13:53:09 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #gld
13:53:09 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/02-gld-irc
13:53:11 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
13:53:11 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #gld
13:53:13 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GLD
13:53:13 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes
13:53:14 <trackbot> Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference
13:53:14 <trackbot> Date: 02 May 2013
13:53:26 <olyerickson> LOL!
13:56:06 <bhyland> bhyland has joined #gld
13:59:22 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started
13:59:45 <Zakim> +Sandro
14:00:06 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman
14:00:29 <Zakim> + +000000aaaa
14:00:39 <gatemezi> gatemezi has joined #gld
14:00:49 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, aaaa is olyerickson
14:00:50 <Zakim> +olyerickson; got it
14:01:01 <Zakim> +David_Wood
14:01:15 <sandro> olyerickson, are you using IP today?
14:01:16 <bhyland> zakim, David_Wood is me
14:01:16 <Zakim> +bhyland; got it
14:01:20 <HadleyBeeman> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130502
14:01:34 <DaveReynolds> DaveReynolds has joined #gld
14:01:46 <martinA> martinA has joined #gld
14:02:16 <Zakim> +??P11
14:02:24 <TallTed> TallTed has changed the topic to: Govt Linked Data (GLD) WG - http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ - current agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130502
14:02:24 <Zakim> +??P13
14:02:32 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
14:02:34 <martinA> zakim, ??p13 is me
14:02:34 <Zakim> +martinA; got it
14:02:38 <TallTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
14:02:38 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
14:02:39 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
14:02:39 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
14:02:49 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:02:59 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is on the call
14:02:59 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', HadleyBeeman
14:03:04 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is on the call?
14:03:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, ??P11, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds
14:03:11 <PhilA> PhilA has joined #gld
14:03:20 <DeirdreLee> DeirdreLee has joined #gld
14:03:21 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld
14:03:28 <Zakim> +DeirdreLee
14:03:37 <PhilA> zakim, code?
14:03:37 <Zakim> the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA
14:03:47 <fadmaa> fadmaa has joined #gld
14:03:53 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:03:55 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, Fadmaa is with deirdrelee
14:03:55 <Zakim> +Fadmaa; got it
14:03:57 <PhilA> zakim, ipcaller is me
14:03:57 <Zakim> +PhilA; got it
14:04:19 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is on the call?
14:04:19 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, ??P11, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, PhilA
14:04:22 <Zakim> DeirdreLee has DeirdreLee, Fadmaa
14:04:31 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, ??P11 is me
14:04:31 <Zakim> +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it
14:04:42 <HadleyBeeman> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130502
14:04:47 <Zakim> +gatemezi
14:05:17 <DeirdreLee> scribe: DeirdreLee
14:05:21 <HadleyBeeman> last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-04-25
14:05:25 <olyerickson> +1 to minutes
14:05:31 <DaveReynolds> +1
14:05:31 <DeirdreLee> +1
14:05:32 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> +1
14:05:33 <gatemezi> +1
14:05:34 <fadmaa> +1
14:05:34 <PhilA> +1
14:06:06 <DeirdreLee> resolved: last week's minutes
14:06:55 <olyerickson> DCAT UCR http://bit.ly/DCATUseCases
14:06:55 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call?
14:06:55 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, PhilA, gatemezi
14:06:58 <Zakim> DeirdreLee has DeirdreLee, Fadmaa
14:07:06 <DaveReynolds> Benedikt sent regrets to the mail list a little while ago
14:07:08 <DeirdreLee> topic: dcat
14:07:26 <bhyland> s/dcat/DCAT UCR
14:08:01 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: Discuss whether we should proceed with DCAT UCR?
14:08:36 <DeirdreLee> olyerickson: prepared by cygri and fadmaa
14:09:40 <bhyland> @olyerickson, does it really cover all of section 4, for example 4.3 Persistent URIs for catalog entries?
14:09:50 <DeirdreLee> ... what is the standing of such a document, are we obliged to complete this doc in a detailed way
14:10:34 <DeirdreLee> ... DCAT doc is already quite complete, with clear guidelines, is it necessary to go into details on how to implement each requirement?
14:10:41 <bhyland> I agree with olyerickson that it is real work to go thru UCR & *prove* but the spec is the thing people read for implementation questions IMO.
