13:08:37 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 13:08:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-mlw-lt-irc 13:08:48 Felix wants us to document high level cases before Rome 13:09:15 topic: testsuite update 13:09:33 DaveL asks Leroy for updates since Monday meeting 13:10:15 Leroy: ? is committing 4 data categories, we're at 59%, up from 50% 13:10:25 http://tinyurl.com/its20-testsuite-dashboard 13:10:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:10:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-mlw-lt-minutes.html Yves_ 13:10:59 need all to provide updates, esp. those who haven't got their 80%, esp. UL and Shawn 13:12:17 Tadej says he's renamed several attributes, will break tests. Wants feedback 13:12:52 topic: Use case document for Rome 13:13:58 mail Don sent out this morning about M4 and M5. This may take down percentage even more. 13:14:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0024.html 13:15:09 involves branching between conformance testing vs showing community that we have something useful (in Rome) 13:15:35 Rome demos will not really affect percentages of what is completed to meeting milestones 13:15:39 joerg has joined #mlw-lt 13:15:51 present+ joerg 13:16:36 concern is that if we ask for metadata, while we can demo that we can open and read files, things may not be completely there 13:16:56 demos may show things that are not complete test cases 13:18:00 for the EU project, we'll also have a review in Rome, and we need to meet their milestones 13:18:38 the w3c milestones give us a bit more time 13:19:05 overall test delays need to be reported to Felix so that some deadlines can be adjusted (within limits) 13:20:12 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0019.html 13:20:13 we need to understand that outreach effort (in Rome) is to demo useful work, vs. meeting EU and w3c deadlines/milestones 13:20:40 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary 13:20:42 present+ Naoto 13:21:12 Felix recommends that we update the high level wiki page to align with what the current state of ITS2 is 13:21:20 present+ chriLi 13:21:32 and then use part of this as a model (before Rome). 13:21:59 Needed for EU but also good for public (at Rome). 13:22:14 This needs to match with posters (for which deadline is 15 Feb). 13:22:21 ... for Rome. 13:22:43 Felix is suggesting updating the high level summary by 18 February 13:23:10 Christian: Felix also brought to the table the suggestion that in the main specifications we want to refer to the use cases. 13:23:51 For this we need to stabilize URIs. This can be done by publishing a recommendation. 13:24:30 DaveL says we can do this. Take same approach we did before. 13:25:07 DaveL says we can do this like chriLi did for ? earlier. 13:25:39 DaveL asks whether anyone has any objections to use the simple MT cases? 13:26:23 DaveL then says we'd need to go through these to compare with how the cases match the text. 13:26:40 chriLi offers to take over this task. 13:27:09 chriLi says to meet this deadline we need input from partners 3 days earlier. 13:27:38 s/DaveL says we can do this like chriLi did for ? earlier./DaveL says the WG did this for the requirements document/ 13:27:38 chriLi points out that 18 Feb is needed publication date 13:28:59 s/chriLi offers to take over this task./chriLi offers to take over this task if the partners have done the update a couple of days before the 18th/ 13:29:10 we ask people to provide by 15 Feb (same day as posters) to update the high level summary page 13:29:30 ... to enable the result to be publishable by 18 Feb. 13:29:48 action; dlewis6 to confirm dates for use case document publishing 13:30:09 action: dlewis6 to confirm dates for use case document publishing 13:30:10 Created ACTION-443 - Confirm dates for use case document publishing [on David Lewis - due 2013-02-13]. 13:31:03 agenda: issue 63 13:31:13 topic: conformance type in LQI 13:31:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0017.html 13:31:49 Naoto has joined #mlw-lt 13:32:46 Phip has indicated that his company (DI) is interested in consuming this, and has another company that will provide these. 13:33:31 Phil (not Phip)... 