IRC log of dap on 2013-03-06

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:48:23 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dap
14:48:23 [RRSAgent]
logging to
14:48:25 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs world
14:48:25 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #dap
14:48:27 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be DAP
14:48:27 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see UW_DAP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes
14:48:28 [trackbot]
Meeting: Device APIs Working Group Teleconference
14:48:29 [trackbot]
Date: 06 March 2013
14:48:44 [fjh]
14:48:56 [fjh]
fjh has changed the topic to: dap 3279 ; agenda
14:49:12 [fjh]
Chair: Frederick_Hirsch
14:49:20 [fjh]
Present+ Frederick_Hirsch
14:50:46 [fjh]
Regrets+ Milan_Patel
14:54:51 [dom]
Regrets+ Bryan_Sullivan
14:58:01 [Zakim]
UW_DAP()10:00AM has now started
14:58:09 [Zakim]
14:58:16 [fjh]
zakim, [IPCaller] is me
14:58:16 [Zakim]
+fjh; got it
14:59:21 [Zakim]
15:00:20 [AnssiK]
AnssiK has joined #dap
15:00:36 [dcheng3]
dcheng3 has joined #dap
15:00:38 [fjh]
zakim, mute josh_soref
15:00:38 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should now be muted
15:00:58 [fjh]
zakim, unmute josh_soref
15:00:59 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should no longer be muted
15:01:09 [Zakim]
15:01:15 [AnssiK]
zakim, ??P11 is me
15:01:15 [Zakim]
+AnssiK; got it
15:01:21 [AnssiK]
Present+ Anssi_Kostiainen
15:02:25 [Zakim]
15:02:33 [dcheng3]
Present+ Diana_Cheng
15:02:52 [Zakim]
+ +1.858.750.aaaa
15:03:02 [Cathy]
Cathy has joined #dap
15:03:03 [Zakim]
15:03:09 [dom]
Zakim, ??P1 is me
15:03:09 [Zakim]
+dom; got it
15:03:30 [gmandyam]
gmandyam has joined #dap
15:03:31 [fjh]
zakim, where is 858?
15:03:31 [Zakim]
North American dialing code 1.858 is California
15:03:51 [Josh_Soref]
Scribe: Josh_Soref
15:03:52 [dom]
Zakim, aaaa is gmandyam
15:03:52 [Zakim]
+gmandyam; got it
15:04:34 [Zakim]
15:04:35 [Zakim]
+ +1.720.934.aabb
15:04:46 [richt]
zakim, IPcaller is me
15:04:46 [Zakim]
+richt; got it
15:04:53 [richt]
Present+ Rich_Tibbett
15:04:56 [fjh]
zakim, where is 720?
15:04:56 [Zakim]
North American dialing code 1.720 is Colorado
15:04:58 [Zakim]
+ +1.781.362.aacc
15:05:03 [Cathy]
zakim, aacc is me
15:05:03 [Zakim]
+Cathy; got it
15:05:05 [dom]
Zakim, aabb is ClarkeSteven
15:05:05 [Zakim]
+ClarkeSteven; got it
15:05:07 [Cathy]
Present+ Cathy_Chan
15:05:53 [fjh]
Topic: Administrative
15:05:55 [Clarke]
Clarke has joined #dap
15:06:16 [fjh]
Please use this link to update phone number mapping for zakim
15:06:41 [fjh]
Note: Next meeting is regular ET time; this makes it an hour earlier in Europe due to different in daylight savings time, see
15:07:16 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: i'm unlikely to call in on the 27th (PassoveR)
15:07:22 [Josh_Soref]
15:07:41 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: Minutes Approval
15:07:46 [fjh]
Approve minutes from 27 February 2013
15:07:46 [fjh]
15:07:47 [fjh]
Approve (revised) minutes from 20 February 2013
15:07:47 [fjh]
15:07:47 [fjh]
proposed RESOLUTION: Minutes from 20 Feb (revised) and 27 February 2013 are approved
15:07:56 [Josh_Soref]
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 20 Feb (revised) and 27 February 2013 are approved
15:08:08 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: F2F Planning
15:08:15 [fjh]
F2F Planning
15:08:15 [fjh]
Questionnaire completes 12 March,
15:08:20 [fjh]
15:08:26 [Josh_Soref]
s/F2F Planning//
15:08:44 [dtran]
dtran has joined #dap
15:08:52 [Josh_Soref]
dcheng3: i still have both reserved
15:08:55 [dtran]
Present+ Dzung_Tran
15:09:09 [fjh]
Deadline for deciding on TPAC 2013? ( Nov 18-22 in Shenzhen - )
15:09:23 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i think we need to know way in advance to decide, because of Visas
