15:53:31 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 15:53:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-irc 15:53:42 meeting: MLW-LT WG 15:53:45 chair: felix 15:55:55 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0001.html 15:56:29 topic: roll call 16:00:47 present+ felix 16:00:54 present+ kfritsche 16:01:00 present+ dF 16:01:18 philr has joined #MLW-LT 16:01:18 Ankit has joined #mlw-lt 16:01:23 present +philr 16:01:30 +present Ankit 16:01:41 present +Ankit 16:02:12 Naoto has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:13 Yves_ has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:32 present+ tadej 16:02:41 present+ Yves 16:02:47 Jirka has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:57 Clemens_ has joined #mlw-lt 16:03:07 present+ Naoto 16:03:46 present+ dave, dom, leroy 16:03:46 shaunm has joined #mlw-lt 16:03:52 present +shaunm 16:03:53 chriLi has joined #mlw-lt 16:04:24 joerg has joined #mlw-lt 16:04:30 present +Jirka 16:04:30 present+ shaunm 16:04:37 present+ joerg 16:04:51 present+ chriLi 16:05:14 scribe: Yves_ 16:05:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0001.html 16:05:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:05:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-minutes.html Yves_ 16:06:01 topic: call time 16:06:21 Felix: proposal is Thursday 4pm UTC 16:06:34 .. that's 5pm CET 16:06:43 .. that's 9am MST 16:06:45 happy new year together 16:07:07 all ok with the new day 16:07:38 Jirka: will have conflict 16:07:43 Milan has joined #mlw-lt 16:08:02 Felix: will do a Doodle for the time of the call 16:08:15 topic: LC feedback 16:08:22 present+ Milan 16:08:22 http://tinyurl.com/its20-comments-handling 16:08:30 present+ Clemens 16:08:35 Fredrik has joined #mlw-lt 16:08:40 Felix: several comments, but none from outside the WG 16:08:54 .. can't move forward in that case 16:09:09 Jorg: maybe the comment period was a bad one 16:09:14 Felix: agree 16:10:12 .. should extend until Jan-18 16:10:21 all: ok with that 16:10:32 Felix: please nudge your contacts 16:10:49 .. we will get comments from the i18n WG 16:10:57 .. for sure. but we need more 16:11:15 Dave: can people comment that they have no c0omments? 16:11:20 Felix: yes 16:11:41 .. endorsment is fine 16:11:56 topic: 2.1) New value for localization quality type "conformance" 16:12:12 Felix: brought up by Phil before the Holidays 16:12:21 .. no disagreement to add the new value 16:12:29 .. no additional support either 16:13:08 DF: seems to be a normative change, no? 16:13:15 Felix: possibly 16:13:35 .. need a strong reason to do the change 16:13:50 .. any supporter in addition to Phil? 16:14:18 DF: should try to avoid normative changes 16:14:27 .. wait if it's really needed 16:14:41 Phil: being additional value makes it easier 16:14:50 .. no back compatibility issue, etc. 16:15:11 .. we have a definite need for it. 16:15:26 Felix: but it's a borderline change 16:15:38 .. would have to justify the rational 16:15:55 .. would drop it now, but keep it open 16:16:10 .. you could try to fine supporters 16:16:12 topic: 2.2) Removing disambigClassPointer 16:16:22 .. other tool to consume/generate that data 16:16:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0170.html 16:16:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0180.html 16:16:50 Felix: a change in the Disambiguation data category 16:17:03 .. 0180 email is the right link 16:17:11 .. this is dropping an attribute 16:17:37 .. but ok because to test or processing is changed by it 16:17:51 DF: looks like an omission correction 16:18:03 Felix: will do the edit after the call 16:18:14 topic: 2.3) Need to clarify global provenance 16:18:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0170.html 16:18:45 Felix: this one is to clarify the global provenance 16:18:58 The attribute provenanceRecordsRefPointer does not apply to HTML as local markup is provided for direct annotation in HTML. Because that information is the only one in the provRule element, the global rule does not apply to HTML. 16:19:44 .. it explains why the global rule does not apply to HTML 16:19:59 Dave: sounds like a clarification, not a substantive change 16:20:16 .. original wording was close to the LQI text 16:20:26 .. maybe we need to look at it there too 16:20:57 Felix: for LQI the requirements are different 16:21:15 .. that's why we have different cases 16:21:26 .. best practices will be important 16:21:39 topic: 2.4) Location of its:version 16:21:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0202.html 16:22:19 "If there is no rules element in an XML document, a prefixed ITS version attribute (e.g. its:version) MUST be provided at the root element of the 16:22:19 Felix: this one is to allow more flexible location of the version 16:22:21 document." 