14:58:31 RRSAgent has joined #eval 14:58:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/12/13-eval-irc 14:58:33 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:58:33 Zakim has joined #eval 14:58:35 Zakim, this will be 3825 14:58:35 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 14:58:36 Meeting: WCAG 2.0 Evaluation Methodology Task Force Teleconference 14:58:36 Date: 13 December 2012 14:58:50 Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:58:50 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has not yet started, MartijnHoutepen 14:58:52 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Detlev, MartijnHoutepen, ericvelleman, Bim, shadi, trackbot 15:00:12 Zakim, who is on the phone? 15:00:12 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has not yet started, MartijnHoutepen 15:00:13 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Detlev, MartijnHoutepen, ericvelleman, Bim, shadi, trackbot 15:00:30 zakim, this is evaltf 15:00:30 sorry, shadi, I do not see a conference named 'evaltf' in progress or scheduled at this time 15:00:44 zakim, this is eval 15:00:44 ok, shadi; that matches WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM 15:00:56 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:00:56 On the phone I see MartijnHoutepen, +31.30.239.aaaa, Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea 15:01:03 +Detlev 15:01:10 zakim, aaaa is Martijn 15:01:10 +Martijn; got it 15:01:44 zakim, aaaa is me 15:01:45 sorry, ericvelleman, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 15:01:54 Zakim, Martijn is really ericvelleman 15:01:54 +ericvelleman; got it 15:03:12 zakim, code? 15:03:12 the conference code is 3825 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), shadi 15:03:12 Zakim, mute me 15:03:15 Detlev should now be muted 15:03:27 +Shadi 15:03:37 regrets: Peter, Sarah, Ramon 15:03:50 hi 15:04:07 scribe: shadi 15:04:34 zakim, mute me 15:04:34 Shadi should now be muted 15:04:47 Zakim, mute me 15:04:47 MartijnHoutepen should now be muted 15:04:55 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:04:55 On the phone I see MartijnHoutepen (muted), ericvelleman, Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Detlev (muted), Shadi (muted) 15:05:03 Ryladog has joined #eval 15:05:03 Kathy has joined #eval 15:05:29 Topic: Disposition of Comments 15:05:42 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120920 15:05:51 EV: new disposition of comments 15:05:55 ...just updated 15:06:04 ...lots of work from me on it 15:06:14 ...includes discussion from last week 15:06:27 ...did the changes in a new Editor Draft 15:06:44 ...for where there is agreement in the survey 15:06:44 MoeKraft has joined #eval 15:06:50 ...for example for comment ID #8 15:07:07 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120920#comment11 15:07:07 ...better example is comment ID#11 15:07:29 ...made the change in an updated Editor Draft 15:07:31 +MoeKraft 15:07:34 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20121213 15:07:44 ...this new draft is now also online 15:07:57 ...fresh from the oven 15:08:30 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120920#comment2 15:08:42 ...column 2 shows the status 15:08:57 ...for example for ID #2 points to on-going discussion 15:09:13 ...this way we can keep track of the current status of each comment 15:10:15 ...for example for ID #5 or #7, did proposal directly into the Editor Draft and point to it from the disposition of comment 15:10:30 ...now can survey these proposals and get group input 15:10:43 q+ 15:11:02 MK: ID #5 took me to the top of the new Editor Draft 15:11:21 ...is there a way to link directly to the relevant section? 15:11:42 q+ 15:11:50 q? 15:11:53 ack me 15:12:11 DF: realize that this is quite complex now with so many comments 15:12:24 ...also note drop of focus within the group 15:12:44 ...not sure if easy to track things in 3 different places 15:12:59 ...for me survey is the best way to respond to comments 15:13:16 ...DoC and ED are static and cannot respond on 15:13:31 ...not good where things need discussion 15:13:36 Zakim, mute me 15:13:37 Detlev should now be muted 15:13:49 EV: agree; taking things that need discussion into surveys 15:13:56 OK .. I see 15:14:06 ...sometimes discussing specific comments and sometimes more general things 15:14:23 q+ 15:14:28 ...sometimes need to propose text in a draft and ask for input on it 15:14:31 q- later 15:14:54 ...sometimes also editorial things 15:15:40 ack me 15:15:50 q? 15:16:09 DF: think reluctance to repond is the amount of comments and places to focus on 15:16:14 ...overwhelming 15:16:33 ...think surveys are good to focus things on 15:16:55 ...doing all in parallel is difficult 15:16:57 ack me 15:17:08 Zakim, mute me 15:17:08 Detlev should now be muted 15:17:37 saz: thanks to Eric for the hard work 15:18:21 ... agree that it is overwhelming and because of the holidays there is less participation 15:18:21 Shadi: thanls Eric for tremendous work, explains reasons why we have a bit id a slow down 15:18:50 Shadi: agrees that surveys are the place to contribute 15:19:26 Shadi: some comments are easier to address in the draft, then having a pointer to draft in the survey 15:19:35 q? 15:20:49 Shadi: disposition of comments affords overview-... Q to Eric - does that reflect your view? 15:20:53 zakim, mute me 15:20:53 Shadi should now be muted 15:21:09 scribe: shadi 15:21:20 EV: agree with Detlev that it is overwhelming 15:21:44 ...linked more in disposition of comments 15:21:44 ack me 15:21:58 ...will link more from surveys 15:22:41 q? 15:22:50 no? 15:22:57 ...also link to survey results from disposition of comments 15:23:02 zakim, mute me 15:23:02 Shadi should now be muted 15:23:26 q+ 15:23:34 ack me 15:23:57 https://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20120915&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20121213 15:24:05 Links to diff version will be very useful!! 