20:56:44 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
20:56:44 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/21-wai-wcag-irc
20:56:46 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
20:56:46 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #wai-wcag
20:56:48 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG
20:56:48 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see WAI_WCAG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 4 minutes
20:56:49 <trackbot> Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
20:56:49 <trackbot> Date: 21 February 2013
20:57:09 <shadi> shadi has joined #wai-wcag
20:57:26 <shadi> zakim, code?
20:57:26 <Zakim> the conference code is 9224 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), shadi
20:57:31 <MichaelC> regrets: Gian_Wild, James_Nurthen, Alex_Li
20:57:43 <Zakim> WAI_WCAG()4:00PM has now started
20:57:50 <Zakim> +Shadi
20:57:59 <MichaelC> agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2013JanMar/0097.html
20:58:00 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
20:58:12 <Joshue108> zakim, [IPcaller] is Joshue;
20:58:12 <Zakim> +Joshue;; got it
20:58:30 <Zakim> +??P16
20:58:32 <MichaelC> zakim, ??P16 is Michael_Cooper
20:58:32 <Zakim> +Michael_Cooper; got it
20:58:59 <Zakim> +Katie_Haritos-Shea
20:59:36 <Ryladog> Ryladog has joined #wai-wcag
21:00:04 <Zakim> +Gregg_Vanderheiden
21:00:27 <greggvanderheiden> greggvanderheiden has joined #wai-wcag
21:00:32 <Zakim> +Robin_Tuttle
21:01:01 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
21:01:01 <Zakim> Joshue; should now be muted
21:01:14 <Zakim> + +1.617.584.aaaa
21:01:50 <MichaelC> zakim, aaaa is Andrew_Kirkpatrick
21:01:50 <Zakim> +Andrew_Kirkpatrick; got it
21:01:51 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
21:02:14 <MichaelC> zakim, Ipcaller is Kerstin_Probiesch
21:02:14 <Zakim> +Kerstin_Probiesch; got it
21:02:16 <kerstin> kerstin has joined #wai-wcag
21:02:26 <robin> robin has joined #wai-wcag
21:03:11 <Joshue108> zakim, unmute me
21:03:11 <Zakim> Joshue; should no longer be muted
21:03:36 <Joshue108> scribenick: Joshue
21:03:47 <MichaelC> scribeNick: Joshue108
21:03:48 <Joshue108> scribenick: Joshue108
21:03:57 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
21:04:10 <AWK> AWK has joined #wai-wcag
21:04:10 <MichaelC> zakim, Microsoft is Cherie_Eckholm
21:04:11 <Zakim> +Cherie_Eckholm; got it
21:04:12 <MichaelC> zakim, who is on the phone?
21:04:13 <Zakim> On the phone I see Shadi, Joshue;, Michael_Cooper, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Robin_Tuttle, Andrew_Kirkpatrick, Kerstin_Probiesch, Cherie_Eckholm
21:04:37 <shadi> zakim, mute me
21:04:37 <Zakim> Shadi should now be muted
21:05:11 <Joshue108> GV: Todays agenda is starting with the EVAL methodology. We hope to sign off on it etc.
21:05:13 <AWK> Zakim, who is making noise?
21:05:16 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
21:05:16 <Zakim> Joshue; should now be muted
21:05:18 <kerstin> zakim, mute me
21:05:18 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should now be muted
21:05:21 <Loretta> Loretta has joined #WAI-WCAG
21:05:30 <Zakim> AWK, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Katie_Haritos-Shea (4%), Gregg_Vanderheiden (80%)
21:05:39 <Loretta> I'm going to try to monitor IRC while attending my orientation, but won't be on the phone.
21:06:29 <Joshue108> GV: So if we have show stoppers we can give feedback etc. For probs please make suggestions. If not poss, an editors note etc is a good idea. Concerned about deadline etc.
21:06:56 <Joshue108> :-)
21:07:12 <greggvanderheiden> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20130221eval/results
21:07:43 <Joshue108> topic: Website Accessibility Conformance Eval Methodology
21:08:57 <Ryladog> q+
21:09:03 <shadi> ack me
21:09:06 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219#teams
21:09:25 <greggvanderheiden> The methodology defined by this document can be carried out by an individual evaluator with the skills described in section Required Expertise. However, using the combined expertise of review teams provides better coverage for the required skills and helps identify accessibility barriers more effectively. While not required, it is strongly recommended to employ review teams for conformance evaluation of websites. Specific guidance is
21:09:26 <greggvanderheiden> provided in Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility.