15:09:40 [Clarke]
Present+ Clarke_Stevens
15:10:02 [Josh_Soref]
dom: usually WGs are asked in March/April if they want to participate in TPAC
15:10:25 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: the June F2F was questionable, i think we can lock that down
15:10:38 [Josh_Soref]
... if we don't progress on Web Intents, we might not need TPAC
15:10:48 [Josh_Soref]
dom: i don't know that there's a schedule on this question
15:10:55 [Josh_Soref]
... but it would probably be asked in April
15:11:01 [Josh_Soref]
Zakim, mute me
15:11:01 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should now be muted
15:11:14 [Josh_Soref]
... intending to meet isn't necessarily a strong commitment
15:11:18 [Josh_Soref]
... we could cancel later
15:11:32 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i mentioned that the Intents/Activity people were supposed to discuss shortly
15:11:43 [Josh_Soref]
... i'd assume we'll know by the first week of April if we'd want to meet
15:12:03 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i'm assuming Dusseldorf will work out well
15:12:10 [Josh_Soref]
topic: Network Service Discovery
15:12:15 [fjh]
Status on updates and publication of WD?
15:12:15 [fjh]
additional discussion:
15:12:15 [fjh]
15:12:15 [fjh]
15:13:22 [Josh_Soref]
richt: i'm traveling until Friday
15:13:25 [Josh_Soref]
... back Monday
15:13:31 [Josh_Soref]
... i have a backlog of changes
15:13:53 [Josh_Soref]
Cathy: re: XXX comments earlier
15:14:01 [Josh_Soref]
... discovering UPnP device types v. Service types
15:14:01 [fjh]
15:14:21 [Josh_Soref]
... w/ device types, controllers typically are more interested in devices as opposed to services
15:14:31 [Josh_Soref]
... but that would be a significant change to the UPnP mechanism in the spec
15:14:36 [Josh_Soref]
... we need to consider implications
15:14:40 [Josh_Soref]
richt: i agree
15:14:58 [Josh_Soref]
... Cathy, based on your experience, it might be a good idea for you to edit that in
15:15:03 [Josh_Soref]
Cathy: i'll work with you on that
15:15:15 [Josh_Soref]
richt: it'd be cool to get you involved in editing
15:15:24 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: the change offers simplifications/solves problems
15:15:40 [Josh_Soref]
... Cathy, there's no need for you to get extra permissions, since we're using git
15:15:48 [Josh_Soref]
richt: we're using overview-src.
15:16:00 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: Cathy, do you need an action?
15:16:02 [Josh_Soref]
Cathy: no
15:16:10 [Josh_Soref]
richt: i'd prefer discussing on list before we make changes?
15:16:14 [Josh_Soref]
Cathy: sure
15:16:32 [fjh]
+1 to proposal on list before editing document, thanks Cathy for volunteering
15:17:06 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: Cathy will make progress on device-types/service-types
15:17:06 [richt]
I think you captured it well, Josh_Soref.
15:17:11 [Josh_Soref]
... and richt will work on the backlog
15:17:17 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: Contacts
15:17:20 [fjh]
Sys Apps draft -
15:17:31 [fjh]
Pick Contacts Implementation status, original DAP Contacts implementation status?
15:17:39 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: marcos asked about implementation
15:17:45 [Josh_Soref]
Zakim, unmute me
15:17:45 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should no longer be muted
15:17:54 [Josh_Soref]
dom: afaik it was never implemented by anyone
15:18:08 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: it's implemented in the original form by Cordova
15:18:15 [dom]
15:18:19 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: we don't have any record of this
15:18:42 [Josh_Soref]
dom: we do, thanks to AnssiK
15:18:53 [fjh]
ok, thanks Dom for the pointer, and AnssiK for the wiki work
15:18:54 [Josh_Soref]
richt: which are we talking about?