14:10:49 <olyerickson> Q+
14:11:02 <DeirdreLee> sandro: UCR is a good marketing tool and would be a nice supporting doc, but not as important as the spec
14:11:21 <DeirdreLee> ... if we have time we could work on it more, but it's not essential
14:11:30 <bhyland> +1 as a supporting documentation (I probably wouldn't call it a marketing doc ;-)
14:12:02 <DeirdreLee> olyerickson: for a complete UCR, each one of these requirements in the DCAT spec may need an example, and this would be a lot of work
14:12:30 <DeirdreLee> ... better to leave it as an informal doc
14:13:23 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: Leave DCAT UCR as it is for the moment, and if we have more time later, or if we get an extension, we could flesh out the document
14:13:26 <bhyland> +1
14:13:26 <sandro> +1
14:13:39 <DeirdreLee> ... but as it is, it is fine to leave as a note
14:14:23 <DaveReynolds> q+
14:14:45 <DaveReynolds> q-
14:15:33 <Zakim> +Mike_Pendleton
14:15:34 <DeirdreLee> Proposal: Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note (after removing pink todo section)
14:15:49 <Mike_Pendleton> Mike_Pendleton has joined #gld
14:15:58 <Yigal> Yigal has joined #gld
14:16:41 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is talking?
14:16:41 <DeirdreLee> ACTION: Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note
14:16:41 <trackbot> Error finding 'Transition'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/users>.
14:16:51 <Zakim> HadleyBeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: HadleyBeeman (20%), olyerickson (57%), bhyland (4%)
14:17:01 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call?
14:17:01 <Zakim> On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, PhilA, gatemezi (muted), Mike_Pendleton
14:17:04 <fadmaa> ACTION: fadmaa to Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note (after removing pink todo section)
14:17:04 <Zakim> DeirdreLee has DeirdreLee, Fadmaa
14:17:04 <Zakim> +Gregg_Vanderheiden
14:17:04 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, mute olyerickson
14:17:04 <trackbot> Created ACTION-124 - Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note (after removing pink todo section) [on Fadi Maali - due 2013-05-09].
14:17:05 <Zakim> olyerickson should now be muted
14:17:30 <Zakim> -martinA
14:17:36 <gatemezi> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable
14:17:48 <DeirdreLee> subtopic: Best Practices
14:17:51 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> I can't hear anyone… is it just me?
14:18:11 <DeirdreLee> bhyland: found great interest in best practice at ODW 2013
14:18:19 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> PhilA, thanks, I will reconnect
14:18:44 <Zakim> +??P32
14:18:45 <DeirdreLee> ... ODI is working on this, Dutch gov has also created a document related to best practice
14:18:49 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, ??P32 is me
14:18:49 <Zakim> +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it
14:19:52 <DeirdreLee> ... content in best practice doc needs to be restructured slightly and updated
14:19:52 <PhilA> There's quote a lot of what Hans Overbeek presented in his ODW13 paper http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/odw13_submission_14.pdf
14:20:11 <DeirdreLee> ... bhyland focusing on URI section, which we expect will get most attention
14:20:43 <DeirdreLee> ... getting it to W3C note status helped to promote BP
14:20:48 <bhyland> Sections I'm focusing on are:
14:20:48 <bhyland> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-constructionhttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-construction
14:20:48 <bhyland> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-policy-for-persistencehttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-policy-for-persistence
14:20:48 <bhyland> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#internationalized-resource-identifiershttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#internationalized-resource-identifiers
14:22:36 <DeirdreLee> ... updating doc is a matter of transferring some content, 3-4 hours of work
14:22:51 <DeirdreLee> ... if someone was willing to help with pub rules for the glossary
14:23:56 <DeirdreLee> ... bhland would like to shadow sandro while he does it
14:24:05 <HadleyBeeman> s/bhland/bhyland
14:24:14 <bhyland> Note from PhilA: "Open Data Best Practices WG"
14:25:10 <HadleyBeeman> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable
14:25:38 <DeirdreLee> bhyland: would like to move timetable forward one week
14:26:28 <DeirdreLee> ... the doc hasn't changed a lot, most content has remained unchanged for a year
14:27:03 <DeirdreLee> ... get doc out by 14th, then will get feedback
14:27:45 <DaveReynolds> q+
14:27:50 <DeirdreLee> ... might not make publication as WG note by 28th May, but will work through feedback
14:28:04 <PhilA> ack olyerickson
14:28:06 <olyerickson> I'm here
14:28:10 <olyerickson> that was from before
14:28:23 <PhilA> ack DaveReynolds
14:29:16 <DeirdreLee> DaveReynolds: Should have a day or two before it's published, for WG members to have a complete read through the doc
14:30:00 <DeirdreLee> ... to publish on 14th (tuesday), we need to agree on previous thursday (9th)
14:30:54 <DaveReynolds> I was only asking for a few days notice
14:31:49 <bhyland> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable#Detailed_timetable_and_checklist
14:32:31 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: if we send BP doc to WG members for review on Tues 7th, we can vote on Thurs 9th, and publish for public feedback on Tues 14th
14:32:59 <bhyland> http://dir.w3.org
14:33:17 <DeirdreLee> bhyland: unsure about first rows in doc, will follow-up with Hadley after
14:33:46 <bhyland> Topic: Community Directory
14:33:48 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
14:33:48 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted
14:33:51 <DeirdreLee> ... every GLD organisation represented in WG should be present in Community Directory
14:34:01 <Zakim> -JoaoPauloAlmeida.a
14:34:24 <DeirdreLee> TallTed: added entry while ago, but it was deleted, should details be re-entered?
