20:27:52 RRSAgent has joined #eo 20:27:52 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/25-eo-irc 20:27:54 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:27:54 Zakim has joined #eo 20:27:56 Zakim, this will be 3694 20:27:56 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 20:27:57 Meeting: Education and Outreach Working Group Teleconference 20:27:57 Date: 25 February 2013 20:28:22 scribe: Sharron 20:28:40 Topic: WCAG-EM Overview 20:29:25 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/wcag-em.php 20:29:51 Andrew has joined #eo 20:29:56 AnnaBelle has joined #eo 20:31:36 Discussion of the document and point by point changes suggested. 20:32:04 Jennifer has joined #eo 20:35:28 ACTION: Andrew to Investigate pros and cons of keeping URI of Prelim Eval -OR- create a redirect. 20:35:28 Created ACTION-279 - Investigate pros and cons of keeping URI of Prelim Eval -OR- create a redirect. [on Andrew Arch - due 2013-03-04]. 20:39:42 hbj has joined #eo 20:55:50 Wayne: Must be clear that this is meant as an audit document. Not meant as a development tool. 20:56:32 ...should need to remove "can be used for other purposes" especially the part about developers during development. 20:57:28 Shawn: developers is not an audience included in the documentation of targets for this document 21:24:54 hbj has joined #eo 21:27:20 q+ to ask about the 'working draft' link 21:40:06 Sharron has joined #eo 21:42:15 ack me 21:42:15 Andrew, you wanted to ask about the 'working draft' link 21:51:29 Andrew: Unless you must demonstrate formal conformance you may not need to go through the WCAG-EM process. 21:51:54 Wayne: But there are many educational aspects inlcluded here 21:52:20 Helle: And they will also use it in the EU for benchmarking 22:03:41 Sharron has joined #eo 22:08:40 Wayne: Proposes that we eliminate developers from Who Will Use 22:09:08 Andres: Or say instead "web devs who waht to understand how it will be evaluated" 22:14:10 Sharron has joined #eo 22:14:13 s/Andres/Andrew 22:16:27 Wayne: This is too broad - this document is an audit process document. it is NOT for all these other groups. 22:17:04 Sharron: Yes and it is a distraction to inlcude groups who may be peripherally interested but not actual users. 22:17:46 Helle: it will be auditors of government regulators, corporate, educational, or third party consultants. 22:18:02 ...not necessary to list all of them. 22:18:11 Jennifer: Internal or external auditors. 22:19:03 Wayne: both are necessary 22:20:38 shawn7 has joined #eo 22:23:51 shawn has joined #eo 22:25:46 Sharron: It is for the direct use of auditors and benchmarking. Also referenced by procurment and management. 22:26:34 Wayne: WCAG-EM is for people who want to spend an exciting life in Web auditing. 22:27:13 Jennifer has joined #eo 22:29:01 shawn7 has joined #eo 22:32:25 shawn has joined #eo 22:37:25 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130208#audience 22:40:41 Jennifer: Disability advocates are listed on the Editor's Draft but truly, that group will not use it. 22:41:33 ...and teachers, if they are training someone to use it, of course will use it but do not need to be called out as an audience. If youa re teaching any topic, you refer to the topic. 22:43:22 Andrew: In the needed skills, is it strong enough to say "knowledge of WCAG?" Is that strong enough? 23:31:46 Jennifer has joined #eo 23:39:06 Andrew has joined #eo 23:40:37 shawn has joined #eo 23:44:22 trackbot, start meeting 23:44:24 RRSAgent, make logs world 23:44:26 Zakim, this will be 3694 23:44:26 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 23:44:27 Meeting: Education and Outreach Working Group Teleconference 23:44:27 Date: 25 February 2013 23:44:35 topic: Easy Checks - Color Contrast section 23:44:38 Wayne has joined #eo 23:44:44 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Web_Accessibility_Preliminary_Evaluation#Color_contrast 23:45:11 Sharron has joined #eo 23:53:42 Wayne: Can we less specific, say dark text on light background for example and bright text on dark background. 23:54:23 Sharron has joined #eo