13:59:01 RRSAgent has joined #gld 13:59:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/03/14-gld-irc 13:59:09 zakim, this will be gld 13:59:09 ok, PhilA; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:59:16 Hello, PhilA 13:59:21 Hi HadleyBeeman 13:59:27 olyerickson has joined #gld 13:59:30 PhilA has changed the topic to: GLD Weekly call 13:59:35 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started 13:59:39 zakim, code? 13:59:39 the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA 13:59:42 +bhyland 13:59:56 @PhilA code = 45394 14:00:07 +[IPcaller] 14:00:13 zakim, ipcaller is me 14:00:13 +PhilA; got it 14:00:43 boris has joined #gld 14:00:51 gatemezi has joined #gld 14:00:57 BenediktKaempgen has joined #gld 14:01:08 zakim, code? 14:01:08 the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), boris 14:01:18 + +1.440.389.aaaa 14:01:31 zakim, aaaa is me 14:01:31 +HadleyBeeman; got it 14:01:34 + +34.60.062.aabb 14:01:38 + +33.4.93.00.aacc 14:01:40 zakim, aabb is me 14:01:41 +boris; got it 14:01:49 zakim, mute me 14:01:50 boris should now be muted 14:02:00 martinA has joined #gld 14:02:01 +[IPcaller] 14:02:24 zakim, [ipcaller] is me. 14:02:26 +olyerickson; got it 14:02:26 +??P22 14:02:36 zakim, ??P22 is me 14:02:52 +BenediktKaempgen; got it 14:02:52 +??P24 14:02:59 zakim, ??P24 is me 14:03:00 +martinA; got it 14:03:22 JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld 14:03:29 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130314 14:03:31 + +1.301.943.aadd 14:04:20 zakim, aadd is mike_pendleton 14:04:20 +mike_pendleton; got it 14:04:25 zakim, who is on the call? 14:04:25 On the phone I see bhyland, PhilA, HadleyBeeman, boris (muted), gatemezi, olyerickson, BenediktKaempgen, martinA, mike_pendleton 14:04:31 +??P28 14:04:35 ha ha 14:04:44 Zakim, ??P28 is me 14:04:44 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:05:29 scribe: PhilA 14:05:58 chair: Bernadette 14:06:21 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0130.html 14:06:23 Zakim, mute me 14:06:23 JoaoPauloAlmeida should now be muted 14:06:36 Last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-07 14:06:44 +1 14:06:47 +1 14:07:11 +1 14:07:14 Woot! 14:07:16 bhyland: key things were the resolutions to go to LC for DCAT and QB 14:07:36 bhyland: Anyone from the DCAT call on Friday want to comment? 14:07:51 DCAT breakout session minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-078 14:07:53 q? 14:08:30 s / http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-078 / http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-078 14:08:47 www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-08 14:08:48 PhilA: We got through a lot of things quickly and efficiently 14:09:15 QB LCWD is at http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/ 14:09:37 DCAT LCWD is at http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ 14:10:03 bhyland: Discusses new PubRules about LCWD and FPWD... 14:10:27 ... there was some discussion about parts being automated from Mercurial 14:11:09 HadleyBeeman: In going through everything, I was looking for the announcement for getting ORG to Last Call. I can't find it - we didn't announce to W3C Chairs that we'd done this 14:11:17 bhyland: This is on you PhilA 14:11:23 PhilA: Yes, I rememebr doing this 14:11:42 HadleyBeeman: Need to send something to W3C Chairs about QB and DCAT 14:11:54 HadleyBeeman: I need to state what our dependencies are 14:11:58 q+ 14:12:09 We can't hear you HadleyBeeman 14:12:21 So this was a step we missed back in October ... 14:12:53 HadleyBeeman: We missed this step in October, we need to do it now. I need to know what dependencies we have. There were discussions with PROV 14:13:04 yes 14:13:30 Charter http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/charter 14:14:09 MariosMeimaris has joined #gld 14:14:47 HadleyBeeman: We need to explicitly put it in the e-mail to the other chairs those chairs listed in the charter 14:14:57 +[IPcaller] 14:15:13 zakim, IPcaller is me 14:15:13 +MariosMeimaris; got it 14:16:04 -gatemezi 14:16:09 But we only MUST notify the LISTED dependencies, is that correct? 