12:39:15 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 12:39:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-irc 12:39:21 meeting: MLW-LT Wg 12:39:22 chair: felix 12:39:53 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0243.html 12:40:25 regrets: arle, jörg 12:40:43 topic: roll call 12:40:46 checking attendance ... 12:40:52 present+ fsasaki 12:40:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 12:50:55 kfritsche has joined #mlw-lt 12:58:52 dF has joined #mlw-lt 12:59:50 DomJones has joined #mlw-lt 13:00:01 I am here but in a shared space. So will be muted unless i need to talk 13:00:25 present +Karl 13:00:37 Naoto has joined #mlw-lt 13:01:23 pnietoca has joined #mlw-lt 13:01:23 present+ DomJones 13:01:32 present+ Karl 13:01:34 leroy has joined #mlw-lt 13:01:35 present+ dF 13:01:47 present+ leroy 13:01:48 present+ Karl 13:01:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:01:57 present+ Naoto 13:02:07 tadej has joined #mlw-lt 13:02:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:02:24 present+ pnietoca 13:02:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:03:09 present+ tadej 13:03:14 philr has joined #mlw-lt 13:03:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:03:33 daveL has joined #mlw-lt 13:03:36 present+ daveLewis 13:03:57 omstefanov has joined #mlw-lt 13:06:00 scribe: karl 13:06:16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0243.html 13:06:26 Ankit has joined #mlw-lt 13:06:28 topic: Test suite update 13:06:35 present+ Ankit 13:06:50 http://tinyurl.com/its20-testsuite-dashboard 13:07:24 fsasaki: tomorrow M3 for the Testsuite, only 45% coverage currently 13:07:50 ... are there any problems for the implementors? 13:08:04 chriLi has joined #mlw-lt 13:08:18 david: should be fine till monday 13:08:56 phil: two new files are added and these will be added till next week 13:09:51 q+ 13:09:57 ack pab 13:10:19 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgIk0-aoSKOadG5HQmJDT2EybWVvVC1VbnF5alN2S3c#gid=0 13:10:32 "31st January 2013: M3 - Test files completely run. To be moved forward at Prague f2f." 13:10:39 pnietoca: should we finish 100% for M3? 13:11:13 fsasaki: only 1 or 2 files left would be okay, but only 80% should be discussed 13:12:10 swalter has joined #mlw-lt 13:12:21 pnietoca: 100% should be okay for linguaserve, but have to talk to mauricio 13:12:28 Yves_ has joined #mlw-lt 13:12:42 felix: please come back to me within this week if 100% from your organisaiton is *not* ok 13:12:52 present+ Yves 13:12:57 present+ omstefanov 13:13:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:13:13 present+ swalter 13:13:25 present+ chriLi 13:13:47 topic: Action item health check 13:13:48 fsasaki: shortly checking attendance again 13:13:54 https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/open?sort=due 13:14:02 fsasaki: there are lot of overdue action items 13:14:22 ... most of items are related for editing 13:14:54 ack pab 13:14:57 ack pb 13:14:57 .. should any action item be discussed? 13:16:05 dF: should the disambiguation be tested till M3? 13:16:27 ... because lot of changes are expected there 13:16:47 fsasaki: no need to do testing for disambiguation 13:17:09 .. for the M3 13:17:12 topic: Discuss domain issue 13:17:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0022.html 13:17:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0182.html 13:17:30 fsasaki: would like to close this today 13:17:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0191.html 13:18:06 ... many discussion till now 13:18:15 ack pni 13:18:17 ... are there any comments for the last proposal? 13:18:29 looks basically fine 13:19:39 fsasaki: link to showcase should be moved, because wiki will probably removed at some point 13:20:22 chriLi: looking at the proposal right now 13:21:02 olaf: suggestion could ? that be moved to best practices? 13:21:13 I replied this morning to this issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0192.html 13:21:31 Just one note: "It is, however, not possible to assign" : it's technically 'possible' but it's not meant to be used that way. 13:21:36 note there's a place holder for best practice docs on wiki at: 13:21:37 Felix has a point maybe a link to the wiki is not the most appropriate 13:21:38 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Best_Practice_Documents 13:21:43 fsasaki: we discussed in prague that we will write maybe more of one of best practices 13:22:47 thanks, dave, for the Best Practice Docs page 13:22:52 chriLi: we are on a good way 13:23:04 ... but not right there now 13:23:45 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0184.html 13:24:11 ... yves example should be added to the note, to show how a MT should handle it 13:24:12 "For example you have a mapping as this:" - Yves' example 13:24:20 in above mail 13:25:54 action: christian to make re-write of note for domain, taking Yves' example at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0184.html and jörgs proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0184.html into account 13:25:54 Created ACTION-434 - Make re-write of note for domain, taking Yves' example at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0184.html and jörgs proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0184.html into account [on Christian Lieske - due 2013-02-06]. 