15:19:00 [Josh_Soref]
richt: we have a mozilla implementation
15:19:04 [Josh_Soref]
dom: but that was an addon
15:19:34 [Josh_Soref]
[ Josh_Soref summarizes concerns about SysApps doc ]
15:20:13 [Clarke]
Clarke has joined #dap
15:20:20 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: thanks fjh for getting them to rename their spec
15:20:48 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i'm not sure if we can give feedback
15:20:56 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: some WGs will be asked to give feedback
15:21:04 [Josh_Soref]
... but all WGs can give unsolicited feedback
15:21:10 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: HTML Media Capture
15:21:16 [fjh]
resolving LC comments,
15:21:39 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i gave shepazu a 2 week time window this time, i should have done that last time
15:21:47 [Josh_Soref]
dom: yes, that's good
15:21:51 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: thanks fjh for pushing Tracker
15:22:00 [Josh_Soref]
... i'll update the draft after we close shepazu's issues
15:22:08 [Josh_Soref]
... i'll add a status section about Exit criteria
15:22:15 [Josh_Soref]
... i'll give shepazu a couple of days
15:22:48 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i think we made a mistake in our publications in not including Exit Criteria/At Risk in our documents
15:22:55 [Josh_Soref]
... i don't think we need to update the status retroactively
15:23:05 [Josh_Soref]
... we won't go back to CR, we'll just go to PR
15:23:12 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: you gave Mar 18 as the deadline to shepazu
15:23:16 [Josh_Soref]
... i won't touch it before then
15:23:36 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: dom, can go to PR w/o having that section in the document, as it's documented elsewhere
15:23:41 [Josh_Soref]
dom: that shouldn't be a problem
15:23:45 [Josh_Soref]
Zakim, mute me
15:23:45 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should now be muted
15:23:55 [Josh_Soref]
dom: you're mixing Battery and Vibration
15:24:03 [Josh_Soref]
... but AnssiK is talking about HTML Media Capture
15:24:29 [Josh_Soref]
i/mistake/Topic: Transition Request process/
15:24:39 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: when we do transitions
15:24:45 [Josh_Soref]
... we need to include status/at risk
15:24:52 [Josh_Soref]
... we need to guess when we're done w/ LC comments
15:25:02 [Josh_Soref]
... we need to add Exit Criteria to the Status section
15:25:15 [Josh_Soref]
... and then having seen that, we publish as CR w/ transition request
15:25:25 [Josh_Soref]
... i just wanted to confirm w/ dom that we don't need to republish
15:25:35 [Josh_Soref]
... going forward, every doc should have status when we go to CR
15:25:41 [Josh_Soref]
dom: that's correct
15:26:02 [Josh_Soref]
dom: do we have any visibility on who is going to implement the spec?
15:26:14 [Josh_Soref]
... i know chrome has an impl based on the old spec
15:26:19 [Josh_Soref]
... i'm unclear about BlackBerry
15:26:27 [Josh_Soref]
... i know Firefox does accept attribute as well
15:26:39 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: we have discussion in the html bug tracker
15:26:46 [Josh_Soref]
... mounir doesn't say they will implement
15:26:56 [Josh_Soref]
... but says that the spec is simple and efficient and they like it
15:27:02 [Josh_Soref]
... Josh_Soref could comment on BlackBerry
15:27:15 [Josh_Soref]
Zakim, unmute me
15:27:15 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should no longer be muted
15:27:27 [fjh]
josh_soref: need to check with our implementers
15:28:03 [Josh_Soref]
dom: anyone know about Chromium/Opera ?
