15:34:40 RRSAgent has joined #i18n 15:34:40 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-irc 15:34:50 trackbot, prepare teleconference 15:34:52 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:34:54 Zakim, this will be 4186 15:34:55 ok, trackbot; I see I18N_CoreWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 34 minutes ago 15:34:55 Meeting: Internationalization Working Group Teleconference 15:34:56 Date: 28 March 2013 15:35:19 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2013Mar/0024.html 15:35:35 Chair: Addison Phillips 15:35:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:35:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 15:36:32 agenda+ I18N-ISSUE-246: computing storage limits in ITS 15:36:49 agenda+ Bidi Change Proposal 15:36:58 agenda+ Charmod-Norm 15:37:06 zakim, agenda? 15:37:06 I see 11 items remaining on the agenda: 15:37:07 1. WTITMA [from aphillip] 15:37:07 2. caseless matching in css3 fonts [from aphillip] 15:37:07 3. css3-text-decoration skipping spaces [from aphillip] 15:37:07 4. language ranges with multiple subtags [from aphillip] 15:37:07 5. locale attribute in HTML [from aphillip] 15:37:08 6. bidi change proposal [from aphillip] 15:37:08 7. charmod-norm [from aphillip] 15:37:08 8. ITS issues? [from aphillip] 15:37:08 9. I18N-ISSUE-246: computing storage limits in ITS [from aphillip] 15:37:08 10. Bidi Change Proposal [from aphillip] 15:37:08 11. Charmod-Norm [from aphillip] 15:37:44 agenda- 1 15:37:51 agenda- 1 15:37:56 agenda- 2 15:38:00 agenda- 3 15:38:03 agenda- 4 15:38:07 agenda- 5 15:38:12 agenda- 6 15:38:16 agenda- 7 15:38:20 agenda- 8 15:38:22 agenda? 15:38:35 zakim, this will be I18N 15:38:35 "I18N" matches I18N_CoreWG()11:00AM, and I18N_MLW WG(LT)10:00AM, aphillip 15:38:51 zakim, this will be I18N_CoreWG 15:38:51 ok, aphillip; I see I18N_CoreWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 38 minutes ago 15:49:15 aphillip has joined #i18n 15:50:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:50:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 15:50:50 Regrets: Aharon 15:52:30 I18N_CoreWG()11:00AM has now started 15:52:35 +aphillip 15:52:37 +??P3 15:56:30 Ning has joined #i18n 15:56:47 Yves_ has joined #i18n 15:56:58 present+ Yves 15:59:31 zakim, dial richard 15:59:32 ok, r12a; the call is being made 15:59:32 +Richard 15:59:57 zakim, who is here? 15:59:57 On the phone I see fsasaki (muted), aphillip, Richard 15:59:58 On IRC I see Yves_, Ning, aphillip, RRSAgent, fsasaki, r12a, Zakim, trackbot 16:02:00 Norbert has joined #i18n 16:02:23 + +1.303.945.aaaa 16:02:35 zakim, who's here ? 16:02:35 On the phone I see fsasaki, aphillip, Richard, +1.303.945.aaaa 16:02:36 On IRC I see Norbert, Yves_, Ning, aphillip, RRSAgent, fsasaki, r12a, Zakim, trackbot 16:02:44 +Norbert 16:04:20 Scribe: Addison Phillips 16:04:24 ScribeNick: aphillip 16:04:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 16:04:43 Topic: Agenda 16:04:45 agenda? 16:05:01 Topic: Action Items 16:05:59 ACTION-170: richard: ported document to HTML5 16:05:59 Notes added to ACTION-170 Coordinate with richard regarding KLReq. 16:06:18 ... improved English, sent comments off, had responses 16:06:25 Ning_ has joined #i18n 16:06:27 ... waiting for all authors to join IG before we process 16:06:33 s/process/proceed/ 16:06:52 ... encouraging folks to join quickly so that next week we can publish FPWD for wide review 16:06:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 16:07:17 Ning_ has left #i18n 16:07:29 close ACTION-194 16:07:29 Closed ACTION-194 Poll for heartburn for keeping call at 1600Z. 16:08:27 ACTION-196: due end of April 16:08:27 Notes added to ACTION-196 Request fequest feedback on ruby use cases with an eye towards publishing updated version in two weeks. 16:09:10 Topic: Info Share 16:09:40 http://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Html-bidi-isolation-new 16:09:57 richard: largely rewritten this 16:10:03 ... have comments from Aharon 16:10:09 ... need to integrate those still 16:10:13 ... made lots of progress 16:10:29 addison: others should comment? 16:10:38 richard: yes, but there will be changes 16:11:04 agenda? 16:11:23 zakim, take up agendum 9 16:11:23 agendum 9. "I18N-ISSUE-246: computing storage limits in ITS" taken up [from aphillip] 16:11:38 felix: two issues here 16:11:54 ... 246 and 247 16:11:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0368.html 16:12:00 ... 