See also: IRC log
<sharper> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/charter4
Simon: sort out charter discussion quickly
... Any additional comments?
<shadi> [@@@ comment from Yeliz: research *questions* versus research *directions*?]
comment1: which research directions?
SAZ: direction fits better than questions!
<sharper> +1
<annika> +1
<klaus> +1
+1
<markel> +1
<sharper> RESOLVED: Change questions to directions
<sharper> RESOLVED: @@@ this paragraph needs updating. just needs udating via Shadi
<sharper> RESOLVED: [@@@ 30 June 2016] just update
<sharper> @@@ comment from Yeliz: would it be useful to add that RDWG is also "Proving a form/platform for researchers to get together and discuss web accessibility research directions"?
SAZ: agrees to Simon that s/research directions/ new research directions/
<shadi> +1 to Annika
Annika: destinction between the RDWG and the external world. This should be clearly stated
Simon: has give himself an action to adapt the scope
<sharper> ACTION: sharper to re-write scope taking Yeliz and Annika. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/04/24-rd-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-37 - Re-write scope taking Yeliz and Annika. [on Simon Harper - due 2013-05-01].
SAZ: cancel next Wednesday as it is a publich
holiday in many countries
... the concept of prioritizing should be changed to documenting
<sharper> @@@ comment from Yeliz: I don't think "internationalization" got enough attention and interest in the group, would it be better to remove it?
<shadi> +1 to Simon
<sharper> Propose to keep internationalisation
<sharper> +1
+1
<markel> +1
<annika> +1
<klaus> +1
<sharper> RESOLVED: Keep Internationalisation
<sharper> [@@@ rename "teleconference" to "online symposia"?]
<markel> +1
<sharper> +1
<klaus> +1
+1
<sharper> RESOLVED: for deliverables 1 and 2
<sharper> [@@@ add "research" in front of "reports"?]
<sharper> +1
<markel> +1
<klaus> +1
+1
<annika> +1
<sharper> RESOLVED: to add the research word
<sharper> [@@@ remove "prioritized" and change to "annotated catalog of research topics" or similar?]
<sharper> +1
<markel> +1
<annika> +1
<klaus> +1
+1
<sharper> RESOLVED: remove "prioritized" and change to "annotated catalog of research topics"
<sharper> [@@@ we should discuss this deliverable in more detail -- is it really going to be a W3C Working Group Note or other format? also think it needs a refined description.]
SAZ: this should be a separate discussion
<sharper> Postpone:
<sharper> Tips for Accessibility-Aware Research: Start-up tips and basic guidance for researchers for incorporating accessibility considerations into their research designs, to be published as a W3C Working Group Note. [@@@ we should discuss this deliverable in more detail -- is it really going to be a W3C Working Group Note or other format? also think it needs a refined description.]
SAZ: better to discuss it with the coordination group
<sharper> [@@@ can we combine this into the "annotated catalog of research topics" above?]
<sharper> I think it can be combined
<sharper> propose combining
<sharper> +1
<klaus> +1
+1
<markel> not sure, we can combine but not merge
<annika> +1
<markel> just want to distinguish "resources" in general and reports
<markel> sorry I unable to make this work
<shadi> +1 to not mixing with "research reports" (point #3)
<sharper> RESOLVED: combine deliverable 4 and 6
Markel: By the combination we should still distiguish reources from reports
<shadi> +1
<sharper> RESOLVED: By the combination we should still distiguish reources from reports
Simon: Will report to the coordination group
about the status of Mobile W3C Note
... any comments or issues about that?
<markel> YM: we have created a draft call containing the announcements
http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/CfP_Email:_User_Modelling_for_Accessibility_(UM4A)
<markel> YM: we have created an email draft too
<markel> YM: any comments are welcome
<markel> YM: so that we can update the calls and email accordingly
http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/CfP_Email:_User_Modelling_for_Accessibility_%28UM4A%29
<markel> YM: my question to SAZ and SH is about the scientific committee. How should I proceed?
<markel> SH: I would suggest to put an email asking whether somebody from the group is skilled to do so.
<markel> SAZ: we can also have people from outside the group. There should be an email template to invite people to the PC.
<markel> SH: the only issue with the draft there seems to be a number of problems on the above links
<markel> YM: I can fix that, you mean HTML tags?
<markel> SH: yes, there are some square brackets
<markel> YM: I'll fix them
<markel> YM: what about the dates?
<markel> SH: they are realistic
<markel> dates look good to me
<markel> SH: the coordination group is aware of the dates, if only we could make the changes
<markel> YM: I'll do that
<sharper> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2012/easy-to-read/note/ED-E2R.html
SH: we can postpone to next time or go line by line now?
<annika> I have to leave now for another meeting. I'll send my comments on the E2R note by email.
SH: paragraph #1 on cognitive disabilities and and
<annika> bye
SH: happy with the abstract
... 3rd paragraph
... Introduction is good - only the mentioned two changes should be made
<klaus> other mic seems not to work, sorry
<sharper> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2012/easy-to-read/note/ED-E2R.html#C2
SH: next time to start onsection 2 Background and related work
<klaus> Am happy to take any comments for changes via email (-: