16:59:41 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 16:59:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-tagmem-irc 16:59:55 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started 17:00:02 +[IPcaller] 17:00:11 Zakim, IP is me 17:00:11 sorry, annevk_, I do not recognize a party named 'IP' 17:00:16 +??P1 17:00:36 + +1.718.877.aaaa 17:01:02 +[IPcaller] 17:01:13 Zakim, +1.7 is wycats_ 17:01:13 +wycats_; got it 17:01:30 Zakim, who is on the call? 17:01:30 On the phone I see annevk_, ht, wycats_, JeniT 17:01:37 trackbot, start telcon 17:01:37 Zakim, annevk_ is me 17:01:37 +annevk; got it 17:01:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:01:41 Zakim, this will be TAG 17:01:41 ok, trackbot, I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM already started 17:01:42 Meeting: Technical Architecture Group Teleconference 17:01:42 Date: 04 April 2013 17:01:42 Zakim, who is on the call? 17:01:42 On the phone I see annevk, ht, wycats_, JeniT 17:03:48 +TimBL 17:03:49 brb 17:04:48 noah has joined #tagmem 17:06:26 +[IPcaller] 17:06:38 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 17:06:38 +noah; got it 17:06:45 zakim, who is here? 17:06:45 On the phone I see annevk, ht, wycats_, JeniT, TimBL, noah 17:06:46 On IRC I see noah, RRSAgent, Zakim, ht, JeniT, annevk, timbl, wycats_, slightlyoff, plinss, Yves, trackbot 17:06:48 b 17:07:00 scribenick: annevk 17:07:34 Topic: Agenda 17:07:37 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/04/04-agenda 17:07:58 +Yves 17:08:00 Zakim, passcode? 17:08:00 the conference code is 0824 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), annevk 17:08:31 Noah: Lets go through F2F actions and then through the TAG's backlog 17:09:04 +Alex 17:09:20 Noah: For those in the backlog we may want to go through them and indicate whether we'll be working on them or that they should not expect an update. 17:09:48 Noah: The next call will be in two weeks. 17:09:50 Alex will scribe on 18 April 17:09:55 No regrets for the 18th 17:10:22 Noah: Another administrative item was a request for a calendar feed 17:10:25 Calendar: https://cal.csswg.org/public.php/tag/calendar.ics 17:10:36 Noah: this is experimental, set up by plinss 17:10:43 ht has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/04/04-agenda.html 17:10:49 Noah: I'll do the updates, you can pull out of it 17:11:54 Noah: TAG F2F in London coming up, start thinking about travel 17:12:24 Reminder, please put ACTION-XXX in subject or body of your emails 17:13:39 Noah: beware of cross-posting ACTION- to other lists as there's no namespacing 17:13:52 [no namespacing, how can this be!] 17:14:00 Topic: Actions 17:14:14 JeniT: I'd like to postpone my action 17:14:14 ACTION=790? 17:14:30 ACTION-790? 17:14:30 ACTION-790 -- Jeni Tennison to do new Editor's Draft of fragids spec for approval to publish as CR -- due 2013-04-16 -- OPEN 17:14:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/790 17:14:43 ACTION-791? 17:14:43 ACTION-791 -- Alex Russell to redraft proposed "status" section that TAG is suggesting for Polyglot -- due 2013-03-27 -- OPEN 17:14:43 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/791 17:15:14 NM: Has discussion converged? 17:15:17 Yehuda: it seems there were two points 17:15:36 Yehuda: Larry thought Alex' use cases were too narrow and I had mentioned another use case worth mentioning 17:15:49 Yehuda: It seemed people were talking past each other via email 17:15:56 sorry, but I've been busy -- I'd like to review the emails before discussing 17:15:59 Yehuda: easiest would be for Alex to reply to those emails 17:16:04 OK, Henry 17:16:10 zakim, who is here? 17:16:10 On the phone I see annevk, ht, wycats_, JeniT, TimBL, noah, Yves, Alex 17:16:11 On IRC I see noah, RRSAgent, Zakim, ht, JeniT, annevk, timbl, wycats_, slightlyoff, plinss, Yves, trackbot 17:16:21 Yehuda: Both Larry and I wanted to expand your wording 17:16:27 Alex: Yes that works for me 17:16:55 Noah: bump due date? 17:17:13 Alex: yes 17:17:15 ACTION-791? 17:17:15 ACTION-791 -- Alex Russell to redraft proposed "status" section that TAG is suggesting for Polyglot -- due 2013-04-16 -- OPEN 17:17:15 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/791 17:17:47 slightlyoff_ has joined #tagmem 17:17:57 *finally*. Sorry 'bout that 17:18:16 Noah: anything else on Polyglot? 17:18:19 [silence] 17:18:23 ACTION-793? 17:18:23 ACTION-793 -- Anne van Kesteren to draft disclaimer text for Authoritative Metadata -- due 2013-04-05 -- OPEN 17:18:23 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/793 17:18:42 AVK: Just updated due date, will do it tomorrow. 