16:23:36 .. not only in the root, but anywhere in the upper part of the tree of a given node 16:23:46 .. not a sever change 16:23:56 leroy has joined #mlw-lt 16:24:03 .. just change checking before you do the process 16:24:23 Shaun: would require to change implementation though 16:24:26 daveL has joined #mlw-lt 16:24:41 .. not too bad, but it's mean changing the code 16:24:45 Yves: agree 16:25:09 Felix: means a difference between 1.0 and 2.0 16:25:50 Yves: not sure there is a problem 16:26:11 Shaun: if it's in the root, and it's an ITS 1.0 processor it's invalid 16:26:26 DF: 1.0 requires it in the root 16:26:33 .. but what is the gaol 16:26:43 .. what is compliant to our principles? 16:27:13 yves_: 1.0 processor can't check 2.0 subset 16:27:44 shaun: 2.0 processor should process 1.0, but not the reverse 16:28:01 .. and here 1.0 processor can know the case 16:28:22 Felix: need to have note in the spc 16:28:40 ACTION: Yves_ to propose notes for the version location change 16:28:40 Error finding 'Yves_'. You can review and register nicknames at . 16:28:46 ACTION: Yves to propose notes for the version location change 16:28:46 Created ACTION-382 - Propose notes for the version location change [on Yves Savourel - due 2013-01-14]. 16:28:53 topic: 2.5) Regular expression change 16:29:15 FYI: TCD has rejoined the internet 16:29:19 scribe: Yves_ 16:29:26 scribe: fsasaki 16:29:36 yves: I re-raised issue I raised earlier 16:29:44 .. about using XSD regex for allowed characters 16:29:50 .. earlier we started with a subset of that 16:29:59 .. we then moved to the XSD character class 16:30:16 .. I didn't disagree strongly at that point so that other implmeneters can work on this 16:30:22 .. I think it's an interop issue 16:30:42 .. it would be better for the allowedchararacter class to be processed with other engines than xsd 16:30:56 .. we can have a subset that works with dotnet, java, xsd etc. 16:31:08 .. the only difference is that the user might have to change the way to write a regex 16:31:19 .. but that's not a big deal, the interop we gain is more important 16:31:41 shaun: you are going to say that you will have the subset 16:31:54 .. but tools need to be required to check that they conform from to the subset 16:32:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:32:44 yves: the schema would ensure that the expression is valid or not 16:33:09 phil: agree with Yves' argument 16:33:30 .. having to figure out equivalent regex syntax can be hard 16:33:38 shaun: in general I agree with Yves 16:33:51 .. just worried about the verification of the subset 16:34:59 felix: would we have a volunteer to help defining the regex subset? 16:35:02 shaun: I could do that? 16:35:12 s/that?/that/ 16:35:26 scribe: Yves_ 16:35:28 scribe: Yves 16:35:42 Felix: this change may be seen as normative 16:36:05 ACTION: Felix to give heads up to W3C about the possible change 16:36:05 Created ACTION-383 - Give heads up to W3C about the possible change [on Felix Sasaki - due 2013-01-14]. 16:36:48 DF: is it absolute that one such change would force a new revision 16:37:08 .. is it a problem to have another LC? 16:37:35 Felix: there is a difference between extending the LC period and doing a new publication 16:37:54 DF: agree, this change seems big and warrant a new publication 16:38:14 .. would hope we can do without 16:38:27 .. because it brings additional feature change often 16:39:04 Jirka: this change is not so big, each XSD-based implementation will be compatible 16:39:18 .. with the old syntax 16:39:57 .. using a sub-set is compatible 16:40:11 DF: so we would not break anything? 16:40:21 +q 16:40:36 Jirka: only issue would be if current implementations use special XSD faeture 16:40:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:40:43 .. but that's not the case 16:41:06 s/implementations/instances/ 16:41:46 Jorg: with sub-set an XSD RE would be ok 16:42:10 .. need to explain what kind of RE engine are supported by the sub-set 16:42:24 ack chri 16:43:32 Christian: does the sub-set has the same expressive power? 16:43:39 Yves: from examples, yes. 16:44:23 DF: a formal proof would be an agrument to not do a new LC 16:45:27 .. even if we have a formal proof that the change does not affect the capability, the spec needs a new LC? 16:45:31 Felix: yes 16:45:59 .. e.g using the Unicode blocks would be 'broken' 16:46:27 .. basically it's a matter of negociation 16:46:41 s/negotation/negoation in the w3c mgmt/ 16:47:15 DF: seems the discussion go back and forth 16:47:31 .. so what is the new evidence is the question. 