21:10:24 <AWK_> AWK_ has joined #wai-wcag
21:12:13 <Zakim> + +1.650.253.aabb
21:12:38 <MichaelC> zakim, aabb is Loretta_Guarino_Reid
21:12:38 <Zakim> +Loretta_Guarino_Reid; got it
21:14:58 <Joshue108> RESOLUTION: Remove 'strongly' from review teams section
21:17:19 <Zakim> +Bruce_Bailey
21:19:47 <BBailey> BBailey has joined #wai-wcag
21:20:34 <Loretta> q+
21:20:52 <shadi> "must" -> "has to"
21:21:32 <MichaelC> ack r
21:21:33 <MichaelC> ack l
21:21:36 <greggvanderheiden> ack ryl
21:21:42 <kerstin> probably a disclaimer like in the techniques "Some techniques use the word "must". Because the techniques document is not a normative document, this word is not used in the sense of RFC 2119. The colloquial use of the word "must" describes proper application of the specific technique under consideration. It does not imply requirements beyond the scope of the technique. "
21:22:37 <kerstin> q+
21:22:51 <kerstin> zakim, unmute me
21:22:51 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should no longer be muted
21:23:56 <kerstin> it's here : http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/intro.html
21:24:08 <Loretta> Agree with Shadi.
21:24:46 <kerstin> I'm also fine with deleting "must" :-)
21:24:55 <kerstin> zakim, mute me
21:24:55 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should now be muted
21:24:56 <Zakim> +David_MacDonald
21:25:33 <greggvanderheiden> probably a disclaimer like in the techniques "Some techniques use the word "must". Because the techniques document is not a normative document, this word is not used in the sense of RFC 2119. The colloquial use of the word "must" describes proper application of the specific technique under consideration. It does not imply requirements beyond the scope of the technique. "
21:27:31 <greggvanderheiden> http://davidmacd.com/test/random.html
21:29:38 <shadi> q+
21:29:45 <David> David has joined #wai-wcag
21:29:51 <Loretta> q+
21:30:31 <kerstin> I'm not in the queue, so shadi is next
21:30:35 <shadi> q- last
21:30:52 <shadi> q- later
21:30:52 <kerstin> q-
21:31:09 <greggvanderheiden> ack l
21:31:15 <shadi> ack me
21:31:23 <greggvanderheiden> ack s
21:36:01 <Zakim> -Loretta_Guarino_Reid
21:36:07 <Loretta> Sorry need to drop off the phone now.
21:36:45 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219#step5a
21:36:56 <kerstin> q+
21:37:21 <kerstin> zakim, unmute me
21:37:21 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should no longer be muted
21:37:47 <greggvanderheiden> Only captures the successes and failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements globally for the entire website. For each WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion applicable as per Step 1.c. Define the Conformance Target, the report identifies if it is met or not met in the selected sample of web pages. Where failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria are identified, at least one example web page from the sample in which such a failure ha[CUT]
21:37:47 <greggvanderheiden> identified must be indicated in the report.
21:38:41 <greggvanderheiden> Detailed Report
21:38:42 <greggvanderheiden> Captures the successes and failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements for each web page. For each WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion applicable as per Step 1.c. Define the Conformance Target, the report identifies if it is met or not met in each web page in the selected sample of web pages. Where failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria on a web page are identified, each identified occurrence of such a failure must be indicated in
21:38:42 <greggvanderheiden> the report.
21:39:59 <greggvanderheiden> ack k
21:44:24 <greggvanderheiden> Basic Report
21:44:25 <greggvanderheiden> Only captures the successes and failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements globally for the entire website. For each WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion applicable as per Step 1.c. Define the Conformance Target, the report identifies if it is met or not met in the selected sample of web pages. Where failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria are identified, at least one example web page from the sample in which such a failure ha[CUT]
21:44:26 <greggvanderheiden> identified must be indicated in the report.
21:44:28 <greggvanderheiden> Detailed Report
21:44:29 <greggvanderheiden> Captures the successes and failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements for each web page. For each WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion applicable as per Step 1.c. Define the Conformance Target, the report identifies if it is met or not met in each web page in the selected sample of web pages. Where failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria on a web page are identified, each identified occurrence of such a failure must be indicated in
21:44:31 <greggvanderheiden> the report.
