07:18:29 RRSAgent has joined #bpmlod 07:18:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-irc 07:18:34 meeting: BPMLOD 07:18:55 chair: DomJorgeJose 07:19:14 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpmlod/2013Jun/0004.html 07:19:55 present: dom, felix, chaals, john, jorge, jose, michale, sebastianH, sebastianS, tatiana 07:20:00 topic: meeting setup 07:20:36 we discussed to use gotomeeting for the phone bridge and IRC for scribing. Self introductions have been sent to the list 07:20:42 topic: topic classification 07:20:47 http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Topic_classification 07:20:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:21:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:22:24 dom: like to have a telco for each topic. Want to publish that as a white paper on best practices 07:22:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:25:48 discussing http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Topic_classification 07:26:10 dave: development of topics vs. development of use cases - how to manage that? 07:26:41 jose: list of topics is a dynamic part. use cases is seperate 07:26:52 DomJones has joined #bpmlod 07:26:54 .. tools can be links to implementation 07:27:14 .. in rome people suggested that we talk about these aspects, that is why I put it here 07:27:22 dave: agree, localization can be an important use case 07:27:31 .. so better put this as a use case rather than a topic 07:27:51 .. question: about publishing - is this publishing of LOD or content in general? 07:28:02 jose: multilingual publishing in general 07:28:13 .. what is the relation between multilingual LOD and multilingual publishing 07:28:22 dave: publishing of content is like a use case 07:28:35 .. publishing of multilingual LOD is an important best practices 07:28:53 .. here we can look into what comes out of META-NET and e.g. DCAT 07:29:04 dcat see http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ 07:29:20 meta-net see http://www.meta-net.eu/meta-share 07:29:32 jose: so move these topics to use cases? 07:29:37 dave, jorge agree 07:29:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:30:19 action: jose to move topics as discussed at http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-irc#T07-29-44 07:30:19 Sorry, but this channel isn't in my configuration. 07:30:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:31:41 people on the call agre on the general items of the topic classification 07:31:57 labra has joined #bpmlod 07:32:16 topic: process of our group 07:32:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:32:45 sebastian: wrt to topics - will we also talk about organization aspects, licensing etc. 07:32:58 dave: these might be best practices 07:34:09 jorge: will not avoid these topics, but thinks like licensing that are general to linked open data will not be focus here 07:34:11 jose: agree 07:34:49 sebastianH: for licensing we can liase with open data / linguistic group 07:35:02 http://linguistics.okfn.org/ 07:35:08 see above link 07:35:16 sebastianS: licensing is just one aspect 07:35:30 .. but there are other non technical aspects 07:35:34 present+ phil 07:36:01 daveL has joined #bpmlod 07:36:15 present+ daveLewis 07:36:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:36:59 dom: licensing on multilingual LOD is interesting. focus here is technical. but having a section about licensing is ok, if people want to discuss that. Do people agree? 07:37:09 jose: a section "non technical aspects"? 07:37:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:37:43 topic: topics again 07:37:51 phil: we also want to drive adoption 07:38:16 s/topic: topics again// 07:38:28 s/topic: process of our group// 07:38:47 dave: agree. If we have pointers about non technical issues, that will help for adoption 07:38:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:39:03 dom: I will add in a non-technical aspects about licensing & legal issue 07:39:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:39:20 phil: do we have a target date for publishing? 07:39:26 dom: depends on people avail. 07:39:34 .. we plan a bi monthly meeting 07:39:55 .. 4 months - aiming for an initial draft by fall this year 07:40:01 phil: sounds good 07:41:11 milestones here http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Main_Page 07:41:23 dom&jorge: want to keep to these milestones 07:42:01 michael: question on scope of group 07:42:19 .. it is called "linked open data" - are we talking about "linked data" in general? 07:42:44 dom: the charter says "Best Practices for Multilingual Linked (Open) Data (BP-MLOD)" 07:42:54 .. "open" is in brackets 07:43:25 .. I would hope that what we prouce can apply to both types of data sets 07:43:34 jose: agree 07:43:36 q+ 07:44:28 sebastian: "open" has various facets, e.g. "open access" via HTTP 07:44:57 s/sebastian:/sebastianH: 07:45:01 s/sebastian:/sebastianH:/ 07:45:20 sebastianH: that is different from "open" in the legal sense 07:45:34 dom: will you add a paragraph on the charter about that? 07:45:40 sebastianH: yes 07:45:57 action: sebastianH to add a paragraph to the charter about what "open" means 07:45:57 Sorry, but this channel isn't in my configuration. 07:46:01 SebastianS has joined #BPMLOD 07:46:19 see sebastianH docuemnt at http://de.slideshare.net/kurzum/linked-data-for-abbreviations-and-segmentation 07:46:52 michael: will we have example data? 07:47:04 jose: agree that this is a good approach, I often use a toy example 07:47:17 .. in terms of implementation I'm not sure since we are a best practices group 07:47:28 ColinM has joined #bpmlod 07:47:33 michael: a BP which is theoretical is not helpful for me 07:50:08 discussion about what we can do in terms of offical w3c standardization 07:50:16 dom: let's do BP by autumn 07:50:30 .. if people are then interest let's do examples, data, implementations 07:50:39 dave: agree wrt to "update" mentioned by phil 07:50:50 .. trying applying things is then helpful 07:52:53 felix: how about having a section on the wiki with data examples 07:53:00 .. these can help also veryfing the BP 07:53:17 +1 on assembling examples as we go along 07:53:53 chaals: problems that we can address wrt to what is open data and what is not open 07:54:14 .. so we will not reject anything just because it does not conform to some definition of linked "open" data 07:54:25 .. I'd hope that we describe from what people actually do 07:54:34 .. should be looking at actual problems 07:54:39 .. as the starting point 07:55:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:55:55 dom: topic classification is what we extracted from rome 07:56:07 .. chaals, do you feel that it represents what people are doing? 07:56:12 chaals: yes, as a first paas 07:56:25 dom: so let's go with the idea to discuss each of these in the group 07:56:37 .. idea of "open vs. not open" is a separate aspect 07:56:48 +1 on driving work from what people are actually doing and on covering open and non-open 07:56:55 .. will start a thread to discuss that so that it is scoped out 07:57:07 action: dom to get wording about open vs not open in the charter 07:57:07 Sorry, but this channel isn't in my configuration. 07:57:43 topic: action health check 07:57:56 action: dom to set up doodle poll about meeting time 07:57:56 Sorry, but this channel isn't in my configuration. 07:58:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 07:58:18 topic: aob 07:58:45 jorge: we wanted to comment on how to deal with use cases collection and spec 07:59:10 .. possible starting point could be: everybody can go to the wiki and put name on it 07:59:21 .. next telco we have a list of use cases that we can refine 07:59:42 dom: agree. Topic classification is clear, but use cases is to be created 08:00:12 .. use cases page is now in wiki at http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Use_cases_definition 08:00:36 action: jose to work on use case definition template and then send a mail out to the list 08:00:36 Sorry, but this channel isn't in my configuration. 08:01:01 dom: next call we will review topic classifiation, will discuss use case definition, then following call will break topics down in a topic per call to work on them 08:01:07 agreement on the call 08:01:11 dom: aob? 08:01:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 08:01:27 dave: thanks a lot for the chairs for starting this? 08:01:37 +1! 08:01:42 dom: thanks to all for taking the call 08:02:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 08:02:17 dom: meeting adjourned, by all! 08:02:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-bpmlod-minutes.html fsasaki 08:04:26 Gavin_ has joined #bpmlod 08:13:00 Gavin_ has left #bpmlod