14:26:21 RRSAgent has joined #rd 14:26:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/16-rd-irc 14:26:21 zakim, please clear the agenda 14:26:22 agenda cleared 14:26:23 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:26:25 Zakim, this will be 7394 14:26:25 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 14:26:26 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 14:26:26 Date: 16 January 2013 14:26:28 klaus has joined #rd 14:26:47 Chair: Harper_Simon 14:26:47 Agenda+ Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [sharper] 14:26:48 Agenda+ Mobile Note Para-by-Para Review - https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2094833/RDWG%20Mobile%20Note.html [yeliz/peter/simon] 14:26:57 zakim, save agenda 14:27:03 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/16-rd-agenda.rdf 14:27:07 zakim, take up item 1 14:27:07 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from sharper] 14:27:15 rrsagent, make logs public 14:27:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:27:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/16-rd-minutes.html sharper 14:28:29 - zakim, code? 14:29:02 the conference code is 7394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), sharper 14:29:53 markel has joined #rd 14:30:03 zakim, mute me 14:30:03 sorry, dave, I don't know what conference this is 14:30:08 Silvia has joined #rd 14:30:18 zakim, this is rdwg 14:30:18 ok, shadi; that matches WAI_RDWG()9:30AM 14:30:26 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:30:26 On the phone I see ??P10, [IPcaller], ??P12, [IPcaller.a], Shadi 14:30:59 annika has joined #rd 14:31:12 41# 14:31:21 41# 14:31:25 zakim, ??P12 is sharper 14:31:25 +sharper; got it 14:31:52 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 14:31:52 +dave; got it 14:31:57 yeliz has joined #rd 14:32:02 zakim, mute me 14:32:02 dave should now be muted 14:32:07 zakim, ??P10 is me 14:32:07 +klaus; got it 14:32:17 zakim. mute me 14:32:20 zakim, [IPcaller.a] is Silvia 14:32:20 +Silvia; got it 14:32:23 +[IPcaller] 14:32:31 zakim, mute me 14:32:31 klaus should now be muted 14:32:34 zakim, [IPcaller] is yeliz 14:32:34 +yeliz; got it 14:32:38 zakim, mute me 14:32:38 yeliz should now be muted 14:32:39 regrets: Peter, Vivienne, Giorgio, Mark, Yehya, Kerstin 14:32:45 +??P16 14:33:00 zakim, mute me 14:33:00 Silvia should now be muted 14:33:09 zakim, ??P16 is me 14:33:09 +markel; got it 14:33:10 regrets+ shawn 14:34:17 +??P17 14:34:19 I can do it 14:34:23 no problem 14:34:30 zakim, unmute yeliz 14:34:30 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:34:46 zakim, mute me 14:34:46 yeliz should now be muted 14:34:51 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2094833/RDWG%20Mobile%20Note.html 14:34:54 zakim, ??P17 is me 14:34:54 +annika; got it 14:34:58 scribe: shadi 14:35:04 zakim, mute me 14:35:04 annika should now be muted 14:35:12 zakim, mute me 14:35:12 Shadi should now be muted 14:36:01 zakim, unmute me 14:36:01 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:36:29 zakim, mute me 14:36:30 yeliz should now be muted 14:36:42 ack me 14:38:22 q- ??p12 14:38:27 q- ipcaller 14:39:13 agenda? 14:39:23 zakim, take up agendum 2 14:39:23 agendum 2. "Mobile Note Para-by-Para Review - https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2094833/RDWG%20Mobile%20Note.html" taken up [from yeliz/peter/simon via sharper] 14:39:45 SH: any concerns with going paragraph-by-paragraph? 