21:44:32 <greggvanderheiden> In-Depth Analysis Report
21:44:33 <greggvanderheiden> Captures the successes and failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements for each Success Criterion. For each WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion applicable as per Step 1.c. Define the Conformance Target, the report identifies if it is met or not met in the selected sample of web pages. Where failures in meeting WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria are identified, examples of the identified occurrence of such a failure must be indicated in the r[CUT]
21:44:34 <greggvanderheiden> The In-Depth Analysis Report includes a summary of the issues identified on the website, examples of frequently occurring issues and an assessment of their impact on the users of the website in completing tasks, and if possible suggestions for improving the overall accessibility of the website and suggesting guidance for the future.
21:45:21 <kerstin> zakim, mute me
21:45:21 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should now be muted
21:45:24 <kerstin> q-
21:45:28 <Zakim> -Bruce_Bailey
21:51:21 <kerstin> q+
21:51:32 <kerstin> zakim, umute me
21:51:32 <Zakim> I don't understand 'umute me', kerstin
21:51:47 <kerstin> zakim, unmute me
21:51:47 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should no longer be muted
21:52:00 <greggvanderheiden> q?
21:54:21 <greggvanderheiden> ack
21:54:24 <greggvanderheiden> ack k
21:54:44 <Joshue108>  Sorry guys, I'm gonna have to go in ~ 5, can someone else please scribe?
21:55:19 <kerstin> zakim, mute me
21:55:19 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should now be muted
21:57:55 <Joshue108> zakim, unmute me
21:57:55 <Zakim> Joshue; should no longer be muted
21:58:51 <Joshue108> RESOUTION: Drop conformance requirements from the report format and add 'for each web page after ' success criterion in depth. Add editors note asking input on report formats.
21:59:01 <Zakim> -Joshue;
21:59:07 <Zakim> -Cherie_Eckholm
21:59:15 <Zakim> -Robin_Tuttle
21:59:27 <AWK> I have to drop off in ~1 minute also.
22:00:21 <Zakim> -Andrew_Kirkpatrick
22:05:05 <Zakim> +Bruce_Bailey
22:06:21 <David> Resolution: CHANGE
22:06:23 <David> Such web pages may not be excluded from the scope of evaluation according to this methodology.
22:06:24 <David> TO
22:06:26 <David> Such web pages may not be excluded from the scope of evaluation if this methodology is used. (or- ....if using this methodology)
22:07:00 <David> RESOLUTION:CHANGE
22:07:01 <David> Such web pages may not be excluded from the scope of evaluation according to this methodology.TO Such web pages may not be excluded from the scope of evaluation if this methodology is used. (or- ....if using this methodology)
22:07:12 <Zakim> +Loretta_Guarino_Reid
22:07:19 <greggvanderheiden> change 1c and 4c to read  "….techniques and failures that have been documented by W3C and others as meeting the success criteria…."
22:07:51 <David> RESOLUTION: Change such web pages may not be excluded from the scope of evaluation according to this methodology to "Such web pages may not be excluded from the scope of evaluation if this methodology is used. (or- ....if using this methodology)"
22:08:18 <David> RESOLUTION: change 1c and 4c to read "… .techniques and failures that have been documented by W3C and others as meeting the success criteria…."
22:10:35 <Loretta> q+
22:12:02 <greggvanderheiden> ack l
22:14:07 <kerstin> zakim, unmute me
22:14:07 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should no longer be muted
22:15:03 <David> RESOLUTION: Shadi to update editorials from Joshue. 'My first thought was, "What situations?", then I realised you are referring to the closed network - that may be clearer if it was something like: "W3C/WAI provides a set of publicly documented Techniques for WCAG 2.0. However, it is not necessary to use these particular techniques. In fact, in some situations, such as in a closed network,...
22:15:05 <David> ...it may be necessary to use techniques that are specifically developed to the particular needs of the users of that network."
22:17:24 <greggvanderheiden> s/1c and 4c/1d and 4c/
22:17:44 <David> s/1c and 4c/1d and 4c/
22:19:47 <shadi> q+
22:20:07 <shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20130219#step4
22:20:09 <shadi> q-
22:25:59 <David> practicable?
22:30:13 <Zakim> -Loretta_Guarino_Reid
22:30:53 <shadi> [[While ideally every web page of a website is evaluated, usually this is not possible on most websites. In cases where all web pages can be evaluated, this sampling procedure can be skipped and the selected sample is considered to be the entire website in the remaining steps.]]