247 is line break type 16:12:09 ... addison's email in the thread above 16:12:52 scribe: fsasaki 16:13:09 addison: didn't seem to make sense to me to say that there is a default encoding 16:13:09 zakim, who's here? 16:13:09 On the phone I see fsasaki (muted), aphillip, Richard, Yves, Norbert 16:13:11 On IRC I see Norbert, Yves_, aphillip, RRSAgent, fsasaki, r12a, Zakim, trackbot 16:13:34 .. if the encoding attribute is not here, you can say many things about what the count is in - but it is not actually said in the spec 16:13:45 .. the counting thing doesn't make sense, not very well described 16:13:54 .. just worked on a unicode FAQ about counting 16:14:00 .. understand the original goal 16:14:24 .. but in many use cases you cannot count. e.g. in utf-16 you cannot have odd number byte count 16:14:35 .. so make the code unit count in the encoding 16:14:52 .. or in other cases you count graphemes or other items 16:15:03 .. I have seen various cases like that 16:15:17 .. graphemes are hard because there is some impresise things 16:15:20 Najib-ma has joined #i18n 16:15:31 .. but code units are reasonable to count 16:15:37 .. esp. with utf-8 16:16:27 norbert: you say the xxx is implementation defined 16:16:39 addison: ITS does not define what the yyy means 16:16:58 norbert: addison's statement is a correct summary of the state of affairs 16:17:05 .. question is it is useful in the spec 16:17:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 16:17:29 felix: would the re-write be useful? 16:17:40 yves: originaal intent was just to mesure the storage 16:17:47 .. e.g. display was not a use case here 16:17:57 .. agree that reference to byte is probably not right 16:18:23 .. would be fine to use a kind of unit that would be not byte 16:18:34 .. beyond that not sure what the problem is in additoin 16:18:48 addision: norbert was trying to say what we require in specs 16:18:54 .. would be fine if we did that 16:18:59 zakim, who's noisy? 16:19:05 .. but ITS gave reasons why you don't do that 16:19:09 r12a, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: fsasaki (14%), aphillip (50%) 16:19:25 .. if you can't define taht, you should spell out it is implementation defined 16:19:38 .. you cannot say that utf-8 is the default 16:19:54 yves: in the spec we say the utf-8 encoding attribute is utf-8 16:20:04 .. the implementation using that is not the ITS processor 16:20:17 .. the implementations may or may not support utf-8 16:20:26 .. I understand we want to encourage utf-8 16:20:42 .. I thikn stefan wanted to convey a "should" in his not to encourage thtat 16:20:56 .. but the ITS processor is not processing that 16:21:04 .. but at the same time we want to have a default value 16:21:11 .. it is just a piece of information 16:21:24 addision: if the attribute is ommitted it is utf-8? 16:21:31 yves: the string, not the encoding 16:22:58 felix trying to explain why "semantics" is not an intend of ITS here and in many places 16:23:24 addison: understand, but the ITS processor has values and gives them to a translation system 16:23:44 .. you want to define the semantics of the values enough so that you have meaning 16:23:56 .. that is enough for non unicode, multi byte encodings 16:24:11 .. it is more problemantic if I need to convey other types of limits 16:24:36 .. if the link between character encoding and xxx is not clear defined it is a problem 16:24:50 yves: agree that reference to bytes is an issue, code units would be ok 16:25:17 addison: you can use utf-16 or utf-32 to enforce that 16:25:23 A storageEncoding attribute. It contains the name of the character encoding form used to calculate the number of code units of the selected text (cf. CharMod). The name MUST be one of the names or aliases listed in the IANA Character Sets registry [IANA Character Sets]. If omitted, the character encoding is undefined and the storageSize attribute's interpretation is implementation defined. Interpretation of the storageEncoding attribute is implementation [CUT] 16:25:24 scribe missed norbert's comment 16:25:36 (norbert, feel free to add) 16:25:47 addison: above was my suggesstion 16:26:12 .. say that the whole thing is implementation defined 16:26:18 yves: the values are defeind by ITS 16:26:28 .. we communicate the values to the tool 16:26:33 .. we need a default value 16:26:50 addision: the ITS process does jsut pass the information? 