14:59:39 RRSAgent has joined #pointerevents 14:59:39 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/04/02-pointerevents-irc 14:59:48 RRSAgent, make log Public 14:59:54 ScribeNick: ArtB 14:59:57 Scribe: Art 15:00:03 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013AprJun/0003.html 15:00:08 Chair: Art 15:00:14 Meeting: Pointer Events WG Voice Conference 15:00:23 RWC_PEWG()11:00AM has now started 15:00:30 +scott_gonzalez 15:00:31 Regrets: Rick_Byers, Olli_Pettay 15:01:08 +Art_Barstow 15:01:21 Cathy has joined #pointerevents 15:01:29 Present+ Cathy_Chan 15:01:47 +Cathy 15:01:52 Present+ Scott_González 15:01:57 Present+ Art_Barstow 15:02:05 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:02:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/02-pointerevents-minutes.html ArtB 15:02:46 +Matt_Brubeck 15:02:56 Present+ Matt_Brubeck 15:03:07 +[Microsoft] 15:04:04 Present+ Asir_Vedamuthu 15:04:25 +Doug_Schepers 15:04:33 Present+ Doug_Schepers 15:04:37 +[Microsoft.a] 15:04:45 Present+ Jacob_Rossi 15:05:11 Topic: Getting started 15:05:11 jrossi21 has joined #pointerevents 15:05:16 AB: I posted a draft agenda yesterday http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013AprJun/0003.html. The main subject is to discuss the status of the LC comment processing. 15:05:27 AB: any change requests? 15:05:34 Topic: Status of Last Call comment processing 15:05:39 AB: Jacob created the comment tracking document https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/dc.html. 15:05:50 AB: it appears we have replies from everyone except Mose Bottacini (#9) and Yandex/Charles (#13-#17). 15:06:01 AB: Asir followed up with Mose and asked him to reply by April 8. In the absence of any additional feedback from Mose by the 8th, I propose we continue with the group's resolution and not block on him. 15:06:29 AB: any concerns Doug? 15:06:55 DS: I'm comfortable with that if we can defend it 15:07:29 AB: Jacob replied to him, Asir pinged him again. I think an additional week should be reasonable 15:07:41 AB: Rick and I followed up with Charles. Charles indicated in IRC today that he will ask Sergey to reply. 15:08:05 AB: Chaals understand we are waiting for him and Yandex to reply 15:08:26 AB: anything else on the comment processing? 15:08:37 JR: I would like everyone to please check the Web IDL changes 15:09:04 … I made one change and then committed something different 15:09:12 … Please take a look all 15:09:23 AB: please look at the new IDL changes 15:09:27 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#extensions-to-the-element-interface 15:09:36 … and ask you to reply to the list if you do review 15:09:52 … Want a record that people looked at the change 15:10:09 Topic: Moving Pointer Events spec to Candidate Recommendation 15:10:15 AB: when I created the draft agenda, I was hopeful we would have closed  the comment loop with all of the `Commenters` and thus we would be in a position to determine if we have consensus to move the spec to CR. 15:10:28 AB: we aren't quite there yet but might be by next week's call. 15:10:53 Topic: Testing: status, plans 15:10:59 AB: any status or news re testing? 15:11:06 AB: it's a bit tricky to create tests when the implementations are lacking which is a segue to our next topic ... 15:11:08 asir has joined #pointerevents 15:11:29 Topic: Any other Business 15:11:35 AB: any implementation status to share? When can we expect a Public version of IE that support the standard? 15:11:56 JR: I can't comment on specific release timeframes 15:12:09 … but we are following the spec closely 15:12:19 q+ 15:12:21 … and expect to update our implementation to conform to the spec 15:12:35 AB: anything new Matt re Mozilla? 15:12:50 MB: lots of discussion. Main issue is getting resources to work on it 15:12:54 q+ 15:13:00 AB: any status on the WebKit port 15:13:13 AV: on a weekly basis, we are posting updates 15:13:22 … you can track that on the WebKit forum 15:14:20 AB: do you have an idea when a WebKit-based browser will have an impl? 15:14:24 AV: I don't have any dates 15:14:30 … Rick might know more 15:14:37 … that is certainly our goal 15:14:51 AB: so in the mean time, use "MS" prefix 15:15:11 AB: anything else on impl for today? 15:15:13 [ No ] 15:15:39 DS: I talked to some LeapMotion people at SxSW 15:15:44 q+ 15:15:47 … they want to make sure it works well with the Web 15:16:03 … LeapMotion is a 3D detector 15:16:14 … I respect JR's comment re z-axis 15:16:27 … There is a lot of buzz/interest re 3D 15:16:40 … Want to know though about the next steps to manage requests like this? 15:16:56 … Do we have a v2 feature list? 15:17:03 AB: yes, it is at the bottom of the agenda 15:17:18 DS: do we have a timeframe for v2? 