17:19:57 [Discussing details of note formatting.] 17:20:38 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20060412 17:22:07 It is better to work in the CVS space than to have it at your own private site 17:22:08 Noah: use a date in the URL 17:22:54 Noah: Yehuda, any update on F2F minutes? 17:23:01 Yehuda: one flight away 17:24:09 Topic: TAG backlog 17:24:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/open 17:25:10 Noah: The TAG used its own issue tracking system that had shortnames. That explains errorHandling-20 and such. 17:25:35 Noah: The first six or so years of the TAG it used issues to drive its agenda. 17:26:52 Noah: And looked at aspects of them, e.g. error handling in HTML vs XML. 17:27:26 Noah: Larry expressed frustration with this process and so we created product pages to have a more overarching goal of what we're working towards. 17:27:49 ISSUE-34? 17:27:49 ISSUE-34 -- XML Transformation and composability (e.g., XSLT,XInclude, Encryption) -- open 17:27:49 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/34 17:27:51 Noah: Lets go through the issues and see which we can close. 17:28:22 -wycats_ 17:29:09 Noah: Processing model of XML. Is there any interest in this? 17:29:40 xmlFunctions-34 17:30:20 q+ to add 0.02USD 17:30:22 Tim: I'm happy to do things with XML. This came from when we're talking about XML was processed. The meaning from XML has to be taken outside-in. Otherwise you cannot create new XML specifications that interweave with what exist. 17:30:31 Tim: Not clear people noticed that. 17:30:59 I note that traceker has several status codes we can assign, including OPEN, PENDING, REVIEW, POSTPONED, and CLOSED. 17:31:12 Tim: Henry did a lot more work on that. I don't feel we need to put a whole lot of energy into XML at all. JSON is the new way for me. It's much more straightforward. 17:31:19 Suggestion: if we think this is now resolved or uninteresting, CLOSE it; if we think it's interesting but not now, then POSTPONED? 17:31:29 q? 17:32:07 Tim: We need another concept besides OPEN/CLOSED. Something like NOT WORKING ON IT. 17:32:16 Noah: It has POSTPONED. 17:32:48 Tim: POSTPONED expresses a feeling of guilt. But there's no guilt. 17:33:11 Noah: It's close enough and I'm not looking forward to changing Tracker. 17:33:13 ack next 17:33:14 ht, you wanted to add 0.02USD 17:33:46 Henri: I'm happy to move this to the backburner. I think there's a genuine issue here and of interest to the community but I don't have the bandwidth. 17:33:52 s/Henri/Henry/ 17:34:20 Noah: We need to tell ourselves a story as to what these codes mean. 17:34:32 Noah: Historically we used CLOSED for "it's in pretty good shape". 17:34:51 Henry: I'm happy with POSTPONED and it's better than CLOSED. 17:35:14 . PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We mark issue xmlFunctions-34 POSTPONED 17:35:17 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We mark ISSUE-34 (xmlFunctions-34) POSTPONED 17:35:26 +1 for postponing 17:35:30 RESOLUTION: We mark issue xmlFunctions-34 POSTPONED 17:35:30 +1 17:35:33 RESOLUTION: We mark ISSUE-34 (xmlFunctions-34) POSTPONED 17:35:48 I think this is important, thanks for doing it noah 17:36:04 ISSUE-35? 17:36:04 ISSUE-35 -- Syntax and semantics for embedding RDF in XHTML -- open 17:36:04 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/35 17:36:09 RDFinXHTML-35 17:36:09 Noah: I think it's important going through these. 17:36:31 Noah: even though it's somewhat boring to do our due diligence and set expectations. 17:36:59 Noah: I think people were pretty happy with the progress Jeni made here. 17:37:01 Propose to CLOSE this one. 17:37:32 q? 17:37:32 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We mark ISSUE-35 (RDFinXHTML-35) CLOSED 17:38:02 +1 17:38:04 +1 17:38:05 RESOLUTION: We mark ISSUE-35 (RDFinXHTML-35) CLOSED 17:38:14 RESOLUTION: The TAG closes issue RDFinXHTML-35, believing that good answers have been developed 17:39:06 ACTION: Jeni to draft text on closing of issue RDFinXHTML-35 17:39:07 Created ACTION-794 - Draft text on closing of issue RDFinXHTML-35 [on Jeni Tennison - due 2013-04-11]. 17:39:19 ISSUE-46? 17:39:19 ISSUE-46 -- Impact of changes to XML 1.1 on other XML Specifications -- open 17:39:19 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/46 17:39:59 +1 17:40:29 +1 17:40:44 -ht 17:41:11 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Mark ISSUE-46 (xml11Names-46) CLOSED because it has been dealt with. 17:41:44 RESOLUTION: Mark ISSUE-46 (xml11Names-46) CLOSED because it has been dealt with and time has passed. 