15:25:16 zakim, mute me 15:25:16 Shadi should now be muted 15:25:45 SAZ: cen predict diff-version URI and link into that from surveys and disposition of comments 15:25:53 s/cen/can 15:26:08 sounds good 15:26:12 q? 15:26:27 ack me 15:26:58 zakim, mute me 15:26:58 Shadi should now be muted 15:27:16 EV: survey #5 is closed 15:27:25 ...working comments into the drafts 15:27:40 q+ 15:27:45 ...survey #6 was open until yesterday 15:27:50 ...some points in there may start new discussion 15:28:00 Bim has joined #eval 15:28:19 +Tim_Boland 15:28:23 ...some divergence of opinions on some of the questions 15:28:45 ...plan to launch new survey tomorrow or over the weekend 15:28:57 q? 15:28:57 ack me 15:29:43 DF: maybe worth while to reopen last survey and ping people 15:30:06 EV: quite some discussion on the last question 15:30:12 ...might be OK 15:30:53 ack me 15:31:18 DF: don't mind several surveys 15:31:32 ...but important clearly request input from the group 15:31:34 q+ 15:31:45 ack me 15:31:46 Zakim, mute me 15:31:46 Detlev should now be muted 15:33:45 EV: agree may seem overwhelming 15:33:49 ...keep focus on surveys 15:33:59 1+ 11+ 1+ 15:35:04 zakim, mute me 15:35:04 Shadi should now be muted 15:35:25 ack me 15:36:07 q+ 15:36:14 zakim, mute me 15:36:14 Shadi should now be muted 15:36:34 ack me 15:36:47 this allows people to reuse the methodology in many more situations without actually broadening the scope of the document. 15:36:59 DF: question on rational to resolution to ID #4 15:37:27 ...what is the difference between broadening the scope and providing use cases? 15:37:33 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120920#comment4 15:37:49 ...had commented on not constraining the uses 15:38:07 ...for example make usable during development 15:38:22 ...but not sure why decision is "no change" 15:38:26 q+ 15:38:43 ...not sure methodology needs to look very different 15:38:57 ...maybe change the report and certainly not accessibility statement 15:39:14 q? 15:39:19 ...think concern is that document will get complicated 15:39:20 ack me 15:39:45 q+ 15:39:49 EV: still on-going discussion 15:39:58 ...e-mail thread going on 15:40:25 ...seems to be mistake in the disposition of coments 15:40:33 ...not the current rationale 15:40:37 https://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20120915&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FER%2Fconformance%2FED-methodology-20121213#scope 15:41:43 ack me 15:42:28 http://www.w3.org/2012/12/06-eval-minutes.html 15:42:45 MK: also discussed not being able to make a statement of compliance when using during development 15:43:07 q? 15:44:22 Shadi: difference between broadening scope and introducing usecases - if we include option for using WCAG-EM during develoopment we may have scope crewep, users asdking for introducing extra things 15:45:00 Shadi: if we focus on main use case we can still encourage application of WCAG-EM in othe contexts / use cases 15:45:46 DF: agree basically with that 15:46:04 ...can specify main purpose 15:46:15 ...but also explain and encourage use during development 15:46:28 ...of course noting that will not lead to conformance 15:47:26 fine 15:48:09 Tim has joined #eval 15:48:10 EV: discussion still open on this 15:48:45 Topic: Discussion in survey evaltfq6 15:48:55 EV: valuable input from Detlev 15:49:17 ...will reopen it and ask people to answer or edit their responses as needed 15:49:19 ack me 15:50:00 DF: maybe good to remind people that they can go back and change their responses 15:50:09 ...did not know about that feature 15:50:24 ack me 15:51:21 you never get the same sense of overview on the mailing list! 15:52:05 q? 15:52:30 EV: as long as comments are relatively concise it helps having it in one place 15:53:08 EV: planning to do call next week 15:53:15 ...then the next in January 15:53:21 Zakim, unmute me 15:53:21 MartijnHoutepen should no longer be muted 15:53:22 bye 15:53:25 -Tim_Boland 15:53:26 -Detlev 15:53:27 bye 15:53:27 -Kathy 15:53:28 -MartijnHoutepen 15:53:29 -Katie_Haritos-Shea 15:53:29 -Shadi 15:53:30 ericvelleman has left #eval 15:53:45 trackbot, end meeting 15:53:45 Zakim, list attendees 15:53:45 As of this point the attendees have been MartijnHoutepen, +31.30.239.aaaa, Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Detlev, ericvelleman, Shadi, MoeKraft, Tim_Boland 15:53:49 -ericvelleman 15:53:49 -MoeKraft 15:53:49 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has ended 15:53:49 Attendees were MartijnHoutepen, +31.30.239.aaaa, Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Detlev, ericvelleman, Shadi, MoeKraft, Tim_Boland 15:53:50 Tim has left #eval 15:53:52 MartijnHoutepen has left #eval 15:53:53 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:53:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/12/13-eval-minutes.html trackbot 15:53:54 RRSAgent, bye 15:53:54 I see no action items