14:16:16 PhilA: Offers advice on others to write to (OKFN, Jeanne etc.) 14:16:27 bhyland: LC closing date is 8th April 14:16:34 Yes, Olyerickson. 14:16:40 k, thx 14:16:48 Though its in our interest to notify others too, because we want lots of comments :) 14:16:55 + +33.4.93.00.aaee 14:17:03 danbri has joined #gld 14:17:14 Question: regarding DCAT vocab, what about the updateed file of the vocab? 14:17:26 zakim, who is on the call? 14:17:26 On the phone I see bhyland, PhilA, HadleyBeeman, boris (muted), olyerickson, BenediktKaempgen, martinA, mike_pendleton, JoaoPauloAlmeida (muted), MariosMeimaris, +33.4.93.00.aaee 14:17:29 bhyland: Congrats to editors and people who worked to get the vocabs out of the door 14:17:42 zakim, aaee is gatemezi 14:17:42 +gatemezi; got it 14:18:04 topic: Glossary 14:18:14 bhyland: Agreed that it will be a Note 14:18:17 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html 14:18:18 YES to glossary 14:18:23 ... thanks to Ghislain for his help 14:18:33 Zakim, unmute me 14:18:33 JoaoPauloAlmeida should no longer be muted 14:18:40 +q 14:18:41 q? 14:18:44 bhyland: I'll add 5 start linked data. We're up to 115 terms 14:18:48 ack gatemezi 14:18:59 ack JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:19:07 One minor issues: "conneg" is a common synonym to Content Negotiation (but is not listed) 14:19:21 JoaoPauloAlmeida: The issue I mentioned about closed world assumptions - it still looks wrong to me 14:19:35 bhyland: I'll look at that - and pass the wording past you 14:19:39 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:20:20 +??P6 14:20:28 my call always drop after a while… sorry about that. 14:20:29 Q 14:20:36 Zakim, ??P6 is me 14:20:36 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:20:39 bhyland: conneg, got it. I can take it from the linked data book unless you have an alternative olyerickson 14:21:15 olyerickson: My point was that you have content negotiation - and the wording is fine. It's just the term 'conneg' that needs to be in there, perhaps referring to conent negotiation 14:21:21 bhyland: Got it, thanks olyerickson 14:21:35 rrsagent, make logs public 14:22:09 bhyland: V grateful to Ghislain for putting in the links/references 14:22:18 Request: Make Linked Data Glossary a Working NOte 14:22:41 As long as the W3C wonks are happy, I'm happy with it being a "WG Note" 14:22:52 bhyland: PROPOSED RESOLUTION That the Glossary be published as a Working Group Note 14:22:54 Definition of a working group note: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#WGNote 14:23:29 PhilA: All Working Group Notes are subject to revision. Publishing this version doesn't stop us from later updating it. 14:23:46 … there is no last call period. People are welcome to comment & editors will update it. 14:24:15 By reference, the PROV Group did a heap of Notes, see http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-prov-overview-20130312/ 14:24:22 bhyland: I saw a lot of Notes from the PROV WG 14:24:36 bhyland: PROPOSED RESOLUTION That the Glossary be published as a Working Group Note 14:24:36 They also don't have lives... ;) 14:24:39 +1 14:24:41 +1 to publish it as WG Note 14:24:46 +1 14:24:49 +1 14:24:51 +1 (if @@TODO is done) 14:24:52 RESOLUTION That the Glossary be published as a Working Group Note 14:25:01 RESOLUTION: That the Glossary be published as a Working Group Note 14:26:11 topic: Best Practices document 14:26:15 See https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html 14:26:33 bhyland: There was a lot of work done a year ago nad it's lain dormant since then. 14:26:56 bhyland: I want to tidy up some of the language etc. and there's more that needs to be added 14:27:07 ... I'm hoping I can make it more readable 14:27:33 ... if this WG doesn't move it to FPWD soon then we won't be on a firm footing to get this through the rec track 14:27:40 ... which I'm keen to do 14:28:03 ... it's up to the WG to decide what it wants to do and what it wants to achieve 14:28:24 ... lengthy mail from Dave Reynolds about procurement (suggesting it shouldn't be there) 14:28:40 