14:35:15 <DeirdreLee> bhyland: yes, new version now, richer features, nice theme,
14:35:35 <DeirdreLee> ... so please resubmit if entry isn't available
14:35:53 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
14:35:53 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
14:35:57 <DeirdreLee> TallTed: suggests bhyland to send a reminder out to those who may have to resubmit
14:36:05 <Zakim> +??P35
14:36:07 <DeirdreLee> bhyland: agreed
14:36:11 <bhyland> I'd like to announce the Directory to the various lists today.
14:36:36 <DeirdreLee> subtopic: ADMS
14:36:51 <bhyland> Per Ted's comment, I'll ping each organization who previously had a listing in v1.0 of the Directory.  I guess we'll call this Directory 2.0
14:37:16 <DeirdreLee> PhilA: going through the spec, addressing comments from F2F, and other comments
14:37:20 <HadleyBeeman> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ADMS_Timetable
14:37:43 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: ADMS timetable is out of date, advises PhilA to update it
14:38:02 <DeirdreLee> Action: to PhilA update ADMS timetable
14:38:02 <trackbot> Created ACTION-125 - PhilA update ADMS timetable [on Tope Omitola - due 2013-05-09].
14:38:22 <DeirdreLee> subtopic: RegORG
14:38:38 <HadleyBeeman> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/REGORG_Timetable
14:38:45 <DeirdreLee> PhilA: Marios is taking a look at that
14:38:56 <DeirdreLee> Action: to PhilA update RegORG timetable
14:38:57 <trackbot> Created ACTION-126 - PhilA update RegORG timetable [on Tope Omitola - due 2013-05-09].
14:39:24 <DaveReynolds> Fadi not Dave :)
14:39:33 <DeirdreLee> subtopic: DCAT
14:39:42 <olyerickson> I must leave at 11a
14:40:07 <fadmaa> q+
14:40:10 <DeirdreLee> DaveReynolds: Could we extend this meeting to talk about DCAT?
14:40:41 <fadmaa> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised
14:40:50 <Zakim> +Sandro.a
14:40:54 <Zakim> -Sandro
14:40:54 <DeirdreLee> s/DaveReynolds/Sandro
14:40:57 <olyerickson> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments
14:41:18 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: Go through DCAT issues
14:41:43 <PhilA> issue-6?
14:41:43 <trackbot> ISSUE-6 -- How should publishers figure out good URIs for properties with non-literal ranges? -- raised
14:41:43 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/6
14:42:03 <PhilA> issue-54?
14:42:03 <trackbot> ISSUE-54 -- Relationship of DCAT and VoID -- raised
14:42:03 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/54
14:42:04 <DeirdreLee> fadmaa: Issue 6 is done
14:42:12 <PhilA> issue-65?
14:42:12 <trackbot> ISSUE-65 -- Add properties for dataset versioning -- raised
14:42:12 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/65
14:42:19 <DeirdreLee> ... issue-9 needs richard to close
14:42:35 <DeirdreLee> ... ISSUE-54 and 65 need further discusssion
14:43:05 <PhilA> issue-60?
14:43:05 <trackbot> ISSUE-60 -- dct:license vs. dct:rights -- raised
14:43:05 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/60
14:43:07 <DeirdreLee> .... the rest of the issues, Fadi and Richard can go through
14:43:24 <olyerickson> 60 and 65
14:43:30 <DeirdreLee> s/54/60
14:44:05 <olyerickson> Do we need to "normalize" on rights vs license?
14:44:10 <gatemezi> I thought one of the resolution during F2F3 was to have a special call for DCAT..
14:44:10 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: Do we need another last call for dcat?