13:33:40 topic; Issue 75, clarification of applicability of domain mapping to a multidomain Post from christian 13:34:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0018.html 13:34:20 also, point from pablo on referencing wiki material http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0020.html 13:34:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0020.html 13:35:08 chriLi and DaveL asking whether anyone has any objections 13:35:16 else will be edited into specs 13:36:12 ... will be done through last call tracking page, by co-chairs (on basis of chriLi's text) 13:37:20 Pablo points out that text is fine, but link will change (note taken: by DaveL). Felix will arrange to copy into persistent URL. 13:37:26 topic: regex definition issue-67 acton for Shaun 13:37:44 Shaun https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/385 13:38:33 There is some small fixes to work out 13:38:47 (sorry ca't talk) 13:39:15 mostly the regex work and we just need a few adjustements 13:39:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0014.html 13:39:40 yes 13:39:53 topic; terminology and disambiguation issue-68 action for Tadej 13:40:07 Tadej https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/435 13:40:46 Tadej outlines discussion to merge the two (terminology and disabig). 13:40:53 In the end, no merge but 13:41:04 disabiguation is simplified 13:41:11 dropped graularity 13:41:37 https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/pull/5 13:41:42 renamed to text analysis (short version: Tan) instead of disabiguation 13:41:50 https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/pull/5/files 13:42:22 this involves not too much work for implementors, mainly renaming 13:42:51 Tadej, in the e-mail you sent there is an attachment that says: "text-analysis-annotation" - should the annotation be dropped?! I agree to Yves who said that annotation mighy be redundant 13:42:55 also dropping disambigClassRef 13:43:12 no changes for terminology, so still backwards compatible. 13:43:29 DaveL asks for comments from others involved 13:43:47 Marcis says, if I understand correctly, no change to terminology 13:44:30 it is important to drop the -annotation suffix. 13:44:42 Tadej says he'll correct examples 13:44:59 Does this then resolve issue-68? 13:45:01 Marcis says, as it now stands, issue 68 is resolved 13:45:31 chriLi says the comment of Marcis is very relevalant. 13:45:53 chriLi asks whether the data cat terminology should be deprecated 13:45:58 Correction - I asked whether the issue would be resolved by the changes or not?! 13:46:14 sorry, Marcis, thanks for correction. 13:47:11 Why should terminology being deprecated? We still have different use cases. 13:47:15 Marcis says that as it now stands, the text-analysis data category does not cover all that the terminology category currently covers. 13:47:54 chriLi says he volunteered to see if he could come up with an "enhanced" text-analysis category 13:48:06 to subsume all the missing items from terminology 13:48:33 its:term=yes -> its:tanClassRef="nerd:Object" 13:49:23 s/chriLi says he volunteered to see if he could come up with an "enhanced" text-analysis category/chriLi says he, Tadej and Marcis volunteered to see if they could come up with an "enhanced" text-analysis category that allow coverage for "term" 13:51:37 local term='no' can be used to override a global rule. 13:51:39 DaveL asks what the difference is between its:term=no vs no term= entry 13:55:15 DaveL summarizes: Marcis still sees a use case for having the capability for "term=yes/no", whether that is in a separate data category or in the tan(ex. disambig) category. 13:56:26 DaveL says you don't support the possibility to capture BOTH an automated process and input from a terminologist. 13:57:37 DaveL asks how critical merging the two categories is 13:59:09 chriLi agrees with changes to former disambig data category, but suggests that we should come up with a solution to cover points still only in term category, 13:59:26 with the view to deprecating the term data category 14:00:10 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:00:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-mlw-lt-minutes.html daveL 14:00:14 Tadej believes this is possible 14:01:06 DaveL asks who will be avail. for Monday call: Tadej yes, Marcis yes, Christian: no 14:01:42 joerg has left #mlw-lt 14:01:46 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:01:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-mlw-lt-minutes.html daveL 14:08:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:08:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-mlw-lt-minutes.html omstefanov 14:09:17 omstefanov has left #mlw-lt 15:17:13 Zakim has left #mlw-lt