15:28:11 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: i think Tizen implements
15:28:13 [Josh_Soref]
Zakim, mute me
15:28:13 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should now be muted
15:28:21 [fjh]
fjh: i thought I saw that as well
15:28:32 [AnssiK]
15:28:37 [Josh_Soref]
15:28:37 [Josh_Soref]
15:28:43 [Josh_Soref]
15:29:17 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: AnssiK, how hard would it be to indicate if it's an implementation
15:29:22 [Josh_Soref]
... or just a note
15:29:26 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: yeah yeah
15:29:44 [Josh_Soref]
... when i notice someone is mentioning it, i try to include
15:29:53 [Josh_Soref]
... perhaps this should be more like
15:30:02 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: when i look at the list, i don't know if we're good to go
15:30:15 [Josh_Soref]
... maybe you can add text to the wiki
15:30:35 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: i haven't always looked at the source code
15:30:37 [dom]
q+ to ask about testing
15:30:45 [Josh_Soref]
... and without the product in my hand, it's hard to know what is the level
15:30:52 [Josh_Soref]
... i'll try to dig deeper
15:30:59 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: just trying to understand what the wiki is saying
15:31:11 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: the wiki is pointers to implementations that claim to support these specs
15:31:18 [Josh_Soref]
... but levels and spec version is missing
15:31:57 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: so this isn't a list of vetted implementations
15:32:05 [dom]
15:32:06 [dom]
Implementations cited in this document may or may not implement the latest version of the related specification. "
15:32:06 [Josh_Soref]
... it's a list where somewhere someone mentioned they might
15:32:36 [AnssiK]
"Implementations cited in this document may or may not implement the latest version of the related specification."
15:32:52 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: when you have more details, it'd be helpful if you add them to the wiki
15:33:10 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: Josh_Soref, what is the status of BlackBerry on Media Capture
15:33:15 [Josh_Soref]
Zakim, unmute me
15:33:15 [Zakim]
Josh_Soref should no longer be muted
15:33:57 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: I received a BB10 device
15:34:51 [dom]
15:34:58 [fjh]
ack dom
15:34:58 [Zakim]
dom, you wanted to ask about testing
15:35:05 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: i'm hoping to talk to devrel guys tomorrow
15:35:14 [Josh_Soref]
dom: for that spec, we probably want to do some testing
15:35:20 [Josh_Soref]
... has anyone done any work on testing?
15:35:26 [Josh_Soref]
... are there existing testcases?
15:35:52 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: i'm going to use the BlackBerry Dev Alpha device to see if it has anything
15:36:05 [Josh_Soref]
... i have the Vibration test suite to do
15:36:12 [Josh_Soref]
... dom, do you have ideas for the interactive tests?
15:36:21 [Josh_Soref]
... how to craft interactive tests for these specs
15:36:29 [Josh_Soref]
... there are implementation details that you're unable to test
15:36:35 [Josh_Soref]
dom: i see two kinds of tests
15:36:37 [Josh_Soref]
... IDL level
15:36:43 [Josh_Soref]
... parsing/handling
15:36:50 [Josh_Soref]
... interaction between Accept and Capture
15:36:56 [Josh_Soref]
... and then there's an interactive part
15:37:03 [Josh_Soref]
... i'd simply say in the test itself
15:37:13 [Josh_Soref]
... when you press the button, you should be offered to get a picture from your camera
15:37:18 [Josh_Soref]
... and then maybe testing the file type
15:37:33 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: thanks, that matches what i was thinking about
15:37:49 [Josh_Soref]
... the idl is simple, so idlharness or manual tests
15:37:56 [Josh_Soref]
... and for interactive, something like you described
15:38:21 [Josh_Soref]
dom: i think separate actions for separate test suites is more actionable
15:38:27 [fjh]
action: anssik to create test cases for battery and vibration
15:38:27 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-620 - Create test cases for battery and vibration [on Anssi Kostiainen - due 2013-03-13].
15:38:31 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: let's do another action
15:39:06 [fjh]
close ACTION-620
15:39:06 [trackbot]
Closed ACTION-620 Create test cases for battery and vibration.
15:39:32 [AnssiK]
ACTION: AnssiK to create test cases for HTML Media Capture
15:39:33 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-621 - Create test cases for HTML Media Capture [on Anssi Kostiainen - due 2013-03-13].
15:40:07 [Josh_Soref]
dom: the HTML WG is making a change to their test suite
15:40:13 [Josh_Soref]
... giving up the submitted/approved structure
15:40:28 [Josh_Soref]
... have we discussed migrating this group's tests?
