14:57:15 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 14:57:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/16-html-a11y-irc 15:00:16 trackbot, start meeting 15:00:18 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:00:20 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:00:20 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 60 minutes ago 15:00:21 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:00:21 Date: 16 May 2013 15:00:56 Chair: Chaals 15:00:56 Regrets: SteveF 15:00:56 agenda+ Identify Scribe 15:00:56 agenda+ Outstanding text team bugs 15:00:56 agenda+ overdue actions - misc: , media: , aria: 15:00:56 agenda+ Longdesc bugs http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wwtyklsqy3oazb@chaals.local 15:00:56 agenda+ Longdesc Public Draft 15:00:57 agenda+ Any Other Business? 15:00:57 15:01:37 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:01:37 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has not yet started, janina 15:01:38 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, SuzanneT, chaals, darobin, MarkS, janina, MichaelC, hober, trackbot 15:02:04 zakim, this will be WAI_PFWG(HTML TF) 15:02:04 ok, janina, I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM already started 15:02:13 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:02:13 On the phone I see MarkS, ??P3 15:02:32 zakim, ??P3 is me 15:02:32 +janina; got it 15:02:36 paulc has joined #html-a11y 15:02:49 +[Microsoft] 15:02:56 +[IPcaller] 15:02:58 zakim, [Microsoft] is me 15:02:59 +paulc; got it 15:03:00 +John_Foliot 15:03:12 zakim, accept my !!! passcode... 15:03:12 I don't understand 'accept my !!! passcode', chaals 15:03:31 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:03:31 agendum 1. "Identify Scribe" taken up [from chaals] 15:05:39 + +1.619.846.aaaa 15:05:47 scribe: janina 15:05:50 + +7.926.113.aabb 15:06:02 zakim, next item 15:06:02 agendum 2. "Outstanding text team bugs" taken up [from chaals] 15:06:06 LJWatson has joined #html-a11y 15:06:17 zakim, aabb is me 15:06:17 +chaals; got it 15:06:44 zakim, who is making noise? 15:06:55 chaals, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: paulc (5%), John_Foliot (90%) 15:07:17 topic: text bugs 15:07:27 ms: No Triage call this week 15:07:43 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13449 15:08:00 zakim, take up item 1 15:08:00 agendum 1. "Identify Scribe" taken up [from chaals] 15:08:09 zakim, close item 1 15:08:09 agendum 1, Identify Scribe, closed 15:08:11 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:08:11 2. Outstanding text team bugs [from chaals] 15:08:14 zakim, next item 15:08:14 agendum 2. "Outstanding text team bugs" taken up [from chaals] 15:09:42 ms: Closed based on behavior of IE and FF 15:10:02 and expectation that gui browsers would do the right thing anyway 15:10:06 ms: suggests reopen 15:10:47 cn: Are there other opinions? 15:10:56 cn: To discuss in Triage? 15:11:08 lw: Suggest TF decision 15:11:10 +Cynthia_Shelly 15:11:28 cn: Anyone else for reopening 15:11:36 cn: Seems not. So we will leave it 15:11:55 RESOLUTION: 13449 stays closed in the absence of a champion to re-open. 15:12:04 zakim, close this item 15:12:04 agendum 2 closed 15:12:05 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:12:05 3. overdue actions - misc: , media: 15:12:05 ... , aria: [from chaals] 15:12:11 zakim, next item 15:12:11 agendum 3. "overdue actions - misc: , media: 15:12:13 ... , aria: " taken up [from chaals] 15:12:22 zakim, take up item 3 15:12:22 agendum 3. "overdue actions - misc: , media: 15:12:25 ... , aria: " taken up [from chaals] 15:12:48 cn: Anyone noting one that should be closed? Or to discuss one of these? 15:13:21 zakim, close this item 15:13:21 agendum 3 closed 15:13:22 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:13:22 4. Longdesc bugs http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wwtyklsqy3oazb@chaals.local [from chaals] 15:13:25 cn: Noting crickets. Will continue to ping 15:13:27 zakim, next item 15:13:27 agendum 4. "Longdesc bugs http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wwtyklsqy3oazb@chaals.local" taken up [from chaals] 15:13:28 zakim, next item 15:13:29 agendum 4 was just opened, janina 15:14:03 cn: Reviewing additional remaining bugs 15:14:18 cn: First relates to adding an attribute to denote presence of a longdesc 15:14:33 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21987 -> add attribute 15:14:38 cn: Propose 21987 to be closed 15:14:49 crickets 15:14:52 cn: So is closed 15:15:00 cn: Next 15:15:09 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21894 - define longdesc like cite instead of as a link 15:15:50 cn: Propose to leave as is 15:15:55 cn: Will close this 15:16:11 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21988 - update URL definition to a link that works 15:16:26 q+ 15:16:28 cn: An editorial issue propose closing 15:16:31 cn: Will be closed 15:16:35 ack paul 15:17:28 pc: Wondering whether the longdesc spec supports the linkage the allows direct filing from the spec 15:17:35 cn: Prefer not to 15:17:36 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-proposals/raw-file/default/longdesc1/longdesc.html -> editor's draft 15:17:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013May/0097.html Media TF request 15:18:11 Media TF bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22062 15:18:50 pc: MSE about to go LC, and it is believed this assists that process 15:18:59 pc: No opinion here, simply suggesting the consideration 15:19:22 cn: Don't believe we need it. It's a simple spec. We've cleared many bugs already. 