20:32:43 RRSAgent has joined #site-design 20:32:43 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/14-site-design-irc 20:33:06 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-site-design/2013May/0010.html 20:33:16 Meeting: Site Redesign Task Force 20:33:44 dorian has joined #site-design 20:34:24 lcreekmo has joined #site-design 20:34:52 Regrets: Kelly 20:36:02 +Bev_Corwin 20:36:09 yeah one moment 20:36:27 phone is plugged in and on a short leash 20:36:29 topic: Last review of draft survey 20:36:44 IJ: Heads-up we plan to launch real soon now 20:37:07 I liked the comments so far. I don't think I have anything else to add to that. 20:37:12 bevcorwin has joined #site-design 20:37:19 Hello 20:37:39 +Dorian_Taylor 20:38:07 Q. any prefs between related question on same slide, or split if #2 depends on #2 with better tie-in? 20:38:11 a) same page 20:38:17 b) two pages w/ dependency 20:38:27 B 20:38:28 Ian: (b) 20:38:29 B 20:38:41 b is fine with me 20:39:02 Any other questions or comments for this meeting? 20:39:06 i spent a considerable amount of time fighting with the first page 20:39:12 yeah what bev just said 20:40:21 I was in Chrome and had to fill in a few answers on some pages but not all. 20:40:26 plus if you aren't sure what the difference between a working/interest/community/business group is that's confusing 20:40:28 i went through the whole survey with FF as my browser, no issue 20:40:31 Bug: If you check none with no comment, it fails 20:40:55 like there's a lot of w3c-peculiar terminology on the first page 20:42:07 I did want a reminder about the audience for that reason, dorian. Language might be too inside-baseball [without explanations]. 20:42:12 IJ: I will say that we ned to clarify that "other" implies you _have_ to put a comment 20:43:36 ..or make extra comment optional 20:45:02 topic: PLan for survey: 20:45:07 - launch 15 or 16 May for 2 weeks 20:45:32 - IJ will announce via twitter 20:45:36 Q. Blog post or home page news item? 20:46:06 - add a comment to the ALA column on this project 20:46:26 - home page news item 20:46:41 - membership as well 20:46:47 - chairs list 20:47:07 IJ: Someone want to post over in IAI 20:47:13 Laura: I can do that. 20:47:38 …forward me the email you send to other groups. 20:48:31 IJ: I will be sure we have a clear signal when survey open and ready 20:48:40 topic: Activities while site survey is going on 20:50:42 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Headlights2013/SiteRedesign#Resources 20:51:34 a) What do we do next with our rough inventory of W3C content? 20:51:35 b) Are there other sites we should take inspiration from for w3.org? 20:52:08 Troy: we could look at commercial sites that have large repositories of information. 20:52:15 …e.g., Oracle, or SAP, or Intel 20:52:22 they can? 20:52:23 haha 20:52:26 …people are able to come in and quickly find information. 20:52:32 OWASP.org 20:52:37 IJ: IEEE? Imax? 20:52:45 s/IJ:/Troy: 20:53:00 Troy: could be useful for what we want or don't want to do. 20:53:03 Laura: Github 20:53:15 https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page 20:53:26 wimax (instead of imax) 20:54:00 https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr 20:54:12 https://www.oasis-open.org/ 20:54:24 and a lobster 20:54:45 q+ 20:54:51 http://www.awwwards.com/ 20:55:17 www.worldpulse.com 20:55:45 Bev: They have a good learning model 20:56:13 Dorian: W3C is sort of its own archetype 20:56:15 For that matter, TED.com has an interesting asset design model. 20:56:25 …I think organizations have modeled on W3C rather than the other way around 20:56:27 http://ted.com 20:56:52 …as for the content of w3.org, it would be interesting to me to assign a temporality horizon to the major clusters of content 20:56:55 …specs, news, etc. 20:57:10 …the idea there is to organize it based on long some stuff is meant to persist 20:57:19 +1 on that, Ian!! 20:57:28 +[Microsoft] 20:57:31 …the home page is a funny creature because it is mostly a brochure or sales thing for the board of directors 20:57:39 Iconathon: http://blog.thenounproject.com/post/50350240045/cultural-heritage-iconathon 20:58:11 …another interesting perspective is that the home page may be less valuable if people get to key content through search engines; that's a perspective of http://stackoverflow.com/ 20:59:36 rginn has joined #site-design 20:59:48 i have to drop. 20:59:53 -Troy 21:00:37 Dorian: I think the home page can have a lot more space. 