so someone other than the submitter should review the tests
14:33:51 <dom> battery is from anssik, vibration from robin, ambientlight and proximity from marcosc,
14:34:15 <Josh_Soref> dom: i reviewed the battery tests from anssik a while ago
14:34:23 <Josh_Soref> ... and the vibration tests from robin a while ago
14:34:34 <Josh_Soref> ... i don't know that anyone has looked at ambient light/proximity
14:34:43 <Josh_Soref> anssik: i initially looked at the tests when marcos submitted them
14:35:03 <dom> ACTION: Dom to do a last check on battery and vibration test cases before merging in github master
14:35:04 <trackbot> Created ACTION-641 - Do a last check on battery and vibration test cases before merging in github master [on Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - due 2013-07-10].
14:35:07 <Josh_Soref> ... now that we have an implementation out, we could actually harness
14:35:17 <Josh_Soref> ... iirc, marcos didn't use idlharness, but basically drafted something similar
14:36:04 <dom> ACTION: Dom to review proximity and ambient light test cases
14:36:04 <trackbot> Created ACTION-642 - Review proximity and ambient light test cases [on Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - due 2013-07-10].
14:36:36 <trackbot> trackbot has joined #dap
14:36:41 <dom> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/127
14:36:46 <Josh_Soref> anssik: i think you can use +1'ing on github
14:36:46 <dom> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/126
14:36:47 <dom> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/125
14:36:48 <dom> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/124
14:38:49 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i'm confused about tests that aren't easily visible in the repo
14:38:59 <Josh_Soref> ... i thought the concern was about improving visibility
14:39:06 <Josh_Soref> dom: yes, ideally the testcases would be merged
14:39:07 <fjh> action: anssik to review Ambient Light and Proximity test cases by Sept
14:39:07 <trackbot> Created ACTION-643 - Review Ambient Light and Proximity test cases by Sept [on Anssi Kostiainen - due 2013-07-10].
14:39:13 <Josh_Soref> ... i don't think there's any particular hurry
14:39:18 <Josh_Soref> ... they should be merged when we exit CR
14:39:39 <Josh_Soref> ... it's clear we need a plan to have them reviewed
14:40:26 <fjh> Test case submission, approval process (and licensing requirements) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jul/0002.html
14:40:50 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i don't know if W3C is enforcing licensing for contributions
14:41:01 <Josh_Soref> dom: the licensing is only problematic for non WG contributors
14:41:08 <Josh_Soref> ... which hasn't been a problem for our WG
14:41:29 <Josh_Soref> topic: Implementation status
14:41:32 <fjh> Request for implementation status, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0069.html
14:42:09 <Josh_Soref> anssik: we're currently working to get Chrome for Android's HTML Media Capture updated
14:42:15 <Josh_Soref> ... it seems we're reaching consensus
14:42:21 <Josh_Soref> ... so we'll get the patches upstreamed
14:42:27 <Josh_Soref> ... once that happens, i can update you on that
14:42:33 <Josh_Soref> fjh: what consensus is needed?
14:42:34 <anssik> https://codereview.chromium.org/14758008/
14:43:09 <Josh_Soref> anssik: there was concern from Google that it would break existing content
14:43:31 <Josh_Soref> ... we reached a conclusion that we could have an implementation strategy that retains backwards compat with existing code
14:43:49 <Josh_Soref> topic: Action Review
14:43:50 <trackbot> trackbot has joined #dap
14:43:54 <fjh> ACTION-523?
14:43:54 <trackbot> ACTION-523 -- Anssi Kostiainen to work on test cases for battery, vibration, and HTML Media Capture -- due 2012-08-31 -- OPEN
14:43:54 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/523
14:44:06 <fjh> ACTION-621?
14:44:06 <trackbot> ACTION-621 -- Anssi Kostiainen to create test cases for HTML Media Capture -- due 2013-03-13 -- OPEN
14:44:06 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/621
14:44:14 <fjh> ACTION-637?
14:44:14 <trackbot> ACTION-637 -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux to arrange for DAP charter extension, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013May/0078.html -- due 2013-06-12 -- OPEN
14:44:14 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/637
14:44:22 <fjh> ACTION-625?
14:44:22 <trackbot> ACTION-625 -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux to move DAP tests to Git, with help from others as needed -- due 2013-05-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW
14:44:22 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/625
14:44:36 <fjh> close ACTION-625
14:44:36 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-625 Move DAP tests to Git, with help from others as needed.
14:44:55 <fjh> close ACTION-635?