15:19:36 cn: It raises a risk of expediting bugs that poorly considered 15:19:51 cn: It's just quite easy to file bugs 15:20:23 cn: Notes that many reading the html spec seem to click the button to see what happens 15:20:37 pc: My only reason to raise is to get wide review 15:21:04 pc: Is true that HTML editorial team always triaging these 15:21:20 cn: What do others think? 15:21:46 jf: See no reason for it, especially on this particular attribute. We've researched and defended this so widely and completely 15:22:55 js: Agree to leave as is 15:23:00 cn: We'll leave as is 15:23:41 cn: Turns out we need to nothing. The base element auto applies by default 15:23:50 cn: Implementations not necessarily good at this 15:24:15 cn: Unclear this is realword as it's unclear anyone uses base plus longdesc 15:24:29 zakim, close this iem 15:24:29 I don't understand 'close this iem', chaals 15:24:42 zakim, next item 15:24:42 agendum 5. "Longdesc Public Draft" taken up [from chaals] 15:25:34 cn: Proposing to publish as a stabilization draft 15:25:42 cn: Call for consensus Monday 15:25:54 cn: Tobe pub'd Tuesday 15:26:17 cn: Idea is to fix anything remaining before we go LC 15:26:56 pc: Any working draft from the TF needs approval from HTML and PF 15:27:54 MSE Pre-LC announcement: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013May/0001.html 15:28:37 pc: For MSE we point people to the editor's draft to avoid the formal Stabilization 15:29:12 darobin_ has joined #html-a11y 15:30:53 [discussion of timeline implications of the formal process] 15:34:32 cn: anticipate finishing in spring 15:34:55 cn: Ah, it's the Aussie spring! 15:36:24 q+ 15:36:34 ack paul 15:40:22 cn: Is there objection to a Stabilization Draft publication now? 15:41:22 RESOLUTION: The Task Force approves publication of a Stabilization Draft for the HTML Image Description extension specification 15:41:35 zakim, close this item 15:41:35 agendum 5 closed 15:41:36 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:41:36 6. Any Other Business? [from chaals] 15:42:32 jf: Asking about a HTML spec walk through 15:43:44 cn: We need to raise either here or in Bug Triage 15:44:12 -Cynthia_Shelly 15:45:29 js: Decision here was to walk through in separate telecons to identify 15:46:07 cn: Ah, the chairs aren't in the same place on this, so need to discuss in coordination 15:46:33 cn: Any further input for the chairs on this topic? 15:46:56 pc: review what docs? 15:47:08 cn: Do essentially what the HTML-WG did with the spec docs 15:47:08 q+ 15:48:05 pc: We expect CFCs soon on some of this soon 15:48:34 cn: TF would check that it agrees with WG decisions specifically with "does it produce a11y issues or not" 15:48:57 pc: Suggest determining the order of work and make it visible to the WG 15:49:27 q+ 15:50:19 David has joined #html-a11y 15:50:19 Overview of testing in view of CR exit: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tests-cr-exit.html 15:50:21 cn: Suggest TF chairs should figure this out with HTML Chairs 15:51:07 ack me 15:51:11 ack lj 15:51:22 action: Charles to set up coordination of spec review for the TF chairs with the HTML WG chairs 15:51:22 Created ACTION-181 - Set up coordination of spec review for the TF chairs with the HTML WG chairs [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-05-23]. 15:51:42 +David_MacDonald 15:52:16 action: Charles to insure that Leonie is looped into action-181 15:52:16 Created ACTION-182 - Insure that Leonie is looped into action-181 [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-05-23]. 15:53:09 ms: Notes regrets for next Thursday 15:53:12 cn: Anyone else? 15:53:16 cn: possibly me 15:53:52 -[IPcaller] 15:53:53 zakim, bye 15:53:53 leaving. As of this point the attendees were MarkS, janina, [IPcaller], paulc, John_Foliot, +1.619.846.aaaa, +7.926.113.aabb, chaals, Cynthia_Shelly, David_MacDonald 15:53:53 Zakim has left #html-a11y 15:53:58 rrsagent, make minutes 15:53:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/16-html-a11y-minutes.html janina 16:17:01 janina has changed the topic to: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference; Thursday 23 May at 15:00Z for 60 minutes 17:35:55 davidb has joined #html-a11y 17:49:27 davidb has joined #html-a11y 18:10:49 davidb has joined #html-a11y