13:26:02 df: its just a clarification? not a normative change? 13:26:14 fsasaki: it is a clarification 13:26:30 ... any further comments on this topic? 13:26:37 topic: disambiguation vs term 13:27:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0246.html 13:27:26 fsasaki: proposal how to structure the discussion 13:28:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0239.html 13:28:38 its-tan-ident-ref="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dublin" its-term="no">Dublin 13:28:47 ... start the discussion today, here is another proposal from marcis 13:29:29 ... do we need standoff markup? 13:29:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0246.html 13:30:49 tadej: how we can merge both data categories? 13:31:22 ... if we merge them, than we can handle both independently? 13:32:00 fsasaki: do we really need to handle both categories independently? 13:33:09 ... there is no need for multilayer annotations, if we drop this 13:33:31 tadej: don't have any objection, but marcis is not on the call today 13:34:27 daveL: there are people who would have both categories separately 13:35:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0248.html 13:36:17 fsasaki: lot of discussion on the topic of levels, that would be a change for disambiguation 13:38:06 tadej: that was my proposal to drop levels, which swalter agreed 13:38:43 fsasaki: this would be a huge step forward for the discussion to merge both categories 13:38:58 ... is everyone fine with dropping the levels? 13:40:53 q+ 13:41:38 tadej: we can add a best practice for the case that someone wants to point to a external resource 13:41:53 ack chril 13:41:59 df: agrees 13:42:14 s/df:/dLewis:/ 13:42:39 Values for "qualifier": lexical, term, termCandidate, ontological-class, ontological-entity; 13:42:42 christian's inital proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0014.html 13:42:50 Dublin 13:43:17 chriLi: with dropping level we mean dropping these values? 13:44:40 fsasaki: we want to drop the complete field "qualifier" 13:45:32 ... nobody really used this field in their workflow 13:46:48 tadej: is there a case where people can't to this with rdfa/a or other methods - and this is not the case for us 13:47:52 dF: is the level a important part of the multilayer topic? 13:48:51 fsasaki: you can't talk about the one, without talking about the other one 13:49:32 fsasaki: should we keep its-tan-type? 13:49:38 chriLi: we should drop it 13:50:12 fsasaki: some consensus today - following some examples 13:50:30 Dublin 13:51:02 ... this would be example without the tan-type and level 13:51:25 You may want to add its-tan-term="yes" 13:51:29 ... we can't discuss this further because marcis is missing today 13:52:43 fsasaki: if we only rename attributes, then me maybe don't need another last call 13:52:54 s/me/we 13:54:02 fsasaki: this wouldn't influence the data category terminology 13:55:15 action: tadej to take care of disambig -> tan examples 13:55:15 Created ACTION-435 - Take care of disambig -> tan examples [on Tadej Štajner - due 2013-02-06]. 13:55:59 I think we need to keep careful watch of Mārcis' comments in 0239.html warning of what happens if we merge terminology and disabiguation (or whatever it is called). 13:56:24 fsasaki: we don't rewrite the section, till the terminology discussion is done 13:57:03 fsasaki: marcis should be at the monday call, so the discussion will be continued on monday 13:57:18 ... any other comments? 13:57:29 topic: poster draft 13:57:57 fsasaki: poster draft moved forward to 15th feb, everybody is okay with that? 13:57:59 bye and thanks, felix 13:58:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:58:22 omstefanov has left #mlw-lt 13:58:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/30-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 14:02:38 DomJones has left #mlw-lt 14:10:02 Marcis has joined #mlw-lt 15:23:52 Pedro has joined #mlw-lt 15:26:00 Pedro has left #mlw-lt 16:10:42 Zakim has left #mlw-lt