14:44:34 <PhilA> q+
14:44:53 <fadmaa> q-
14:44:59 <PhilA> ack me
14:45:07 <DeirdreLee> fadmaa: It depends on resolution of ISSUES 60 and 64, as decisions on these could mean a change to the core, and as such, would impact on conformance
14:45:28 <DeirdreLee> PhilA: recommends we go for a second LC
14:46:01 <DeirdreLee> ... given the rate of progress and amount of work being done, but still to be done, we have good justification of an extension
14:46:05 <bhyland> +1 to what PhilA is saying, critical to get this correct even if we flow over a couple months.
14:46:28 <olyerickson> I see no strong argument against dcterms:rights
14:46:57 <DeirdreLee> ... DCAT is getting a lot of attention, so to acknowledge all comments, make informed decisions, and go for quality over urgency, we should go for 2nd LC
14:47:06 <DeirdreLee> fadmaa: totally agrees with PhilA
14:47:33 <HadleyBeeman> q?
14:47:41 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: We will leave this decision with editors, and should they decide on a need for 2nd LC, the chairs/groups will support this
14:48:01 <olyerickson> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised
14:48:07 <DeirdreLee> PhilA: related to ADMS, will DCATinclude a contact point?
14:48:23 <DeirdreLee> fadmaa: surprised there is no issue related to this
14:48:48 <DeirdreLee> ... fadmaa will create an issue on this, he would be for creating a contact point in DCAT
14:49:11 <DeirdreLee> PhilA: if it is in DCAT, it can be removed from ADMS, and they will just use the DCAT property
14:49:11 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is talking?
14:49:14 <olyerickson> NOT ME
14:49:21 <Zakim> HadleyBeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: HadleyBeeman (50%), DeirdreLee (44%)
14:49:22 <olyerickson> ;)
14:49:51 <olyerickson> +1 to DCAT going to where it needs to go...
14:50:20 <fadmaa> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments
14:50:26 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: Are all issues for DCAT being followed up on / progressed?
14:50:55 <DeirdreLee> olyerickson: editors are working through comments/issues
14:51:27 <Zakim> -??P35
14:51:50 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: issues are being recorded in issue-tracker and in LC comments section, they may not be the same issues, so as long as editors is keeping an eye on both places
14:51:54 <Zakim> +??P2
14:51:59 <DeirdreLee> subtopic: ORG
14:51:59 <DaveReynolds> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_CR_transition
14:52:00 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, ??P2 is me
14:52:00 <Zakim> +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it
14:52:48 <DeirdreLee> DaveReynolds: Have created a section on uses of ORG that needs feedback from, from Bart and PhilA
14:52:48 <HadleyBeeman> davereynolds: expecting bits to be completed by Bart
14:52:49 <DaveReynolds> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_CR_transition
14:52:58 <DaveReynolds> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations
14:53:06 <PhilA> action: phila to provide info about usage of ORG in Italy and Greece
14:53:06 <trackbot> Created ACTION-127 - Provide info about usage of ORG in Italy and Greece [on Phil Archer - due 2013-05-09].
14:54:46 <DeirdreLee> ... proposes to subdivide ORG into a set of features (5), and uses could be reported at a feature level instead of property level
14:55:16 <DeirdreLee> ... that way users may not have to use every single property in a feature, but we can still see which features are actually useful
14:55:35 <HadleyBeeman> If we label a feature "at risk" and then discover implementations, do they lose that "at risk" label?
14:55:50 <DeirdreLee> ... for the exit criteria, we could check the use/conformance specification at feature level
14:56:06 <DaveReynolds> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Validation_Suite
14:56:49 <HadleyBeeman> q+
14:56:50 <DeirdreLee> ... there will be a set of SPARQL queries that will act like a minimal consumer (at link)
14:57:17 <DeirdreLee> ... the resultant list will still have to be manually checked to see if the results are valid
14:57:29 <olyerickson> olyerickson has left #gld
14:57:29 <Zakim> -olyerickson
14:57:42 <sandro> q+
14:57:48 <DeirdreLee> ... will we rely on implementers to report this
14:58:13 <bhyland> @DaveReynolds, that is a really good approach & outcome based on the WG F2F discussions, IMO.  Thank you very much.  I think that gives us sufficient due diligence that an implementer can use to guide their use of ORG.
14:58:28 <DeirdreLee> ... but would we need a dedicated person from WG to check the negative compliance?
14:58:40 <HadleyBeeman> ack sandro
14:58:48 <bhyland> Sandro: THinks this is great!
14:59:22 <DeirdreLee> Sandro: this seems like a great approach. Normally we don't want implementations to be public, but maybe in this case we could make them public?
14:59:40 <DeirdreLee> DaveReynolds: would we need 2 public ones, or would 1 be sufficient?