15:40:34 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i was thinking of wait-and-see
15:40:42 [Josh_Soref]
dom: i think it's working reasonably well for them
15:41:03 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: vibration is stuck because it's submitted but not accepted
15:41:19 [fjh]
would like to see focus on actual work rather than logistics unless it is low effort to make the changes
15:41:25 [Josh_Soref]
... AnssiK now has a bb10 with it
15:41:36 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: i'm testing it, but it seems to indeed be implemented
15:41:38 [Josh_Soref]
... it is buzzing
15:41:43 [Josh_Soref]
... good work guys
15:42:20 [Josh_Soref]
i/is stuck/Topic: Vibration test progress/
15:42:36 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: OMA Liaison
15:42:41 [fjh]
15:42:41 [trackbot]
ACTION-613 -- Frederick Hirsch to draft proposed OMA liaison response -- due 2013-02-13 -- OPEN
15:42:41 [trackbot]
15:42:59 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: dom said it was inappropriate for me to close w/o a comment
15:43:04 [Josh_Soref]
... i'll draft a response
15:43:05 [mounir]
Regarding the HTML Media Capture, there is a problem regarding the ability for the user to opt-out from the capture device and use its stored pictures instead. I believe that should be allowed but I'm not sure how much we should make this a requirement for specifications.
15:43:31 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: mounir: i thought that we designed the spec to specifically allow for that!
15:43:37 [fjh]
s/said it was inappropriate for me to close w/o a comment/ reminded me that it might be appropriate to respond formally/
15:43:50 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: Privacy
15:43:56 [fjh]
PING feedback :
15:44:17 [fjh]
Possible updates to Proximity and Ambient Light Event specs
15:44:22 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i believe this message captures their feedback accurately
15:44:43 [Josh_Soref]
... specs aren't used in isolation
15:44:48 [Josh_Soref]
... npdoty offered to help
15:44:58 [Clarke]
Clarke has joined #dap
15:45:01 [Josh_Soref]
... The ability to fingerprint based on timing might not be the easiest way
15:45:54 [mounir]
Josh_Soref: actually, if the user must have to use a capture device, that could work too (i guess) but a common behaviour would be better. I'm not sure what is the specification wording regarding this.
15:46:14 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: there is another advantage re privacy timings
15:46:25 [Josh_Soref]
... if an application is written to a single implementation
15:46:33 [Josh_Soref]
... it could break if another implementation has different timings
15:46:39 [Josh_Soref]
... if the sepc encouraged a single timing behavior
15:46:45 [Josh_Soref]
15:47:06 [Josh_Soref]
... then an application could be less likely to break when it interacts with a different implementation
15:47:26 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: in GeoLocation there's an idea of lying
15:47:37 [Josh_Soref]
... that might also apply to these other apis
15:47:45 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: it should apply to these apis as well
15:47:59 [Josh_Soref]
... capture being an example
15:48:18 [Josh_Soref]
... -- letting the user select an already available object
15:48:26 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: the other concept from GeoLocation is Fuzzing
15:48:30 [Josh_Soref]
... giving a less accurate value
15:48:38 [Josh_Soref]
... we did that with ambient light
15:49:45 [fjh]
in HTML Media Capture you could opt out by defaulting to file picker instead of using camera device
15:50:08 [AnssiK]
"When the attribute is specified, the should invoke a file picker of the specific"
15:50:35 [AnssiK]
"When the capture attribute is specified, the user agent should invoke a file picker of the specific capture control type."
15:50:36 [Josh_Soref]
s|"When the attribute is specified, the should invoke a file picker of the specific"||
15:50:40 [Zakim]
15:50:52 [AnssiK]
15:51:06 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: note that it's a "File Picker" of a "Capture Type"
15:51:28 [richt]
richt has joined #dap
15:51:31 [Josh_Soref]
... certainly BlackBerry systems where the file picker gives access to both Gallery and Camera/Mic does this :)
15:51:49 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: we received Feedback from PING about Proximity/Ambient light
15:51:56 [Josh_Soref]
... with specific approaches we should take
15:52:08 [Josh_Soref]
... should we try to take a pass through the spec to see if we can incorporate that before moving forward?