22:33:16 <David> RESOLUTION: add one more question to the scoring editors not... or would scoring be a good idea at all?
22:35:36 <David> s/not/note/
22:36:38 <David> RESOLUTION: Unanimous consent to oublishethe EVAL DOC as a draft with the resolutions of this meeting
22:37:10 <David> s/oublishethe/Publish the/
22:39:38 <Zakim> -Shadi
22:39:48 <greggvanderheiden> http://tinyurl.com/balvfg3
22:39:49 <greggvanderheiden> '
22:40:02 <David> TOPIC: WCAG to ICT
22:42:36 <David> TOPIC: Comment LC-2661
22:43:59 <David> TOPIC: Comment LC-2653
22:44:16 <kerstin> zakim, mute me
22:44:16 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should now be muted
22:46:48 <Zakim> -Bruce_Bailey
22:50:50 <David> RESOLUTION: Resolve LC-2653 as revised
22:51:14 <David> TOPIC: LC-2665
22:52:13 <David> RESOLUTION: Resolve LC-265 as written
22:52:49 <David> TOPIC:LC-2655
22:56:11 <David> s/ LC-265 as written/ LC-2665 as written
22:56:23 <David> s/ LC-265 as written/ LC-2665 as written/
22:56:57 <David> RESOLUTION: AcceLC-2653 as revised
22:58:44 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2665 as revised
22:59:16 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2653 as written
23:01:46 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2665, 2655, 2690, 2666, 2656, 2667, 2657, 2692, 2687, 2702, 2664, 2675, 2654, 2689, 2676, 2691, 2677, 2678, 2680, 2694, 2693, 2682,
23:02:23 <David> TOPIC: LC- 2668
23:04:05 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2668 as written
23:04:25 <David> TOPIC: LC- 2701
23:04:55 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2701 as written
23:05:38 <David> TOPIC: LC-2658
23:06:15 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2658 as written
23:06:26 <David> TOPIC: LC-2660
23:07:13 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2660 as revised
23:07:33 <David> TOPIC: LC-2698
23:09:02 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2698 as written
23:09:29 <David> TOPIC: LC-2770
23:12:14 <David> s/2770/2700/
23:12:19 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2700 as amended
23:12:43 <David> TOPIC: LC-2679
23:15:20 <David> TOPIC: LC-2681
23:16:19 <David> Topic: LC-2695
23:20:56 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2695 as amended
23:21:12 <David> TOPIC: LC-2688
23:25:03 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2688 as amended
23:25:48 <David> TOPIC: LC-2661
23:36:36 <Loretta> zakim, who is here?
23:36:36 <Zakim> On the phone I see Michael_Cooper, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Kerstin_Probiesch (muted), David_MacDonald
23:36:38 <Zakim> On IRC I see David, Loretta, kerstin, greggvanderheiden, Ryladog, shadi, Zakim, RRSAgent, jamesn, MichaelC, trackbot
23:38:40 <kerstin> No
23:40:05 <kerstin> zakim, unmute me
23:40:05 <Zakim> Kerstin_Probiesch should no longer be muted
23:40:53 <David> RESOLUTION: Accept LC-2669, 2679, 2681 as amended
23:42:22 <David> zakim, bye
23:42:22 <Zakim> leaving.  As of this point the attendees were Shadi, Joshue;, Michael_Cooper, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Robin_Tuttle, +1.617.584.aaaa, Andrew_Kirkpatrick,
23:42:22 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wai-wcag
23:42:25 <Zakim> ... Kerstin_Probiesch, Cherie_Eckholm, +1.650.253.aabb, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Bruce_Bailey, David_MacDonald
23:42:32 <David> rrsagent, make log public
23:42:37 <MichaelC> chair: Gregg_Vanderheiden
23:42:41 <MichaelC> rrsagent, make minutes
23:42:41 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/21-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC
23:42:44 <David> RRSAgentI have made the request,
23:43:08 <kerstin> zakim, bye
23:43:35 <David> do you have it Michael
23:54:26 <MichaelC> present+ Kerstin_Probiesch, Cherie_Eckholm, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Bruce_Bailey, David_MacDonald
23:54:37 <MichaelC> present- +1.617.584.aaaa
23:54:41 <MichaelC> rrsagent, make minutes
23:54:41 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/21-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC
23:55:02 <MichaelC> rrsagent, bye
23:55:02 <RRSAgent> I see no action items