13:00:18 RRSAgent has joined #webtv 13:00:18 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-irc 13:00:20 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:00:20 Zakim has joined #webtv 13:00:22 Zakim, this will be 13:00:22 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:00:23 Meeting: Web and TV Interest Group Teleconference 13:00:23 Date: 21 May 2013 13:00:24 pal_ has joined #webtv 13:00:39 zakim, list conferences 13:00:39 I see Team_(RevCadence)9:00AM, SW_SWSTR()9:00AM active 13:00:40 also scheduled at this time are UW_WebTVIG()9:00AM, Team_(MEET)8:00AM, TAG_(AWWSW)9:00AM, MM_MMI(Discovery)9:00AM 13:00:46 zakim, this will be webtv 13:00:46 ok, glenn; I see UW_WebTVIG()9:00AM scheduled to start now 13:00:56 zakim, call kazuyuki-617 13:00:57 ok, kaz; the call is being made 13:00:57 UW_WebTVIG()9:00AM has now started 13:00:59 +Kazuyuki 13:01:15 +pal 13:01:39 "conference is restricted at this time"? 13:01:49 +glenn 13:01:58 rrsagent, stop 13:04:15 + +44.303.040.aaaa 13:04:23 zakim, aaaa is me 13:04:23 +olivier; got it 13:04:54 zakim, who is here? 13:04:54 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, pal, glenn, Jean-Charles, Mark_Vickers, olivier 13:04:56 On IRC I see pal_, Zakim, RRSAgent, olivier, jcverdie, pal, glenn, kaz, trackbot 13:06:14 Mark_Vickers has joined #webtv 13:06:54 rrsagent, start 13:06:54 Chair: Pierre 13:07:14 Scribe: Mark 13:07:37 Present: Kaz, Pierre, Glenn, Jean-Charles, Mark_Vickers, Olivier 13:08:31 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2013May/0020.html 13:08:49 pierre: Agenda: 1. meeting time. 2. TTWG Charter 3. Testing project 13:09:13 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2013AprJun/0136.html 13:09:19 http://www.w3.org/2013/05/timed-text-charter.html 13:09:22 Topic: Revised TTWG charter 13:10:16 Pierre: The main addition to the charter is WebVTT 13:11:02 q+ 13:11:09 ... There seems to be support in the TTWG, but some opposition on AC list discussion. Can the Web & TV industry provide some direction. 13:13:15 Olivier: One thing that could be useful is to point to adoption of both specs. Both specs have wide adoption. AC statements that TTML is irrelevant & noxious are concerning. 13:13:49 q- 13:13:55 Pierre: TTML has had great adoption. It is the responsibility of W3C to harmonize the two. 13:16:38 Glenn: Harmonize implies merging into one. I expect both will exist. I think it will be good for both to be in one group. There has been much misinformation on TTML, for example on XSL. Having both in one group will decrease partisanship. 13:17:37 ... Cox has asked for specific language in the charter asking for a level playing field and support of both. 13:18:28 Mark_Vickers: we've had too much of a focus on tech issues, not enough IMHO on doing what's best for people with hearing impairments 13:18:34 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2013May/0082.html 13:18:35 ... more important than this vs that architecture 13:18:46 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2013May/0087.html 13:18:49 ... in that regard fewer specs would be better than more 13:19:10 ... would be good to see all TTML variants pulled into one 13:19:31 ... and make sure we can maximally map the semantics between the two, if there are to be more than one spec 13:19:46 ... if there can't be a mapping, we would lose information 13:20:33 i/we've had too much/scribenick: olivier 13:20:39 scribenick: Mark_Vickers 13:21:06 glenn: Do you think it's realistic that one community will give up one sntax? 13:23:46 olivier: I don't think that it's realistic for there to be one spec given current usage. 13:24:32 mark_vickers: I agree it's unlikely to be one spec, but I think it's worth stating that it's an ideal. 13:25:30 glenn: I don't agree with a single spec notion because I think it's impractical and causes more trouble. 13:26:08 ... I agree it's important to serve the community for captions, both hearing and hearing-impaired. 13:26:32 Pierre: What about the goal of maximizing semantic compatibility? 