q? 14:28:41 ... procuremetn may be a topic for a CG or similar 14:29:32 See the timeline summary chart for our group: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Main_Page 14:29:38 bhyland: When Hadley joined, she worked back and said, right, the docs we hope to be CR by the end of May, need to be at stage X by date Y 14:30:02 ... if things don't make FPWD today and then to LC at the end of March we won't make it 14:30:42 bhyland: FPWD means we as a group feel good enough about the doc that it should be released to the public 14:30:46 ... it's not last call 14:31:02 ... if we don't get it in the pipeline it won't come out the other end 14:31:24 ... arguing over the doc can then be used as part of the extension discussion 14:32:12 PhilA: Promised URI wording but fine to see the current BP doc move to FPWD status today. 14:32:28 zakim, unmute me 14:32:28 boris should no longer be muted 14:32:33 q+ 14:32:43 "Policy" is a pretty strong word 14:32:44 http://philarcher.org/diary/2013/uripersistence/ 14:33:06 Q+ 14:33:31 action: PhilA to make good on promises to add wording to URI persistence section etc. 14:33:31 Created ACTION-104 - Make good on promises to add wording to URI persistence section etc. [on Phil Archer - due 2013-03-21]. 14:33:52 Mike_Pendleton: What you;re saying makes sense - let's do it 14:34:15 boris: I just wanted to say that yes, we can push it to FPWD and we can get some feedback from the community 14:34:25 boris: And thank you Bernadette for your recent changes 14:34:54 bhyland: I didn't want people not to recognise it, but I cut some stuff out where people had asked questions but not offered answers 14:35:02 bhyland: Happy to put stauff back in 14:35:03 Shouldn't the title of the document be: Best Practices for Publishing *Government *Linked Data? 14:35:19 Q? 14:35:23 Q? 14:35:28 Q? 14:35:30 Q? 14:35:33 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: That the Best Practices document be prepared and published as a first public working draft 14:35:38 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:35:45 zakim, ack boris 14:35:45 I see olyerickson on the speaker queue 14:35:46 Q? 14:35:49 Q? 14:35:54 ack olyerickson 14:35:56 +??P0 14:36:07 Zakim, ??P0 is me 14:36:07 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:36:11 olyerickson: There were a couple of questions I had around persistent URIs 14:36:26 ... do we really mean *policy* or do we mean something a little less formal? 14:36:38 ... I'm not sure we need *policy* 14:36:39 q+ 14:36:49 q+ 14:36:56 olyerickson: I've got some wording on persistent IDs that I wrote for a different project 14:37:04 I'll send that to you back channel that might be useful 14:38:57 ack]\ 14:38:59 ack 14:39:00 q? 14:39:06 ack PhilA 14:39:40 phila: People meeting at a pub can have a "policy" 14:40:56 I offer to explain what I mean by use of the word "policy" 14:41:41 bhyland: I can suggest that there's a URI policy within an organisation, and everyone will tailor their policy to their needs 14:42:02 ... e.g. NCBO has a different policy to Astra Zeneca for example 14:42:11 ... I'd say you need one, they're good and here's why they matter 14:42:41 ... purlz suffers from the name being a project and an acronym 14:43:07 ... really just want to flag to include 'this is why they matter' 14:43:19 ... want to include that Purls are useful for governments 14:43:22 gatemezi has joined #gld 14:43:33 ... then URI design principles are more like edicts 14:43:50 k 14:44:03 decrapulate 14:44:28 +1 to hg hate 14:44:38 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: That the Best Practices document be prepared and published as a first public working draft 14:44:43 +1 14:44:46 +1 14:44:48 +1 14:44:53 RESOLUTION: That the Best Practices document be prepared and published as a first public working draft 14:45:04 +1 14:45:07 +1 14:45:34 Spring skiing is pretty icy and fast ;) 14:46:14 -boris 14:46:26 PhilA: I think you can go to first LC directly. 