15:17:37 … we have a good idea about v1 status 15:17:46 … have we publized the v2 list? 15:18:06 … can we say "it's X-X number of months before we start v2?" 15:18:22 … it will help with our engagement with folks like LeapMotion 15:18:28 … It could help bring them in 15:18:49 JR: I have also talked to Josh from LeapMotion and Bill 15:19:06 … I think our engagement has been useful 15:19:15 … I now have a LM device 15:19:36 … I think a projection of PE onto 3D can be done 15:19:47 … but there are some issues e.g. coordinate mapping 15:19:57 … I think we have done the right things for v1 15:20:12 … that facilitate the experimentation of other devices 15:20:29 … Re timeline for v2, agree a goal would be "noble" 15:20:39 … but I think we really need to finish v1 first 15:20:57 … Don't want to get distracted from finishing v1 15:21:18 DS: how complete is our test suite? 15:21:22 AB: maybe 1% 15:21:39 DS: so let's set a timeline for the test suite 15:21:54 Work? who does that!? 15:21:59 … can we identify the assertions, what tests are needed 15:22:24 … understand that without impls, it is a bit hard to write tests 15:22:35 … There is a TestTheWebForward 15:22:46 MB: I can go to that since it is in Seattle 15:22:48 http://testthewebforward.org/events/seattle-2013.html 15:23:00 I should be there. 15:23:03 DS: would be good if some of us went to that event and asked for help 15:23:13 … need to know which tests we need 15:23:19 … could get some good tests 15:23:34 … Need to take steps to correct the test definciency 15:24:21 AB: agree it would be useful to tease out specific actions for the test suite 15:24:51 … FYI, Cathy made good progress on the Test Assertion document 15:24:52 http://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/TestAssertions 15:25:07 DS: that's great Cathy 15:25:36 mbrubeck has joined #pointerevents 15:25:42 AB: can anyone agree to take some assertions and create tests? 15:25:50 JR: I want to get my team involved 15:26:05 … we are committed to contribute 15:26:26 SG: I can help with some of the tests 15:26:31 AB: excellent 15:26:55 DS: can we identify different types of tests? 15:27:19 … f.ex. there is some commonality of pointerdown, pointerdown 15:27:35 … It could help with an event like TTWF 15:28:03 … Need a template that others can follow/use/extend 15:29:21 AV: would be useful to update the TA wiki with coverage and who is working on what 15:29:41 CC: I still need to do some more work 15:29:50 Congratulations Cathy!! 15:31:07 AB: could you please give us some status about which parts are complete and where we have gaps? 15:31:12 CC: yes, I can do that 15:31:31 this is how Microsoft stress tests touch. Give your tablet to a 4 year old 15:31:34 :-) 15:32:17 AB: if people can volunteer for assertions today, that would be great 15:32:33 … otherwise, send your TA items to the list 15:32:38 SG: ok; will do 15:33:02 DS: "compatibility tables" say where features are supported 15:33:10 … I have been doing some related automation work 15:33:46 … with WebPlatform.org, want the features' impl status to be current 15:34:07 … using a library from CanIUse.com 15:34:27 … working toward taking W3C test suites and report back to test assertions 15:35:07 … I could prototype taking our Impl results and mapping them to feature stability 15:36:20 AB: everyone please review the TA doc and notify the list when you identified the TAs you will create tests for 15:36:34 AV: what are the expectations for next call (April 9)? 15:36:56 AB: hopefully, we will be in a position to see if we have consensus to move to CR 15:37:07 … depends on the reponses from Yandex and Mose 15:37:28 AB: plan on a call on April 9 15:37:42 AB: meeting adjourned 15:37:48 -[Microsoft.a] 15:37:50 -Doug_Schepers 15:37:51 -Cathy 15:37:54 -scott_gonzalez 15:37:56 -Art_Barstow 15:37:58 -asir 15:38:10 -Matt_Brubeck 15:38:12 RWC_PEWG()11:00AM has ended 15:38:12 Attendees were scott_gonzalez, Art_Barstow, Cathy, Matt_Brubeck, Doug_Schepers, asir 15:39:07 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:39:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/02-pointerevents-minutes.html ArtB 15:40:48 ArtB Cathy: Where are the existing tests stored? 15:42:08 scott_gonzalez https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/default/tests/pointerevents-v1/ 15:42:46 thanks 15:45:59 zakim, bye 15:45:59 Zakim has left #pointerevents 15:46:03 jrossi21 has left #pointerevents 15:46:08 rrsagent, bye 15:46:08 I see no action items