13:27:19 glenn: To some degree. The goals of TTML were broader, for example in the use of SMIL. I wouldn't expect WebVTT to adopt that. 13:27:47 Pierre: But to the amount that one is a semantic superset of the other> 13:29:53 mark_vickers: what about when semantics cannot be mapped? 13:30:07 glenn: browsers need to support both formats 13:31:13 glenn: The superset format can be mapped, but some information will be lost. 13:31:24 http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Timed_Text_Efforts 13:32:22 pierre: Would it be worth sharing the TF list of adoption of TTML & WebVTT to show adoption of both? 13:32:41 ... Can we come up with a requirement that all are happy? 13:34:54 glenn: it would be useful to identify the caption communities 13:39:16 olivier: the audio group has a hierarchy of developer, implementor, spec maker. In the case of timed text: user, author, implementor, spec maker 13:40:10 glenn: I'd order user, author first, but whether implementor or spec maker is first is unclear 13:41:02 olivier: an example is if something is tedious to specify, but important for implementors, you need to do the spec 13:43:52 glenn: I see the order as user, {author, implementor, spec maker} with the latter an unoredered list 13:44:36 pierre: I think author is a priority over the latter two 13:45:15 glenn: How about user, author, {`implementor, spec maker}? 13:46:11 "ensure maximal interop"? 13:46:48 pierre: Some progress on community. How do we get to agreement on the points on mapping? 13:47:06 olivier: I like maximize semantic mapping 13:49:57 ... what really worries me is that if the two evolve together, there will be mapping from one to the other, but if there's not a clear decision of which is a superset, we're in trouble 13:50:22 glenn: I like "Ensure maximal semantic interop" 13:51:06 ... right now I beliebe WebVTT is a subset of TTML, as far as I'm aware. 13:51:51 ... for example TTML ability to specifiy feature priority 13:53:20 ... if WebVTT is kept as a subset of TTML, that would maximize interop 13:53:56 pierre: that is beyond the ability of this group, 13:54:06 - pal's notes 13:54:10 - need to provide better information 13:54:13 glenn: Perhaps just state one could be superset of another 13:54:19 - minimize profiles 13:54:26 - user, author, {implementer, spec maker} 13:54:35 - ensure maximal semantic interop (one syntax might be a superset of the other) 13:55:03 s/syntax/format/ 14:02:29 topic: Meeting time 14:02:48 pierre: 8AM Los Angeles time? 14:02:48 -Jean-Charles 14:03:08 ... on Thursdays 14:03:29 pierre: What about 30th for next call? 14:04:01 zakim, unmute me 14:04:01 Kazuyuki was not muted, kaz 14:04:50 ACTION: Pierre to draft position statement and post to email 14:04:50 Error finding 'Pierre'. You can review and register nicknames at . 14:05:11 -olivier 14:05:12 rrsagent, make log public 14:05:12 -pal 14:05:17 -Kazuyuki 14:05:25 rrsagent, publish minutes 14:05:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-minutes.html glenn 14:05:36 trackbot, end meeting 14:05:36 Zakim, list attendees 14:05:36 As of this point the attendees have been Kazuyuki, pal, glenn, Jean-Charles, Mark_Vickers, +44.303.040.aaaa, olivier 14:05:39 ACTION: pal_ to draft position statement and post to email 14:05:44 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:05:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-minutes.html trackbot 14:05:45 RRSAgent, bye 14:05:45 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-actions.rdf : 14:05:45 ACTION: Pierre to draft position statement and post to email [1] 14:05:45 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-irc#T14-04-50 14:05:45 ACTION: pal_ to draft position statement and post to email [2] 14:05:45 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-irc#T14-05-39 14:05:45 Error finding 'pal_'. You can review and register nicknames at . 14:07:31 RRSAgent has joined #webtv 14:07:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-irc 14:07:54 i/The main addition to the/scribenick: Mark_Vickers/ 14:07:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:07:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/21-webtv-minutes.html kaz 14:08:02 rrsagent, stop