17:41:57 close ISSUE-46 17:41:57 Closed ISSUE-46 Impact of changes to XML 1.1 on other XML Specifications. 17:42:13 close ISSUE-35 17:42:13 Closed ISSUE-35 Syntax and semantics for embedding RDF in XHTML. 17:42:24 ISSUE-47? 17:42:24 ISSUE-47 -- WS-Addressing SOAP binding & app protocols -- open 17:42:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/47 17:42:50 Issue description: 17:42:50 "In a nutshell, it [ 17:42:50 WS-Addressing - SOAP Binding ] requires that the URI in the "Address" component of a WS-Addressing EPR be serialized into a wsa:To SOAP header, independent of the underlying protocol. IMO, a Web-architecture consistent means of doing this would be to serialize it to the Request-URI when using SOAP with HTTP, or the "RCPT TO:" value when using SOAP with SMTP, etc.." 17:43:03 must have been overtaken by events, surely 17:43:43 close 17:43:43 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Mark ISSUE-47 (endPointRefs-47) CLOSED because we cannot affect this. 17:43:47 ACTION: Noah to draft text on closing of ISSUE-46 17:43:47 Created ACTION-795 - Draft text on closing of ISSUE-46 [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2013-04-11]. 17:44:29 NM: Even the WS community is not using Endpoint References. 17:44:35 NM: Even the WS community is not using Endpoint References? 17:44:40 YL: That's my understanding 17:44:55 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Mark ISSUE-47 (endPointRefs-47) CLOSED because we cannot affect this and code has either been deployed or is dead. 17:46:09 SGTM 17:46:13 +1 17:46:13 +1 17:46:16 +1 17:46:30 RESOLUTION: Mark ISSUE-47 (endPointRefs-47) CLOSED because we cannot affect this and code has either been deployed or is dead. 17:46:51 close ISSUE-47? 17:46:51 Closed ISSUE-47 WS-Addressing SOAP binding & app protocols. 17:47:04 Noah: Yves, can you draft text to post to the community? 17:47:15 Yves: sure thing 17:47:20 ISSUE-61? 17:47:20 ISSUE-61 -- URI Based Access to Packaged Items -- open 17:47:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/61 17:47:45 Description: " 17:47:45 The TAG opened an issue, uriBasedPackageAccess-61 [1] to consider URI based access and reference to items within a web accessible package. In addressing a more general problem the TAG expects to cover the requirements of the WAF community who have requested help wrt to their current work on widgets [2] as well other situations that involve reference within and into packaged structures on the 17:47:45 web." 17:48:20 I don't know but this looks like it could still be interesting 17:48:50 q? 17:48:57 Anne: SysApps is the new group that works on stuff like this, I think 17:49:08 Anne: there's an app:// URL thingie 17:49:29 q+ 17:49:32 I agree, I just wanted us to look because I knew that the original issue arose from concerns about a particular component technology that I believe is no longer moving ahead. I agree that it's reasonable to keep the issue open. 17:49:39 ack next 17:49:41 Tim: Certainly with a zip file you want to get bits out of it. 17:50:11 Jeni: Coming from the Open Data angle is that we have really big data files, zip them up, and still reference bits inside of it. 17:51:36 Anne: There's different use cases. One is about locally referencing a file. The other one is referencing a file from the outside. 17:52:05 Tim: it would be nice if they could be treated consistently. 17:52:37 Noah: issues track several things usually 17:53:08 Anne: I think they are orthogonal, but I suspect we won't work on it much 17:54:57 looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#zip-relative-paths 17:54:59 Noah: Okay, lets keep it open, and if we later get more information we can add it to and revisit it 17:55:12 http://appuri.sysapps.org/ 17:55:23 this is stuff marcosc is working on 17:56:26 Tim: can you add that link to ISSUE-61 Anne? 17:56:28 Anne: done 17:56:49 Topic: Pending review actions 17:56:50 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview 17:57:10 Noah: I think these can be closed 17:57:45 +1 to closing the action 17:57:45 close ACTION-741 17:57:46 Closed ACTION-741 Check with Norm Walsh on closing out HTML/XML unification work. 17:57:51 ACTION-782? 17:57:51 ACTION-782 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule F2F discussion of polyglot, the TAG's request to HTML WG on polygot, and HTML/XML Unification -- due 2013-03-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:57:51 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/782 17:57:52 -JeniT 17:58:07 close ACTION-782 17:58:07 Closed ACTION-782 schedule F2F discussion of polyglot, the TAG's request to HTML WG on polygot, and HTML/XML Unification. 