12:30:25 RRSAgent has joined #a11y-bugs 12:30:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-a11y-bugs-irc 12:30:50 LJWatson has changed the topic to: HTML A11y Bug Triage telecon 12:31:03 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 12:31:14 zakim, this will be 2119 12:31:14 ok, LJWatson; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML_TF)9:00AM scheduled to start in 29 minutes 12:31:39 Meeting: HTML A11y Bug Triage telecon 12:31:46 Chair: LĂ©onie Watson 12:31:56 agenda+ New bugs review 12:32:10 agenda+ Resolved needsInfo/wontFix bugs review 12:32:21 agenda+ Resolved later bugs review 12:32:30 agenda+ New team members 12:32:37 zakim, save agenda 12:32:45 ok, LJWatson, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-a11y-bugs-agenda.rdf 12:36:52 MarkS has joined #a11y-bugs 12:53:47 hhillen has joined #a11y-bugs 12:55:15 MichaelC has joined #a11y-bugs 12:59:06 WAI_PFWG(HTML_TF)9:00AM has now started 12:59:13 + +1.617.715.aaaa 12:59:43 zakim, aaaa is MarkS 12:59:43 +MarkS; got it 12:59:46 +[IPcaller] 13:00:24 zakim, [IPcaller is LJWatson 13:00:24 +LJWatson; got it 13:01:02 +[IPcaller] 13:02:12 +EricM 13:02:24 MichaelC has joined #a11y-bugs 13:02:36 zakim, EricM is MichaelC 13:02:36 +MichaelC; got it 13:03:01 scribe: hhillen 13:03:27 Zakim, next item 13:03:27 agendum 1. "New bugs review" taken up [from LJWatson] 13:04:14 HH: There's a few new bugs, most of them were longdesc related or editing related 13:04:31 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21722 13:04:43 HH: One bug I think should be discussed here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21722 13:06:20 HH: It's a bug about placeholder text 13:08:36 HH: I think we need to talk about the risk of using placeholder text as only means of labeling a field 13:12:05 HH: Visually it's not clear what a field's label/placeholder text is the moment that text is dded to the field 13:13:13 HH: User agents should provide a way for the placeholder text to still be visible when text is entered to the field (e.g. through a tooltip that appears on focus). Alternatively developers could do this. I think this is a TF issue 13:13:19 MC: Marked it as a11ytf 13:13:26 Zakim, next item 13:13:26 agendum 2. "Resolved needsInfo/wontFix bugs review" taken up [from LJWatson] 13:13:34 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?keywords=a11ytf&keywords_type=allwords&product=HTML%20WG&bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=NEEDSINFO&list_id=3187 13:14:44 MC: First one we could look at is: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9098 13:15:00 MC: This one seems to be directly related to issue 31, and I thought it could be assigned to STeve 13:15:02 s/MC:/MS:/ 13:15:08 s/MC:/MS:/ 13:16:09 LW: That makes sense, if Steve's happy with that 13:16:49 MC: I have two more that are similar: 10708 13:17:12 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10708 13:17:12 s/10708/https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10708/ 13:17:50 s|10708|https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10708/| 13:18:20 MS: The other one I talked about is https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13449 13:19:30 MS: assigned to Steve 13:20:09 MS: The other one is https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13451 13:21:08 MS: Our proposal is to remove the note altogether. Ian mentioned that this wouldn't resolve anything and I agree with that. 13:21:59 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/the-iframe-element.html#the-object-element 13:22:49 MS: Scroll down to the very end of number 4 (processing rules), there's an "otherwise" line that should stand out. 13:23:39 LJWatson has joined #a11y-bugs 13:24:01 MS: If the author doesn't recreate the links that were contained in the image maps then they wouldn't be accessible 13:24:25 LW: I think we need to push this back to the TF, there's definitely stuff that needs looking at here. 13:24:50 MS: I can bring that up at the meeting tomorrow 13:25:16 MS: That's as far as I got 13:25:35 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13436 13:25:57 LW: still assigned to contributor 13:26:22 MC: We should assign it to one of the media people 13:26:39 LW: Assign it to John 13:26:45 MC: I will do that 13:27:40 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13461 13:28:36 MS: Judy felt we shouldn't update this one at the moment 13:28:59 LW: So we should keep the TF keyword in place? 13:29:02 MS: Yes 13:29:22 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 13:29:53 MS: I'm going to be provided with some research for this one 13:30:17 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13727 13:30:45 MS: This one seems related to @longdesc but I haven't looked closely at it yet 13:31:14 LW: Charles takes care of this part of the spec, so we should assign it to him 13:32:16 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14870 13:34:25 LW: I'm not sure if this one is a11y related 13:37:02 LW: Should we close this one? 13:37:27 MC: Yeah, I think the requested feature is a bad idea 13:37:34 HH: me too 13:38:42 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9485 13:39:50 MC: I think there are two ones related to conformance checkers: 9485 and 13728 13:40:02 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13728 13:43:12 LW: 9485 doesn't seem like a spec bug but a suggestion for the validator 13:43:41 MC: 13728 was split off from a larger bug filed by the VA 13:43:57 MC: They tried to file 3 bugs into one and Michael split them off 13:44:17 LW: Regarding 9485, is there a validator products in Bugzilla? 13:45:43 MS: There is a validator product 13:45:55 LW: Should we reassign it to that? 13:46:24 MC: Changing products is something I would be very careful of doing 13:47:33 HH: Why is this bug being tracked? 13:48:59 LW: I think we should probably close it, it hasn't been reviewed in 3 years 13:50:46 MC: Regarding 14870 , I'm a little reluctant to close it because we don't know David Stone 13:50:58 LW: Maybe we should just remove the a11ytf keyword 13:51:17 MS: If this bug is followed through it WILL have an accessibility impact 13:51:54 MS: If you add me to the CC list I can keep an eye on it in case it is updated 13:52:07 LW: We'll take out the keyword and leave it with David 13:52:47 zakim, take up item 4 13:52:47 agendum 4. "New team members" taken up [from LJWatson] 13:53:38 LW: At the TA call last week I mentioned HH going to NZ in a few weeks, making it more difficult to meet up for the triage call 13:53:56 LW: Charles sent out a call for more volunteers 13:54:31 LW: A few people responded: 13:55:47 LW: Adrian Roselli 13:56:11 LW: Joe o' Connor 13:56:40 LW: A lady called Jacky Ahrens 13:56:52 LW: She's a UK based web producer 13:57:13 LW: Web A11Y evangelist 13:57:36 LW can we recruit them as invited experts? 13:58:26 MC: Yes 13:58:36 MS: Suzanne Taylor was interested as well 13:58:52 LW: She's already a TF member 13:59:44 LW: I'll get the ball rolling with Joe becoming an invited expert in the HTMLWG 14:00:35 LW: I'll get in touch with the rest as well 14:01:21 -MichaelC 14:01:22 -LJWatson 14:01:25 -MarkS 14:01:26 -[IPcaller] 14:01:26 WAI_PFWG(HTML_TF)9:00AM has ended 14:01:26 Attendees were +1.617.715.aaaa, MarkS, [IPcaller], LJWatson, MichaelC 14:02:30 RRSAgent: make minutes 14:02:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-a11y-bugs-minutes.html hhillen 14:24:02 zakim, please part 14:24:02 Zakim has left #a11y-bugs 14:24:09 rrsagent, please part 14:24:09 I see no action items