14:40:03 SAZ: sometimes need to go back and look at the bigger picture, flow, or such 14:40:06 zakim, unmute me 14:40:08 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:40:24 zakim, mute me 14:40:24 yeliz should now be muted 14:40:30 SH: absolutely, emphasis is on the core message rather than typographics 14:40:38 zakim, unmute me 14:40:38 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:40:46 [[Abstract]] 14:41:35 zakim, mute me 14:41:35 yeliz should now be muted 14:41:51 YY: Shawn had comment on citation 14:42:00 http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#citation 14:43:11 yes 14:43:21 SAZ: W3C Manual of Style has section on citation that we need to follow 14:43:34 SH: will add to the guidance for document editors 14:43:49 q+ 14:43:58 q- ipcaller 14:44:30 we don't know 14:44:31 that 14:44:34 :) 14:44:42 we don't know if it is good or bad 14:44:43 :)) 14:44:46 q- [ipcaller] 14:44:48 q- 14:45:32 SAZ: the word "sophisticated" sticks out 14:45:45 ...will comment separately on such wording stuff 14:46:04 q+ 14:48:10 SH: maybe good to clarify 14:48:10 We refer them in the future directions part 14:48:22 Under "research roadmap" 14:48:26 SAZ: only reference existing work but there is more in development 14:48:38 SH: maybe too much for the abstract 14:48:54 Q+ 14:49:03 Ack sha 14:49:04 SAZ: maybe link to the MWI "roadmap" rather than enumerate all the work 14:49:04 q- 14:49:06 ack dav 14:49:06 ack me 14:49:19 [[Introduction]] 14:49:38 DS: maybe better to scope what "mobile devices" are 14:50:02 ...smart phones but maybe also portable computers? 14:50:22 ...is it just mobility aspect or also location services in such devices? 14:50:24 +1 14:50:46 SH: agree, could define them as how MWBP define them 14:51:02 I did, thanks David 14:51:10 zakim, mute me 14:51:10 dave should now be muted 14:51:44 q+ 14:51:59 ack me 14:52:00 ack dave 14:52:44 DS: assertion about iOS in paragraph 3 needs qualification 14:52:59 ...otherwise may seem biased 14:53:01 zakim, unmute me 14:53:01 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:53:08 ...also typo "accessibility community" 14:53:11 zakim, unmute me 14:53:11 dave was not muted, dave 14:53:16 zakim, mute me 14:53:16 dave should now be muted 14:53:44 zakim, unmute me 14:53:44 dave should no longer be muted 14:53:47 YY: what specifically is the issue? 14:54:08 SH: "excellent accessibility features" 14:55:01 zakim, mute me 14:55:01 yeliz should now be muted 14:55:09 Thanks, David 14:55:14 SAZ: maybe stay more objective, like "built-in" rather than "excellent" 14:55:24 zakim, mute me 14:55:24 dave should now be muted 14:56:42 zakim, unmute me 14:56:42 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:56:47 zakim, q+ 14:56:47 I see yeliz on the speaker queue 14:57:01 q+ 14:57:05 ack yeli 14:57:09 SAZ: also here we have focus on "existing standards" only 14:57:19 ...actually here is only subset of that too 14:57:27 ...seems to be issue throughout 14:57:37 YY: these are specific examples 14:57:42 ack shad 14:57:42 ack me 14:58:09 zakim, mute me 14:58:09 yeliz should now be muted 14:59:39 zakim, unmute me 14:59:39 yeliz should no longer be muted 15:00:04 SAZ: maybe need to scope the standards we are considering 15:00:20 ...rather than enumerate a different list each time 15:00:26 zakim, mute me 15:00:26 yeliz should now be muted 15:00:31 yes, I will do that 15:00:40 YY: not sure fully understand 15:01:04 -sharper 15:01:04 ...was not the scope of the symposium 15:01:13 SH: think understand the issue, will discuss the editors 15:01:17 zakim, unmute me 15:01:17 yeliz should no longer be muted 15:02:17 q+ 15:02:22 ack me 15:02:46 DS: maybe be explicit about when the symposium took place? 15:03:01 ...to give a sense of time and currency 15:03:15 +1 15:03:39 YY: something specific changed? 