14:47:00 PhilA: I prefer to see Tuesday's release be deemed FPWD, followed by LC if ready by end of March 14:47:16 +boris 14:47:19 All agreed 14:48:26 To confirm: FPWD to be published Tuesday; Last call transition discussion next week and (hopefully) last call publication on the 26th. (For Best Practice) 14:48:33 bhyland: So, we have the glossary through and the BP doc 14:48:47 ???? 14:49:43 topic: Future meeting agendas 14:50:21 i will 14:50:55 Anyone available to formally review the BP doc in FPWD state 14:51:11 I'm not sure what the "ask" is...for BP reviewers? 14:51:19 PhilA: I suggest we ask Michael Hausenblas 14:51:21 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:51:23 i can do it as well 14:51:43 bhyland: and some from the GLD. We need people who are not editors 14:51:53 Suggested MichaelH but there should others in the GLD WG 14:52:09 PhilA will review the parts he's not writing 14:52:09 PhilA: I'll review that which I'm not writing 14:52:21 Agreed: MichaelH, Marios, Hadley, Phil, MikeP 14:52:21 bhyland: and you Mike_Pendleton? 14:52:30 yes 14:52:34 I will look at Phila's P-URI stuff and the URI design stuff (which is changed from what I contributed) 14:52:58 +??P0 14:53:00 bhyland: It's not that long and not that techie 14:53:02 Zakim, ??P0 is me 14:53:02 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:53:09 topic: Face to face meeting 14:53:33 bhyland: Did anyone get anything accepted at the European data Forum 14:53:34 q? 14:53:38 ack bhyland 14:53:38 I think Ghislain 14:53:49 http://2013.data-forum.eu/program 14:53:52 gatemezi: I had something accepted 14:54:34 Open Data Session 14:54:39 -olyerickson 14:54:58 olyerickson has left #gld 14:56:20 bhyland: Thanks for the pointer 14:56:50 bhyland: I'm going to send round updates on the community directory 14:57:16 ... we're putting quite a bit of effort into getting the distributed model for that 14:57:34 ... people will be able to publish their own .ttl files and we'll pick them up without then having to login etc. 14:57:37 q? 14:57:48 bhyland: I'd like to have that done by the time of he EDF 14:58:02 q? 14:58:50 http://www.w3.org/2013/02/vrc.html 14:58:58 Topic: Brief about Vocabulary group 14:59:07 For your information: Germany has now published a government data portal. It has been presented at CEBIT. Check it out at: https://www.govdata.de/ (so far only in German, unfortunately) 14:59:54 sorry, wrong topic, thought it to be announcements. 15:00:01 PhilA: Taking Vocabularies our of Rec Track process in WG's 15:00:04 danbri has joined #gld 15:00:07 http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/ 15:00:39 Topic: Open Data on the Web 15:00:54 Jim King is the headliner, the Adobe PDF spec inventor. Cool. 15:01:30 Everyone else who submitted & is accepted will get 5 or 10 minutes. 15:01:41 … everyone welcome to come along. 15:01:42 fadmaa has joined #gld 15:01:47 + +3539149aaff 15:01:59 Zakim, aaff is me 15:01:59 +fadmaa; got it 15:02:20 thanks 15:02:21 -mike_pendleton 15:02:22 thanks 15:02:22 -HadleyBeeman 15:02:22 -PhilA 15:02:23 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 15:02:24 -bhyland 15:02:25 -gatemezi 15:02:25 -BenediktKaempgen 15:02:28 -martinA 15:02:29 -boris 15:02:31 -fadmaa 15:02:34 martinA has left #gld 15:02:38 -MariosMeimaris 15:02:39 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended 15:02:39 Attendees were bhyland, PhilA, +1.440.389.aaaa, HadleyBeeman, +34.60.062.aabb, boris, olyerickson, gatemezi, BenediktKaempgen, martinA, +1.301.943.aadd, mike_pendleton, 15:02:39 ... JoaoPauloAlmeida, MariosMeimaris, +33.4.93.00.aaee, +3539149aaff, fadmaa 15:02:40 @PhilA, thanks for scribing. I trust you're fine to publish minutes. 15:02:44 MariosMeimaris has left #gld 15:02:57 will do bhyland 15:03:36 Thanks, PhilA! 15:05:38 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started 15:05:46 + +3539149aaaa 15:05:57 - +3539149aaaa 15:05:58 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended 15:05:58 Attendees were +3539149aaaa 15:11:06 PhilA has left #gld 15:27:20 annew has joined #gld 15:54:43 danbri has joined #gld 16:20:15 danbri has joined #gld 17:02:02 Zakim has left #gld 17:06:19 cygri has joined #gld 17:06:52 cygri_ has joined #gld 18:49:00 danbri has joined #gld