21:00:45 http://www.upassoc.org/ 21:01:05 Dorian: Heads-up on cramming stuff onto the home apge 21:01:15 ..we should think about the behavioral aspects and strategic choices. 21:07:51 q? 21:07:52 DDF: https://tools.codice.org/wiki/display/DDF/Distributed+Data+Framework+Home 21:07:58 ack dorian 21:08:00 I will say, I am finally almost finished with my content strategy thoughts :) and I will include some thoughts about what we can do with that mini-, high-level inventory we have. I'll get that to you this week, Ian. 21:09:19 tx 21:09:36 Great Laura! :-) 21:09:59 IJ: We can think about the org as: 21:10:05 - solutiosn for businesses 21:10:14 - developer solutions (and that sub site can grow) 21:10:28 - the standards and processes for creating them 21:11:15 models 21:11:17 - the organization 21:11:20 documented methodologies, maturities, visions, etc. 21:11:55 - what is the web platform 21:12:29 - what are the services we provide (standards, testing, dev documentation, training, ….) 21:12:59 yes, the leadership role the W3C plays with the web, globally, etc. 21:13:29 have subdomains been discussed? 21:13:33 e.g. validator.w3.org 21:14:52 there seems to be "web app dev" and "everything else" 21:15:01 relationship models w/ other standards orgs? 21:15:20 html5/css/dom/etc vs say, rdf or wai 21:15:28 SDB 21:15:30 SDN 21:15:39 IETF 21:16:00 Robin: Having gone through this with our team…we struggled with "what we do"... 21:16:01 and frankly the semantic web stuff is a lot more interesting to the rest of the world that doesn't make whizzbang web apps 21:16:16 eg biotech who loves that stuff 21:16:26 Robin: …we had to convince our leadership that we need to use plain languag 21:17:36 Where does the W3C live in the webs many dimensions? 21:18:20 Robin, I'm with you. The plainer the language the better, but "experts" always have to be shown why that's so. 21:18:24 ian yes re verticals 21:18:27 Multi modal, multi dimensional, multi media, etc.? 21:18:50 IJ: Could do something like this: 21:18:53 - want to use the web 21:18:56 - want to add to the wb 21:19:01 Ian, I think that's a nice idea. You probably want to give people a way to dive deep immediately if they know what they want. but I'm betting most visitors don't know exactly what they need from you. 21:19:10 - want to see how the web is affecting my industry 21:19:16 Robin: You are missing the vision piece 21:19:31 …and you need a fast track for people who visit the site frequently 21:20:14 Intelligent, knowledge space 21:20:41 I love white boards! 21:21:29 [panasonic virtual white board] 21:22:03 http://www.idroo.com/ ? 21:22:23 content mapping exercise 21:22:26 content mapping 21:23:41 Robin: You can create carousels on a rotation basis... 21:23:55 Bev: Configurable is nice based on preferences 21:26:04 I've got to jump off! 21:26:13 -Laura_Creekmore 21:27:34 Bev: Can we have a content conversation at some point? 21:27:40 IJ: please send comments to the list 21:30:41 topic: Proposed next meeting - 21 May 21:30:58 machines first that's a jaron lanier thing 21:31:13 also: REST, RDF(a) 21:31:37 [On content for machines first] 21:32:24 http://bibliontology.com/ 21:32:32 http://bibotools.googlecode.com/svn/bibo-ontology/trunk/doc/classes/Standard___-2089222601.html 21:32:52 …you can tag things…sort content based on what content is. 21:33:19 IETF's user preferences would work with Dorian's ideas.. would be very interesting to design w/ W3C MMI and IETF's 21:40:36 data source comes from an rdf triplestore 21:40:38 e.g. virtuoso 21:40:41 (just fyi) 21:41:48 http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/ 21:42:05 sparql endpoint ;) 21:42:51 Tool box? 21:43:06 Web framework challenge 21:43:58 http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison 21:45:31 Available next week? 21:45:33 +1 21:45:34 yes 21:45:35 +1 21:45:52 yes, but starting at 2 pm PT?? 21:45:53 I can help other times, too, anyone feel free to ping me if needed, on Skype: bevcorwin 21:45:54 4pm ET ok? 21:46:10 5pm ET? 21:46:22 i'm pacific 21:46:35 I'm Eastern NYC 21:46:58 proposed: 15:30-16:40 ET 21:47:01 resolved 21:47:05 ok 21:47:09 rrsagent, make minutes 21:47:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/14-site-design-minutes.html Ian 21:47:14 -[Microsoft] 21:47:15 -Bev_Corwin 21:47:16 -Dorian_Taylor 21:47:17 Team_Comm(SITE)4:30PM has ended 21:47:17 Attendees were Troy, Ian, +1.615.500.aaaa, Laura_Creekmore, Bev_Corwin, Dorian_Taylor, [Microsoft] 21:47:19 rrsagent, set logs public