15:04:04 DS: difficult to say but may change over time 15:04:59 ...gives chronological order 15:05:06 YY: seems very relevant to all Notes 15:05:13 DS: yes, agree with that 15:06:23 [[Related Work]] 15:06:46 DS: list of references has no apparent order 15:07:04 ...may need a specific order style 15:07:14 ...maybe chronological or alphabetical 15:07:21 YY: agree, will add to issues list 15:09:01 DS: wonder about the choice of study to back the statement "disabled users experience many difficulties when they access the web" 15:09:26 q+ 15:09:42 YY: many studies, suggestions? 15:10:06 DS: most general one, maybe don't need a specific assertion 15:13:26 DS: maybe the focus needs to be on contrasting challenges on the desktop versus on the Web? 15:13:45 zakim, mute me 15:13:45 dave should now be muted 15:13:59 ...could bypass the need to have references for such a generic statement 15:14:06 [[2.1 Mobile Technology and Accessibility]] 15:16:29 +1 to shadi 15:16:50 q+ 15:16:56 ack me 15:16:59 SAZ: observation that paragraph 1 seems to be defining and scoping things that are relevant to the entire document 15:16:59 q- 15:17:22 ...may get lost there under "related work" and "mobile technology and accessibility" headings 15:18:34 DS: maybe good to clarify that some features are easier to invoke and work with than others 15:19:04 YY: very difficult to find studies about usability of features 15:19:07 DS: maybe can say that there is less data 15:19:09 q+ 15:19:21 YY: say something about that earlier on 15:19:48 ...but maybe too specific and not backed with scientific work 15:19:48 zakim, mute me 15:19:48 dave should now be muted 15:21:17 SAZ: not specific to mobile alone, also on the desktop accessibility features may be easier or more difficult to use 15:22:32 ...maybe can extrapolate experience from desktop and assume that is similar on mobile? 15:22:52 q+ 15:22:58 ...know that WAI-AGE literature review looked at easy of use of accessibility features for older people 15:22:59 ack me 15:23:00 q- 15:23:16 YY: can find references for desktop, there are several 15:23:41 [[2.2 Mobile Accessibility Guidelines]] 15:24:01 DS: maybe can separate out an "evaluation" sub-section? 15:25:31 [[2.3 Mobile Interaction Models]] 15:27:01 SAZ: focus on mobile phones only? tablets? laptops? 15:27:39 q+ on 2.3. para 3 15:28:04 YY: can look at the MWBP definition though may be a little outdated 15:28:16 ...agree need to scope the term 15:28:24 SAZ: agree may be outdated 15:28:36 YY: need to separate from ubiquitous devices 15:28:44 ack d 15:28:44 dave, you wanted to comment on 2.3. para 3 15:29:35 zakim, mute me 15:29:35 dave should now be muted 15:29:44 DS: "Many studies show that small device users benefit from haptic feedback [...] Similarly, haptic feedback is also used on mobile devices in the form of vibro-tactile display" 15:30:01 ...may need to be reworded for clarity 15:30:20 YY: agree 15:30:40 YY: can continue from section 3 next time 15:31:44 bye! 15:31:44 thankyou yeliz and shadi - bye! 15:31:46 ok, bye 15:31:49 -yeliz 15:31:50 markel has left #rd 15:31:51 dave has left #rd 15:31:56 bye 15:31:57 -annika 15:32:00 -dave 15:32:04 -Shadi 15:32:07 annika has left #rd 15:32:10 -Silvia 15:32:13 -klaus 15:32:16 trackbot, end meeting 15:32:16 Zakim, list attendees 15:32:16 As of this point the attendees have been Shadi, sharper, dave, klaus, Silvia, yeliz, markel, annika 15:32:24 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:32:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/16-rd-minutes.html trackbot 15:32:25 RRSAgent, bye 15:32:25 I see no action items