14:59:52 <DeirdreLee> sandro: 1 is fine, 2 or more would be great
15:00:34 <DeirdreLee> ... we're not committing to cross-referencing it, but we have the option to check the public implementations ourselves then if we want
15:00:48 <Zakim> -TallTed
15:01:09 <DeirdreLee> DaveReynolds: we could add a checkbox for implementers, asking whether they mind if their data is made public
15:02:14 <DeirdreLee> ... we could provide a service to check this
15:02:22 <gatemezi> @DaveReynolds: if we change the Select queries to ASK ones? could them be also sufficient for checking?
15:02:32 <DeirdreLee> sandro: w3c will provide a vm to host the service for the CR period
15:03:11 <sandro> (probably)
15:03:12 <DeirdreLee> HadleyBeeman: Could this exit criteria methodology be applied to other vocabs?
15:03:17 <HadleyBeeman> ack me
15:04:26 <DeirdreLee> DaveReynolds: qb is a different beast., in the spec we have an idea of what is a good and bad implementation, so we can simply run the validation queries on these and see if they conform
15:04:43 <DeirdreLee> ... might not be worth breaking down into features
15:05:04 <DeirdreLee> also doesn't make sense to have online service as datacube data would be very large
15:06:18 <DeirdreLee> fadmaa: the exit-criteria for ORG should also apply to DCAT
15:06:42 <DeirdreLee> ... would make more sense to run online service on same VM as ORG
15:07:16 <Zakim> -JoaoPauloAlmeida.a
15:07:28 <bhyland> Great job Dave, thank you for blazing the path forward to seeing sunlight out the other side of CR process.  Thanks.
15:07:38 <Zakim> +??P2
15:07:45 <Zakim> -DeirdreLee
15:07:49 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is here?
15:07:49 <Zakim> On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, DaveReynolds, PhilA, gatemezi (muted), Mike_Pendleton, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Sandro.a, ??P2
15:07:51 <Zakim> On IRC I see Yigal, Mike_Pendleton, fadmaa, JoaoPauloAlmeida, DeirdreLee, PhilA, martinA, DaveReynolds, gatemezi, bhyland, Zakim, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, TallTed, danbri, cygri,
15:07:51 <Zakim> ... sandro, trackbot
15:07:55 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> Zakim, ??P2 is me
15:07:56 <Zakim> +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it
15:08:21 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: We just lost our scribe, but I think we're done with the agenda!
15:08:34 <bhyland> Thank you Hadley, awesome work barreling through this mega-agenda!!
15:08:35 <Zakim> +DeirdreLee
15:08:40 <sandro> HadleyBeeman: Thank you all for everything today.   Talk to you all next week.
15:08:41 <Zakim> -Mike_Pendleton
15:08:41 <bhyland> thanks all.  have a good weekend.
15:08:46 <sandro> ADJOURNED
15:08:47 <Zakim> -JoaoPauloAlmeida.a
15:08:49 <Zakim> -Gregg_Vanderheiden
15:08:50 <fadmaa> bye
15:08:50 <Zakim> -PhilA
15:08:50 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
15:08:52 <Zakim> -bhyland
15:08:52 <Zakim> -JoaoPauloAlmeida
15:08:52 <Zakim> -gatemezi
15:08:52 <Zakim> -Sandro.a
15:08:54 <Zakim> -DeirdreLee
15:08:55 <Zakim> -DaveReynolds
15:08:57 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended
15:08:57 <Zakim> Attendees were Sandro, HadleyBeeman, +000000aaaa, olyerickson, bhyland, martinA, TallTed, DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, Fadmaa, PhilA, JoaoPauloAlmeida, gatemezi, Mike_Pendleton,
15:08:57 <Zakim> ... Gregg_Vanderheiden
15:09:00 <martinA> martinA has left #gld
15:09:26 <DeirdreLee> RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
15:09:36 <HadleyBeeman> thank you again, DeirdreLee!
15:09:46 <DeirdreLee> RRSAgent, generate minutes
15:09:46 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/02-gld-minutes.html DeirdreLee
15:09:51 <DeirdreLee> no worries Hadley
15:10:01 <HadleyBeeman> :)
15:28:03 <cgueret> cgueret has joined #gld
15:39:49 <DaveReynolds> DaveReynolds has left #gld
15:46:16 <PhilA> PhilA has left #gld
17:16:10 <Zakim> Zakim has left #gld
17:47:49 <bhyland> bhyland has joined #gld
18:50:51 <cgueret> cgueret has joined #gld