17:58:09 +1 17:58:14 ACTION-785? 17:58:14 ACTION-785 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule discussion of developer involvement/outreach at F2F -- due 2013-03-04 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:58:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/785 17:58:37 I think this should be extended 17:58:53 can we assign marcosc? 17:58:59 hate to volunteer him 17:59:08 close ACTION-785 17:59:08 Closed ACTION-785 schedule discussion of developer involvement/outreach at F2F. 17:59:41 ACTION: Marcos to develop new ideas for improved synergy with and outreach to the developer community - Due: 2013-05-20 17:59:41 Created ACTION-796 - Develop new ideas for improved synergy with and outreach to the developer community - Due: 2013-05-20 [on Marcos Caceres - due 2013-04-11]. 18:00:22 ACTION-796? 18:00:22 ACTION-796 -- Marcos Caceres to develop new ideas for improved synergy with and outreach to the developer community -- due 2013-05-20 -- OPEN 18:00:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/796 18:00:39 ACTION-787? 18:00:39 ACTION-787 -- Alex Russell to solicit informal discussion on HTML WG list of clarifying: polyglot doesn't restrict html5 futures -- due 2013-02-25 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:00:39 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/787 18:00:54 it was me 18:01:26 close ACTION-787 18:01:26 Closed ACTION-787 solicit informal discussion on HTML WG list of clarifying: polyglot doesn't restrict html5 futures. 18:01:27 Alex: I solicited that feedback privately, no follow up 18:01:38 Noah: all pending review actions are dealt with 18:01:58 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner 18:03:18 curious to know if we want to keep pursuing http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Proposal27 18:03:26 Noah: overdue actions is a permathread 18:03:28 thanks 18:04:34 Alex: I'm curious to know what happens to actions assigned to outgoing TAG members 18:05:19 Noah: I think it's my task to sort out these overdue actions with outgoing TAG members and then come back to the TAG 18:06:08 -Alex 18:06:08 ADJOURNED 18:06:08 Noah: I propose to adjourn the call. Please keep me up to date with requests for the meeting. That'd be very helpful. 18:06:09 -TimBL 18:06:13 -Yves 18:06:20 s/the meeting/the meetings/ 18:06:25 RRSAgent: make minutes 18:06:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-tagmem-minutes.html annevk 18:06:33 Anne, please check in formatted minutes if you can, else send me HTML and I'll check it in/. 18:06:35 Tnx 18:06:56 Zakim, on the phone? 18:06:56 I don't understand your question, annevk. 18:07:01 Zakim, who is on the phone? 18:07:01 On the phone I see annevk, noah 18:07:26 https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/coordination/TAGGuide.html#scribing 18:09:23 RRSAgent: draft minutes 18:09:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-tagmem-minutes.html annevk 18:10:10 -annevk 18:10:12 -noah 18:10:12 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:10:12 Attendees were +1.718.877.aaaa, ht, JeniT, wycats_, annevk, TimBL, noah, Yves, Alex 18:10:31 Present: Yehuda Jeni Tim Noah Yves Henry Alex Anne 18:10:37 Chair: Noah 18:11:05 s/AVK/Anne/ 18:11:37 RRSAgent: make minutes 18:11:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-tagmem-minutes.html annevk 18:15:46 Regrets: Marcos 18:15:50 RRSAgent: make minutes 18:15:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-tagmem-minutes.html annevk 18:15:59 scribe: Anne 18:16:26 RRSAgent: make minutes 18:16:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/04-tagmem-minutes.html annevk 18:20:18 annevk has joined #tagmem 18:38:00 noah has joined #tagmem 18:40:23 noah: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/04/04-minutes.html 18:40:34 noah: I'll email them now 18:44:06 noah has joined #tagmem 18:44:25 and done 18:44:53 ooh, I used camelcase in my email subject 18:44:54 I hate that 18:45:01 Zakim, bye 18:45:01 Zakim has left #tagmem 18:53:05 JeniT has joined #tagmem 19:34:19 annevk has joined #tagmem 19:35:41 noah has joined #tagmem 20:00:48 JeniT has joined #tagmem 20:13:44 JeniT has joined #tagmem 21:35:12 noah has joined #tagmem 22:22:29 ht has joined #tagmem 23:41:41 timbl has joined #tagmem 23:53:03 annevk has joined #tagmem