16:47:50 .. seems people have different view at different time 16:48:44 felix: from implementer it's unlikely to go back to XSD RE 16:48:55 .. noone is pushing in that direction 16:49:05 s/noone/no-one/ 16:49:34 topic: 3.4) Test suite dashboard 16:49:34 .. so we wait to see the regex from Shaun/yves 16:49:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0190.html 16:50:06 Felix: worked on the test suite dashboard 16:50:07 DomJones1 has joined #mlw-lt 16:50:37 .. did you have a time to look at it? 16:51:05 .. was proposing to drop the Google doc and replace it with an XML doc 16:51:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/att-0190/TestStuiteMaster.xml 16:51:17 .. automatically generated from the test suite results 16:51:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/att-0190/testsuiteDashboard.html 16:51:44 .. and the HTML page would be generated automatically 16:52:22 .. this way a simple stylesheet can re-generate the output from the developer outputs 16:52:32 Dave: appreciate the work 16:52:49 leroy: agree, looks fine 16:53:02 .. need to finish the corrections from Jirka 16:53:08 .. add a few test files 16:53:20 .. and after that I can look at it 16:53:34 .. should be able to work on it by end of week 16:53:59 Felix: so by next monday we can deprecate the Google doc and use the XML output 16:54:07 .. it would be on Github as well 16:54:13 leroy: agree 16:54:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Dec/0087.html 16:54:42 Felix: need input test cases for some data categories 16:54:46 .. see the list 16:55:01 .. M3 deadline is at the end of January 16:55:06 DomJones1 has left #mlw-lt 16:55:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0001.html 16:55:21 .. changes in the suite are documented in the above link 16:55:33 topic: 5) XML Prague demo session 16:55:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Dec/0094.html 16:56:13 Felix: we'll have confirmation from fredrik (ENLASO) that he'll be there 16:56:14 present+ fredrik 16:56:29 .. Dave as well? 16:56:39 Dave: leroy should be able to go 16:57:00 .. are we presenting this as a MLW event? 16:57:12 http://www.xmlprague.cz/pre-conference-friday/ 16:57:13 Felix: pre-conference day, 1.5h slot 16:57:35 .. Karl also said he would be available 16:57:48 .. need to distribute the work between those people 16:58:08 ACTION: Felix to make agenda proposal for Prague meeting about the XML prague day 16:58:08 Created ACTION-384 - Make agenda proposal for Prague meeting about the XML prague day [on Felix Sasaki - due 2013-01-14]. 16:58:22 Karl: do i need to register? 16:58:50 Jirka: yes 16:59:02 .. fee is small 16:59:25 felix: this is ok to use the LT-Web budget for this 16:59:32 Registration for XML Prague http://www.xmlprague.cz/conference-registration/ 16:59:47 Clemens: can we access the full conference for 40 Euro? 17:00:02 Jirka: yes, but not to lunches and social events 17:00:11 .. for that it's 100 Euros 17:00:31 Felix: anyone else? 17:00:50 DF: will try see if it's needed 17:01:07 Felix: this is about demoing implementations 17:01:26 .. good opportunity to bridge to the content world 17:01:40 DF: yes, good way to contact XML people 17:01:49 Felix: Prague F2F is soon 17:02:30 .. let's talk about the EC-specific parts. 17:02:32 topic: 8) EC-project internal 17:03:04 Felix: need input from Ankit 17:03:19 \quit 17:03:27 .. MT harvesting tool taks: any update? 17:03:44 Ankit: started to work with Cocomore on this 17:04:19 Felix: talked to Clemens about this, but no info on the tool 17:04:33 Ankit: we need to data to make the tool 17:04:45 .. by end of January we should have prototype 17:05:09 Karl: Not quite sure 17:05:37 Felix: Ankit let me know if you don't get info from Clemens 17:05:54 .. david: any update on roundtipping with XLIFF? 17:06:08 DF: yes, should be able to provide that Wednesday 17:06:37 Phil: what info will you have on Wednesday? 17:06:48 .. does it includes the mapping? 17:07:00 DF: we have a working prototype 17:07:13 .. part of it is the mapping, but not frozen 17:07:28 Felix:the task is about a prototype 17:07:44 DF: Q1 is the time when we'll work on this 17:07:57 .. we have work in progress 17:08:52 Felix: anything else? 17:09:05 meeting adjourned 17:09:17 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:09:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-minutes.html Yves_ 17:09:26 dF has left #mlw-lt 17:19:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:19:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-minutes.html Yves_ 17:19:55 Jirka has left #mlw-lt 18:33:02 fsasaki has joined #mlw-lt 19:01:45 Zakim has left #mlw-lt