15:53:13 [fjh]
"there should be an indication to the user when the sensors are used"
15:53:18 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: Ambient could have been designed as a Media Query
15:53:27 [Josh_Soref]
... but you can certainly detect Media Query states
15:53:34 [fjh]
"disable sharing proximity information"
15:54:18 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: browsers have spent 20 years trying to design the lock icon
15:54:34 [Josh_Soref]
... and some low level specs have UI requirements which were *never* implemented
15:54:47 [Josh_Soref]
dom: we generally avoid putting normative text in about UI
15:54:56 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: but we put in consideration sections?
15:55:11 [Josh_Soref]
dom: do we put an indication in to suggest to the user that it's in use?
15:55:30 [Josh_Soref]
dom: we claim that these are generally QOI
15:55:35 [Josh_Soref]
15:56:41 [Josh_Soref]
Josh_Soref: we could point to implementations which have done something for indications
15:56:54 [fjh]
I suggest we should take the PING input and see what changes we should make to the specs, such as the privacy considerations
15:56:56 [Josh_Soref]
... e.g. the current Chrome (Canary) shows you what's allowed/has been used if you click the Lock Icon
15:57:09 [fjh]
also need to follow up with nick on general considerations
15:57:25 [fjh]
action: fjh to follow up on concrete actions based on PING input
15:57:25 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-622 - Follow up on concrete actions based on PING input [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2013-03-13].
15:57:41 [dom]
- > Chrome permissions
15:57:43 [dom]
-> Chrome permissions
15:57:50 [Josh_Soref]
s|- > Chrome permissions||
15:58:11 [Josh_Soref]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
15:58:11 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate Josh_Soref
15:58:14 [Josh_Soref]
RRSAgent, make logs public
15:58:22 [Josh_Soref]
AnssiK: i think we should be concrete
15:58:37 [Josh_Soref]
fjh: i'd appreciate if people could respond to the message on the list
15:59:16 [Zakim]
15:59:19 [Josh_Soref]
Topic: Action Review
16:00:11 [fjh]
16:00:11 [trackbot]
Notes added to ACTION-617 Set up f2f questionnaire.
16:00:15 [fjh]
close ACTION-617
16:00:15 [trackbot]
Closed ACTION-617 Set up f2f questionnaire.
16:00:32 [fjh]
16:00:32 [trackbot]
Notes added to ACTION-618 Provide sotd text for battery, vibration status updates.
16:00:39 [Zakim]
16:00:42 [fjh]
close ACTION-618
16:00:42 [trackbot]
Closed ACTION-618 Provide sotd text for battery, vibration status updates.
16:00:44 [Zakim]
16:00:47 [Zakim]
16:01:17 [fjh]
16:01:17 [trackbot]
Notes added to ACTION-619 Follow up with Doug re closing HTML Media Capture LC Comments.
16:01:30 [fjh]
close ACTION-619
16:01:30 [trackbot]
Closed ACTION-619 Follow up with Doug re closing HTML Media Capture LC Comments.
16:01:37 [fjh]
Topic: Other Business
16:01:38 [fjh]
no e
16:01:42 [fjh]
s/no e/none
16:01:46 [fjh]
Topic: Adjourn
16:01:52 [Josh_Soref]
trackbot, end meeting
16:01:52 [trackbot]
Zakim, list attendees
16:01:52 [Zakim]
As of this point the attendees have been fjh, Josh_Soref, AnssiK, dcheng3, +1.858.750.aaaa, dom, gmandyam, +1.720.934.aabb, richt, +1.781.362.aacc, Cathy, ClarkeSteven
16:01:58 [Zakim]
16:02:00 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, please draft minutes
16:02:00 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate trackbot
16:02:01 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, bye
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
I see 3 open action items saved in :
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: anssik to create test cases for battery and vibration [1]
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: AnssiK to create test cases for HTML Media Capture [2]
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: fjh to follow up on concrete actions based on PING input [3]
16:02:01 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
16:02:05 [fjh]
zakim, who is here?
16:02:07 [Zakim]
On the phone I see fjh, Josh_Soref, AnssiK
16:02:07 [Zakim]
On IRC I see Cathy, dcheng3, AnssiK, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, slightlyoff, dom, tobie, lgombos, Josh_Soref, mounir, trackbot