14:44:55 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-635 Check on Media Capture TPAC F2F plans.
14:45:06 <fjh> close ACTION-636
14:45:06 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-636 Send public list regarding consensus regarding charter extension.
14:45:13 <fjh> close ACTION-638
14:45:13 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-638 Review webapps approach to reviewing test cases.
14:45:18 <fjh> ISSUE-128?
14:45:18 <trackbot> ISSUE-128 -- Need more description on how bandwidth should be estimated -- open
14:45:18 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/128
14:45:28 <Josh_Soref> topic: Other Business
14:45:36 <Josh_Soref> anssik: i'll be on vacation during the summer
14:45:43 <Josh_Soref> fjh: you were canceling July 31?
14:45:52 <Josh_Soref> s/you were/i'm/
14:45:54 <Josh_Soref> s/?//
14:45:58 <dom> q+ about August?
14:46:05 <dom> queue=
14:46:09 <dom> q+ to ask about August
14:46:16 <Josh_Soref> ... but i'll cancel other calls when there's isn't content for meetings
14:46:36 <fjh> ack dom
14:46:36 <Zakim> dom, you wanted to ask about August
14:46:56 <Josh_Soref> dom: i can't remember if we tend to cancel in August
14:46:59 <Josh_Soref> fjh: i don't think we did
14:47:04 <Josh_Soref> ... it depends on the makeup of the group
14:47:11 <Josh_Soref> ... some are in the US, some aren't
14:47:16 <Josh_Soref> ... some are on vacation, some aren't
14:48:01 <Josh_Soref> ... i'm hoping to have an agenda for TPAC to give people time to make travel decisions
14:48:38 <Josh_Soref> fjh: dom, are you away in August?
14:48:43 <Josh_Soref> dom: i'll be away a couple of weeks at the end
14:48:50 <Josh_Soref> fjh: anssik, you're back?
14:48:55 <Josh_Soref> anssik: i'm back August 10th
14:49:45 <Josh_Soref> fjh: if Cathy and Rich are available, maybe it's worth having a call to move that spec forward
14:49:58 <Josh_Soref> dcheng3: i agree, it would be good to have calls to tackle the topics that have been lagging behind
14:50:10 <Josh_Soref> ... i won't take many holidays in August, maybe a week
14:51:46 <Josh_Soref> fjh: we won't make decisions without the right people on calls
14:51:52 <Josh_Soref> ... i guess i won't make CfCs in August
14:52:12 <Josh_Soref> ... thanks all
14:52:21 <Josh_Soref> ... if people want to send Regrets to the Member List
14:52:29 <Josh_Soref> ... that could help me
14:53:04 <Josh_Soref> topic: Adjourn
14:53:10 <Josh_Soref> fjh: thanks everyone for your time
14:53:14 <Josh_Soref> ... see you next week, if we have a call
14:53:14 <Zakim> -giri
14:53:16 <Zakim> -dcheng3
14:53:16 <Zakim> -fjh
14:53:17 <Zakim> -anssik
14:53:18 <Zakim> -dom
14:53:19 <Zakim> -Milan_Patel
14:53:20 <Zakim> -Josh_Soref
14:53:20 <Zakim> UW_DAP()10:00AM has ended
14:53:20 <Zakim> Attendees were fjh, dom, dcheng3, +1.214.919.aaaa, +1.858.651.aabb, giri, Milan_Patel, anssik, Josh_Soref
14:53:22 <Josh_Soref> trackbot, end meeting
14:53:22 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
14:53:22 <Zakim> sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
14:53:26 <fjh> fjh has left #dap
14:53:30 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
14:53:30 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-minutes.html trackbot
14:53:31 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
14:53:31 <RRSAgent> I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-actions.rdf :
14:53:31 <RRSAgent> ACTION: fjh to send Vibration CR CfC and make transition request once LC disposition complete [1]
14:53:31 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-irc#T14-10-34
14:53:31 <RRSAgent> ACTION: fjh to respond to Nick and Rigo re privacy concerns in Proximity, Light [2]
14:53:31 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-irc#T14-27-07
14:53:31 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Dom to do a last check on battery and vibration test cases before merging in github master [3]
14:53:31 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-irc#T14-35-03
14:53:31 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Dom to review proximity and ambient light test cases [4]
14:53:31 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-irc#T14-36-04
14:53:31 <RRSAgent> ACTION: anssik to review Ambient Light and Proximity test cases by Sept [5]
14:53:31 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-dap-irc#T14-39-07