16:26:53 yves: right 16:27:08 addision: is it better to have an empty value or utf-8? 16:27:15 yves: having utf-8 is better 16:27:27 .. same for other ITS items 16:27:50 A storageSize attribute. It contains the maximum number of units the text of the selected node is allowed in storage. Units are generally code units in a given character encoding. Interpretation is implementation defined. 16:27:56 yves: I can try to rephrase the note that stephan was putting out, taking in account the change for the byte 16:28:46 felix: sounds good, let's see where we are next week 16:28:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html fsasaki 16:29:08 ACTION: yves: coordinate with stephen et al in ITS to phrase the text 16:29:08 Error finding 'yves'. You can review and register nicknames at . 16:29:36 topic: http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/247 16:29:42 felix: the other issue is 247 16:29:44 ... line-break type 16:29:58 ... not resolved yet, but not aware of current state 16:30:22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0301.html 16:30:43 addison: norbert, your take? 16:30:56 norbert: catching up... not used to this type of spec 16:31:16 yves: application checks the length might run into linebreak 16:31:26 ... probably normalized as \n 16:31:39 ... but original application might use, e.g. \r\n 16:31:43 ... so count could be different 16:32:36 norbert: so you could write into spec that it could be \n, \r, \r\n, etc. 16:32:42 ... what about
? 16:32:51 yves: there is a list of values in the spec 16:33:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 16:33:12 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#storagesize 16:33:25 yves: here's the link to that poart of the spec 16:33:51 "The possible values are: cr for CARRIAGE RETURN (U+000D), lf for LINE FEED (U+000A), crlf for CARRIAGE RETURN (U+000D) followed by LINE FEED (U+000A), or nel for NEXT LINE (U+0085). The default value is lf." 16:33:53 s/poart/part/ 16:34:03 yves: can work on writing update of the note 16:35:00 felix: can you (yves) work on updating and coordinating, and if we need to, have another shared call next week? 16:35:04 (general agreement) 16:35:11 JcK has joined #i18n 16:35:26 felix: one more minute on ITS issues? 16:35:26 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0388.html 16:35:38 felix: above list on winter@ 16:35:43 ... this is about directionality 16:35:50 ... tried to implement your proposals 16:35:55 ... let me know what you think 16:36:43 ACTION: addison: remind folks to review ITS item in the winter 388 email for next time (4 April) 16:36:43 Created ACTION-200 - Remind folks to review ITS item in the winter 388 email for next time (4 April) [on Addison Phillips - due 2013-04-04]. 16:37:03 felix: related to three comments about direction 16:37:10 scribe: fsasaki 16:37:14 agenda? 16:37:28 richard: which version of ITS to look at? 16:37:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0389.html 16:37:36 ... link from yves above doesn't have it 16:37:39 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#directionality 16:37:41 ... what's the undated link 16:37:47 felix: see above 16:37:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 16:38:19 agenda? 16:38:53 topic: bidi 16:39:03 addison: no discussion this week, 16:39:11 topic: charmod-norm 16:39:25 addison: anything to discuss this week? 16:39:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html fsasaki 16:40:25 Topic: AOB? 16:40:34 richard: comment for felix 16:40:35 richard: one more comment for felix 16:40:43 .. "quote" in example 48 16:40:52 .. needs change in example 47 and 45 as well 16:40:55 felix: thanks, will do 16:41:09 action: felix to change example 47 and 45 in ITS spec 16:41:10 Created ACTION-201 - Change example 47 and 45 in ITS spec [on Felix Sasaki - due 2013-04-04]. 16:41:19 REMINDER: next week at 1500 UTC 16:42:01 -Yves 16:42:02 -aphillip 16:42:04 -Norbert 16:42:05 -fsasaki 16:42:13 zakim, drop richard 16:42:13 Richard is being disconnected 16:42:15 I18N_CoreWG()11:00AM has ended 16:42:15 Attendees were aphillip, fsasaki, Richard, +1.303.945.aaaa, Norbert, Yves 16:42:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html fsasaki 16:43:50 Najib-ma has left #i18n 16:49:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-i18n-minutes.html aphillip 16:49:50 zakim, bye 16:49:50 Zakim has left #i18n 18:47:35 r12apad has joined #i18n